Model Constraints from Multiwavelength Variability of Blazars

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extragalactic jets: a new perspective
Advertisements

Almost every galaxy hosts a BH 99% are silent 1% are active 0.1% have jets Extragalactic jets: a new perspective G. Ghisellini in coll. with F. Tavecchio.
Connection between the parsec-scale radio jet and γ-ray flare in the blazar Venkatessh Ramakrishnan Aalto University Metsähovi Radio Observatory,
Klein-Nishina effect on high-energy gamma-ray emission of GRBs Xiang-Yu Wang ( 王祥玉) Nanjing University, China (南京大學) Co-authors: Hao-Ning He (NJU), Zhuo.
The Optical Microvariability of the BL Lacertae Object S and Its Multi-waveband Correlations Poon Helen Beijing Normal University.
Determining the location of the GeV emitting zone in fast, bright blazars Amanda Dotson, UMBC Markos Georganopoulos (advisor), UMBC/GSFC Eileen Meyer,
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
Multiwavelength Polarization as a Diagnostic of Jet Physics Markus Böttcher North-West University Potchefstroom, South Africa Most of this work done by:
Naoki Isobe, Yoshihiro Ueda (Kyoto University) Kousuke Sugimori, Nobuyuki Kawai (Tokyo Tech.) Hitishi Negoro (Nihon Univ.) Mutsumi Sugizaki, Masaru Matsuoka.
Markus B ӧ ttcher Ohio University Athens, OH VHE Gamma-Ray Induced Pair Cascades in Blazars and Radio Galaxies.
Modeling Variability of Blazar Jets with a Turbulent Magnetic Field Alan Marscher Institute for Astrophysical Research, Boston University Research Web.
Multi-Wavelength Time Variability of Active Galactic Nuclei Ritaban Chatterjee Advisor: Prof. Alan P. Marscher Collaborators: Svetlana Jorstad (B.U.),
Active Galaxies PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 22.
Astrophysical Jets Robert Laing (ESO). Galactic black-hole binary system Gamma-ray burst Young stellar object Jets are everywhere.
Models for non-HBL VHE Gamma-Ray Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA “TeV Particle Astrophysics” SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, July 13 – 17,
Outflow Residual Collisions and Optical Flashes Zhuo Li (黎卓) Weizmann Inst, Israel moving to Peking Univ, Beijing Li & Waxman 2008, ApJL.
Numerical Modeling of Electromagnetic Radiation from AGN Jets Based on  -ray emission and spectral evolution of pair plasmas in AGN jets Bottcher et al.
Mid-Atlantic Radio-Loud AGN Meeting, 27 September 2013 , STScI
Theory of TeV AGNs (Buckley, Science, 1998) Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University.
Multi-wavelength AGN spectra and modeling Paolo Giommi ASI.
Gamma-ray Astronomy of XXI Century 100 MeV – 10 TeV.
COLOR STUDY OF BLAZARS Robert Filgas Supervisor: RNDr. René Hudec, CSc., AÚ AV ČR.
Statistical analysis of model-fitted inner-jets of the MOJAVE blazars Xiang Liu, Ligong Mi, et al. Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory (Former Urumqi Observatory),
Multiwaveband Opportunities to Study AGN (Mostly Blazars) Detected by Fermi Alan Marscher Boston University, Incoming Chair of Fermi Users Group Research.
Markos Georganopoulos 1,2 David Rivas 1,3 1 University of Maryland, Baltimore County 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 3 Johns Hopkins University SUPER-EDDINGTON.
Long-term monitor on Mrk 421 using ARGO-YBJ experiment S.Z Chen (IHEP/CAS/China, On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration  1. Introduction.
High energy emission from jets – what can we learn? Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University Levinson 2006 (IJMPA, review)
Studying emission mechanisms of AGN Dr. Karsten Berger Fermi School, June ©NASA.
Blazars and Neutrinos C. Dermer (Naval Research Laboratory) Collaborators: A. M. Atoyan (Universite de Montreal) M. Böttcher (Rice University) R. Schlickeiser.
Leptonic and Hadronic Modeling of Gamma-Ray Blazars Markus Böttcher and Anita Reimer North-West University Universit ӓ t Innsbruck Potchefstroom, Innsbruck.
Time dependent modeling of AGN emission from inhomogeneous jets with Particle diffusion and localized acceleration Extreme-Astrophysics in an Ever-Changing.
