Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
Overview of the Chesapeake Bay Prioritized Organic Toxics of Concern List Rich Eskin Greg Allen Chesapeake Bay Program Toxics Subcommittee.
Endocrine Disruptors: What are they, and why should we care? httpwww.usgs.govthemesFS
Endocrine Disrupting Compounds: General Overview and Impact on Freshwater Biology SCAP Water Issues Committee Meeting May 5, 2011 Photo by Judy Gibson.
Northwest Region Cleanup Program Zidell Waterfront Property Cleanup 2012 Portland Scott Manzano | Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
BENEFITS OF THE RMP AND CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Regulated Community Perspective David W. Tucker City of San Jose.
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Columbia River Toxics Reduction Working Group 2012 Regional Roundtable: Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center.
Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants India GEF National Dialogue Workshop 29 th Oct - 1 st Nov Bhubaneshwar.
Goals  Determine which chemicals present (or potentially present) in the Lake Champlain basin would cause detrimental effects  Determine the pathways.
Persistent Organic Pollutants in Marine Ecosystems.
ESM 595 Chris Gibson. "A lake is the landscape's most beautiful and expressive feature. It is the earth's eye; looking into which the beholder measures.
Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.
Biomonitoring II EnviroChem Connections Mini-Talk 1 on CDC’s 3rd Report Suzanne Snedeker Cornell University Sprecher Institute for Comparative Cancer Research.
Spokane River: Contaminants and Health. Chemicals and Heavy Metals 1.PCBs 2.PBDEs 3.Dioxins/Furans 4.Metals Biological Hazards Public Health Risks.
A Small Dose of Pollutant – 12/04/10 An Introduction To The Health Effects of Persistent Chemical Pollutants A Small Dose of Pollutant.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
Oregon Toxics Reduction & Green Chemistry PPRC Roundtable – October 24, 2012 Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
1 Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014 Issues Resolution Committee: Recommendations to PSC on Key Issues Raised during the Public/Partner Comment Period.
Oxon Run and C&O Canal TMDLs
Washington State’s Chemical Action Plans Washington State’s Chemical Action Plans Janice Adair Washington State Department of Ecology Robert Duff Washington.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Current Great Lakes Toxic Prevention Programs Maumee Bay, OH February 22, 2005.
Bulgarian National Emission Inventory System Assoc. Prof. N.Miloshev – Geophysical Institute BAS St. Tzonev – National Statistical Institute E. Nikolova.
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Fishing Advisories and Fish Contaminants EEES 4730 Amanda Wendzicki.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips U.S. Geological Survey.
DRAFT Spokane River Regional Task Force Members of the community, stewards of the river 6/4/2016srrttf.org1.
Proposed Lake Michigan Rivers Network NMN proposed 17sites. Lake Michigan group added 3 additional sites that already conduct flow and quality monitoring.
52 NAWQA Study Areas. Occurrence in Water Streams Shallow Ground Water Streams Major Aquifers Percentage of Samples with Detections Land use Agricultural.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
What are PCB’s PCB’s are polychlorinated biphenyls, which are a group of manufactured organic chemicals. Contains 209 individual chlorinated chemicals.
What is EPA’s NPEP Program? NPEP is a partnership with EPA to help member organizations identify opportunities for product substitutions, process changes,
POTENTAIL IMPACTS OF CONTAMINANTS ON ANGUILLA ROSTRATA US Fish and Wildlife Service New York Field Office - Region 5 Cortland, NY Draft Work Product 2/1/06.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
STOCKHOLM (POPs) & ROTTERDAM (PIC) CONVENTIONS Produced by Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator.
Cancer Susceptibilit y Genes Environment polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons PAH P450, glutathione S- transferase (GST) N- acetyltransferase (NAT) P. Perera.
Regulatory Chemical Risk Assessment From Superfund to Contaminants of Emerging Concern Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Patrick Gwinn November.
Water Quality APES Ch. 14. Heavy Metals  Lead:  Rarely found naturally in drinking water  Contaminates through lead containing pipes, solder, & brass.
Water Quality in San Francisco Bay J.A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute.
Draft Data - Do Not Cite, Quote, or Distribute 2006 Sport Fish Status and Trends March 18, 2008 TRC Meeting Jennifer Hunt
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Organic Chemicals and Water. Synthetic Organic Chemicals Dioxins Pesticides PCBs Cleaning agents Chlordane Dioxin PBDE DDT Organochlorines Flame Retardants.
Region 3 Successes: Reducing Toxics with NPEP Partnerships Sharon Pérez-Suárez, PMP, CHMM U.S. EPA Region 3 Implementing EO 13423: Opportunities to Reduce.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Cumulative Risk Assessment: A Critical Step Forward in Human Health Protection Deborah A. Cory-Slechta Department of Environmental Medicine University.
The Challenge of PCBs in the Spokane River
Harmful Chemicals.
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
The Challenge of PCBs in the Spokane River
Niagara River Area of Concern
Common Toxic Pollutants and Analytical Methods
Benefits and Risks of Pesticides
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014
Health & Consumers Directorate General
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)
UNC Superfund Research Program
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Semi-Permeable Membrane Devices (SPMD)
Presentation transcript:

Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)

Report and Objectives Contaminants effect fish and wildlife CBP Toxics 2000 EO Strategy Summary Report released –Extent and severity –Biological effects Used by EPA and CBP to consider: –Goals for reducing contaminants –Monitoring and research

Contaminant Groups Polychlorinated biphenyls Dioxins and Furans Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Petroleum hydrocarbons Pesticides Pharmaceuticals Household and Personal Care Products Polybrominated diphenyl ether Flame Retardants Biogenic hormones Metals and Metalloids Effects on fish and wildlife

Assessment Approach Define extent and severity –Widespread, localized, or uncertain –Information used and limitations Extent –Widespread: throughout watershed –Localized: limited watersheds Severity –Widespread: impairments listed at many locations –Localized: few locations Uncertain: lack of monitoring or standards

Extent Widespread: –PCBs, PAHs, Mercury –some herbicides (atrazine, simazine, metochlor, and their degradation products) Localized: –Dioxins/furans, petroleum hydrocarbons –Insecticides (aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, DDT/DDE, heptachlor epoxide, mirex) –Metals: Al, Cr, Fe, Pb, Mn, Zn Uncertain: pharmaceuticals, care products, flame retardants, some pesticides, hormones

Severity Widespread: PCBs and mercury Localized: –dioxins/furans, PAHs, petroleum, –Insecticides: aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, DDT/DDE, heptachlor epoxide, mirex –Metals: Al, Cr, Fe, Pb, Mn, Zn Uncertain: –pharmaceuticals, care products, flame retardants, biogenic hormones –herbicides (atrazine, simazine, metochlor, and their degradation products)

Biological Effects Degraded fish health –Infections and parasites –Feminization –Reduced reproduction –Tumors Wildlife: Reproductive impairment in water birds –Eggshell thinning (DDE) –Embryo lethality (pesticides) –Hatching success (PCBs)

Monitoring and Research Gaps Monitoring to better define extent –Groups with “uncertain” or “localized” occurrence Research-Severity –Exposure studies –Multiple contaminants and stressors –Effects of newer contaminants –Sources, pathways and exposure

Need for Partnership Goal Required in CBP reauthorization Widespread extent and severity of contaminants Current controls producing minimal reductions Effects other CBP goals (fish, habitat, water quality) and human health Benefit from coordination

Concept for Goal Types Reduction Goals and Strategies Additional Information and Analysis Needed Research and/or Monitoring PCBs Mercury Dioxin, Petroleum, Insecticides, Metals PAHs Pesticides Herbicides Pharmaceuticals Hshld/Personal Care Flame Retardants Biogenic Hormones Multi-component strategy Track national air regs. Local impairments Are goals warranted based on extent and effects? Monitoring for occurrence Research for sublethal effects and mixtures DRAFT For discussion purposes only. Final goal decisions TBD

PCB example for goal/strategy PCBs are widespread in extent and severity … Possible PCB Goal Structures Concentrations in fish tissue Pounds of PCBs remediated Number of transformers decommissioned Site cleanups completed Possible PCB Reduction Strategies Optimize reductions from nutrient/sediment TMDL Partner voluntary removal of PCB fluids Coordination with regulatory programs Contaminated sediment remediation DRAFT For discussion purposes only. Final goal decisions TBD

Next steps –CBP consider toxic contaminants in future efforts –Balance focus on nutrients/sediment –WQ GIT, MB, PSC, EC CAC opportunities –Support inclusion of toxic contaminant goal at upcoming CBP discussions/decisions –Meet directly with states and federal agencies –Facilitate informing watershed groups about concerns due to toxic contaminants –Other? Next Steps and CAC