COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN NORTH GLENGARRY La Communauté engagée – The Community Engaged.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Advertisements

CRESTDALE NEIGHBORHOOD P R E S E N T P A S T F U T U R E MATTHEWS, NORTH CAROLINA.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Community Development Department ZONING ORDINANCE AND DESIGN UPDATE (ZODU) Sustainable Land Use, Culturally Influenced.
Crofton Community Planning Meeting Introduction to Crofton Community Plan Process Brian Green, Deputy Director of Planning & Development Audrey Rogers,
Bexhill Town Centre Planning Framework David Marlow for Bexhill Town Centre Steering Group 2 nd November 2010.
Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor Management Plan - Committee Session February 6, 2010.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
The following is a presentation containing aerial photos, zoning maps and relevant information for the rezoning cases and proposed text and map amendments.
Cally Plan Update Team Cally Ward Partnership September 2014.
San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.
Form-Based Codes 101 Form-Based Codes Committee City of South Burlington July 12, 2012.
Community Planning Land Use Education Project Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP Principal Planner.
STATE ROAD 100 CORRIDOR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Bulldog Drive Improvements Right-of-Way and Design September 21, 2010 Presentation for SR 100 CRA.
Priority Project Update PSSD-CIO Joint Council Meeting Lac Carling, May 28, 2003 Service Delivery to Business and Mapping.
Operating a Commercial Revitalization Program with the Main Street Approach.
City of North Richland Hills TOD Code Overview. Comments from November 20 Work Session Need to ensure the preservation of key historic assets in the Smithfield.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Seattle’s Evolving Approach Current Neighborhood Planning.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
SLU Rural District Reform Act 205 SLH Mission Implement Act 205 SLH 2005 Engage Community & County Leadership in Reform Dialogue Support County.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
Building Affordable Housing & Strong Futures Since 1975.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Adur & Worthing Services working in partnership IMPROVING THE STREET SCENE WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL CONFERENCE Wednesday 7 th June 2006 PRESENTATION.
Springfield Zoning Ordinance Revision Project Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame April 25, 2006 Planning and Economic Development Office Sponsored by a grant.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Visitor Center Heritage Crossroads: Miles of History Heritage Highway  Designated in 2008 as a Florida Scenic Highway by Florida Department of Transportation.
JAMESBURG, NEW JERSEY Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy.
HUMPHREY STREET OVERLAY DISTRICT 2015 Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment Public Information Session.
Roslyn Community Revitalization Plan with Real Estate Strategies October 28, 2009 Community Visioning Workshop.
Bergen Street South Community Planning Workshop March 18, 2015 Visual Preference Survey Results ▪Retail and Mixed Uses ▪žResidential Densities ▪žRecreational.
Planning & Community Development Department 1336 and 1347 East Colorado Blvd. Pre Development Plan Review City Council Meeting January 28, 2013.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Regeneration and Housing Growth in Waltham Forest Private Landlords Forum Nick Powell – Head of Strategic Housing & Investment 22 September 2015.
Integrating Uses.
South Lake Union Urban Design Framework Report to the Seattle Design Commission September 17, 2009.
Local endogenous development and urban regeneration of small alpine towns ‘ ‘ ’ ’ A trans-national project co-financed by ERDF funding in the framework.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
Colorado Front Range Trail Corridor Plan Colorado Front Range Trail Corridor Plan.
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop Workshop June 12, 2007 Folsom Annexation – South of Highway 50.
Understanding and Improving Walkable Caribbean Urban Heritage: St Georges, Paramaribo, Bridgetown and East Port of Spain.
Improvement Public Open House Presentation July 9, 2015 Community Project Plan Puslinch.
Councillor John Beesley Leader of Bournemouth Borough Council.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
Potomac Hill Campus Master Plan Preliminary Planning Principles “Observing the Past, Planning the Future” Campus Master Plan Potomac Hill.
Livable Oakville Subcommittee of Council April OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW.
Town of Chapel Hill | 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. | Neighborhood Conservation District Public Information Meeting September.
La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Plan Public Hearing Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Wednesday, August 26, 2015 Sara Dechter, AICP City of.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
North Ponce Neighborhood Strategies. North Ponce Study Area N N.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County Green Gables Official Development Plan Case RZ Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Christopher Brown, Planner II December 4th, 2014 Case No. 14ZONE1036 La Grange Road Office Louisville Metro Planning Commission Public Hearing.
Downtown Stockton Housing Strategy Stockton City Council/ Stockton Redevelopment Agency Draft Report August 28, 2007.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Plan Heritage Preservation Commission Wednesday, September 16, 2015 Sara Dechter, AICP City of Flagstaff Comprehensive Planning.
The City of Colorado Springs Recognized a Unique and Powerful Window of Opportunity: Linking Expansion of its Knowledge and Innovation Capacity (UCCS)
AERIAL/LOCATION MAP N Old Kings Rd. Town Center Blvd. 10 Peylo Place
Lambeth Community Improvement Plan (CIP) UPDATE
Proposed Changes to Draft Official Plan Downtown Policies
Nanaimo Old City Association
CECIL COUNTY LAND USE FORUM:
Template and Process for Expression of Interest by Countries
Land Use 101: What is Zoning?
Presentation transcript:

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN NORTH GLENGARRY La Communauté engagée – The Community Engaged

What is a Community Improvement Plan (CIP)? C’est quoi un Plan d’améliorations communautaires (PAC)? A CIP is a tool that allows municipalities to direct funds and implement policy initiatives toward a specifically defined project area. Community Improvement Plans:  Are shaped by community needs, priorities and circumstances;  Allow municipalities to focus attention on local priorities and municipal initiatives;  Target areas in need of revitalisation;  Stimulate private sector investment through municipal incentive-based programs.

