ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2009-2010 Cycle, 2010-2011 Cycle Del Mar College Dr. Irma Woods Rise’ E. Knight April 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE CULMINATING PROJECT: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Presented by: Shujaat Ahmed and Kaitlin Fitzsimons.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Welcome… The attendee will understand assessment basics with a focus on creating learning activities and identifying assessment expectations. Apply the.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
Evidence and Standard Two. The Big Picture The Big Picture Standard Two is about: Curriculum Curriculum Planned, overseen curriculum – with clear outcomes.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT UNITS ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP CYCLE Cycle Del Mar College Risè Knight May 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
WEAVEONLINE TRAINING By Sabrina Qureshi. OBJECTIVES  Become familiar with WEAVEonline software  Understand how WEAVEonline is used as an assessment.
Welcome to Del Mar College. How have you changed the lives of your student learners?
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Refresher Course on Assessment A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others January 22, 2016.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Consider Your Audience
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Jo Lynn Autry Digranes Coordinator for Assessment Updated 10/2017
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP Cycle, Cycle Del Mar College Dr. Irma Woods Rise’ E. Knight April 2010

Assessment Reports Assessment Reports = SACS Documentation Findings Action Plans Analysis Annual Report Reports demonstrate our institution is effectively accomplishing our mission.

SACS REQUIREMENT Del Mar College submits Academic Detailed Assessment Reports as supporting documentation for compliance with SACS Core Requirement 2.5 and Comprehensive Standard

SACS Core Requirement 2.5 The institution engages in ongoing, integrated and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that (1) incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; (2) result in continuing improvement in institutional quality; and (3) demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.(Institutional Effectiveness)

SACS Comprehensive Standard The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.

Cycle FINDINGS Findings are the results(data) from the measures used to assess student learning outcomes or program objectives. The findings indicate the level of student success in achieving the student learning outcomes or level of the program success in achieving the program objectives. A quantitative finding must be entered for each measure. The actual percentage(%) or numbers should be reported in findings. If possible, the sample size (the “n”) should be reported as well.

What to do…… Target: 80% of students writing a formal report will receive an overall rubric score of 70% or greater. Findings: 85% of students (17/20) scored 70% or greater on the formal reports rubric. or Findings: 75%of students (15/20) scored 70% or greater on the formal reports rubric.

Good Example – Measure, Target, & Findings Measure 1: Capstone Course Reflective Essay Students shall submit, as part of the Senior Capstone Course Portfolio, a reflective essay evidencing knowledge and significance of the historical development, evolution and structure of contemporary systems. Students should include an explanation of how the portfolio materials contributed to the synthesis and analysis of their foundational knowledge. The essay will be graded on logic, structure, knowledge and persuasiveness (25%for each component). Target Performance Level: 80% of the students will achieve an overall essay score of 75 or better on the first attempt. Findings: 88% of the students (22/25) writing the reflective essay achieved an overall essay score of 75 or better on the first attempt.

What not to do…. Target: 80% will receive an overall rubric score of 70% or better. Findings: 80% of students scored 70% or greater on the formal reports rubric. or Findings: Less that 80% of students scored 70% or greater on the formal reports rubric. or Findings: More than 80% of students scored 70% or greater on the formal reports rubric.

ACTION PLANS An action plan needs to be developed for each measure, even if the achievement target was met. The action plan is developed at the end of the academic year cycle and implemented the following academic year cycle. Action Plans are the description of what actions will be taken to address findings (results) identified through the assessment of student learning outcomes or program objectives.

TRACKING Action Plans will be found in Assessment Reports as “Tracking”. Indicate the status of each as Current, Finished, On-hold, or Terminated. Enter a comment regarding each Action “Close the Loop” Documentation of improvement over time

Action Tracking Example Assessment Report Action Plan LIBRARY TOUR: Encourage student to take the library tour – offer extra credit Assessment Report Action Tracking Status: Current Comment: Implemented extra credit for Library tour. Students completed a survey. Results are being analyzed and we are considering making the tour mandatory.

ANALYSIS Proven Strengths and Progress on Outcomes  College–wide “ Progress on Outcomes” report. Supporting documentation for compliance with SACS Comprehensive Standard Outcomes Requiring Continued Attention

GOOD EXAMPLE – Analysis: Strength and Progress What specifically did your assessments show regarding proven strengths or progress you made on outcomes/ objectives? Major strengths indicated through the assessments show that teamwork a major objective of the program and an attribute highly desired by industry employers, continues to reach a level of excellence as assessed through peer evaluations and exit survey data. Public and industry support for the program remain high as assessed by scholarship contributions and funds generated by a student-managed public event. The more recent emphasis on technology and website development was determined to be successfully implemented based on pre-and post-test scores, and self report by students enrolled in relevant courses What specifically did your assessments show regarding any outcomes/objectiv es that will require continued attention? Weaknesses identified fell into two major areas. First, on the data collection portion of the assessment plan, we failed to collect quantitative

GOOD EXAMPLE – Analysis: Strength and Progress What specifically did your assessments show regarding proven strengths or progress you made on outcomes/objectives? Major strengths indicated through the assessments show that teamwork, a major objective of the program and an attribute highly desired by industry employers, continues to reach a level of excellence as assessed through peer evaluations and exit survey data. Public and industry support for the program remain high as assessed by scholarship contributions and funds generated by a student-managed public event. The more recent emphasis on technology and website development was determined to be successfully implemented based upon pre-and post-test scores, and self report by students enrolled in relevant courses

GOOD EXAMPLE - Analysis:Continued Attention (cont.) (…Assessment scores indicate students are not meeting the minimum desirable target values on research, documentation and oral delivery of materials need to support outcome 1. Addressing this discrepancy will require investigation into prerequisite courses in the u core prior to making any content specific changes in the program.

