References: DK, M. Georganopoulos, A. Mastichiadis 2002 A. Mastichiadis, DK 2006 DK, A. Mastichiadis, M. Georaganopoulos 2007 A. Mastichiadis, DK 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
Advertisements

Klein-Nishina effect on high-energy gamma-ray emission of GRBs Xiang-Yu Wang ( 王祥玉) Nanjing University, China (南京大學) Co-authors: Hao-Ning He (NJU), Zhuo.
Understanding the prompt emission of GRBs after Fermi Tsvi Piran Hebrew University, Jerusalem (E. Nakar, P. Kumar, R. Sari, Y. Fan, Y. Zou, F. Genet, D.
A two-zone model for the production of prompt neutrinos in gamma-ray bursts Matías M. Reynoso IFIMAR-CONICET, Mar del Plata, Argentina GRACO 2, Buenos.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
Magnetic Fields in Supernova Remnants and Pulsar-Wind Nebulae S.P. Reynolds et al. Martin, Tseng Chao Hsiung 2013/12/18.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
Electron thermalization and emission from compact magnetized sources
GRB B: Prompt Emission from Internal Forward-Reverse Shocks Yun-Wei Yu 1,2, X. Y. Wang 1, & Z. G. Dai 1 (俞云伟,王祥玉,戴子高) 1 Department of Astronomy,
Very High Energy Transient Extragalactic Sources: GRBs David A. Williams Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics University of California, Santa Cruz.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
Joe Giacalone and Randy Jokipii University of Arizona
X-ray/Optical flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts Daming Wei ( Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Relativistic photon mediated shocks Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University With Omer Bromberg (PRL 2008)
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
Outflow Residual Collisions and Optical Flashes Zhuo Li (黎卓) Weizmann Inst, Israel moving to Peking Univ, Beijing Li & Waxman 2008, ApJL.
Spectral analysis of non-thermal filaments in Cas A Miguel Araya D. Lomiashvili, C. Chang, M. Lyutikov, W. Cui Department of Physics, Purdue University.
Collisionless shocks in Gamma Ray Bursts Current results and future perspectives. Århus, September 2005 Troels Haugbølle Dark Cosmology.
THE TIME-DEPENDENT ONE-ZONE HADRONIC MODEL A. Mastichiadis University of Athens.
The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.
A Model for Emission from Microquasar Jets: Consequences of a Single Acceleration Episode We present a new model of emission from jets in Microquasars,
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
Zhang Ningxiao.  Emission of Tycho from Radio to γ-ray.  The γ-ray is mainly accelerated from hadronic processes.
Magnetic Fields in Supernova Remnants and Pulsar-Wind Nebulae 2013/12/18 Speaker : Yu-Hsun Cheng Professor: Yosuke Mizuno.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
Monte-Carlo Simulation of Thermal Radiation from GRB Jets Sanshiro Shibata (Konan Univ.) Collaborator: Nozomu Tominaga (Konan Univ., IPMU)
Radiative transfer and photospheric emission in GRB jets Indrek Vurm (Columbia University) in collaboration with Andrei M. Beloborodov (Columbia University)
1 Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland (Stern, Poutanen, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1217; Stern, Poutanen, 2007, MNRAS, submitted, astro- ph/ ) A new.
IceCube non-detection of GRB Neutrinos: Constraints on the fireball properties Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators : H. N. He, R. Y.
Particle Acceleration The observation of high-energy  -rays from space implies that particles must be accelerated to very high energies (up to ~
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
From Democritus to now….  a Greek philosopher, proposed that matter was made up of small, hard, indivisible particles, which he called atoms.  Democritus.
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
The peak energy and spectrum from dissipative GRB photospheres Dimitrios Giannios Physics Department, Purdue Liverpool, June 19, 2012.
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB G. Barbiellini (1), F. Longo (1), N.Omodei (2), P.Tommasini (3), D.Giulietti (3), A.Celotti (4), M.Tavani.
Radiation spectra from relativistic electrons moving in turbulent magnetic fields Yuto Teraki & Fumio Takahara Theoretical Astrophysics Group Osaka Univ.,
Modeling the Emission Processes in Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University Athens, OH.
Continuum correlations in accreting X-ray pulsars Mikhail Gornostaev, Konstantin Postnov (SAI), Dmitry Klochkov (IAAT, Germany) 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1601.
Gamma-ray Bursts and Particle Acceleration Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Institute of Technology) S.Inoue ( NAOJ ), P.Meszaros ( PSU )
Dongsu Ryu (CNU), Magnetism Team in Korea
A. Bondarevskaya Highly charged ion beam polarization and its application to the search for the parity nonconservation effects in ions
A Pulsar Wind Nebula Origin for Luminous TeV Source HESS J Joseph Gelfand (NYUAD / CCPP) Eric Gotthelf, Jules Halpern (Columbia University), Dean.
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
Neutrinos produced by heavy nuclei injected by the pulsars in massive binaries Marek Bartosik & W. Bednarek, A. Sierpowska Erice ISCRA 2004.
Gamma-Ray Bursts and unmagnetized relativistic collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Caltech.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in Authors: Manasvita Joshi and Markus Böttcher (Ohio University) Abstract: An extensive multi-wavelength.
A.Yu. Chirkov1), S.V. Ryzhkov1), P.A. Bagryansky2), A.V. Anikeev2)
Alessandra Corsi (1,2) Dafne Guetta (3) & Luigi Piro (2) (1)Università di Roma Sapienza (2)INAF/IASF-Roma (3)INAF/OAR-Roma Fermi Symposium 2009, Washington.
Gamma-ray Bursts from Synchrotron Self-Compton Emission Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland Boris Stern AstroSpace Center, Lebedev Phys. Inst., Moscow,
High Energy Observational Astrophysics. 1 Processes that emit X-rays and Gamma rays.
The prompt optical emission in the Naked Eye Burst R. Hascoet with F. Daigne & R. Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) Kyoto − Deciphering then.
UHE Cosmic Rays from Local GRBs Armen Atoyan (U.Montreal) collaboration: Charles Dermer (NRL) Stuart Wick (NRL, SMU) Physics at the End of Galactic Cosmic.
A RUNAVA B HADRA AND B HAKTA K UNWAR High Energy & Cosmic Ray Research Centre, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, WB, India Scattered radiation from.
Fermi Several Constraints by Fermi Zhuo Li ( 黎卓 ) Department of Astronomy, Peking University Kavli Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 August, Xiamen.
Slow heating, fast cooling in gamma-ray bursts Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland +Boris Stern + Indrek Vurm.
Thermal electrons in GRB afterglows, or
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Analogy between laser plasma acceleration and GRB
Les sursauts gamma : la phase des chocs internes.
Fermi Collaboration Meeting
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Modelling of non-thermal radiation from pulsar wind nebulae
Can we probe the Lorentz factor of gamma-ray bursts from GeV-TeV spectra integrated over internal shocks ? Junichi Aoi (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) co-authors:
Andrei M. Beloborodov Columbia University
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB
Presentation transcript:

References: DK, M. Georganopoulos, A. Mastichiadis 2002 A. Mastichiadis, DK 2006 DK, A. Mastichiadis, M. Georaganopoulos 2007 A. Mastichiadis, DK 2009 Bulk Comptonization GRB Model and its Relation to the Fermi GRB Spectra Demosthenes Kazanas NASA/GSFC Apostolos Mastichiadis Un. Of Athens

Major GRB Facts/Issues GRB involve relativistic blast waves ( Ress & Meszaros ) GRB involve relativistic blast waves ( Ress & Meszaros ) This guarantees that most of the energy of the swept-up matter is stored in relativistic protons (accelerated or not; electrons carry ~1/2000 of available energy). This guarantees that most of the energy of the swept-up matter is stored in relativistic protons (accelerated or not; electrons carry ~1/2000 of available energy). PROBLEMS: PROBLEMS: Protons do not lose energy to radiation easily. Protons do not lose energy to radiation easily. The observed luminosity peaks at E~1 MeV in the lab frame! (Despite the blast wave LF of order ). The observed luminosity peaks at E~1 MeV in the lab frame! (Despite the blast wave LF of order ).

There are (at least) two outstanding issues with the prompt GRB emission (Piran 2004): There are (at least) two outstanding issues with the prompt GRB emission (Piran 2004): A. Dissipation of the RBW free energy. Energy stored in relativistic p’s or B-field. Sweeping of ambient protons stores significant amount of energy in p’s anyway. Necessary to store energy in non-radiant form, but hard to extract when needed. A. Dissipation of the RBW free energy. Energy stored in relativistic p’s or B-field. Sweeping of ambient protons stores significant amount of energy in p’s anyway. Necessary to store energy in non-radiant form, but hard to extract when needed. B. The presence of E peak ~0.1 – 1.0 MeV. If prompt emission is synchrotron by relativistic electrons of Lorentz factor (LF) same as shock E p ~  , much too strong to account for the observations. B. The presence of E peak ~0.1 – 1.0 MeV. If prompt emission is synchrotron by relativistic electrons of Lorentz factor (LF) same as shock E p ~  , much too strong to account for the observations.

