Patient Engagement for Care Teams: Utilizing REACH’s Patient Engagement Portal November 13, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. Meaningful Use Webinar Series March 5, 12, and 19, :00pm – 1:00pm.
Advertisements

How To Get To The Winners Circle with Your Patient Portal; Our Challenges To Get To The Finish Line. Julie Patterson, Baptist Health Carey Ronan, MHA,
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.
+ HEALTH INSURANCE: UNDERSTANDING YOUR COVERAGE Navigator Name Blank County Extension UGA Health Navigators.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Medication Use Crisis Conference Sponsored by The VA Medication Reconciliation Initiative In conjunction with Multiple Program Offices, DoD and Indian.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Population Management & Reporting. Federally-designated Regional Extension Center for the State of Missouri  University of Missouri:  Department of.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
Antonio Vega Health IT Advisor June 10 th, 2015 Patient Portal.
Enabling a Medical Home With a Patient Communication Strategy Jeanette Christopher Northwest Primary Care Group, P.C.
MARISA TORRIERI Associate Editor, Physicians Practice.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
DRAFT Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup October 28, 2013.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families June 17, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use: Patient Engagement Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
SMARTworks ® EffectiveResponse Training: Clinical Staff – Responders National Park Medical Center November 20, 2014.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
How to Use the Toolkit Health Information Technology Toolkit for Chiropractic Offices.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
Patient Electronic Access Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
One Health Information Exchange’s experience in responding to the changing landscape Funding: AHRQ Contract ; State of Tennessee; Vanderbilt.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Stratis Health Prevention Project June 30, Stratis Health Stratis Health is a non-profit organization that leads collaboration and innovation.
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Workflow and Protocol – Meaningfully Using the Electronic Health Record for Tobacco Screening and Cessation Intervention Carol Saavedra, BA Health Informatics.
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Electronic Access to Health Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
Patient Engagement Today’s presenter:
Health IT for Post Acute Care (HITPAC) Stratis Health Special Innovation Project Candy Hanson, BSN, PHN December 5, 2012.
Meaningful Use and PQRS How to help your practices avoid penalties April 25 th,2015 Washington D.C. Mark Norris Medical Records Services, LLC
Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Electronic Health Records Lecture a – Introduction to the EHR This material Comp3_Unit15 was developed.
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
Health Information Technology Erin Aklestad, Account Manager April 2016.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #8 – Patient Electronic Access Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

Patient Engagement for Care Teams: Utilizing REACH’s Patient Engagement Portal November 13, 2013

Presenter Sarah Tupper, MS, RN-BC, LHIT, CPHIMS HIT Consultant for REACH 2

Conflict of Interest Sarah Tupper is an HIT Consultant for the Minnesota - North Dakota Regional Extension Assistance Center for HIT (REACH) – An ONC REC REACH is active in developing a Patient Engagement toolkit No other conflict of interest 3

Objectives Understand drivers for patient engagement Gain knowledge from leading voices in the Patient Engagement Movement Understand how care teams can use the toolkit to: –Get motivated –Get informed –Get going 4

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Patient Engagement for Care Teams: Utilizing REACH’s Patient Engagement Portal 5

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Steak 6 Patient Engagement – a hot topic Care teams have good reason to be skeptical – tremendous amount of smoke We will discuss the “Why, Who, and What” Show new resource for “How” or Just Sizzle?

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Why: are we getting what we pay for? 7

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Why: everyone realizes we need to change Global: National Strategy Local: MN Strategy Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI.org)(IHI.org) Health Reform Minnesota 8

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR 9

What is Patient Engagement? Clearly no agreement Very different from “Your blood pressure is 140/90” A paradigm shift What it isn’t –Compliance – doing what the doctor says –Something that starts or stops with eHealth – A Portal, a Blue Button, PHR, or an eAnything 10

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Some Good Definitions 11 REACH definition: Patient engagement refers to a set of tools, activities, and relationships (by and for both patients and care teams) that promote shared decision- making and facilitate improved care outcomes for patients through empowerment. Patient engagement spans the continuum of healthcare and therefore relates to those experiences within healthcare organizations, the community, and at home Carman, et al (2013). Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Carman, et al (2013). Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Judith Hibbard:

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR We Know it’s a Really Big Shift From paternalism to collegiality From “Doctor” to “Care Team” From stacks of paper journal articles to “Google it” From “patient” to empowered consumer From telling to listening and asking 12

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Why: No one should guess at patient preferences Lee CN, et al. Health Expect Sep 1;13(3): Thanks to Dr. Larry Morrissey 13

