CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review A Survey of Stellar Families Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars Deepak Raghavan Ph.D. Dissertation Talk March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Contrast AO Imaging at the MMT with ARIES SDI Laird Close, Beth Biller, Eric Nielsen Don McCarthy & MMT AO Group (Steward Obs)
Advertisements

Our target sample was culled from the 2MASS and DENIS near-infrared sky surveys and consists of objects spectroscopically confirmed to be L dwarfs together.
The Origin of Brown Dwarfs Kevin L. Luhman Penn State.
1. absolute brightness - the brightness a star would have if it were 10 parsecs from Earth.
N EW ULTRA COLD DWARF BINARIES New discoveries and follow up observations University of Hertfordshire Joana Gomes.
Deriving the true mass of an unresolved BD companion by AO aided astrometry Eva Meyer MPIA, Heidelberg Supervisor: Martin Kürster New Technologies for.
NEAT: Very high precision astrometry to detect nearby planetary systems down to one Earth mass F. Malbet, A. Crouzier, M. Shao, A. Léger and the NEAT collaboration.
The Carnegie Astrometric Planet Search and the role of ground based astrometry in the pre-Gaia era. Guillem Anglada-Escude (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia.
Exploring a Nearby Habitable World …. Orbiting an M-dwarf star Drake Deming NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.
Gaspard Duchêne (UC Berkeley, Obs. Grenoble) Andy Boden (Caltech), Guillermo Torres (CfA Harvard), Andrea Ghez (UCLA), Quinn Konopacky (LLNL) Keck Science.
HIGH-PRECISION PHOTOMETRY OF ECLIPSING BINARY STARS John Southworth + Hans Bruntt + Pierre Maxted + many others.
Ge/Ay133 What have radial velocity surveys told us about (exo)-planetary science?
Ge/Ay133 What have radial velocity surveys told us about (exo)-planetary science?
Extrasolar planet detection: Methods and limits Ge/Ay133.
Exoplanet Transits and SONG Angelle Tanner. Venus Transiting the Sun.
04/03/2011ARC Meeting, CSL Long baseline interferometry applied to the study of colliding-wind massive binaries: current status and prospects for the near.
Near & Long Term Planet Searches (not a review) S. R. Kulkarni California Institute of Technology.
Extrasolar planet detection: Methods and limits Ge/Ay133.
Nov. 6, 2008Thanks to Henrietta Leavitt Cepheid Multiplicity and Masses: Fundamental Parameters Nancy Remage Evans.
19/02/09ARC Meeting, Colonster Long baseline interferometry applied to the study of massive stars: current observations and prospects for VSI Michaël De.
Ge/Ay133 What have radial velocity surveys told us about (exo)-planetary science?
M. Shao - 1 SIM Space Interferometry Mission A NASA Origins Mission SIM GRID.
Robo-AO First Science Workshop May 20, The Demo Period Robo-AO Science Workshop Agenda.
Adam L. Kraus February 1, 2007 Multiple Star Formation at the Bottom of the IMF.
„We are not talking about cosmology...“ (A. Sozzetti)
The NASA/NExScI/IPAC Star and Exoplanet Database 14 May 2009 David R. Ciardi on behalf of the NStED Team.
Extrasolar planets. Detection methods 1.Pulsar timing 2.Astrometric wobble 3.Radial velocities 4.Gravitational lensing 5.Transits 6.Dust disks 7.Direct.
Astrometry of Binary Stars: What Are We Waiting For? Elliott Horch, Southern Connecticut State University 9/21/20081Stars in Motion BU 151AB 1 arcsec Andor.
Searches for exoplanets
CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review. The Separated Fringe Packet Survey Chris Farrington CHARA / Mt. Wilson March 2009 Collaborators: T.A ten.
The Chinese SONG proposal: scientific concerns Jianning Fu (Beijing Normal University) and Chinese SONG team Beijing ─ March 29, 2010 The third workshop.
The Impact of Multiplicity on Planet Formation Adam Kraus Hawaii-IfA Michael Ireland (Sydney), Frantz Martinache (Subaru), Lynne Hillenbrand (Caltech)
1 The Precision Radial Velocity Spectrometer Science Case.
Search for planetary candidates within the OGLE stars Adriana V. R. Silva & Patrícia C. Cruz CRAAM/Mackenzie COROT /11/2005.
Olivier Absil Chargé de Recherches FNRS AEOS group 3 rd ARC meeting – March 4 th, 2011 Imaging faint companions with interferometric closure phases 3 rd.