Leptonic and Hadronic Models for the Spectral Energy Distributions and High- Energy Polarization of Blazars Markus Böttcher North-West University Potchefstroom.
Minimum e Lorentz factor and matter content of jet in blazars Qingwen Wu Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China S.-J. Kang & L. Chen Collaborators:
Lunch discussion on motivations for studying blazar variability Greg Madejski, SLAC Parts of this presentation use slides by Benoit Lott and Jun Kataoka.
1 Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland (Stern, Poutanen, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1217; Stern, Poutanen, 2007, MNRAS, submitted, astro- ph/ ) A new.
Multiwavelength observations of the gamma-ray blazars detected by AGILE Filippo D’Ammando INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica Roma.
Determining the location of the GeV emitting zone in fast, bright blazars Amanda Dotson, UMBC Markos Georganopoulous, UMBC/GSFC Eileen Meyer, STScI MARLAM.
Broadband Properties of Blazars
Probing the Inner Jet of the Quasar PKS 1510  089 with Multi-waveband Monitoring Alan Marscher Boston University Research Web Page:
We fit the high-state data to a model with three free parameters: the normalizations of the three radiation components. The figure below shows the fit.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Gamma-rays, neutrinos and cosmic rays from microquasars Gustavo E. Romero (IAR – CONICET & La Plata University, Argentina)
The Quasar : A Laboratory for Particle Acceleration Svetlana Jorstad IAR, Boston U Alan Marscher IAR, Boston U Jonathan Gelbord U. Durham Herman.
Modeling the Emission Processes in Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University Athens, OH.
Gamma-ray Bursts and Particle Acceleration Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Institute of Technology) S.Inoue ( NAOJ ), P.Meszaros ( PSU )
High-energy radiation from gamma-ray bursts Zigao Dai Nanjing University Xiamen, August 2011.
ICRR 17/9/2001 Gamma-ray emission from AGN Qinghuan Luo School of Physics, University of Sydney.
Blazars: the gamma-ray view of AGILE on behalf of the AGILE WG-AGN Filippo D’Ammando Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica.
AGN: Linear and Circular Polarization
Gamma-Ray Burst Working Group Co-conveners: Abe Falcone, Penn State, David A. Williams, UCSC,
Jets at different scales and the connection with accretion L. Maraschi and F.Tavecchio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera.
Multi - emission from large-scale jets Fabrizio Tavecchio INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in Authors: Manasvita Joshi and Markus Böttcher (Ohio University) Abstract: An extensive multi-wavelength.
The non-thermal broadband spectral energy distribution of radio galaxies Gustavo E. Romero Instituto Argentino de Radio Astronomía (IAR-CCT La Plata CONICET)
Constraining the Location of Gamma-ray Emission in Blazar Jets Manasvita Joshi, Boston University Collaborators: Alan Marscher & Svetlana Jorstad (Boston.
Rapid high-energy emission variability in relativistic pair plasma reconnection Benoît Cerutti University of Colorado, USA. 5 th International Symposium.
5 vii 2012Frascati1 The Crab Impact Roger Blandford Yajie Yuan KIPAC Stanford.
Implications of VHE Emission in Gamma-Ray AGN Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University.
Markus Böttcher North-West University Potchefstroom South Africa
Fermi Several Constraints by Fermi Zhuo Li ( 黎卓 ) Department of Astronomy, Peking University Kavli Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 August, Xiamen.
r = Ag / Aopt > 2 or more, so Compton dominance varies.
Swift Monitoring of Fermi Blazars and Other Sources
Gamma Rays from the Radio Galaxy M87
Broadband Properties of Blazars
A diagnostic for the location of the energy dissipation in blazars.
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)
X-Ray Binaries as Gamma-Ray Sources
Gamma-ray emission along the radio jet:
Modeling polarization from relativistic outflows
Presentation transcript:

