Boosting Deuteron Polarization in HD Targets: Experience of moving spins between H and D with RF methods during the E06-101 experiment at Jefferson Lab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polarized 3 He Target for A1n-A J. P. Chen, June 11, 2013, Hall A Meeting Overview Design Progress Progress in target lab Progress from users.
Advertisements

Speakers Read Yamaha manual pgs Read Yamaha manual pgs The cone, usually made of paper, plastic or metal, is attached on the wide end.
AGS pp Status Feb. 6, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.
10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.
R. D. Foster, C. R. Gould, D. G. Haase, J. H. Kelley, D. M. Markoff, (North Carolina State University and TUNL), W. Tornow (Duke University and TUNL) Supported.
Danielle Boddy Durham University – Atomic & Molecular Physics group Red MOT is on its way to save the day!
Noise near peak field is increased Peak width narrow Peak is symmetric Purpose: Resonate nuclei to prevent polarization. Matching the resonant frequencies.
Bureaucracy Did everybody get the detailed comments on their first lab report from ELMS? Lab 1 resubmit due 26 Nov Bring paper copy of lab report for today’s.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
Lab #2: Magnetic Fields due to Currents
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance spectrometer
SPIN 2004 Oct. 14, 2004 W. Kim, S.S. Stepanyan, S. Woo, M. Rasulbaev, S. Jin (Kyungpook National University) S. Korea Polarization Measurements of the.
Lecture II Non dissipative traps Evaporative cooling Bose-Einstein condensation.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft DSMC simulations of polarized atomic beam sources including magnetic fields September 13, 2013 | Martin Gaisser, Alexander.
Electricity, Electronics And Ham Radio “Kopertroniks” By Nick Guydosh 4/12/07.
Nov. 17, 2005Fermi Lab AP Seminar AC Dipole Based Diagnostics Mei Bai, C-A Department.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
NMR Background Curve Fitting Caitlyn Meditz, on behalf of the Nuclear and Particle Physics Group. Advisor K. Slifer, E. Long Overview Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.
Polarization Facilities at COSY September 11, 2007 D.Eversheim, PSTP How Everything Began The CBS for COSY Overcoming Depolarizing Resonances The.
Feasibility Check / How to test EquipmentsStatusCostDateCommentsContact Polarized 3 He atomsCell for transfer design / LKB, Paris/MainzSspm.e. optical.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
September, 2003BME 1450 Introduction to NMR 1 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a phenomenon discovered about 60 years ago.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Hall B Cryogenics CLAS and CLAS12 David Kashy Hall B Lead Engineer May 26, 2010.
Advisors:Rurng-Sheng Guo Wen-Chen Chang Graduate: Su-Yin Wang 2009/06/19, NKNU.
HD target.
HD target. HD target overview Characteristics of polarized HD target Polarization Method HD target is polarized by the static method using “brute force”
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
Normalization of the NPDGamma Experimental Data F. Simmons, C. Crawford University of Kentucky, for the NPDGamma collaboration Background: NPDγ Experiment.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Some notes about liquid Hydrogen target 1.How it operates 2.Modification Target length, empty mode 4.Status.
Analysis of the Ammonia Target Polarization Kangkang L. Kovacs, Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Recent progress in N* physics from Kaon photoproduction experiments at CLAS using polarization observabes. The Rutherford Centennial Conference on Nuclear.
Quantum Computing and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jonathan Jones EPS-12, Budapest, August Oxford Centre for Quantum Computation
2007/11/02nEDM BOSTON1 Dressing Field Study Pinghan Chu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign nEDM Collaboration Boston Dressed.
The polarized target for G E n Gordon D. Cates, Jr. University of Virginia Professor of Physics and Radiology G E n, - October 24, 2003.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Laser-Driven H/D Target at MIT-Bates Ben Clasie Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ben Clasie, Chris Crawford, Dipangkar Dutta, Haiyan Gao, Jason Seely.
Recent Developments in Polarized Solid Targets H. Dutz, S. Goertz Physics Institute, University Bonn J. Heckmann, C. Hess, W. Meyer, E. Radke, G. Reicherz.
SEPTEMBER 2002 Pixel Support Tube A. Smith LBNL 1 ATLAS Pixel Detector Heater Panel Testing Alexis Smith September 17, 2002.
First Experiments with the Polarized Internal Gas Target (PIT) at ANKE/COSY Ralf Engels for the ANKE-Collaboration Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum.
Electrons on the HDice Target Results and Analysis of Test Runs at JLab in 2012 M. M. Lowry PSTP2013 Sep 2013.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Akira Tanaka Department of Physics For Yamagata University PT group.
A. Nass, M. Chapman, D. Graham, W. Haeberli,
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Preliminary result of the target polarization 2004 Kaori Kondo COMPASS target team.
Double spin asymmetry measurement from SANE-HMS data at Jefferson Lab Hoyoung Kang For SANE collaboration Seoul National University DIS /04/23.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
FLASH RF gun developments. Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team FEL Seminar Hamburg,
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
CLAS Collaboration at Jefferson Lab Deuteron Spin Structure function g 1 at low Q 2 from EG4 Experiment Krishna P. Adhikari, Sebastian E. Kuhn Old Dominion.
Status of Polarimeters and Polarized Targets: what are the plans for development of polarized targets to meet the needs of the Day 1 and future experimental.
The HD target JLab12 Collaboration Meeting Annalisa D’Angelo
(Instrument part) Thanundon Kongnok M
Polarized Target Activity at the University of Virginia
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Wideband, solid-state driven RF systems for PSB and PS longitudinal damper.
SPARC RF gun status by P. Musumeci Review committee
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York , USA
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
I Alexander Nass for the JEDI collaboration
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
RHIC Spin Flipper M. Bai, T. Roser Collider Accelerator Department
Presentation transcript:

Boosting Deuteron Polarization in HD Targets: Experience of moving spins between H and D with RF methods during the E experiment at Jefferson Lab Xiangdong Wei Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility The XVth International Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry (PTSP 2013) University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA September 9-13, 2013 HD

Collaborators Jefferson Lab X. Wei, C. Bass, A. Deur, G. Dezern, T. Kageya, M.M. Lowry, A. M. Sandorfi and R. Teachey Universita di Roma “Tor Vergata” and INFN-Sezione di Roma2 A. D'Angelo Blaise Pascal University V. Laine James Madison University C.S. Whisnant HD

Topics Target Life-Cycle Spin Manipulation Methods Experimental Setup Target Performance During E Experiment Summary HD

Topics Target Life-Cycle Spin Manipulation Methods Experimental Setup Target Performance During E Experiment Summary HD

HD Target Life Cycle Gas Handling Gas recovery Gas Storage HD purification (JMU) Gas analysis (JMU, Rome2) Target Production Condensing Calibrating Polarizing Aging Experiment (Spin Transferring) eHD,  HD (Spin Flipping) (Field Rotating) HD See Lowry’s Talk See Steve Whisnant’s Talk

Topics Target Life-Cycle Spin Manipulation Methods Experimental Setup Target Performance During E Experiment Summary HD

Polarize HD with High Field and Low Temp. (Brute Force) HD Maximum for current setup (15T and 10 mK) I=1/2 for H and 1 for D Can P D be improved? Yes. In reality, typically 60% for H and 15% for D

1.Adiabatically rotating magnetic field direction –Using both transverse and axial magnets, this operation is straight forward and quick, as long as the field rotation rate is much slower than the Lamar Frequencies of H and D at the lowest field, and the T 1 s are much longer than the rotation time. Typical scales: T 1 ~months; rotation time ~minutes; NMR frequency ~300kHz for D and ~2MHz for –Polarization amplitudes stay the same H &D rotate together. Spin Manipulation Methods HD

2. Adiabatically flipping spins of H or D with RF –Nearly 100% efficiency for H and 70% for D so far. Could be improved: uniformed RF field, stable power supply... –Moderate RF power required (~10mW with non-tuned coils). –Can be used with higher holding field. HD m D =+1 m D =0 m D =-1 m H =-1/2 m H =+1/2 PHPH PDPD Zeeman Levels of HD Induce “allowed” transitions with RF

Spin Manipulation Methods HD m D =+1 m D =0 m D =-1 m H =-1/2 m H =+1/2 PHPH PDPD Zeeman Levels of HD Induce “forbidden” transitions with RF

Transferring polarizations HD Spin Dipole coupling between H and D in adjacent molecules A. Abragam, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, p395, (1983) A. Honig and H. Mano, Phys. Rev. B 14, V14, vol. 5, 1858 (1976)

FAFP vs. SFP HD FAFP-Flip entire population between levels –ε max =100% (only if everything listed below works) –High power RF(H 1 ~ gauss) partial flip => low net polarization Watts of RF heats up fridge.Needs uniform RF field. –Monotonic field sweep (field jitter hurts, reduces ε).. –One chance only (available spins reduced after each operation). Achieved with 1 cc test target. NOT EASY for large target with limited cooling power and space. SFP-Multi FAFP until population on connected levels are equalized –ε=50% is guaranteed (it’s also the maximum) –Fridge cold can handle the “low” RF power. –Field and frequency jitter helps; Jittered field and modulated RF results in multiple transfers per sweep higher ε –keep sweepings until no net spin transfer. Easy to achieveUsed During E Experiment but ε max =50%

Topics Target Life-Cycle Spin Manipulation Methods Experimental Setup Target Performance During E Experiment Summary HD

Experimental Setup NMR Coils: –A pair of 8-post ”Birdcage” coils was utilized in HDice to improve H1 homogenty to ~10%. Circuit Tuning: –C parallel was connected to the transmitter outside IBC, and C series was used to isolate the output impedence of RF amplifier. –target heating under control; system tunned at off-resonance field. –Circuit simulation used as the guide for fine tuning. RF Power: –A computer controlled RF switch/attenuation box was built. –An 110W RF amplfier was added into the NMR spectrometer. HD HD coils I Cs I Cp I Coil circuit I(A) vs. f(MHz) in various components

Operation: G-14 Run at Hall-B HD HDIBC in Hall B 

Topics Target Life-Cycle Spin Manipulation Methods Experimental Setup Target Performance During E Experiment Summary HD

SFP Results during G-14 Run HD

Target Performance during G-14 Run HD HDice targets used in frozen spin mode during E06-101/g14 run. Relaxation times were longer than a year at B=0.9T and T<100mK. RF H flip Erase H Field rotation Pseudo quench Field rotation Beam steering H flip caused partial FAFP FAFP H=>D Quench FAFP H=>D Field rotation RF H flip

“Empty” (red) On-going Analysis for G-14 Run HD 1 st look at data vertex projection “Full” (blue)

“Empty” (red) On-going Analysis for G-14 Run HD 1 st look at data vertex projection “Full” (blue) eg: γn => π – p E P(D) = 27% ~ 10% of g14 data set (T.Kageya, NSTAR’13) *

Summary Methods of manipulating spins in HDice targets have been successfully implemented during the E run in CLAS. Polarizations of H and D can be transferred back and forth. More improvements can be done in the future to increase the spin transfer efficiency. E06-101/g14 data from polarized D, following SFP, now under analysis. These demonstrate a large potential for solid HD for photon experiments. HD