Young active star research with SONG and mini-SONG Huijuan Wang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Charleston.
Planets in Binary Systems Searching for High Contrast Binaries with ShaneAO Lea Hirsch 3 rd Year Graduate Student UC Berkeley Department of Astronomy
Statistics of multiple stars A.Tokovinin Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
Goal: To understand binary stars Objectives: 1)To review why we get binary star systems 2)To learn about the 2 different binary star types and how we find.
The Nature of the Stars Chapter 19. Parallax.
Proper Motion Some nearby stars observed to move relative to distant stars Find tangential velocity from angular proper motion Radial velocity from Doppler.
A Dedicated Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets using a Doppler Survey and Photometric Follow-up A Proposal for NASA's Research Opportunities in Space.
The Completeness of Planetary Searches Adric R. Riedel
Direct imaging of substellar objects around young and nearby stars: The SACY sample N. Huélamo (Laeff-INTA, Spain) H. Bouy (UC Berkeley) C. Torres (LNA,
23 November 2015what do we know from the exo-planets? Florian Rodler What do we know about the exo-planets? & How to detect direct signals from exo-planets?
Constraints on Extrasolar Planet Populations from VLT NACO/SDI and MMT SDI Direct Imaging Surveys: Giant Planets are Rare at Large Separations (2008 ApJ.
The first exoplanets/brown dwarfs in the Milky Way: A study of population II objects PI: M. Petr-Gotzens Total time: > 10 nights(ELT 42m)
CHARA Collaboration Year-Eight Science Review Host stars investigations with VEGA/CHARA R. Ligi, D. Mourard, A.-M. Lagrange, K. Perraut Observatoire de.
Detection of Extrasolar Giant Planets Hwihyun Kim 03/30/06.
CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Dynamite Diameters Tabetha Boyajian GSU/CHARA Presented by Hal McAlister.
WIDE BINARY SCIENCE USING PAN-STARRS1 NIALL DEACON (MPIA) MICHAEL LIU, EUGENE MAGNIER, WILL BEST, KIMBERLY ALLER, MICHAEL KOTSON (HAWAII), BRENDAN BOWLER.
Eva Meyer MPIA-Student-Workshop, Italy Various information from different detection methods.
Metallicity and age of selected nearby G-K Giants L. Pasquini (ESO) M. Doellinger (ESO-LMU) J. Setiawan (MPIA) A. Hatzes (TLS), A. Weiss (MPA), O. von.
PHYS 205 Multiple Star Systems PHYS 205 Binary systems Question: Why are the binaries important?? Answer: They allow us to measure the mass of other.
CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Massive Star Diameters Measured with CHARA/PAVO PhD update for Noel Richardson (GSU) Presented by Douglas.
CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Closure Phase Interferometry: Lambda Andromedae Rob Parks Georgia State University March 19 th 2009 Nice,
Stars, metals and planets? I. Neill Reid STScI. The question Over 100 extrasolar planets have been discovered since this includes several multiplanet.
Universe Tenth Edition Chapter 17 The Nature of the Stars Roger Freedman Robert Geller William Kaufmann III.
Tautenburg planet search program Eike Guenther Artie Hatzes Davide Gandolfi Michael Hartmann Massimiliano Esposito (now Hamburger Sternwarte) Felice Cusano.
Observational Windows on the Dynamics of Open Clusters Robert D. Mathieu University of Wisconsin - Madison.
1 Dynamical Interactions and Brown Dwarfs Michael F. Sterzik, ESO Richard H. Durisen, Indiana University Hierarchical fragmentation and „two-step“ dynamical.
Companion Candidates around Transiting Planetary Systems: SEEDS First/Second Year Results Norio Narita (NAOJ) Yasuhiro H. Takahashi (Univ. of Tokyo) and.
Chapitre 1- Introduction
Signatures of formation mechanisms in the multiple-star statistics
The primordial binary population in Sco OB2
The Lowest Mass Young Star Spectroscopic Binaries
Multiplicity Among Young Stars and Brown Dwarfs
Binary Stars Hypothesis. Masses of Stars  While we can find the radius of a star from the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, we still do not know the mass  How do.
Pre-Cursor Data Needed for JWST Transit and Eclipse Observations
Binary Stars Palomar Observatory.
Presentation transcript:

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review A Survey of Stellar Families Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars Deepak Raghavan Ph.D. Dissertation Talk March 17, 2009 Advisor: Dr. Hal McAlister GSU Committee members: Dr. Doug Gies GSU Dr. Todd Henry GSU Dr. David Latham Harvard-Smithsonian CfA Dr. Brian Mason USNO Dr. Unil Perera GSU Dr. Russel White GSU Thanks to the CHARA team

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Presentation Outline Motivation for this effort The sample of nearby solar-type stars Survey methods & observing techniques Results

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Understanding Stellar Families C o m p a n i o n s ? Do Sun-like stars have… C h i l d r e n ? You are here Do they have… NoYes No Yes

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review A Modern Update to the DM91 Survey Larger and more accurate sample More complete survey Check longstanding beliefs DM91 = Duquennoy & Mayor (1991) A&A 248, 485 Is the Sun weird? 67% of Sun-like stars have companions with mass > 10 M Jup

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review The DM91 Sample Using Hipparcos data (N=148): 72 (44%) fall outside their criteria 56 (38%) match their criteria, but are not in their sample Selected from Gliese (1969) F7 – G9 IV-V, V, VI Dec > -15 o π > 45 mas N = 164

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Best-fit MS AAQ MS Parallax ≥ 40 mas, error < 5% Luminosity classes IV, V, VI 0.5 < B-V < 1.0 Selects “solar-type” stars (2.35 ≤ M v ≤ 7.35) Final sample = 454 primaries (including the Sun) Best-fit MS AAQ MS Defining the Sample Data from the Hipparcos CatalogAAQ: Allen’s Astrophysical Quantities (2000)

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review The Current Sample of Solar-type Stars Using van Leeuwen (2007) revisions (N=451): 18 (4%) fall outside the criteria 15 (3%) matching the criteria not in the sample Selected from Hipparcos (1997) 0.5 < B-V < 1.0 IV-V, V, VI All-sky π > 40 mas N = 454

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Sample Completeness

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review A Comprehensive Effort Speckle Sep ~ 0.035” – 2” Δmag 3 ~ < * for two solar-mass stars at 20 pc RV Period 20 yrs a 0.46” * * for 2 solar-mass stars at 20 pc Inclination effect ~ < ~ < CPM, Visual Sep ~ 1” – 600” The First “Complete” Survey CHARA Sep ~ 10 – 120 mas ΔK 2 mag K < 6 mag For Separated Fringe Packets ~ < AO Sep ~ 0.5” – 10” Δmag 10 ~ <

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Common Proper Motion September 1953 HIP 7513 Indicates Companionship, Helps Identify Optical Pairs HIP December 1954 HIP October 1953 HIP September 1953 N E 10’ X 10’

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Wide CPM Companions 90% of the sample investigated –366 (81%) investigated effectively (proper motion clearly seen on blinking) –An additional 43 (9%) investigated via marginal motion between images blinked Search radius: –For d < 20 pc, searched out to 660’’ (22’ images) –For d > 20 pc, searched out to 450’’ (15’ images) Effectively searched 400 – 10,000 AU for companions with R < 17 Confirmed or refuted by follow-up photometry

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review CHARA: Separated Fringe Packets Source: Bagnuolo et al. (2006) AJ 131, 2695

