Transformative R01 Program November 20, 2008 Betsy Wilder, PhD Deputy Director Office of Strategic Coordination Division of Program Coordination, Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report of the Committee of Visitors Energy Frontier Research Centers and Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis Energy Innovation Hub Office of Basic.
Advertisements

NIH K-22 Application Career Transition Award
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Proposals, Grants, Merit Review and You: Focus on trends at NSF with implications for NIH and other agencies Stephanie Pfirman Environmental Science Member.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants  Up to £12 million funding for Large grants to foster collaborative research.
Current Directions in NIEHS Extramural Programs J. Patrick Mastin, Ph.D. Chief, Cellular, Organs, and Systems Pathobiology Branch Division of Extramural.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
1 Template Guidelines This presentation is to be used as a template to create your LDRD presentation. The presentation and question/answer period are limited.
1 Inside the NIH 2009 NIH Overview of Program Funding and Grants Administration Sally Rockey, PhD Deputy Director, NIH Office of Extramural Research (OER)
Roger Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA Program Official National Institute on Drug Abuse 1 Update on “New” Investigator Activities.
GRC 4 th Annual Meeting, 27 May 2015 Kiyoshi SAITO Chair of the GRC International Steering Committee Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
RESEARCH TEAMS OF THE FUTURE Working Groups and Co-Chairs  Interdisciplinary Research Patricia Grady, NINR Ken Olden, NIEHS Larry Tabak, NIDCR  High-risk.
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
1 CRCHD-sponsored Professional Development and Mock Review Workshop June 23, 2014 NIH Funding Opportunities, Grant Applications, and Recent Changes Christopher.
Research Administrators Forum November 18, NCURA National Meeting 2008  Hot Topics in Research Compliance Preparing for a Federal Audit  NSF and.
NIH Roadmap for Medical Research and Common Fund Update on Recent Changes Dinah Singer, Ph.D. Director, Division of Cancer Biology June 18, 2008.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Enhancements University of Manitoba February 14, 2012.
Major Non-Consensus Program and its review process design Wang Yue; Li xiaoxuan Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences Zheng yonghe.
CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
Considerations for CIHR’s New Open Program. The Context Bottom up Strategy Reform of Open Suite of Programs Full spectrum of CIHR mandate Top Down Strategy.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal
ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Americas (Washington D.C., United States, 21 September 2015) Conformance and Interoperability Activities in CITEL.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Belinda Seto, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director for Extramural Research National Institutes of Health Human Subjects Research Enhancements Awards Renaissance.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
Building Sustainable Community-Linked Infrastructure to Enable Health Science Research (RC4) RFA OD Pre-application workshop October 23, 2009.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
New Investigator and Early Career Grant Opportunities Dan Hoyt.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
The Importance of a Strategic Plan to Eliminate Health Disparities 2008 eHealth Conference June 9, 2008 Yvonne T. Maddox, PhD Deputy Director Eunice Kennedy.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Creating an Integrated Framework for Reducing Disparities in Health Care Quality Francis D. Chesley, Jr., MD Director Office of Extramural Research, Education.
2015/2016 PSIEE Seed Grant Information Session October 21, 2015.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
GRANT & PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE VICE DEAN, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CIHR Project Scheme st Live Pilot Workshop Translating the Open Operating.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Recipe for an RFA (Request for Applications) Danielle J. Carlin, PhD, DABT Program.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
What are sponsors looking for in research fellows? Melissa Bateson Professor of Ethology, Institute of Neuroscience Junior Fellowships.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
Safer, high quality care Better patient experience Improved health Value for money Real influence More accessible services Better health, Better care 1.
David M. Murray, Ph.D. Associate Director for Prevention Director, Office of Disease Prevention Multilevel Intervention Research Methodology September.
ERC grants Funding for excellent ideas. European Research Council - mission 2 To encourage the highest quality research in Europe through competitive.
NRF Evaluation & Rating
Early Career Research Funding
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
What are sponsors looking for in research fellows?
Seeking NIH Funding: Deconstructing the Alphabet Soup
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Seeking NIH Funding: Deconstructing the Alphabet Soup
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
Proposals, Grants, Merit Review and You: Focus on trends at NSF with implications for NIH and other agencies Stephanie Pfirman Environmental Science Member.
Information Session October 13, 2016
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
University of the Incarnate Word
Presentation transcript:

Transformative R01 Program November 20, 2008 Betsy Wilder, PhD Deputy Director Office of Strategic Coordination Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives (DPCPSI) Office of the NIH Director NIH Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives

2 The TR01 Program in context: an HRHR Demonstration Project  Fostering transformation via investigator-initiated projects has been a key goal of the NIH Roadmap High Risk/High Reward Program.  The Roadmap programs are intended to test new ways of identifying transformative research and new mechanisms of funding.  The 2006 NIH Reform Act encouraged this type of program development by authorizing the creation of High Risk/High Reward Demonstration Projects.  The Pioneer and New Innovator Programs represent the first two programs of this type in the Roadmap.