Model Constraints from Multiwavelength Variability of Blazars Markus Böttcher North-West University Potchefstroom South Africa

Blazars Class of AGN consisting of BL Lac objects and gamma-ray bright quasars Rapidly (often intra-day) variable

Blazar Variability: Example: The Quasar 3C279 X-rays Optical Radio (Bӧttcher et al. 2007)

Blazar Variability: Variability of PKS 2155-304 VHE g-rays VHE g-rays Optical X-rays (Aharonian et al. 2007) VHE g-ray variability on time scales as short as a few minutes! (Costamante et al. 2008) VHE g-ray and X-ray variability often closely correlated → See D. Dorner's and S. Ciprini's, and V. Karamanavis' Talks

Polarization Angle Swings Optical + g-ray variability of LSP blazars often correlated Sometimes O/g flares correlated with increase in optical polarization and multiple rotations of the polarization angle (PA) g-rays (Fermi) Optical PKS 1510-089 (Marscher et al. 2010)

Blazars Class of AGN consisting of BL Lac objects and gamma-ray bright quasars Rapidly (often intra-day) variable Strong gamma-ray sources

Blazar Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs) 3C66A Collmar et al. (2010) Non-thermal spectra with two broad bumps: Low-energy (probably synchrotron): radio-IR-optical(-UV-X-rays) High-energy (X-ray – g-rays)

Blazars Class of AGN consisting of BL Lac objects and gamma-ray bright quasars Rapidly (often intra-day) variable Strong gamma-ray sources Radio and optical polarization Radio jets, often with superluminal motion

Superluminal Motion (The MOJAVE Collaboration)

Leptonic Blazar Model g-q → P. Mimica's Talk g1 g2 g-q or g-2 g-(q+1) Synchrotron emission Injection, acceleration of ultrarelativistic electrons Relativistic jet outflow with G ≈ 10 nFn g-q Qe (g,t) n → P. Mimica's Talk g1 g2 g Compton emission Radiative cooling ↔ escape => nFn g-q or g-2 n Qe (g,t) g-(q+1) Seed photons: Synchrotron (within same region [SSC] or slower/faster earlier/later emission regions [decel. jet]), Accr. Disk, BLR, dust torus (EC) g1 gb g2 g gb: tcool(gb) = tesc gb g1 g2

Sources of External Photons (↔ Location of the Blazar Zone) Direct accretion disk emission (Dermer et al. 1992, Dermer & Schlickeiser 1994) → d < few 100 – 1000 Rs Optical-UV Emission from the BLR (Sikora et al. 1994) → d < ~ pc Infrared Radiation from the Obscuring Torus (Blazejowski et al. 2000) → d ~ 1 – 10s of pc Synchrotron emission from slower/faster regions of the jet (Georganopoulos & Kazanas 2003) → d ~ pc - kpc Spine – Sheath Interaction (Ghisellini & Tavecchio 2008) → d ~ pc - kpc → M. Georganopoulos' talk

Hadronic Blazar Models Injection, acceleration of ultrarelativistic electrons and protons Proton-induced radiation mechanisms: Relativistic jet outflow with G ≈ 10 nFn n g-q Qe,p (g,t) Proton synchrotron g1 g2 g pg → pp0 p0 → 2g Synchrotron emission of primary e- pg → np+ ; p+ → m+nm m+ → e+nenm nFn → secondary m-, e-synchrotron (Mannheim & Biermann 1992; Aharonian 2000; Mücke et al. 2000; Mücke et al. 2003) Cascades … n

