Classification using intersection kernel SVMs is efficient Joint work with Subhransu Maji and Alex Berg Jitendra Malik UC Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max-Margin Additive Classifiers for Detection
Advertisements

Classification using intersection kernel SVMs is efficient
Introduction to Support Vector Machines (SVM)
Road-Sign Detection and Recognition Based on Support Vector Machines Saturnino, Sergio et al. Yunjia Man ECG 782 Dr. Brendan.
Multiclass SVM and Applications in Object Classification
Image classification Given the bag-of-features representations of images from different classes, how do we learn a model for distinguishing them?
SVM - Support Vector Machines A new classification method for both linear and nonlinear data It uses a nonlinear mapping to transform the original training.
An Introduction of Support Vector Machine
Handwritten digit recognition

An Introduction of Support Vector Machine
Support Vector Machines
1 Lecture 5 Support Vector Machines Large-margin linear classifier Non-separable case The Kernel trick.
SVM—Support Vector Machines
Machine learning continued Image source:
CSCI 347 / CS 4206: Data Mining Module 07: Implementations Topic 03: Linear Models.
Lecture 31: Modern object recognition
LPP-HOG: A New Local Image Descriptor for Fast Human Detection Andy Qing Jun Wang and Ru Bo Zhang IEEE International Symposium.
Many slides based on P. FelzenszwalbP. Felzenszwalb General object detection with deformable part-based models.
1 Fast Asymmetric Learning for Cascade Face Detection Jiaxin Wu, and Charles Brubaker IEEE PAMI, 2008 Chun-Hao Chang 張峻豪 2009/12/01.
Enhancing Exemplar SVMs using Part Level Transfer Regularization 1.
Groups of Adjacent Contour Segments for Object Detection Vittorio Ferrari Loic Fevrier Frederic Jurie Cordelia Schmid.
Ghunhui Gu, Joseph J. Lim, Pablo Arbeláez, Jitendra Malik University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA
Biased Normalized Cuts 1 Subhransu Maji and Jithndra Malik University of California, Berkeley IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
Detecting Pedestrians by Learning Shapelet Features
Fast intersection kernel SVMs for Realtime Object Detection
Discriminative and generative methods for bags of features
Recognition using Regions CVPR Outline Introduction Overview of the Approach Experimental Results Conclusion.
Image classification Given the bag-of-features representations of images from different classes, how do we learn a model for distinguishing them?
Prénom Nom Document Analysis: Linear Discrimination Prof. Rolf Ingold, University of Fribourg Master course, spring semester 2008.
Learning to Detect Natural Image Boundaries Using Local Brightness, Color, and Texture Cues David R. Martin Charless C. Fowlkes Jitendra Malik.
Generic Object Detection using Feature Maps Oscar Danielsson Stefan Carlsson
Robust Real-time Object Detection by Paul Viola and Michael Jones ICCV 2001 Workshop on Statistical and Computation Theories of Vision Presentation by.
Berkeley Vision GroupNIPS Vancouver Learning to Detect Natural Image Boundaries Using Local Brightness,
Lecture 10: Support Vector Machines
Generic object detection with deformable part-based models
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines Martin Law.
Ch. Eick: Support Vector Machines: The Main Ideas Reading Material Support Vector Machines: 1.Textbook 2. First 3 columns of Smola/Schönkopf article on.
July 11, 2001Daniel Whiteson Support Vector Machines: Get more Higgs out of your data Daniel Whiteson UC Berkeley.
“Secret” of Object Detection Zheng Wu (Summer intern in MSRNE) Sep. 3, 2010 Joint work with Ce Liu (MSRNE) William T. Freeman (MIT) Adam Kalai (MSRNE)
CSE 473/573 Computer Vision and Image Processing (CVIP) Ifeoma Nwogu Lecture 24 – Classifiers 1.
Handwritten digit recognition Jitendra Malik. Handwritten digit recognition (MNIST,USPS) LeCun’s Convolutional Neural Networks variations (0.8%, 0.6%
Lecture 31: Modern recognition CS4670 / 5670: Computer Vision Noah Snavely.
Pedestrian Detection and Localization
Classifiers Given a feature representation for images, how do we learn a model for distinguishing features from different classes? Zebra Non-zebra Decision.
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines (M. Law)
Distributed Representative Reading Group. Research Highlights 1Support vector machines can robustly decode semantic information from EEG and MEG 2Multivariate.
Handwritten digit recognition
Gang WangDerek HoiemDavid Forsyth. INTRODUCTION APROACH (implement detail) EXPERIMENTS CONCLUSION.
Methods for classification and image representation
CS 1699: Intro to Computer Vision Support Vector Machines Prof. Adriana Kovashka University of Pittsburgh October 29, 2015.
Object Recognition as Ranking Holistic Figure-Ground Hypotheses Fuxin Li and Joao Carreira and Cristian Sminchisescu 1.
Locally Linear Support Vector Machines Ľubor Ladický Philip H.S. Torr.
Hybrid Classifiers for Object Classification with a Rich Background M. Osadchy, D. Keren, and B. Fadida-Specktor, ECCV 2012 Computer Vision and Video Analysis.
In: Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 30, Nr. 1 (2008), p Group of Adjacent Contour Segments for Object Detection.
Finding Clusters within a Class to Improve Classification Accuracy Literature Survey Yong Jae Lee 3/6/08.
1 Kernel Machines A relatively new learning methodology (1992) derived from statistical learning theory. Became famous when it gave accuracy comparable.
1 Bilinear Classifiers for Visual Recognition Computational Vision Lab. University of California Irvine To be presented in NIPS 2009 Hamed Pirsiavash Deva.
Non-separable SVM's, and non-linear classification using kernels Jakob Verbeek December 16, 2011 Course website:
Recent developments in object detection
Cascade for Fast Detection
Support Vector Machines
Object detection with deformable part-based models
Lit part of blue dress and shadowed part of white dress are the same color
Paper Presentation: Shape and Matching
Digit Recognition using SVMS
Object detection as supervised classification
A Tutorial on HOG Human Detection
An HOG-LBP Human Detector with Partial Occlusion Handling
Support Vector Machines
Presentation transcript:

Classification using intersection kernel SVMs is efficient Joint work with Subhransu Maji and Alex Berg Jitendra Malik UC Berkeley

Fast intersection kernel SVMs and other generalizations of linear SVMs - IKSVM is a (simple) generalization of a linear SVM - Can be evaluated very efficiently - Other kernels (including ) have a similar form - Novel features based on pyramid of oriented energy. - Methods applicable to current most successful object recognition/detection strategies.

Detection: Is this an X? Ask this question over and over again, varying position, scale, multiple categories… Speedups: hierarchical, early reject, feature sharing, cueing but same underlying question!

Detection: Is this an X? Ask this question over and over again, varying position, scale, multiple categories… Speedups: hierarchical, early reject, feature sharing, but same underlying question!

Detection: Is this an X? Ask this question over and over again, varying position, scale, multiple categories… Speedups: hierarchical, early reject, feature sharing, but same underlying question! Boosted dec. trees, cascades + Very fast evaluation - Slow training (esp. multi-class) Linear SVM + Fast evaluation + Fast training - Need to find good features Non-linear kernelized SVM + Better class. acc. than linear. Medium training - Slow evaluation

Detection: Is this an X? Ask this question over and over again, varying position, scale, multiple categories… Speedups: hierarchical, early reject, feature sharing, but same underlying question! Boosted dec. trees, cascades + Very fast evaluation - Slow training (esp. multi-class) Linear SVM + Fast evaluation + Fast training - Need to find good features Non-linear kernelized SVM + Better class. acc. than linear. Medium training - Slow evaluation This work

Outline What is Intersection Kernel SVM? Trick to make it fast (exact) Trick to make it very fast (approximate) Why use it? Multi-scale Features based on Oriented Energy Generalization of linear classifiers Reinterpret the approximate IKSVM Fast training Summary of where this matters

Outline What is Intersection Kernel SVM? Trick to make it fast (exact) Trick to make it very fast (approximate) Why use it? Multi-scale Features based on Oriented Energy Generalization of linear classifiers Reinterpret the approximate IKSVM Fast training Summary of where this matters

Support Vector Machines Linear Separators (aka. Perceptrons)

Support Vector Machines Other possible solutions

Support Vector Machines Which one is better? B1 or B2? How do you define better?

Support Vector Machines Find hyperplane maximizes the margin => B1 is better than B2

Kernel Support Vector Machines Kernel : Inner Product in Hilbert Space Can Learn Non Linear Boundaries

Feature Representation Discriminative Classifier (+ examples) (- examples) Training Stage

Our Multiscale HOG-like feature Concatenate orientation histograms for each orange region. Differences from HOG: -- Hierarchy of regions -- Only performing L1 normalization once (at 16x16)

Comparison to HOG (Dalal & Triggs)

Smaller Dimensional (1360 vs. 3780) Simple Implementation (Convolutions) Faster to compute + No non-local Normalization + No gaussian weighting + No color normalization Comparison to HOG (Dalal & Triggs)