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Why: Better Outcomes 14

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Why: Triple Aim 15 Judith Hibbard:

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Why: MU and Patient Engagement - Stage 1 E-copy of health information (EP Core 12/EH Core 11) –50% of those who request w/in 3 days E-copy of discharge instructions (EH Core 12) –50% of discharges Within 3 days Clinical summaries (AVS) (EP Core 13) –50% of office visits Within 3 days Patient electronic access (EP Menu 5) within 4 business days –10% of all patients have access w/in 4 days: to lab results, problem lists, med list, med allergies Patient-specific Education Resources (EP Menu 6/EH Menu 5) –10% get patient-specific education –Interesting: Menu 5 was 6 th most commonly picked menu item and Menu 6 was 4 th most commonly picked by EPs 16

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR MU and Patient Engagement - Stage 2 Clinical summaries (AVS) (EP Core 13) –50% of office visits Within 1 day Patient-specific Education Resources (Now Core) –10% get patient-specific education Secure Messaging –A secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of Certified EHR Technology by more than 5% of unique patients seen during the EHR reporting period E-copy of health information (EP Core 12/EH Core 11) –Combined into Core: Combined Access to Health Information E-copy of discharge instructions (EH Core 12) –Combined into Core: Combined Access to Health Information Patient electronic access (EP Menu 5) within 4 business days –Combined into Core: Combined Access to Health Information 17

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Online Access to Health Information Stage 1 Core for 2014 and later Measure –> 50 percent are provided timely online access to their health information within 4 business days of it being available Denominator –Unique patients Exclusion –EP: Creates no information, except for “Patient name” and “Provider's name” and office contact information. Stage 2 (Core) Measures –>50% are provided timely online access to their health information within 4 business days –>5% view, download, or transmit their health information Denominator –Unique patients Exclusions –EP: Creates no information, except for “Patient name” and “Provider's name” and office contact information, may exclude both measures. –EP & EH: ≥50% encounters in a county with <50% percent of its housing units have 3Mbps broadband may exclude the second measure An EP may decide that online access is not the appropriate forum for certain health information for patients under the age of 18. Within the confines of the laws governing guardian access to medical records for patients under the age of 18, we would defer to the EP's judgment regarding which information should be withheld for such patients.

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR For 2014 Who’s being counted DENOMINATOR: Number of unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period. NUMERATOR: The number of patients in the denominator who have timely (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information. Access Defined Access – When a patient possesses all of the necessary information needed to view, download, or transmit their information. This could include providing patients with instructions on how to access their health information, the website address they must visit for online access, a unique and registered username or password, instructions on how to create a login, or any other instructions, tools, or materials that patients need in order to view, download, or transmit their information. 19

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Q and A on 2014 Mandate If a patient has been given the option of accessing a portal and has been given information about how to set up a portal but chooses not to set up a portal (does not provide address or does not complete any validation steps or does not provide online permission etc) can this patient be included in the numerator? –Yes– provided all required health information maintained in an electronic form is available to the patient within four business days. If patients can be included in the numerator without any registration/set up/validation steps, can a provider push/sync health information (within 3 business days) if the portal has not been created/established? –Assuming you mean that the EP does not have a patient portal to which s/he can push patients’ health information, the answer is NO because the required information is not available to the patient within four business days. If you mean that the patient has not completed the necessary steps to access the information, the answer is YES if the required information is available to the patient within the specified timeframe. If a registration/validation step is required to be included in the numerator, then is there any exclusion or solutions for providers that have non-English speaking patients? –No– there is not an exclusion for EPs who have patients who do not speak English. Please see the specification sheets for the acceptable exclusions for this measure. 20

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR But….It’s Not Really a Technology Problem eAccess is very important eAccess is not enough A paradigm shift that begins with seeing the patient as an active partner will naturally result in granting access to records A mandate to provide access to records will not naturally result in a paradigm shift to seeing the patient as an active partner 21

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR How: There is Help 22

REACH - Achieving meaningful use of your EHR Taking Advantage of the KHA Site Different ways to explore: –Just browsing, starting to learn –Concern about time and getting useable visit summaries Teach Back Shared Decision Making Motivational Interviewing 23

Additional links 24 Show Me the Data! Video ZK1Pps

Send Questions to: Jerri Hiniker, BSN, RN, CPEHR Phone: Questions?

Thank You! This material was prepared by Stratis Health, the Minnesota Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The materials do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. 10SOW-MN-C