Hand Intensive Work: Predicting the Demand of a Manual Activity Richard Wells Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Injuries to the Elbow, Forearm, Wrist & Hand
Advertisements

Richard Wells 1,2 (1) Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada (2) Centre of Research Expertise for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal.
Manual Handling.
Hand Tool Use and Selection Principles
Chapter 14 Hand tools. 1. Special-purpose vs. general purpose tools An SP tool Performs better for tasks that are repeated many times/week, quality of.
Lab 3 Upper Extremity Part 2. Range of Motion.
STRUCTURE OF THE HAND Carpals (8); scaphoid, lunate, triquetral, pisiform, trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate Metacarpals (5); proximal base, medial.
Lecture 9 The Forearm and Wrist.
Body Mechanics and Range of Motion
Wrist and Hand Wrist is the most complex joints of the body due to the numerous joints combined to create one.
ESS 303 – Biomechanics Elbow & Wrist. Anterior View.
Elbow & Wrist Mazyad Alotaibi.
EHS 218 Occupational Ergonomics Hand Tools. Types of Grip  Power –Hands wrap around the handle –Capable of generating more force than others with less.
ELBOW DISLOCATIONS. ELBOW DISLOCATIONS ELBOW DISLOCATIONS When discussing elbow dislocations, we talk about the direction that the ulna exited from.
Hand Tool Use and Selection Guidance in Construction Adapted from a presentation developed by Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, Division.
ACCESS SAFETY Todd Culver Assistant Director Workplace Safety & Health Training Project in partnership with MIOSHA CET Division An Association of Service.
Part 2 Wrist Evaluation.
Muscle testing By Prof. Dr. Samy A. Nasef. Clinically.
PNF TECHNIQUE UPPER EXTREMITY LENNY. A. Upper Extremity Diagonal Patterns 1.D1Flexion: a)Starting Position (Fig. 6.33A) shoulder extension, abduction,
s.gov.uk/+/ /files/file21811.pdf Specific anthropometric and strength data for people with dexterity.
Sketch courtesy from Riekes Material Handling. Occupational MH tasks Occupational material handling (MH) can be classified into three broad types: –Pulling/Pushing.
Biomechanics of Lifting Graduate Biomechanics. Biomechanics of Lifting Topics Lifting and Back Injury Biomechanics of Joint Torque and Shear Standards.
Elbow Anatomy. Bones of the Elbow Humerus –Medial and Lateral Epicondyle Ulna –Olecranon Process Radius –Head.
Sketch courtesy from Riekes Material Handling. Severity of the problem Manual handling (lifting) is injury prone & expensive –BLS 2007: 140,330 out of.
Psy 552 Ergonomics & Biomechanics Lecture 19. Your workstation chair  Seat height:  Seat depth:  Seat width:  Backrest:  Seat back angle:  Lumbar.
Kinesiology PED 2440.
Carpal tunnel syndrome. Introduction Definition Introduction Definition Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is defined as compression of the median nerve at.
Chord Keyboard Richard Wells. Complaints user-keyboard interface postures movements of the fingers, wrists, shoulders forces necessary to activate keys.
Muscles of the Hand, Wrist and Forearm
Forearm, Wrist and Hand.
Arm/Shoulder/Forearm Muscles
Distal Biceps Injury: Surgery and Rehabilitation Caroline Chebli, MD Kennedy-White Orthopaedic Center.
Preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries at KGH. Kingston General Hospital is committed to providing a safe and healthy work environment for you and your coworkers.
Ergonomics Maximum Voluntary Effort By: Group 10 - Marcus, Allan, Matt, Andre, and Lance.
Overuse Syndromes.  Overuse can occur in any musculotendinous structure in the elbow region especially in the muscles attached to the lateral or medial.
1 8 C H A P T E R Resistance Training.
Engineering Mechanics: Statics Chapter 2: Force Vectors Chapter 2: Force Vectors.
International conference – Women’s health and work March , Brussels Physical Strength: Results and Differences in Age and Gender Patrick Serafin,
Marian Abowd, Dr. Cindy Trowbridge, Dr. Mark Ricard EFFECTS OF PATTERNED ELECTRICAL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION ON KNEE JOINT STABILIZATION AbstractResultsConclusion.
Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo TWG-IS Ergonomic Intervention Pilot Study Objectives Assess the effectiveness.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo OPTIMAL UPPER LIMB SUPPORT CONDITIONS FOR MOUSE USE? Richard Wells.
UPPER LIMB Parts of the upper limb : 1- shoulder. 2- arm. 3- forearm.
A Guide to Selecting Non-Powered Hand Tools Ergonomics Design Guidelines to prevent WMSDs.
UC Davis Safety Services Monthly Safety Spotlight February 2010 Workplace Ergonomics: Shop & Field Safety Discussion Topics Be Smart About Tool Use Workspace.
Chapter 14 – The Elbow and Forearm Pages
UC Davis Safety Services Monthly Safety Spotlight February 2010: Workplace Ergonomics/Shop & Field Safety Discussion Topics Be Smart About Tool Use Workspace.
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLORADO SPRINGS Office Ergonomics University of Colorado Colorado Springs Environmental Health and Safety.
1 ISE 311 Handtools Extend the capability of the hand Selection criteria:  What the tool can do  How the tool is used.
The Elbow, Wrist & Hand Hard & Soft Tissue Anatomy.
Strength. Strength Strength is the maximum amount of force a muscle, or group of muscles, can exert in a single effort The three main types of strength.
Ergonomics WRULD and musculoskeletal disorders Loisa Sessman, Halmstad University.
Manual Handling Presented by Occupational Health.
Parson’s Engineering Insert Image Here. Manual handling is the handling of objects in a physical capacity, and the correct techniques to do so. The best.
Strength Strength is the maximum amount of force a muscle, or group of muscles, can exert in a single effort The three main types of strength are:  Static.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 6: The Upper Extremity: The Elbow, Forearm, Wrist, And Hand, (Pt. 2) KINESIOLOGY Scientific.
Chapter 14 Handtools Learning Objective 1
Biomechanics and Kinetics of Elbow Position in the Baseball Swing
High Impact Grip Training Methods
MANUAL RESISTANCE FOR UPPER LIMB
Kathy Whalley 25 February 2009
Basic Weight Training Developing the Arms
PNF TECHNIQUE.
Objective: identifying the different tools and their uses.
Geoffrey A. Power, Brian H. Dalton, Charles L
Anatomy and physiology
Office Ergonomics University of Colorado Colorado Springs
For more slides click here
prolonged repetitive motion
Chapter 13 Hand.
Forearm & Wrist Anatomy
Presentation transcript:

Hand Intensive Work: Predicting the Demand of a Manual Activity Richard Wells Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo

Hand Activities Hold a hammer Push hose on pipe || ? Use a key to open a lock Hold a plate of food || ?

Hand Strength Characterizing human hand capabilities or demand created by occupational tasks has been mainly accomplished by measuring the maximum force exerted on a handgrip dynamometer or similar transducer. How many people squeeze handgrip dynamometers at work?!!

Hand Grip Strength If the occupational activity is: not a power grip or a pinch on an isolated object or involves combinations of actions, such as exerting moments and forces, how well does the handgrip dynamometer strength characterize the demand and load on the tissues of the hand and forearm?

Hand Prehension Description Two Parts 1.The geometry of the hand/object interaction 2.The forces and moments applied on the environment

Prehensile Grips Cylindrical/Prismatic Grips Grips with Pulp/tip Contact Non-Prehensile or Force Dependant “Grips” Hook “Press” Palm Pulp Press, Thumb/Finger Tips 2/3/4/5, Sphere `Tripod Tips Key/Lateral Pinch Side Opposition Grip A/B) X) T) Y) F) K)J)E) G) R) Z) Increasing force and size Decreasing Forces and Size Increasing dexterity Fingers 2/3/4/5 Carry Box T+F) X+F) K’) M)