CIP Working Group – Le Comite de travail Katherine Alistair-MacDonald, President, Maxville Chamber of Commerce Audrey Evans, Maxville Resident Daniel Gagnon, CAO, North Glengarry Township Jamie MacDonald, Deputy Mayor Michael Madden, President, Alexandria Chamber of Commerce Kerri Strotmann, EDO, North Glengarry Township Jean Vaillancourt, Business owner, Alexandria Carma Williams, Councillor, Maxville Ward Public involvement is essential to build consensus and community support and to develop a common vision. A working group, comprised of township officials, business owners and residents, has come together to spearhead the CIP process, but there will be public meetings and other opportunities for the population at large to contribute to the process.

Scope of the CIP – La portéé du PAC Working Group proposal: To emphasize the following physical interventions in the scope of the Community Improvement Plan:  Principal building facade(s) that are visible from the street;  Commercial signage and awnings;  Landscaping features that are visible from the street. Note: Building interiors, plumbing, roofing and/or structural issues are not to be included.

Proposed CIP Phases - Les phases du PAC proposées Phase I (Years 1 & 2): Villages of Alexandria and Maxville Maxville The Community Improvement Area for the Village of Maxville is situated along the main North-South corridor of County Road 20/Main Street, and located between County Road 22, to the North and Grant Avenue to South. Alexandria The Community Improvement Area for the Village of Alexandria is situated along the main North-South corridor of SDG Highway 34 / Main Street, between Lochiel Street to the South and St. George Street to the North.

Guiding Principle Used to Define Phase I CIP Areas To create and preserve a traditional “main street” where people can stroll, relax, participate in various activities and shop in a charming and secure village-like atmosphere that is highlighted through its architecture and physical setting.

CIP Phase I : Maxville Parameters: Situated along the main North-South corridor of County Road 20/Main Street, and located between County Road 22, to the North and Grant Avenue to South. Justification: Tightly-knit, relatively uniform streetscape. Clearly defined village entrances. Large number of heritage buildings. Similar architectural characteristics in terms of height, density and detailing. Few breaks in the urban fabric offer interesting potential for development and for public space. Situated along the main North-South corridor of County Road 20/Main Street, and located between County Road 22, to the North and Grant Avenue to South. Justification: Tightly-knit, relatively uniform streetscape. Clearly defined village entrances. Large number of heritage buildings. Similar architectural characteristics in terms of height, density and detailing. Few breaks in the urban fabric offer interesting potential for development and for public space.

Maxville Main Street C.1921 & 2013

CIP Phase I : Alexandria Parameters: Situated along the main North-South corridor of SDG Highway 34 / Main Street, between Lochiel Street to the South and St. George Street to the North. Justification: The streetscape is tightly-knit and more uniform, leading one to perceive this sector as the core commercial area. The setbacks from the street are relatively similar, as are many of the architectural characteristics in terms of scale and detailing, as well as the location of off-street parking areas. The traffic appears calmer due to the more compact nature of the buildings, thereby giving the appearance of this sector of Main Street as being far more pedestrian-friendly than the village fringes. Additionally, there is a more discernible commercial vocation on the ground floor. Situated along the main North-South corridor of SDG Highway 34 / Main Street, between Lochiel Street to the South and St. George Street to the North. Justification: The streetscape is tightly-knit and more uniform, leading one to perceive this sector as the core commercial area. The setbacks from the street are relatively similar, as are many of the architectural characteristics in terms of scale and detailing, as well as the location of off-street parking areas. The traffic appears calmer due to the more compact nature of the buildings, thereby giving the appearance of this sector of Main Street as being far more pedestrian-friendly than the village fringes. Additionally, there is a more discernible commercial vocation on the ground floor.

Alexandria Main Street C.1900 & 2013

Phase 2 (Year 3): Commercial Zones in Rural Hamlets All commercially-zoned properties in the rural hamlets of Dalkeith, Glen Robertson, Dunvegan, Apple Hill, Glen Sandfield, Greenfield.

Phase 3 (Years 4 & 5): Commercial Fringe Areas & Identified Buildings of Significant Heritage Interest All non-residential buildings or residential buildings that have been identified by the Township as being of “significant heritage interest”. Priority will be given to projects in the Phase I CIP areas.

CIP Priorities Present the CIP Phasing and CIP Areas to Council (March 9, 2015) Update the Chambers of Commerce on the status of the CIP (March 4 & 12, 2015) Submit an information request to the Arts, Culture & Heritage Committee for a definition of what constitutes a heritage building in North Glengarry; for a list of buildings of significant heritage interest; and for historical photos of Maxville and Alexandria.  Verify the ownership list extracted from the GIS system and establish the ratio of owners/versus tenants.  Undertake a photo inventory of Alexandria and Maxville  Organize two public image session (Maxville and Alexandria) for the Spring of  Establish CIP design guidelines/criteria.