We have proposed a model that can resolve both these issues simultaneously. The model relies: We have proposed a model that can resolve both these issues simultaneously. The model relies: 1. On a radiative instability of a relativistic proton plasma with B-fields due to the internally produced sychrotron radiation ( Kirk & Mastichiadis 1992 ). 1. On a radiative instability of a relativistic proton plasma with B-fields due to the internally produced sychrotron radiation ( Kirk & Mastichiadis 1992 ). 2. On the amplification of the instability by relativistic motion and scattering of the internally produced radiation by upstream located matter, a ‘mirror’ ( Kazanas & Mastichiadis 1999 ). 2. On the amplification of the instability by relativistic motion and scattering of the internally produced radiation by upstream located matter, a ‘mirror’ ( Kazanas & Mastichiadis 1999 ).

p  e + e - eB B   In the blast frame the width of the shock  ~ R/  is comparable to its observed lateral width thereby considering all processes taking place in a spherical volume of radius 

The instability involves 2 thresholds: The instability involves 2 thresholds: (All particles behind the shock are assumed to have Lorentz factors equal to the shock one , i.e. no accelerated particle populations!) 1. A kinematic threshold for the reaction p   e - e + The photon at the proton rest frame must have energy greater than 2 m e c 2. The synchrotron photon has an energy E S ~ b  2 at the plasma frame and ~ b  3 on the proton frame. So the condition reads b  3 > 2 m e c 2 or  b   b  3 > 2 m e c 2 or  b  

2. A dynamic threshold : At least one of the synchrotron photons must be able to produce an e - e + - pair before escaping the plasma volume. Because each electron produces     b    b  photons, we obtain the following condition for the plasma column density (note similarity with atomic bombs!) n  p  R  b  or n  p  R    b    n  p  R  b  or n  p  R    b   

The instability involves 2 thresholds: The instability involves 2 thresholds: 1. A kinematic one for the reaction p   e - e + b  5 > 2 m e c 2 b  5 > 2 m e c 2 (the prompt phase ends when this condition is not satisfied) 2. A dynamic one: At least one of the synchrotron photons must be able to reproduce before escaping the plasma volume. This leads to the following condition for the plasma column density (note similarity with atomic bombs!)

Similarity of GRB/Nuclear Piles-Bombs The similarity of GRB to a “Nuclear Pile” is more than incidental: The similarity of GRB to a “Nuclear Pile” is more than incidental: 1. They both contain lots of free energy stored in: 1. They both contain lots of free energy stored in: Nuclear Binding Energy (nuclear pile) Nuclear Binding Energy (nuclear pile) Relativistic Protons or Magnetic Field (GRB) Relativistic Protons or Magnetic Field (GRB) 2. The energy can be released explosively once certain condition on the fuel column density (and not mass) is fulfilled ( Note: no particle acceleration required!! ). 2. The energy can be released explosively once certain condition on the fuel column density (and not mass) is fulfilled ( Note: no particle acceleration required!! ).

The instability requirements are greatly reduced if the radiation produced at the shock is mirrored by upstream located matter (because the energy of each photon increases by  2 ; DK, A. Mastichiadis 1999) to the following conditions: The instability requirements are greatly reduced if the radiation produced at the shock is mirrored by upstream located matter (because the energy of each photon increases by  2 ; DK, A. Mastichiadis 1999) to the following conditions: b  5 > 2 b  5 > 2 n  p  R    b    n  p  R    b    For n ~ 1, R ~ R 17  ~ 211 (n R 17 ) 1/4, T ~ 40 sec

RBW Mirror b    GeV photons b    MeV photons b    eV O-UV photons R  

No accelerated population is invoked !!

RBW Mirror Min(m e c 2  , b  6+1  GeV photons b    MeV photons ( GBM photons are due to BC) b    eV O-UV photons R   Syn. BC RS BC, SSC THE SPECTRA

RBW Mirror b    GeV photons b    MeV photons b    eV O-UV photons

We have modeled this process numerically. We assume the presence of scattering medium at R ~10 16 cm and of finite radial extent. We have modeled this process numerically. We assume the presence of scattering medium at R ~10 16 cm and of finite radial extent. We follow the evolution of the proton, electron and photon distribution by solving the corresponding kinetic equations. We follow the evolution of the proton, electron and photon distribution by solving the corresponding kinetic equations. We obtain the spectra as a function of time for the prompt GRB emission. We obtain the spectra as a function of time for the prompt GRB emission. The time scales are given in units of the comoving blob crossing time  co /c ~ R   c ~ 2 R 16  2.6 sec  The time scales are given in units of the comoving blob crossing time  co /c ~ R   c ~ 2 R 16  2.6 sec 

The kinetic equations are solved on the RBW rest frame with pair production, synchrotron, IC losses, escape in a spherical geometry of radius R/  and proton density n = n 0  The protons are assumed to be injected at energy E p = m p c 2  These are the following:

Prompt GRB Spectra (Mastichiadis & Kazanas 2006) S : b  3 BC: b  5 SSC : m e  2

The “scattering screen” We consider scattering of the Synchrotron (O-UV) photons by the ambient medium at atomic cross sections (  cm 2 ) at R ~ cm to give us photon mfp ~ R. For L  ~10 51 erg/s, L S ~ erg/s, or F ~ 10 ( ) ~10 24 ph/cm 2 /s or r ~ F  10 7 excitations/s to be compared to the spontaneous rate of 10 8 /s. For higher luminosities (fluxes) the corresponding radii will be larger. The Lya photons may contribute to the reduction of the width of the E peak distribution.