Leptonic and Hadronic Model Fits along the Blazar Sequence Red = Leptonic Green = Hadronic Accretion Disk Accretion Disk External Compton of direct accretion disk photons (ECD) Synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) External Compton of emission from BLR clouds (ECC) Electron synchrotron Synchrotron Proton synchrotron (Bӧttcher, Reimer et al. 2013)

Leptonic and Hadronic Model Fits Along the Blazar Sequence 3C66A (IBL) Red = leptonic Green = lepto-hadronic

Lepto-Hadronic Model Fits Along the Blazar Sequence (HBL) Red = leptonic Green = lepto-hadronic In many cases, leptonic and hadronic models can produce equally good fits to the SEDs. Possible Diagnostics to distinguish: Neutrinos Variability X-ray/g-ray Polarization

Distinguishing Diagnostic: Variability Time-dependent leptonic one-zone models produce correlated synchrotron + gamma-ray variability (Mastichiadis & Kirk 1997, Li & Kusunose 2000, Bӧttcher & Chiang 2002, Moderski et al. 2003, Diltz & Böttcher 2014) → See also M. Zacharias' Talk → Time Lags → Energy-Dependent Cooling Times → Magnetic-Field Estimate! Time-dependent leptonic one-zone model for Mrk 421

Correlated Multiwavelength Variability in Leptonic One-Zone Models Example: Variability from short-term increase in 2nd-order-Fermi acceleration efficiency X-rays anti-correlated with radio, optical, g-rays; delayed by ~ few hours. (Diltz & Böttcher, 2014, JHEAp)

Distinguishing Diagnostic: Variability Time-dependent hadronic models can produce uncorrelated variability / orphan flares (Dimitrakoudis et al. 2012, Mastichiadis et al. 2013, Weidinger & Spanier 2013) (M. Weidinger)

Inhomogeneous Jet Models Internal Shocks (see next slides) Radially stratified jets (spine-sheath model, Ghisellini et al. 2005, Ghisellini & Tavecchio 2008) Decelerating Jet Model (Georganopoulos & Kazanas 2003) Mini-jets-in-jet (magnetic reconnection → D. Giannios' Talk)

The Internal Shock Model Central engine ejects two plasmoids (a,b) into the jet with different, relativistic speeds (Lorentz factors Gb >> Ga) Gb Ga Gr Gf Shock acceleration → Injection of particles with Q(g) = Q0 g-q for g1 < g < g2 Time-dependent, inhomogeneous radiation transfer Synchrotron SSC (→ Light travel time effects!) External Compton (Chen et al. 2012) Sokolov et al. (2004), Mimica et al. (2004), Sokolov & Marscher (2005), Graff et al. (2008), Bӧttcher & Dermer (2010), Joshi & Bӧttcher (2011), Chen et al. (2011, 2012) → X. Chen's Talk

Parameters / SED characteristics typical of FSRQs or LBLs Internal Shock Model Parameters / SED characteristics typical of FSRQs or LBLs (Bӧttcher & Dermer 2010)

Internal Shock Model Discrete Correlation Functions X-rays lag behind HE g-rays by ~ 1.5 hr Optical leads HE g-rays by ~ 1 hr Optical leads X-rays by ~ 2 hr (Bӧttcher & Dermer 2010)

Varying the External Radiation Energy Density Parameter Study Varying the External Radiation Energy Density DCFs / Time Lags Reversal of time lags! (Bӧttcher & Dermer 2010)

Polarization Angle Swings Optical + g-ray variability of LSP blazars often correlated Sometimes O/g flares correlated with increase in optical polarization and multiple rotations of the polarization angle (PA) PKS 1510-089 (Marscher et al. 2010)

Polarization Swings 3C279 (Abdo et al. 2009)

Previously Proposed Interpretations: Helical magnetic fields in a bent jet Helical streamlines, guided by a helical magnetic field Turbulent Extreme Multi-Zone Model (Marscher 2014) Mach disk Looking at the jet from the side

Tracing Synchrotron Polarization in the Internal Shock Model Viewing direction in comoving frame: qobs ~ p/2 B Viewing direction in obs. Frame: qobs ~ 1/G

