1 Update on Metrics for MFE/IFE Progress toward ARIES Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ ARIES Pathway Project Meeting January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Paths for IFE Mike Campbell General Atomics FPA 25 th Anniversary Meeting December 13,2004.
Advertisements

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
FESAC Charge on MFE Priorities For the Next Decade Dale Meade ARIES Quarterly Meeting September 26, 2012 Bethesda, MD.
VLT Report the fusion trend line Stan Milora (ORNL) and Richard Nygren (SNL) FNST/PFC/MASCO Meeting Aug 2-6, UCLA.
Tom Mulford John Sheffield Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. December 15, Fusion Energy Assessment – Status Report.
Community Input on Plasma Materials Interactions Rajesh Maingi (PPPL), chair Steve Zinkle (UTK), co-chair Pete Pappano, FES program POC FESAC meeting Gaithersburg,
Physics of Fusion Lecture 15: Inertial Confinement Fusion Lecturer: Dirk O. Gericke.
Status Report FESAC Panel on Priorities Status Report FESAC Panel on Priorities For further information, please access FESAC Priorities Panel website at:
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
December 10-12, 2008/ARR 1 International HHFC Workshop on Readiness to Proceed from Near Term Fusion Systems to Power Plants ARIES Workshop UCSD, La Jolla,
Burning Plasma Gap Between ITER and DEMO Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy US-Japan Workshop Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
September 6-7, 2007/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: Status and Documentation A. René Raffray Mark Tillack University of California, San.
May 5-6, 2003/ARR 1 Town Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics ARIES Town Meeting Hilton Garden Inn, Livermore, CA May 5-6, 2003 Background and Goals.
Summary Report of the Energy Issues Working Group Organizer: Farrokh Najmabadi Covenors:Jeffrey Freidberg, Wayne Meier, Gerald Navaratil, Bill Nevins,
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Stephen O. Dean, President Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium December 16-17, 2014.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
1 Lecture #24 Fusion ENGR 303I. 2 Outline Fusion →Definition →Atoms usually used Previous attempts at fusion Current attempts at fusion →International.
Energy “Laws” Energy “Producers” Energy “Consumers” Next step: Panels Sustainable Energy: Complex problem that requires long term planning and government.
1 October 26, 2010 Presentation before the California Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities, and Communications, Hearing on “Nuclear Power and California’s.
National Research Council – An Assessment of the Prospects for Inertial Fusion Energy Ronald C. Davidson and Gerald L. Kulcinski, Co-Chairs Prepared for.
1 Update on National Academy Review of IFE Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ ARIES Pathway Project Meeting April 5, 2011.
1 "Magnetic Fusion: Issues, Metrics, Gaps and a Road Map to Energy " Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ ARIES Project Meeting.
Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Stellarator Team Meeting 18 January 2012 Stellarator Program Update.
Page 1 Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) California Institute for Energy & Environment (CIEE) Bill Tschudi Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1. Feb 2001:NRL 2. May 2001:NRL 3. Nov 2001:LLNL 4.Apr 2002:GA 5. Dec 2002:NRL 6. Apr 2003:Sandia 7. Sep 2003:Wisconsin 8. Feb 2004:Georgia Tech 9. Jun.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego US-Japan Workshop on Power Plants Study and Related Advanced Technologies with.
National Research Council Assessment - Prospects for Inertial Fusion Energy Update on NRC Inertial Fusion Energy Assessment David B. Lang, NRC Study Director,
Charles C. Baker, Panel Chair DOE FESAC Meeting 30 March 2004 Status Report FESAC Panel on Priorities Status Report FESAC Panel on Priorities For further.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
San Diego Workshop, 11 September 2003 Results of the European Power Plant Conceptual Study Presented by Ian Cook on behalf of David Maisonnier (Project.
Agenda / Logistics John J. Barnard Twelfth US - Japan Workshop on Heavy Ion Fusion and High Energy Density Physics September 7-8, 2009 Intercontinental.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Some Thoughts on Phase II for Target fabrication, injection, and tracking presented by Dan Goodin Georgia Institute of Technology February 5th & 6th, 2004.
PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Stephen O. Dean, President Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium December 1-2, 2010.
Moon Fueled Nuclear Fusion Allen Jiang PhD Student | King’s College London | Robotics.
Fusion Magic? “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Radical, transformative technologies typically appear ‘impossible’
Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
UCRL-PRES Magnet Design Considerations & Efficiency Advantages of Magnetic Diversion Concept W. Meier & N. Martovetsky LLNL HAPL Program Meeting.
The High Average Power Laser (HAPL) Program We are developing Fusion Energy with lasers, based primarily on direct drive targets and dry wall chambers.
Presented By Charles Shoemaker NUCLEAR POWER. Nuclear Power Generation Similar to any other power plant Difference: Heat source used to power turbine.
NRC Study on Prospects for Inertial Confinement Fusion Energy Systems Presentation at Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting December 1, 2010 David Lang,
Welcome to the eighth HAPL meeting Courtesy, Mark Tillack, UCSD.
Overview of the Physics R&D Roadmap for Innovative Confinement Concepts S. Woodruff 14th July 2005 Presenting at the PSI-Center Kick-Off Meeting.
Burning Simulation and Life-Cycle Assessment of Fusion Reactors Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya University, Nagoya , Japan (with the help of T. Oishi, K.
N A T I O N A L N U C L E A R S E C U R I T Y A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O F F I C E O F D E F E N S E P R O G R A M S The National Academy of Sciences.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION ARIES Pathways Study Kick-off Meeting Ken Schultz 3 April 2007 Determining the.
Status and Plans for Systems Modeling for Laser IFE HAPL Progress Meeting November 2001 Pleasanton, CA Wayne Meier, Charles Orth, Don Blackfield.
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
John H. Nuckolls LLNL Director Emeritus Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting “Countdown to Ignition and Gain” December 3, 2008 Search For A “YES WE CAN”
1. Feb 2001:NRL 2. May 2001:NRL 3. Nov 2001:LLNL 4.Apr 2002:GA 5. Dec 2002:NRL 6. Apr 2003:Sandia 7. Sep 2003:Wisconsin 8. Feb 2004:Georgia Tech 9. Jun.
Developing Technology for Inertial Fusion Energy David H. Crandall Advisor to the Under Secretary for Science On National Security and Inertial Fusion.
Possible Strategies for a Broadened Fast Track Approach to Fusion Energy Dale Meade Princeton Plasma Physics laboratory Symposium.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Plasma Co-Chairs. Steve Cowley, UCLA. John Peoples. Fermilab.
Update on Systems Modeling and Analyses
Target Gain Curves for Systems Modeling*
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program
Lecture 15: Inertial Confinement Fusion Lecturer: Dirk O. Gericke
PRESENTATION OF AWARDS
Presentation transcript:

