Acknowledgements Funding Partners:University at Buffalo (UB) & National Disability Authority (NDA Project Mentors:Prof. Joe Lane (UB), Dr. Ger Craddock(CEUD/NDA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Social Research Methods
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Universal Design in an Irish Context NDA Conference 2012 Donal Rice Senior Design Advisor, ICT Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD)
Sustaining your Community Strategies & Structures Fran Butterfoss Coalitions Work Tim LaPier CDC’s Healthy Communities Program.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
Iterative development and The Unified process
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Business & Enterprise Systems Introduction to Hewlett Packard (HP) Application Lifecycle Management.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
EUA Higher Education Convention, Graz, May 29-31, 2003 Group 5A First discussion: overriding principles of the two-cycle structure overriding structural.
PROCUREMENT IN WORLD BANK INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: STATUS OF THE REFORM March, 2014 Operations Policy and Country Services.
Enterprise Architecture
Grey Literature in Scholarly Communication Current Thinking from Libraries and Publishers James Neal and Kate Wittenberg.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
ITIL & COBIT O6PLM Kevin Lisay – Rendy Winarta –
Tertiary Education Management Conference 2006 Integration For a New Generation – Technological solutions for linking core functions of teaching and learning.
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Universal Design in Third Level Design Teaching in Ireland Marie Callanan, Antoinette Fennell, Anthony Owens, Mark R. Dyer, James Hubbard, Ger Craddock.
Transforming Elementary Education Management : a perspective on institutional development Dr Pramila Menon NUEPA, New Delhi.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
Knowledge Mobilization: Research Administrators as Brokers in the New Knowledge Systems By Paul J Graham, MLIS Harley D Dickinson, PhD University of Saskatchewan.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Creating a European entity Management Architecture for eGovernment CUB - corvinus.hu Id Réka Vas
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Methodologies and Tools for Technology Needs Assessment: an Overview Zou Ji Dept. of environmental Economics and Management, Renmin University of China.
RESEARCH METHODS IN TOURISM Nicos Rodosthenous PhD 07/02/ /2/20131Dr Nicos Rodosthenous.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Marketing Leadership and Planning
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
The KT4TT Knowledge Base: Steps and Supporting Evidence to Improve Your Process! Webcast sponsored by SEDL September 29, 2010, 2:00 pm (Central) / 3:00.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
Science Curriculum Review Strategies Britton B. Cook.
Set background image for this slide to change picture. A range of photos are available in the graphics folder.
Dr Jane Tonge Senior Examiner
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
Flash Presentation Name : Mohamed Ali Mohamed SONBOL Nature of the Organization : Research Country : EGYPT Organization : National Water Research Center.
The USAID Agency-wide Climate Change Evaluation Agenda: Unpacking Overarching Concepts Nancy Peek, Research Associate, Development and Training Services,
Chapter 9 Database Planning, Design, and Administration Transparencies © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
A Practical Guide to Evidencing Impact
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
Information Technology (IT)
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Assessment at Northeastern University
Improving Public Services through Collaboration in Education
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Acknowledgements Funding Partners:University at Buffalo (UB) & National Disability Authority (NDA Project Mentors:Prof. Joe Lane (UB), Dr. Ger Craddock(CEUD/NDA) & Mr. James Hubbard(CEUD/NDA) Infusing Universal Design principles to adapt the Need to Knowledge (NtK) model through identification of appropriate tools Dr. James Condron University at Buffalo (UB), New York, Center for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD) Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT) Goal Identify where Universal Design can be embedded in the NtK model and populate the new model with an inventory of analytic methods/instruments appropriate to each step, to serve as a resource and guide to academic and industrial users. Stakeholders from manufacturers to product/service users are to be central to the design process – thus enabling the largest possible user group to be catered for. Background The NtK Model is a model used for new product development. The model was designed to include all activities from inception of a project through post-launch evaluation to paint a complete picture of the research, development, and production processes. Key features of the model include: 3 Phases of activity broken down into 9 stages, 58 steps, and 71 tips, with knowledge to action cycles bridging each phase. Case examples from prior success in technology transfer and commercialization demonstrate how to implement the NtK concepts. Tools identified during the literature review embedded in Supporting Evidence links at the step level. Work to Date Since the Irish Disability Act of 2005 – Universal Design principles are to be implemented as a core strategy in national policy. With this in mind, the integration of Universal Design into the NtK model has been achieved through developing a tool repository which allows a model user the transition from each of the stages, steps and tips. Universal Design itself is now being developed as a core resource throughout the entire NtK model process, hence design for all approach increases market possibilities and hence success of the product or service, These tools have been researched defined according to several parameters. These tools are collected in a large data base which is populated according to the following parameters include: Name of Tool – Description – Advantages/Disadvantages – Compliance standards – Cost – Knowledge User Groups – Stage/Step/Tip – Citations – Useful Resources. This subset of tools for Universal Design are applied model wide. Tools that are described throughout the model are from a large variety of disciplines, ranging from marketing, engineering to business management. Through this diversity of disciplines, a core set of tools overarch and govern their implementation for successful New Product Development (NPD). Universal Design has been identified as one of these core principles and a tool set which allows the examination of Universal Design compatibility is available throughout every step in the model. Useful Resources The NtK Model: hp The Centre for Excellence in Universal Design