A VISUAL AID TO PYROMETRY COMPLIANCE (A Guide To An Acceptable TUS Report) February 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Advertisements

ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
Module 4B Grinder & Waste Conveyance Inspections/Sampling.
Internal Audit Documentation and Working Papers
Environmental Management System (EMS)
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
First Article Inspection Report
ISO 9001 : 2000.
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Corrective & Preventive Action Programme l Corrective and preventive action managed by one programme l Closely linked to the internal audit programme l.
Calibration (Qualification) of Centrifuge
Total Quality Management BUS 3 – 142 Statistics for Variables Week of Mar 14, 2011.
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
TS16949 requirements Subjects –Audit planning –Recertification audit requirements –Auditing Remote supporting functions.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
Quality Representative Training Version
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures. Objective In this module, you will learn: u How to define verification u What functions are part of HACCP plan verification.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Project co- financed by Asean European Committee for Standardization Implementing Agency Project co-financed by European Union Module 7 GMP Workshop Kuala.
Quality Management Systems P.Suriya Prakash Final Mech Vcet
The Role of the Internal Auditor for Maintaining System Compliance and Promoting Continuous Improvement Wayne M. Uttke
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Inspections.
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002  AERODROME MANUAL.
PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED Notice To Lessee/Operators of Onshore Federal Oil and Gas Leases Within the Jurisdiction of the Wyoming State Office (NTL.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Understanding ISO 22000:2005 TCISys.com.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Ismar Financial and administrative procedures Nearest Kick-off meeting Bologna, 11 October 2006.
Chapter 11 Record-Keeping Procedures. Objective In this module, you will learn: u What kinds of records are needed in a HACCP system u When to record.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Module 4C Sea Surface and Shoreline Monitoring. Module 4C – Sea Surface & Shoreline Monitoring Stephanie Mann Environmental Program Specialist III 2.
Presented by: David Beamish DeFelsko Corporation
Ergonomics Regulatory Requirements Bawan Saravanabawan, Labour Program, HRSDC February 4, 2008.
Performance Appraisal Appraisal for: non repetitive jobs Key Result Area for: repetitive jobs.
Laboratory Certification Update Part 2 Common Findings KWWOA Louisville April 15, 2015 Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
The Software Development Process
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
Design Documentation Clint Kehres, Brian Krouse, Jenn Shafner.
Internal Auditing ISO 9001:2015
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Basic Concepts: Definitions Readability (R): indicates the closeness with which the scale of the instrument may be read.Readability (R): indicates the.
? Training removes doubt, instills confidence, and lays the foundation for everyone’s skill and experience level.
Nadcap Supplier Seminar Heat Treatment
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
First Article Inspection Reports (FAIRs) Instructions for Suppliers
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
OSHA A GUIDE TO THE NEGATIVE EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT.
Table 3 – Value of Dimension D
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
Quality Assurance Procedure Manuals.
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Module 6 Corrective Action Request (CAR) Overview
Chapter 11 Record-Keeping Procedures.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
Setting up an Internal Audit Program
First Article Inspection
TRTR Briefing September 2013
ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Nonconformity Writing
Presentation transcript:

A VISUAL AID TO PYROMETRY COMPLIANCE (A Guide To An Acceptable TUS Report) February 2010

Reasons for the TUS Report Visual Aid To help address the top pyrometry findings Feedback from HT suppliers in answering NCR’s: –Struggle to grasp AMS 2750 requirements; particularly newer suppliers. Provides a snap-shot of where the requirements come from in AMS 2750D. (IT DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL REQUIREMENTS.) –Visual aid for newer suppliers –Can be used as a checklist Information for the auditor –Condenses many of the requirements onto one page –Feedback from Nadcap auditors

Top Pyrometry Findings The following AC7102C checklist questions had the most occurrences for NCRs written from Oct 16, 2006 through Jan 3, 2008: Checklist Question (AC7102E): Occurrences: / out of the 10 are from TUS

Top Pyrometry Findings Question Does documentation of the performed TUS include as a minimum: (requirements of the TUS report). Questions / Do procedures specify when correction factors are to be used? Is the application documented in clear and unambiguous terms? Question Do all test instruments have a digital display and output, and meet the readability, calibration frequency, and accuracy requirements of Table 3 of AMS 2750D or more stringent customer requirements? Question Do procedures and documentation exist to demonstrate that test frequencies and test temperatures meet AMS 2750D Table 8 or 9, or more stringent customer requirements, on both a periodic and annual basis?