1 Update on Metrics for MFE/IFE Progress toward ARIES Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ ARIES Pathway Project Meeting January 26, 2011 UCSD, La Jolla, CA

How should we Communicate Progress in Fusion? There have been recent National Energy Policy reports (DOE Energy policy report and a Holdren level report by PCAST) that have barely mentioned fusion. I am of the view that the key audience for us are the scientific advisors and gate keepers that provide input to middle and higher level Energy Policy decisions in the government. A good example is the National Academy Panel to review IFE. The recent upsurge in IFE communication has complicated the issue because IFE uses similar terminology but several key details are different, especially the burn dynamics and power plant requirements. What is the best way for MFE and IFE to communicate progress toward the goal of a fusion based power plant similar to ARIES?

Nationa Academy Committee to Review IFE Ronald C. Davidson, Co-Chair, Princeton University Gerald L. Kulcinski,† Co-Chair, University of Wisconsin-Madison Charles Baker, University of California, San Diego [Retired] Roger Bangerter, E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [Retired] Riccardo Betti, University of Rochester Jan Beyea, Consulting in the Public Interest Robert L. Byer, Stanford University Franklin Chang-Diaz, Ad Astra Rocket Company Steven C. Cowley, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority David Hammer, Cornell University Joseph S. Hezir, EOP Group, Inc. Kathyrn McCarthy, Idaho National Laboratory Lawrence T. Papay, PQR, LLC Ken Schultz, General Atomics Andrew M. Sessler, E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory John Sheffield, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Thomas Anthony Tombrello, Jr, California Institute of Technology Dennis G. Whyte, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jonathan S. Wurtele, University of California, Berkeley Rosa Yang, Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Adrian Zaccaria, Bechtel Group, Inc.

Laser Energy ~ 1 MJ ~600J, Q ~6x10 -4

x 6 if 50/50 DT => 140J, Q ~ 1.4x10 -4

Q ~ 10 ITER Lawson Diagram as a Metric for Fusion Progress Study A. Wootton, J Perkins Budapest EPS Review Paper Lawson for IFE W. Nevins Lawson for Advanced Fuels with self-consistent f.p. accumulation

Betti Approach and diagram

Caution: W hot spot = Kinetic energy of the ablating layer ≈ 2% of W laser

Fusion Gain and Conversion Efficiencies must be defined Self-Consistently within a Closed Power Cycle (e.g., Lawson -1957) New title on John Perkin’s VG

MFE/IFE - Two Very Different Approaches Thermonuclear Burn dynamics are very different Extremely transient burn vs quasi-steady state burn Hot spot ignition with propagation vs no burn propagation Ignition at Q ~ 0.5 vs Ignition at Q >30 Power Plant requires Q ~120 vs Q ~ 30 Power Handling Requirements are very different Large transient heat loads every pulse vs an occassional disruption Chamber clearing at high rep rate vs impurity removal with divertor

Fusion Energy per Pulse as a Metric for Progress dmeade NIF Initial Results 2010 (Goal) Indirect Drive

14 TFTR/JET ActualNIF Planned Average Fusion Power as a Metric for Progress D-T Fusion Gain, Q Fusion Energy/pulse MJ Day (TFTR) ~ 5,000 W Day (JET) ~ 5,000 W Day (ITER) ~ 100 MW First D-T ~2011 Fusion Gain, Q ~10 Fusion Energy/pulse20 MJ Day ~70 W dmeade: 2010

15 Economic Competitiveness is the Metric for Chu and Koonin Chu at PPPL Oct “A nuclear power plant at 6-9$B is problematic for the nuclear power industry. With ITER costing ~ $20B, what are the propects for magnetic fusion?” Koonin made a similar comment at the March 2010 FESAC meeting. We responded by citing the ARIES study results. How do we strengthen our response to this question? Related to the Mountain of Death problem mentioned before?

16 To Do List The average power metric may be a useful approach, need to try it out on the intended audience. Will be working to get a suitable MFE/IFE progress figure that could go into the NAS-IFE report. Will be working on a figure or representation that could be put into a broader energy report that would compare fusion with other carbon free or advanced energy sources.