What is the Intersection Kernel? Histogram Intersection kernel between histograms a, b

What is the Intersection Kernel? Histogram Intersection kernel between histograms a, b K small -> a, b are different K large -> a, b are similar Intro. by Swain and Ballard 1991 to compare color histograms. Odone et al 2005 proved positive definiteness. Can be used directly as a kernel for an SVM. Compare to

linear SVM, Kernelized SVM, IKSVM Decision function is where: Linear: Non-linear Using Kernel Histogram Intersection Kernel

Kernelized SVMs slow to evaluate Arbitrary Kernel Histogram Intersection Kernel Feature corresponding to a support vector l Feature vector to evaluate Kernel EvaluationSum over all support vectors SVM with Kernel Cost: # Support Vectors x Cost of kernel comp. IKSVM Cost: # Support Vectors x # feature dimensions Decision function is where:

The Trick Decision function is where: Just sort the support vector values in each coordinate, and pre-compute To evaluate, find position of in the sorted support vector values (cost: log #sv) look up values, multiply & add

The Trick Decision function is where: Just sort the support vector values in each coordinate, and pre-compute To evaluate, find position of in the sorted support vector values (cost: log #sv) look up values, multiply & add #support vectors x #dimensions log( #support vectors ) x #dimensions

The Trick 2 For IK h i is piecewise linear, and quite smooth, blue plot. We can approximate with fewer uniformly spaced segments, red plot. Saves time & space! Decision function is where: #support vectors x #dimensions log( #support vectors ) x #dimensions

The Trick 2 Decision function is where: #support vectors x #dimensions log( #support vectors ) x #dimensions constant x #dimensions For IK h i is piecewise linear, and quite smooth, blue plot. We can approximate with fewer uniformly spaced segments, red plot. Saves time & space!

Timing Results Time to evaluate 10,000 feature vectors IKSVM with our multi-scale version of HOG features beats Dalal & Triggs. Also for Daimler Chrysler data. Current Best on these datasets. Linear SVM with our multi-scale Version of HOG features has worse classification perf. than Dalal & Triggs. reduced memory!

Distribution of support vector values and h i Distribution of

Best Performance on Pedestrian Detection, Improve on Linear for Many Tasks INRIA PedestriansDaimler Chrysler Pedestrians Caltech 101 with “simple features” Linear SVM 40% correct IKSVM 52% correct

Classification Errors

Results – ETHZ Dataset Dataset: Ferrari et al., ECCV images, over 5 classes training = half of positive images for a class + same number from the other classes (1/4 from each) testing = all other images large scale changes; extensive clutter

MethodApplelogoBottleGiraffeMugSwanAvg PAS* Our Beats many current techniques without any changes to our features/classification framework. Recall at 0.3 False Positive per Image Shape is an important cue (use Pb instead of OE) Results – ETHZ Dataset *Ferarri et.al, IEEE PAMI - 08

Other kernels allow similar trick Decision function is where: IKSVM SVM h i not piece-wise linear, but we can still use an approximation for fast evaluation. h i are piece-wise linear, uniformly spaced piece-wise linear approx. is fast.

Results outside computer vision Accuracy of IK vs Linear on Text classification Error rate of directly trained piecewise linear (blue) best kernel (green) and linear (red) on SVM benchmark datasets

Results outside computer vision Accuracy of IK vs Linear on Text classification Error rate of directly trained piecewise linear (blue) best kernel (green) and linear (red) on SVM benchmark datasets

Results outside computer vision Accuracy of IK vs Linear on Text classification Error rate of directly trained piecewise linear (blue) best kernel (green) and linear (red) on SVM benchmark datasets Piecewise linear usually better, Depending on amount of data relative to the dimension and regularization

Conclusions Exactly evaluate IKSVM in O(n log m) as opposed to O(nm) Makes SV cascade or other ordering schemes irrelevant for intersection kernel Verified that IKSVM offers classification performance advantages over linear Approximate decision functions that decompose to a sum of functions for each coordinate (including Chi squared) Directly learn such classification functions (no SVM machinery) Generalized linear svm beats linear SVM in some applications often as good as more expensive RBF kernels Showed that relatively simple features with IKSVM beats Dalal & Triggs (linear SVM), leading to the state of the art in pedestrian detection. Applies to best Caltech 256, Pascal VOC 2007 methods.

Classification Using Intersection Kernel Support Vector Machines is efficient. Subhransu Maji and Alexander C. Berg and Jitendra Malik. Proceedings of CVPR 2008, Anchorage, Alaska, June Software and more results available at