We have also modeled the propagation of a relativistic blast wave through the wind of a WR star (that presumably collapses to produce the relativistic outflow that produces the GRB). We have also modeled the propagation of a relativistic blast wave through the wind of a WR star (that presumably collapses to produce the relativistic outflow that produces the GRB). In this case we also follow the development of the blast wave LF and the radiative feedback on it. In this case we also follow the development of the blast wave LF and the radiative feedback on it. In this scenario the “scattering screen” necessary for the model to work is provided by the pre- supernova star wind, the length scales smaller, R 0 ~10 13 cm and the GRB is a “short GRB”. In this scenario the “scattering screen” necessary for the model to work is provided by the pre- supernova star wind, the length scales smaller, R 0 ~10 13 cm and the GRB is a “short GRB”.

Evolution of the LF and the luminosity

Evolution of Spectra with Time (  B ~1)

Evolution of Luminosity with Time (  B ~1)

Evolution of Luminosity with Time (  B ~0.01) Ep decreases with decreasing Luminosity. The BC component Decreases faster Than the SSC leaving The LAT flux after The GBM one is Gone.

Aftreglow, GRB, XRF, Unification Inclusion of non-thermal particle populations and repeating the same arguments as above one obtains the evolution of Epeak with G or with time. A simple calculation gives (DK, AM, MG 2007) Inclusion of non-thermal particle populations and repeating the same arguments as above one obtains the evolution of Epeak with G or with time. A simple calculation gives (DK, AM, MG 2007) Ep ~ [  (t)/50] 2 ~ t -3/4 Ep ~ [  (t)/50] 2 ~ t -3/4 (talk/poster by R. Margutti on Monday)

Conclusions The “nuclear pile” GRB model provides an over all satisfactory description of several GRB features, including the dissipation process, Ep and the Fermi observations. The “nuclear pile” GRB model provides an over all satisfactory description of several GRB features, including the dissipation process, Ep and the Fermi observations. Provides an operational definition of the GRB prompt phase. Provides an operational definition of the GRB prompt phase. No particle acceleration necessary to account for most of prompt observations (but it is not forbidden!). No particle acceleration necessary to account for most of prompt observations (but it is not forbidden!). GBM photons due to bulk Comptonization ( => possibility of high polarization ~100%). GBM photons due to bulk Comptonization ( => possibility of high polarization ~100%). It can produce “short GRB” even in situations that do not involve neutron star mergers. It can produce “short GRB” even in situations that do not involve neutron star mergers. Exploration of the parameter space and attempt to systematize GRB phenomenology within this model is currently at work. Exploration of the parameter space and attempt to systematize GRB phenomenology within this model is currently at work.

Distribution of LE indices 

The spectra of doubly scattered component (Mastichiadis & DK (2005)) S=1/2,  S=1,  S=2, 

 G  G  G  G

E iso of the three different spectral components as a function of B for  =400 and n p =10 5 cm -3. x 10 3 denotes the relative  -ray – O-UV normalization of GRB , a. O-UV 100 GeV 1 MeV X 10 3

E peak as a function of the magnetic field B

Variations If the “mirror” is in relative motion to the RBW then the kinematic threshold is modified to b     rel ~ 2;  rel is the relative LF between the RBW and the “mirror”. If the “mirror” is in relative motion to the RBW then the kinematic threshold is modified to b     rel ~ 2;  rel is the relative LF between the RBW and the “mirror”. The value of E peak is again ~ 1 MeV, however the synchrotron and IC peaks are higher and lower by   rel than     The value of E peak is again ~ 1 MeV, however the synchrotron and IC peaks are higher and lower by   rel than     In the presence of accelerated particles the threshold condition is satisfied even for  (2/b) 1/5. This may explain the time evolution of GRB (Gonzalez et al. 04) In the presence of accelerated particles the threshold condition is satisfied even for  (2/b) 1/5. This may explain the time evolution of GRB (Gonzalez et al. 04) GRB flux is likely to be highly polarized (GRB , Coburn & Boggs 03). GRB flux is likely to be highly polarized (GRB , Coburn & Boggs 03). This model applicable to internal shock model (photons from downstream shell instead of “mirror”). This model applicable to internal shock model (photons from downstream shell instead of “mirror”).

Then....

Shock – Mirror Geometry

formation region, generally not much different than the