Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 2 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The rate of aftershock density decay with distance Karen Felzer 1 and Emily Brodsky 2 1. U.S. Geological Survey 2. University of California, Los Angeles.
Advertisements

Earthquake Dynamic Triggering and Ground Motion Scaling J. Gomberg, K. Felzer, E. Brodsky.
Statistical Physics Approach to Understanding the Multiscale Dynamics of Earthquake Fault Systems Theory.
Chambery, 17 octobre, 2008 Seismic monitoring of volcano processes Paola Traversa, Jean-Robert Grasso.
Repeating Earthquakes Olivier Lengliné - IPGS Strasbourg Cargese school.
1 – Stress contributions 2 – Probabilistic approach 3 – Deformation transients Small earthquakes contribute as much as large earthquakes do to stress changes.
Induced Seismicity Houston Bar Association Environmental Law Section Houston, Texas January 21, 2015 Mark K. Boling Executive Vice President and President,
Earthquake swarms Ge 277, 2012 Thomas Ader. Outline Presentation of swarms Analysis of the 2000 swarm in Vogtland/NW Bohemia: Indications for a successively.
Lecture 7. Few points about earthquakes Some basic facts and questions Great Chilean earthquake /Valdivia earthquake / of 1960 (Mw=9.5) and recent Tahoku.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
Friction Why friction? Because slip on faults is resisted by frictional forces. In the coming weeks we shall discuss the implications of the friction law.
Tidal triggering of earthquakes: Response to fault compliance? Elizabeth S. Cochran IGPP, Scripps.
Report on “Evidence for tidal triggering of earthquakes as revealed from statistical analysis of global data” by S. Tanaka and M. Ohtake and H. Sato Carl.
Numerical simulation of seismic cycles at a subduction zone with a laboratory-derived friction law Naoyuki Kato (1), Kazuro Hirahara (2), and Mikio Iizuka.
Contents: WWhat is an Earthquake? SSeismic waves SShallow-focus and deep-focus earthquakes AAftershocks EEarthquake storms SSize and frequency.
Stress, Strain, Elasticity and Faulting Lecture 11/23/2009 GE694 Earth Systems Seminar.
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
Earthquake interaction The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
The seismic cycle The elastic rebound theory.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Full.
Epidemic Type Earthquake Sequence (ETES) model  Seismicity rate = "background" + "aftershocks":  Magnitude distribution: uniform G.R. law with b=1 (Fig.
Remote Seismicity following Landers Earthquake Steve Kidder.
Omori law Students present their assignments The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
COMPLEXITY OF EARTHQUAKES: LEARNING FROM SIMPLE MECHANICAL MODELS Elbanna, Ahmed and Thomas Heaton Civil Engineering.
Stress III The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
Aftershocks tend to fall preferentially in area of static Coulomb stress increase but there are also earthquakes in area of decrease Coulomb stress Aftershocks.
Friction Why friction? Because slip on faults is resisted by frictional forces. We first describe the results of laboratory friction experiments, and then.
Omori law The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
 ss=  * +(a-b) ln(V/V * ) a-b > 0 stable sliding a-b < 0 slip is potentially unstable Correspond to T~300 °C For Quartzo- Feldspathic rocks Stationary.
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
Earthquake nucleation How do they begin? Are large and small ones begin similarly? Are the initial phases geodetically or seismically detectable? Related.
If we build an ETAS model based primarily on information from smaller earthquakes, will it work for forecasting the larger (M≥6.5) potentially damaging.
Chapter 11: Earthquakes. Introduction Earthquake: Vibration of the Earth produced by rapid release of energy Most often caused by slippage along a fault.
The use of earthquake rate changes as a stress meter at Kilauea volcano Nature, V. 408, 2000 By J. Dietrich, V. Cayol, and P. Okubo Presented by Celia.
The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 1 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside.
Agnès Helmstetter 1 and Bruce Shaw 2 1,2 LDEO, Columbia University 1 now at LGIT, Univ Grenoble, France Relation between stress heterogeneity and aftershock.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
Toward urgent forecasting of aftershock hazard: Simultaneous estimation of b-value of the Gutenberg-Richter ’ s law of the magnitude frequency and changing.
A functional form for the spatial distribution of aftershocks Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Southern California Earthquake Center Triggering Models vs. Smoothed Seismicity PG = 1.35/eqk PG = 10/eqk Information gain per earthquake Reference forecast.
A (re-) New (ed) Spin on Renewal Models Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.
Scientific Drilling Into the San Andreas Fault zone San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD)
Constraints on Seismogenesis of Small Earthquakes from the Natural Earthquake Laboratory in South African Mines (NELSAM) Margaret S. Boettcher (USGS Mendenhall.
Inherent Mechanism Determining Scaling Properties of Fault Constitutive Laws Mitsuhiro Matsu’ura Department of Earth and Planetary Science Graduate School.
Schuyler Ozbick. wake-up-call /
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence Jim Dieterich, UC Riverside.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
What can we learn about dynamic triggering in the the lab? Lockner and Beeler, 1999.
Near-Source Observations of Earthquakes:
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 25 Feb 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Seismic Source Modeling For an earthquake, the f(t) in the source.
Does the Scaling of Strain Energy Release with Event Size Control the Temporal Evolution of Seismicity? Steven C. Jaumé Department of Geology And Environmental.
A Post-Loma Prieta Progress Report on Earthquake Triggering by a Continuum of Deformations Presented By Joan Gomberg.
-Liu and Rice (2005), Aseismic slip transients emerge spontaneously in three-dimensional rate and state modeling of subduction earthquake sequences, JGR.
The Snowball Effect: Statistical Evidence that Big Earthquakes are Rapid Cascades of Small Aftershocks Karen Felzer U.S. Geological Survey.
A proposed triggering/clustering model for the current WGCEP Karen Felzer USGS, Pasadena Seismogram from Peng et al., in press.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , SHORT-TERM PROPERTIES.
Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward.
Earthquakes 1 Presented by: Anjela Lu B. Arellano
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
Some issues/limitations with current UCERF approach
Friction: The rate-and-state constitutive law
學生:林承恩(Cheng-en Lin) 指導老師:陳卉瑄(Kate Huihsuan Chen)
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
R. Console, M. Murru, F. Catalli
by Naoki Uchida, Takeshi Iinuma, Robert M
Nature, magnitude and frequency of seismic activity (earthquakes)
Presentation transcript:

Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 2 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside

Log  Coefficient of friction  Constant V (high) Constant V (low)  ss B B-A x V1V1

Log  Coefficient of friction  Constant V (high) Constant V (low)  ss B B-A x During slip  evolves toward  ss V1V1

Log  Coefficient of friction  Constant V (high) Constant V (low)  ss B B-A x During slip  evolves toward  ss V1V1

Log  Coefficient of friction  Constant V (high) Constant V (low)  ss B B-A x During slip  evolves toward  ss V1V1

yr 10 yr 20 yr Time to instability (seconds) Log (slip speed)  m/s Effect of stress change on nucleation time

min 1 yr 10 yr 20 yr ~1hr ~5hr Time to instability (seconds) Log (slip speed)  m/s Effect of stress change on nucleation time  = 11.6

Earthquake rate formulation: Model Earthquake occurrence is represented as a sequence of earthquake nucleation events. Dependence of nucleation times on stressing history is given by nucleation solutions derived for rate- and state-dependent fault strength. Model assumes 1) The population of nucleation sources is spontaneously renewed as stress increases 2) Reference steady-state seismicity rate r at the constant stressing rate.

Use the solution for time to nucleation an earthquake (1), where and assume steady-state seismicity rate r at the stressing rate This defines the distribution of initial conditions (slip speeds) for the nucleation sources (2) The distribution of slip speeds (2) can be updated at successive time steps for any stressing history, using solutions for change of slip speed as a function of time and stress., n is the sequence number of the earthquake source Model for earthquake occurrence Log (time to instability) Log (slip speed)

For example changes of with time are given by the nucleation solutions and change of with stress are given directly from the rate- and state- formulation In all cases, the final distribution has the form of the original distribution where Evolution of distribution of slip speeds

Earthquake rate is found by taking the derivative dn/dt = R For any stressing history Evolution of distribution of slip speeds

Coulomb stress formulation for earthquake rates Earthquake rate, Coulomb stress Assume small stress changes (treat as constants), Note:. Hence, Earthquake rate, Dieterich, Cayol, Okubo, Nature, (2000), Dieterich and others, US Geological Survey Professional Paper (2003)

Some useful solutions Earthquake rate Evolution with time Stress step

Example S t (steady state)

Example - Secondary aftershocks t S t =0

Earthquake rates following a stress step Earthquake rate (R/r ) Time (t / t a )

Earthquake rates following a stress step

Aftershocks by time and distance Time at which x is at edge of aftershock zone

Factors affecting rate of aftershock decay (p) In this model, intrinsic value p=1 The following factors result in p≠1 Spatial heterogeneity of stress change (  S/A  ) p < 1 Stress relaxation by log(t) after the stress step if u>0.2  p > 1 Secondary aftershocks p > 1 (short-term effect)

Time (t/t a ) Earthquake rate (R/r 0 ) Slope p=0.8 Net aftershock rate for region surrounding a circular shear rupture

Over short time intervals (  t <<t a ) Triggering by seismic waves

Stress (S/A  ) Cumulative Number Time (seconds) Triggering by seismic waves r = 5.0x10 -5 /s

Triggering by seismic waves Peak stress  S/A 

Triggering by seismic waves Peak amplitude (  S) to trigger EQ (A  ) Time to EQ with no triggering (sec) 10 year

Triggering by seismic waves Peak amplitude (  S) to trigger EQ (A  ) Time to EQ with no triggering (sec) 10 year Threshold stress model x

Change of earthquakes rates, tidal stresses Over short time intervals (  t <<t a ) For small stress changes (  S << A  ) this becomes

Minimum number of events to see tidal influence  S = S S 0-25  S~ bar A  = 1 bar:  R/r = A  = 2 bar:  R/r =

Method to obtain stress time series from earthquake rates STEPS 1) Select region and magnitude threshold 2) Obtain time series for  : 4) Solve evolution equation for Coulomb stress S. For example:

Synthetic Data

STEPS 1) From earthquake rates obtain time series for  at regular grid points: 2) Solve evolution equation for Coulomb stress S as a function of time at each grid point 3) Prepare maps (or cross sections) of stress changes over specified time intervals Dieterich, Cayol, and Okubo, Nature (2000) Dieterich and others, USGS Prof Paper(2004) Maps of stress changes from earthquake rates

1/3/83

Synthetic Data

Model A Foreshocks Advance the time of Mainshock Mainshocks following foreshocks and aftershocks have similar origins. The stress change of a prior earthquake results in increased nucleation rates at all magnitudes. Extrapolation of aftershock rates to larger magnitudes gives rate of foreshocks  S is a function of distance from the prior earthquake. Net earthquake rate following a stress step is obtained by integrating over the region affected by the stress change. Foreshock models

Foreshocks in Southern California

Foreshock models Model B Mainshock Nucleation Causes Foreshocks Premonitory creep of a large nucleation zone causes rapid stressing on nearby smaller nucleation sources

Foreshock model B Nucleation on fractal fault 2 hours before instability

Foreshocks in Southern California