Top Pyrometry Findings Question Do instrument calibration records and stickers show conformance to the requirements of AMS 2750, or more stringent customer requirements? Question Are the furnaces instrumented for the Instrumentation Type identified by the supplier? Number 1 TOP FINDING The temperature uniformity survey data and summary reports for all aerospace approved furnaces did not include the test instrument calibration correction factors in accordance with AMS2750D, paragraph

TUS Report Visual Aid

Temperature Uniformity Survey Report BACK TO TABLE

I. Thermal Processing Equipment Identification: –Unique identifier tying the furnace to calibration history and data (par ). –Can use name and/or number. Work Zone Dimensions and Volume: –To define the qualified work zone boundaries and to determine the number and location of TUS thermocouples (par , , ,Table 11). BACK TO TABLE

I. Thermal Processing Equipment Furnace Atmosphere: –Defines the atmosphere that will be used for the TUS. It shall be the normal atmosphere used in production except as noted in paragraph Load Condition: –Load condition (rack, production load, etc.) must be established during initial TUS so that all subsequent surveys shall be conducted in like manner (par ). BACK TO TABLE

I. Thermal Processing Equipment TUS Fixture or Load Identification: –Used to determine that the qualified work zone meets the required uniformity range. –Ties the initial TUS to all subsequent periodic/annual surveys (par , , ). –Detailed diagram, description or photograph(s) required (par ). Furnace Class and Instrument Type: –The controlling processing specifications determine the minimum required temperature uniformity range and defines the Class. (par 3.3.1). –Defines the SAT and TUS intervals, the instrument/sensor configuration/resolution, (par 3.3.1, ; Tables 3, 6, 7, 8, 9). BACK TO TABLE

II. Furnace Instrumentation Control, Monitoring, Recording Equipment must be calibrated: –Accuracy is based on type of instrument (analog or digital). –Calibration interval is based on the furnace class and on the type of instrument (Table 3, Note 5). Control, Monitoring, Recording Equipment must be tested for sensitivity: –Minimum sensitivity is based on furnace class (Table 3, Note 4). –Definition: The temperature change in the input that is required to activate a change on the instrumentation. BACK TO TABLE

III. TUS Test Instrument A TUS test instrument shall be: –Digital –Have a minimum readability of 1 o F or 1 o C (par 3.2.3). This includes recording test instrumentation. –Maximum calibration frequency is 3 months (Table 3). Correction factors: –Correction factors must be included in the test instrument calibration (par ). BACK TO TABLE

IV. TUS Thermocouples Type: –When choosing the type of sensor, consider whether it will be expendable/nonexpendable, base or noble metal. This determines usage and recalibration requirements (par , , Table 1). Correction Factor: –Be sure to understand whether the certification is reporting error deviation or correction factor. –Their application is to be documented in clear and unambiguous terms. –No extrapolation above or below calibration data listed on the certifications. BACK TO TABLE

IV. TUS Thermocouples Calibration Report Number: –Thermocouples shall have a certificate of compliance as stated in paragraph Calibrated Range: –Sensors shall be calibrated in the temperature range within which they are to be used (par ). –Interval between any two test points must be not greater than 250 deg. F or more stringent customer requirement (par , Table 1.) Number of Thermocouples: –Based upon work space volume and furnace class (Table 11). BACK TO TABLE

V. Furnace Thermocouples Required by Instrument Type Depending on instrument type, load sensors and/or high and low sensors are required for the TUS. Attach to or insert load sensors to heat sinks that meet Maintain same method of surveying as performed for initial TUS. BACK TO TABLE

VI. Diagram of Thermocouple Location and Identification Sensor location must be unambiguous. This is required so as to properly analyze the TUS data (par ). Show location of furnace sensors required by applicable instrumentation type such as high/low sensors (par ). A detailed diagram, description, or photograph(s) of any load or rack used. BACK TO TABLE

VII. TUS Test Information Next TUS Due Date: –Frequency based upon furnace class and instrument type as defined in Table 8 or 9. Qualified Operating Range: –Define the qualified operating range(s) with 600 deg. F intermediate ranges max. (par and 3.5.6). Initial or Periodic TUS: –Establishes what set temperatures can be used for the TUS. –At least once within each calendar year, periodic tests to be performed at minimum and maximum of each qualified operating temperature range (par 3.5.6). BACK TO TABLE

VII. TUS Test Information Time Stabilized / Start Time: –It is required that TUS data must be collected from all furnace sensors required by the applicable instrument type (par ). –TUS data collection shall begin before the first furnace or TUS sensor reaches the lower tolerance limit of each test temperature (par ). –Stabilization, recovery or recurrent temperature pattern must not exceed the time limit specified in any applicable process specification (par ). BACK TO TABLE

VII. TUS Test Information Finish Time: –TUS sensors shall be recorded at a frequency of at least one set of all readings every two minutes for the duration of the survey (par and ). –Duration of the survey is 30 minutes minimum after stabilization (par ). –Recording frequency of furnace sensors required by the applicable instrumentation type may be up to 6 minutes as defined in paragraph BACK TO TABLE

TUS Report Summary Furnace Uniformity Furnace uniformity resulting from the TUS: +XX / -XX deg F. Overshoot: None observed. ****************************************************************************** Report Summary Are the TUS test results acceptable per applicable specification requirements? A “No” response requires explanatory comment in the notes section. Yes ___ No ___ Notes: 1) Furnace TUS test results were within the required ±XXºF tolerance. No adjustments were necessary. ______________________________________ Signature of Technician and Date ______________________________________ Quality Assurance Acceptance and Date