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review SFP Survey Null Result Gap between spectroscopic and visual techniques has been previously seen –Bouvier et al. 1997, Mason et al No such gap in the current study Excellent spectroscopic coverage… –Longstanding RV studies over 30 years, ± 0.5 km/s precision CORALIE, CfA –High-precision measures over 12 years, ± 3 m/s precision –Can detect orbits of few tens of years Separations out to 400 mas (P=30y, M sum =1.5M Sun, d= 20pc, i=45 o ) Augmented by extensive high-resolution visual coverage –450 / 453 targets observed by speckle interferometry at least once –Separations ≥ 30 mas Spectroscopic Visual

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review CHARA Visual Orbits Source: Raghavan et al ApJ 690, 394 Four short-period binaries resolved –HD 8997, 45088, , Separations 1.2 – 8.1 mas HD (σ 2 CrB) published results –Shortest period (1.1 day) SB resolved –Central pair of a quintuple system –M 1 = ± M sun –M 2 = ± M Sun Component Masses (M sun ) HD 8997 M 1 = ± M 2 = ± HD M 1 = ± M 2 = ± HD M 1 = ± M 2 = ± Prelim Final

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Other Astrometric Companions Speckle Interferometry –450 / 453 targets observed (99% completion) Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS) –504 pairs investigated 184 confirmed companions, 313 confirmed optical, 7 candidates –The Sixth Visual Orbit Catalog (37 orbits + 31 prelim) –The Fourth Interferometric Catalog (includes null results) Catalog of Nearby Stars (CNS) –198 companions investigated 148 CPM companions: 142 confirmed, 6 refuted –Two extra-wide companions (15’ and 20’) unique in this source 50 SB/RV companions: 22 confirmed, 25 refuted, 3 candidates Hipparcos Double Stars (C, G, O, X) –99 companions investigated 91 confirmed, 6 refuted, 2 candidates

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Radial Velocity Studies

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Radial Velocity Coverage: CfA Note: Only constant-velocity stars included in the bottom two plots

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Radial Velocity Coverage: CCPS

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review P(χ 2 ) not a Good Variability Indicator DM91 Current Results RV-constant stars

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Multiplicity Results: Companion Counts

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Multiplicity Results DM91 observed (N = 164) DM91 including P(χ 2 ) < DM91 incompleteness analysis (q > 0.1)43 DM91 single stars (M 2 < 10 M J )33 This work, observed (N = 454)57±333±28±12±10.4 This work, including candidates54±234±29±22±10.2 This work, incompl analysis (q > 0.01)54±335±29±22±1 Among Planetary Systems Raghavan et al (N = 131)77212 This work, observed (N = 34)68293 This work, planet-host frequency8±27±23±3 P e r c e n t a g e o f s t a r s

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Multiplicity by Spectral Type

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Companions Erode with Age

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Effect of Metallicity on Multiplicity Tantalizing indication that brown dwarfs form like planets rather than like stars, at least when they are companions to stars No correlation between metallicity and stellar companions, as expected “Stars form like stars” Stars with companions Stars without companions Stars with planets Stars without planets or BDs Stars with brown dwarfs Planet-Metallicity Correlation First reported by Fischer & Valenti (2005)

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Period Distribution Mean log(P) = 5.03, P = 293 years Significant overlap of techniques in all but the longest period bins (SB, VB gap closed) 66% of pairs have separations greater than 10 AU, leaving room for planets

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Period-Eccentricity Relationship Binaries Triple Quadruple HD components Very young system log (R’ HK ) = High rotation Emission in spectra Consistent with DM91, components of triples seen to have higher eccentricity

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Eccentricity Distribution In contrast to DM91, no relationship is seen between period and eccentricity distribution P < 1000 days (35 systems) P > 1000 days (82 systems) DM91 results

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review Mass-Ratio Distribution Another departure from DM91 –Twins are definitely preferred (consistent with Abt & Levy 1976) Twins are not confined to short-period systems –Fragmentation is only one of the formation mechanisms Correlation between mass-ratio and period –Percentage of systems with P < 100 days 4% for mass-ratio 0.9

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review 67% DM91 results So, is the Sun Weird?

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review So, is the Sun Weird? 54% Updated results