Conditions for Using Negotiation Two or more parties –Conflict of interest such that what one party wants is not what the other party wants –Both willing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural justice and a constructive approach to negotiating with stakeholders Jill Howieson.
Advertisements

Conflict Definition: A process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected,or is about to negatively affect,something.
Chapter 13 Conflict & Negotiation
Conflict Management Dr. Monika Renard Associate Professor, Management College of Business.
Negotiation INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING. Ugli Orange Take 5 minutes to read the role information Negotiate with your partner (5-10 minutes) Write down agreement.
Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework
Factors That Facilitate Successful Integrative Negotiation
NEGOTIATION/BARGAINING. VIEWS DISTRIBUTIVE BARGAINING –DIVIDE A FIXED AMOUNT –WIN-LOSE INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING –TRY TO CREATE WIN-WIN.
MODULE 23 CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION
©Prentice Hall, 2001Chapter 131 Negotiation and Conflict.
Conflict and Negotiation in the Workplace. Conflict Defined  The process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively.
Managing Conflict.
The Nature of Negotiation
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 5 th Edition PPT.
International negotiation
Negotiation & Conflict Management Class 1 John D. Blair, PhD
Week 8. ~ The process by which people organize and interpret the environment ~ StimulusBehavior Perception.
Presented by Prof. Alan Kirtley May 14, 2008
 2007 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 9 Conflict and Negotiation.
Prosocial & Deviant Behavior Chapter 11 Part 1: March 22, 2007.
Conflict and Negotiation
Managing Conflict, Politics, and Negotiation
©Prentice Hall, 2001Chapter 121 Communication and Interpersonal Skill.
Connections to Independence
Strategy And Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
Mahesh Sharma, MPA, ICMA-CM, MASCE City Administrator City of Raytown
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Managing Conflict, Politics, and Negotiation
Part 4 E – 1 V3.0 THE IIA’S CIA LEARNING SYSTEM TM 1.Conflict resolution 2.Added-value negotiating Section Topics Part 4, Section E.
© 2007 by Prentice Hall1 Chapter 7: Managing Conflict 7 -
Module 5 Section 3: Communication. Learning Outcomes Learn why communication is important to managers Describe the communication process Learn to overcome.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S © 2005 Prentice Hall.
Ways to Manage Conflict Appreciate Conflict –Positive and negative Use Correct Conflict Management Styles –Avoid, Accommodate, Compete, Compromise, Collaborate.
Now What….. I want the last remaining orange and so do you.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Now What….. I want the last remaining orange and so do you.
PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ CONFLICT MANAGEMENT A Practical Guide to Developing Negotiation Strategies By.
Edit the text with your own short phrase. The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Introduction Negotiation is something that everyone does, almost daily 1-1.
Outline Causes and effects of conflict Personality types
Hmmm, Now What…..  I want the last remaining orange and so do you.
Negotiation Skills Mike Phillips Training Quality Manager
Strategy And Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
Small Group Communication. Discussion Cooperative exchange of information, opinions, and ideas.
Organizational Behavior: Conflict and Negotiation.
Interest-Based Bargaining.  Interest-based bargaining involves parties in a collaborative effort to jointly meet each other’s needs and satisfy mutual.
CHAPTER THREE Strategy and Tactics of Integrative Negotiation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
17-1 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Organizational Conflict  The discord that arises when goals, interests.
Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework Salacuse 1991.
Organizational Behavior 15th Ed
TUMAINI UNIVERSITY DAR ES SALAAM COLLEGE HRM303: Managerial Skills Development MWEMFULA, A.{BIR,Msc. HRM)
©  Conflict occurs when two or more people or organizations disagree because their needs, wants, goals, or values are different. 
The Nature of Negotiation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict and negotiation. Conflict 14–1 Conflict Defined Is a process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected,
Chapter 3: Strategy and Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
16 Organizational Conflict, Politics, and Change.
LEAP Silver Required Session
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 5: Preparing to Drive Stages of a Successful Negotiation
What Makes Integrative Negotiation Different?
Strategy And Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
CHAPTER 7 By ADELANI WAHAB MGMT 660 CSUSB
Conditions for Using Negotiation
MGT 210 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING TEAMS
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CONFLICT & NEGOTIATION
Chapter 7: Managing Conflict © 2007 by Prentice Hall 7 -
Developing Management Skills
NEGOTIATION/BARGAINING
Presentation transcript:

Conditions for Using Negotiation Two or more parties –Conflict of interest such that what one party wants is not what the other party wants –Both willing to negotiate for a good outcome –Preference to work together rather than fight, give in, break off contact, or take the dispute to a higher authority

Choose the Best Conflict- Handling Style Collaborate if: issues are important to both parties power is fairly equal and candor is possible there is potential for mutual benefits you have adequate time to fully discuss the details * most likely to maximize everyone’s outcomes * Accommodate or Compromise if: you lack time or ability to collaborate * can have positive or negative consequences * Force/Compete or Avoid if: other options aren’t feasible * can create negative feelings *

Prentice Hall, 1999 Chapter 123 Available Resources Primary Motivations Primary Interests Focus of Relationships Fixed Amount I Win, You Lose Opposed Short-Term Variable Amount I Win, You Win Congruent Long-Term Integrative Bargaining Distributive Bargaining Characteristics The Two Types of Bargaining Strategies

Preconditions for Integrative Negotiation Common goal Faith in one’s own problem-solving ability Belief in validity of other party’s position Motivation to work together Mutual trust Clear communication

Prentice Hall, 1999 Chapter 125 Decision-Making Biases That Impede Negotiations Escalation of commitment The mythical fixed pie Anchoring and adjustments Framing negotiations Availability of information The winner’s curse Overconfidence

Ugli Oranges 1. What will you do? 2. What price will you offer? 3. To whom and how will the oranges be delivered?

Ugli Oranges Info sharing Assess “orange options” Guarantee trust

Coalition Bargaining Exercise Possible Coalitions & Their Values: Groups A & B: Coalition receives $20K Groups A & C: Coalition receives $18K Groups B & C: Coalition receives $16K

Rules for Negotiation 1.There will be 3 rounds, each proceeding as follows: Teams A & B first, A & C second, B & C third 2. All members of negotiating team may be present, but only the negotiator may speak 3. Notes may be passed to negotiators 4. A team may change its negotiator between rounds 5. At the end of the negotiations, payoffs are allocated only if a coalition has been formed 6. Only one formal coalition is permitted

Rules for Negotiation (cont.) 7. First round negotiations can take up to 5 minutes; second and third round negotiations take up to 3 minutes each 8.The team that is not currently negotiating must leave the room. 9. A coalition will be recognized only if (A) Not two teams receive the same amount of points, and (B) Neither team in the coalition receives zero 10. After the third round of negotiations, all three teams will have the opportunity to submit a written statement in the following form:

Rules (cont.) “Team X has a coalition with Team Y, whereby Team X gets ___ and Team Y gets ___.” When written statements meeting the above requirements from any two teams agree, a valid coalition has been formed.