ANNUAL REPORT Used by Deans and the Provost to analyze and assess the year and to write their Annual Reports Becomes the history of Del Mar Colleges’ academic accomplishments for academic year Annual Report should communicate what you want everyone to know about your program.

GOOD EXAMPLE – Executive Summary The paralegal program at Del Mar remains strong and healthy. Compared to other programs, the paralegal studies program is relatively small, yet we have over 100 majors. Robert Smith, who was adjunct faculty at Del Mar last year, was made a permanent full-time paralegal faculty member Our faculty all received good student evaluations and many of our students have been accepted to law school (most notably Pepperdine University in California). Our program has recently been notified that its ABA approval has been extended for one year until an on-site visit by the ABA can be made.

GOOD EXAMPLE – Contributions to the Institution The Math Zone opened and is offering MAT 099 and MAT 101. Regular faculty and adjuncts taught 179 sections of math courses, serving approximately 5300 students. 5 grant proposals funded and 15 other grant proposals submitted.

GOOD EXAMPLE - Highlights Interior Design students and faculty sponsored and built a home in collaboration with Habitat for Humanity Operation Home Delivery. One student was awarded Best of Show, four students received 1st place awards, and three student were awarded 2nd place in various categories for projects completed this year at the Annual Regional ASID Student Career Day in Little Rock

GOOD EXAMPLE – Teaching Activities Student evaluations provided evidence that faculty members are teaching well. During the summer there were 33 sections with an enrollment of 636. During the fall semester there were 73 sections with an enrollment of During the spring semester there were 73 sections with an enrollment of 1838.

GOOD EXAMPLE – Public/Community Service Program involvement in Family Network Partnership ASPIRE Benefit Concert. Young People’s Matinee to school-aged children. Involvement in Civic Light Opera production. Multiple dance performances open to the public each semester.

GOOD EXAMPLE - Challenges The major challenges are improving ACS test scores, especially in gatekeeper courses like analytical chemistry, developing a workable model for formal laboratory reports across the curriculum, and just tracking the information required for these reports.

CYCLE ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Assessment of Student Learning can be defined as the systematic collection of information about student learning, using the time, knowledge, expertise, and resources available, in order to inform decisions about how to improve learning. 1 The Three Steps of Assessment 1 (WEAVE components italicized) 1) Articulate your goals for student learning (Student Learning Outcomes) 2) Gather evidence about how well students are meeting the goals. (Measures, Targets, & Findings) 3) Use the information for improvement (Analysis, Action Plans, Action Tracking, Annual Report)

ARTICULATE GOALS Student Learning Outcomes A Student Learning Outcome is a statement regarding knowledge, skills, and/or traits students should gain or enhance as a result of their engagement in an academic program. A program does not need to state all possible student learning outcomes, but it should try to articulate those that are fundamental 5 minimum (for ) Programs reevaluate SLO’s at the beginning of the assessment cycle. Program faculty should evaluate if existing SLO’s clearly communicate intended learning. SLO’s should be rotated

GATHER EVIDENCE Measures and Targets Check to see that the measure matches the SLO – “apples to apples” Measures need to clearly identify the content that addresses the student learning outcomes. An overall course grade is NOT an acceptable direct measure. Each SLO must have one direct measure, preferably two, or one direct and one indirect. Targets need to show criteria for success for each student learning outcome.

APPROPRIATE DIRECT MEASURE/TARGET Random, anonymous individual papers collected by instructors from the program’s Writing Intensive course are evaluated by blind/cross-reading using departmentally- approved 100-point grading rubric. The grading rubric is comprised of four subheadings; Content, Grammar, Research, and Argument. The Grammar subheading contains criteria for evaluating students’ ability to demonstrate competence in the proper use of Standard English grammar, punctuation, spelling, and usage. Target: 80% of the students will score a 20 (out of 25) or higher on the Grammar subheading of the rubric

Not an Appropriate Direct Measure /Target Random, anonymous individual papers collected by instructors from the program’s Writing Intensive course are evaluated by blind/cross- reading using departmentally-approved 100- point grading rubric. The grading rubric is comprised of four subheadings; Content, Grammar, Research, and Argument. Target: 80% of the students will score a 90 (out of 100) or higher on the rubric.

Appropriate INDIRECT Measure /Target Graduating seniors will indicate on an exit survey whether they are satisfied with their acquired knowledge and skills in current and emerging technologies. Satisfaction is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 5 as the highest satisfaction. Target: 90% of students will be satisfied (rating 4 or 5 on questions #4, #5, & #6) with their knowledge and skills in current and emerging technologies acquired in the program. In WEAVE, please describe in detail the measure itself in the “Full Description” text box, without defining the targeted level of achievement. The quantifiable target should only be stated in the Target text box. (Do not duplicate the target.)

NOT an appropriate INDIRECT Measure/Target Graduating seniors will evaluate on an exit survey their overall satisfaction with their degree program. Target: 90% of students will be satisfied with the program

USE THE INFORMATION FOR IMPROVEMENT (Analysis, Action Plans, Action Tracking, Annual Report) Assessment Plans and the Action Plans developed in the Assessment Report will tell what you will do in the future. Assessment contacts need to ensure the program faculty know the program’s action plans, outcomes, and measures and are carrying out and reporting assessment activities throughout the academic year. The entire faculty should be involved in the analysis of the assessment data to recommend changes in curriculum, pedagogy, or other aspects intended to improve student learning. The goal is to keep it simple and to use the assessment process for better decision making.

CALL FOR HELP Dr. Irma Woods Rise’ E Knight