Light Travel Time Effects B B Shock propagation B (Zhang et al. 2014) Shock positions at equal photon-arrival times at the observer

Flaring Scenario: Magnetic-Field Compression perpendicular to shock normal Baseline parameters based on SED and light curve fit to PKS 1510-089 (Chen et al. 2012)

Flaring Scenario: Magnetic-Field Compression perpendicular to shock normal Synchrotron + Accretion Disk SEDs Degree of Polarization P vs. time Frequency-dependent Degree of Polarization P Polarization angle vs. time PKS 1510-089 (Zhang et al. 2014)

Flaring Scenario: Magnetic-Field Compression perpendicular to shock normal Synchrotron + Accretion Disk SEDs Degree of Polarization P vs. time Frequency-dependent Degree of Polarization P Polarization angle vs. time Mrk 421 (Zhang et al. 2014)

Summary Both leptonic and hadronic models can generally fit blazar SEDs well. Distinguishing diagnostics: Variability, Polarization, Neutrinos? Time-dependent hadronic models are able to predict uncorrelated synchrotron vs. gamma-ray variability Synchrotron polarization swings (correlated with g-ray flares) do not require non-axisymmetric jet features!

Superluminal Motion Apparent motion at up to ~ 40 times the speed of light!

Requirements for lepto-hadronic models To exceed p-g pion production threshold on interactions with synchrotron (optical) photons: Ep > 7x1016 E-1ph,eV eV For proton synchrotron emission at multi-GeV energies: Ep up to ~ 1019 eV (=> UHECR) Require Larmor radius rL ~ 3x1016 E19/BG cm ≤ a few x 1015 cm => B ≥ 10 G (Also: to suppress leptonic SSC component below synchrotron) => Synchrotron cooling time: tsy (p) ~ several days => Difficult to explain intra-day (sub-hour) variability! → Geometrical effects?

Spectral modeling results along the Blazar Sequence: Leptonic Models High-frequency peaked BL Lac (HBL): Low magnetic fields (~ 0.1 G); High electron energies (up to TeV); Large bulk Lorentz factors (G > 10) The “classical” picture Synchrotron No dense circum-nuclear material → No strong external photon field SSC (Acciari et al. 2010)

Spectral modeling results along the Blazar Sequence: Leptonic Models High magnetic fields (~ a few G); Lower electron energies (up to GeV); Lower bulk Lorentz factors (G ~ 10) FSRQ External Compton Plenty of circum-nuclear material → Strong external photon field Synchrotron

Intermediate BL Lac Objects 3C66A October 2008 (Abdo et al. 2011) (Acciari et al. 2009) Spectral modeling with pure SSC would require extreme parameters (far sub-equipartition B-field) Including External-Compton on an IR radiation field allows for more natural parameters and near-equipartition B-fields → g-ray production on > pc scales?

Leptonic and Hadronic Model Fits along the Blazar Sequence Hadronic models can more easily produce VHE emission through cascade synchrotron Red = Leptonic Green = Hadronic Synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) Proton synchrotron + Cascade synchrotron Proton synchrotron External Compton of emission from BLR clouds (ECC) Electron synchrotron Synchrotron Electron SSC (Bӧttcher, Reimer et al. 2013)

Diagnosing the Location of the Blazar Zone Energy dependence of cooling times: Distinguish between EC on IR (torus → Thomson) and optical/UV lines (BLR → Klein-Nishina) If EC(BLR) dominates: Blazar zone should be inside BLR → gg absorption on BLR photons → GeV spectral breaks (Poutanen & Stern 2010) → No VHE g-rays expected! →VHE g-rays from FSRQs must be from outside the BLR (e.g., Barnacka et al. 2013) (Dotson et al. 2012)

Time-dependent SED and light curve fits to PKS 1510-089 Internal Shock Model Time-dependent SED and light curve fits to PKS 1510-089 (SSC + EC[BLR]) (Chen et al. 2012) → X. Chen's Talk