3 NIH Director’s Pioneer Award Pioneer Awards are designed to support  individual scientists of exceptional creativity who  propose pioneering – and possibly transformative – approaches to major challenges in biomedical and behavioral research.... To be considered pioneering, the proposed research must reflect  ideas substantially different from those already being pursued in the investigator’s laboratory or elsewhere... Pioneer Awards provide $500K direct costs per year for 5 years; 65 awards have been made since the program’s inception in FY2004.

4  Launched in February 2007 with additional resources provided in the 2007 Joint Resolution  Open to new investigators (within 10 years of doctorate)  Goal is to fund new investigators of exceptional creativity who propose bold and highly innovative new research approaches that have the potential to produce a major impact on broad, important problems in biomedical and behavioral research.  Up to $1.5 million direct costs over 5 years  Funded 31 awards in FY2008

5 Pioneer and New Innovator Application and Review  Pioneer Awards: 2009 competition will proceed in two formal stages, with two separate Funding Opportunity Announcements. Pre-application stage PAR pre-applications will be assessed by a group of external reviewers Investigators whose proposals are judged to be the most outstanding will be invited to apply through a limited competition RFA - RFA-RM and will be invited to NIH for interviews  New Innovator competition will follow similar scheme, although second review will not involve interviews  Both programs involve a short application with emphasis on prior successes of the applicant as well as impact of the proposed research

6 Rationale for development:  Roadmap Cohort 1  Fostering Innovations Workshop (Dec ’07)  Enhancing Peer Review  HRHR Demonstration Oversight Group  The NIH needs a program that will allow  investigators maximal flexibility to develop  “out-of-the-box” transformative projects. Transformative R01 Program

7  Projects with potential to create or overturn fundamental paradigms  Inventive, innovative, original and/or unconventional (risk)  Major impact in biomedical or behavioral research  Open to all scientific fields of interest to NIH  Budgetary flexibility allows projects of varying complexities to be supported The Concept:

8 TR01s: a new way to stimulate innovation  The High Risk/High Reward portfolio within the Common Fund provides different ways of fostering innovation and creativity Pioneer Awards and New Innovator Programs – seek to identify innovative individuals and provide them with funds to go in a new direction TR01s – seeks to foster transformative projects in any area of health research with minimal oversight by NIH Flexible Research Authority – can be used to support high risk projects to reach a defined goal, with NIH maintaining considerable control to ensure milestones toward defined endpoint are met.

9  Strategic Planning Process identified areas of particular need: Understanding & facilitating human behavior change Complex 3-dimensional tissue models Functional variation in mitochondria in disease Transitions from acute to chronic pain Formulation of novel protein capture reagents Providing an evidence base for pharmacogenomics  Program groups can use Roadmap Concept Development Funds to prepare communities for this new program Raise awareness Fostering brainstorming Transformative R01 Program Areas of Highlighted Need:

Transformative R01 Program Implementation: RFA-RM Important Dates: Applications due Jan 29, 2009 Peer Review (CSR) May/June 2009 Council Reviews Aug 2009 Awards Sept 2009 Investigators: extramural only multi-PI OK any area of NIH research – biomedical or behavioral any level Funds Available : 25M TC FY09 FOA to be reissued annually for 5 years No cost limit per application up to 25M TC 10

Transformative R01 Program Implementation: RFA-RM Shorter applications: Abstract Biosketch (limited) Research Plan (8 pgs) Challenge & Impact (1 pg) Approach (5 pgs) T-R01 Suitability (1 pg) Timeline (1 pg) Lit Cited (1 pg) Innovative CSR Review: Multi-tiered process using a broad special emphasis panel informed by comments from topic experts Emphasis is on significance, innovation & transforming potential 11

Transformative R01 Program Post-review: ICs & program directors assigned Second level review by Council of Councils Mandated by the 2006 NIH Reform Act for HRHR Demo Projects Funding plan developed by OD & ICs NIH Director makes final selection Awards September 2009 Post-award management: OSC will convene assigned PDs & GMB to develop consistent mgmt principles Annual meeting of awardees Awards will begin in FY09, with new competitions planned for FY10, FY11, FY12 and FY13 12

13 Second level of review by CoC  Will be conducted by telephone conference in Summer,  Council members will be briefed in advance of the review procedures  Applications and summary statements will be sent in advance  Purpose of second level review is to ensure that initial review was conducted with appropriate expertise and lack of conflict