Typical Tool Use for Grip Types A/B Pistol grip on in-line screw runner T) Hammer (also T+F) X) Carry or hold with small handles Y) Pliers Z) Screw-driver J) Hold parts/objects F) Key K) Small prismatic objects E) Small prismatic objects K’) Pen, pencil, scriber, dental tool G) Carrying with handle. Pull on wrench. Single finger(s) may operate trigger. Also carry boxes M) Apply force, support tray, hand hammer R) Sensory or apply force to seat or insert part

Part 2: Forces and Moments Exerted on Objects

Wrench Defined Exertion of hand on environment described by “wrench” (3 forces and 3 moments) expressed about the centre of the grip Y, My X, Mx Z, Mz Y, My X, Mx Z, Mz R. Wells

Hand Actions Because of the asymmetry of the hand there are 13 possible actions Extend Ulnar Radial Supinate Pronate Push Pull Push Up Push Down Push to Side Flex Power Grip

Example: A Drilling Task 5 Nm Torque 1.2 kg. Mass 60N Feed Force

Measures of Hand Capabilities? Most studies measure 1 or 2 of these components Most studies use wrist moments or pinch/grip forces No data on combined actions (e.g. pronate and pull) Therefore Need to collect all forces and moments about centre of the grip

Measurement Thirteen randomized actions, about the orthogonal axes in 3 grip types (power, lateral, and pulp pinch), as well as combined activities, were performed at maximal and sub-maximal levels in mid pronation and a naturally adopted wrist extension posture.

Measurement of Capabilities Specially developed dynamometer measured the three force and moment components as well as the pinch or power grip forces.

Population Working men and women with recent manual work experience recruited from industrial temporary agency

Example Data Maximum Moments about Grip Centre:

Electromyography (EMG) 8 Sites

EMG/RPE vs Exertion Lateral Pinch, One Participant, All Muscles Max limited by balance, shoulder strength?

EMG/RPE vs Exertion Pulp Pinch, One Participant, All Muscles

EMG/RPE vs Exertion Power Grip, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, All Participants

Hand Demand Calculator AnalysisCalculator 20 Participants 10 M 10 F Multiple Linear Regression by Participant EMG1 = f (3 x Force, 3 x Moment) EMG2 = f (3 x Force, 3 x Moment) ….. EMG8 = f (3 x Force, 3 x Moment) RPE = f (3 x Force, 3 x Moment) Regression Coefficients 3 x Force, 3 x Moment Percentile of population Predicted; 8 EMG and RPE

Hand Demand Calculator: 1

Hand Demand Calculator: 12

Does The Method Describe the Demand on the Hand? Compare the perceived exertion and EMG for an action and the same action described as a wrench and performed on the test apparatus =

Test Tasks 1

Test Tasks 2

EMG for Tasks and Their Mock-Ups Extensor Digitorum Slope = R 2 = 0.93

RPE for Tasks and Their Mock-Ups Perceived Exertion Slope = 1.11 R 2 = 0.929

The Wrench Demand Description The wrench demand description appears to adequately describe the demand on the forearm hand system

Two new grips added, “”volar diagonal” and three finger “tripod” pinch Adding these grips to the “Calculator” How to make the technique available? As part of “Ergowatch”? Web available calculator? Current and Future Work

Summary Existing methods of hand demand evaluation were deemed inadequate A description of hand activities was developed that accounts for the demand of a manual activity Experimental testing of working Canadian men and women while performing a wide range of hand activates allowed creation of relationships between the external task definition and its demand A “ hand demand calculator” was developed for evaluation and design

References 1.Wells, R. and Greig, M. Characterising human hand prehensile capabilities by force and moment wrench, Ergonomics, 15;44(15): , Greig, M. and Wells, R. (2004) Measurement Of Prehensile Grasp Capabilities By A Force And Moment Wrench: Methodological Development And Assessment Of Manual Workers, Ergonomics, 47(1); Morose, T., Greig, M., and Wells, R. (2004) Utility of using a force and moment wrench to describe hand demand, Occupational Ergonomics, 4:1-10.