Safeguarding and improving animal welfare Harry Blokhuis Department of Animal Environment and Health Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Safeguarding and improving animal welfare - Why? Who/what are the drivers in the food chain? - Components in safeguarding and improving welfare - Points for discussion
Public concerns Farmers Retail Consumers Legislators Safeguard and improve Animal Welfare ’Drivers’ in the food chain
Drivers in the food chain Public concerns
To inform general public Unni Kjaernes, Mara Miele and Joek Roex (eds) (2007) How important is farm animal welfare for you?
Many public concerns get scientific support (c.f. EFSA scientific reports) E.g.- barren environment - high stocking densities - lighting conditions - air quality - transport - mutilations Public concerns
Top concerns in Member States (SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 354 (2010) Food-related risks) Public concerns
To inform general public Would you like to be more informed about the conditions under which animals are farmed in your country? (SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 354 (2010) Food-related risks) Public concerns
Drivers in the food chain Public concerns Retail
In quality food chains and markets, animal welfare is increasingly an important attribute of an overall conception of food quality: business opportunity
A large part of animal products (60% of 300) surveyed in the 10 most popular retailing outlets of each of the six EU countries (UK, Italy, NO, France, NL, SW) were communicating to consumers some aspects of farm animals’ lives or the production methods adopted. Half of the surveyed products were carrying welfare claims that were not supported by any specific welfare-friendly production standard. In all cases they were bundled with other quality specifications (e.g. better taste, higher safety, environmental friendliness, and so forth). Retail
In quality food chains and markets, animal welfare is increasingly an important attribute of an overall conception of food quality: business opportunity Quality insurance, certification and consumer information Harmonisation of welfare assessment
Drivers in the food chain Public concerns Retail Consumers
54% of respondents have difficulties finding proper information on the animal welfare standards applied in producing food EU special barometer on attitudes of EU citizens (March 2007) Consumers
animal welfare is not at the forefront of consumers when shopping for food
Drivers in the food chain Public concerns Retail Consumers Farmers
- Farmers want to take good care of their animals - They recognise the link between good welfare and good economics -welfare – production costs -welfare – market demands
Comparison of observed lameness and farmers’ estimation (%) Šárová et al., 2011 Farmers Farm managers underestimate lameness prevalence
Tools to support animal welfare management on farm Farmers Needs:
Tools to support animal welfare management on farm Since animal welfare is more and more considered as a quality aspect, farmers need a way to demonstrate this quality Farmers Needs:
Tools to support animal welfare management on farm Since animal welfare is more and more considered as a quality aspect, farmers need a way to demonstrate this quality Level playing field (in EU and global) Farmers Needs:
Drivers in the food chain Public concern Retail Consumers Farmers Legislators
’Translate’ public concerns in legislation (’science based’) Legislators
’Translate’ public concerns in legislation (’science based’) Compliance Legislators
’Translate’ public concerns in legislation (’science based’) Compliance Harmonisation/level playing field (EU) Legislators
’Drivers’ in the food chain
1.Assess animal welfare Components in safeguarding and improving welfare
Welfare assessment Until now: Mainly resource based
Resource based EU Council Directive 1999/74/EC Enriched cages From 1 January 2002: cm 2 /hen (600 plus) - nest - litter - 15 cm perch per hen - 12 cm feedtrough per hen - 2 nipple drinkers per cage - claw-shortening devices
Welfare assessment Until now: Mainly resource based ’Conceptual difficulties’
Welfare assessment Until now: Mainly resource based ’Conceptual difficulties’ ?
Welfare assessment Until now: Mainly resource based ’Conceptual difficulties’ ?
Welfare assessment Until now: Mainly resource based ’Conceptual difficulties’ ?/
Welfare assessment Animal based indicators
Welfare assessment Animal based indicators
The Welfare Quality ® System
Animal based measures
Welfare Quality assessment protocols
Resource based or outcome based??? Welfare assessment
Resource based or outcome based??? A clever combination but outcome parameters should be included Welfare assessment
1.Assess animal welfare 2.Feedback and improve Components in safeguarding and improving welfare
Feedback and improve
1.Assess animal welfare 2.Feedback and improve 3.Legislate Components in safeguarding and improving welfare
– Some problems: Too many details complicated and inflexible May have different effects under different conditions Compliance – Possible improvements Ban systems/practices clearly detrimental to welfare Harmonise assessment measures and control practices Require on-farm welfare management systems Include role of private schemes Legislation
Legislate
1.Assess animal welfare 2.Feedback and improve 3.Legislate 4.Communicate Components in safeguarding and improving welfare
Communicate
Points for discussion – Welfare assessment measures and information need to be harmonised – Legislation and private schemes should complement each other – Certification schemes should include a welfare improvement component
Thank you for your attention!