NOAA THORPEX Highlights John Cortinas Tom Hamill NOAA/OAR 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WWRP 1 THORPEX Summary Paper David Parsons U of Oklahoma School of Meteorology
Advertisements

1 NCEP Operational Regional Hurricane Modeling Strategy for 2014 and beyond Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NOAA/NWS, NCWCP, College Park, MD National.
Xuguang Wang, Xu Lu, Yongzuo Li, Ting Lei
The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) Richard Swinbank, Zoltan Toth and Philippe Bougeault, with thanks to the GIFS-TIGGE working group.
The impact of targeted observations from 2011 Winter Storms Reconnaissance on deterministic forecast accuracy Tom Hamill NOAA Earth System Research Lab,
1 What constrains spread growth in forecasts initialized from ensemble Kalman filters? Tom Hamill (& Jeff Whitaker) NOAA Earth System Research Lab Boulder,
Munehiko Yamaguchi Typhoon Research Department, Meteorological Research Institute of the Japan Meteorological Agency 9:00 – 12: (Thr) Topic.
94th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting
WEATHER RESEARCH AFTER THORPEX Acknowledgements: USTEC Members US THORPEX Planning Workshop, Silver Spring, MD, 5-6 June
CHOICES FOR HURRICANE REGIONAL ENSEMBLE FORECAST (HREF) SYSTEM Zoltan Toth and Isidora Jankov.
Observing System Simulation Experiments to Evaluate the Potential Impact of Proposed Observing Systems on Hurricane Prediction: R. Atlas, T. Vukicevic,
Ensemble-4DVAR for NCEP hybrid GSI- EnKF data assimilation system 1 5 th EnKF workshop, New York, May 22, 2012 Xuguang Wang, Ting Lei University of Oklahoma,
Improving High Resolution Tropical Cyclone Prediction Using a Unified GSI-based Hybrid Ensemble-Variational Data Assimilation System for HWRF Xuguang Wang.
Instituting Reforecasting at NCEP/EMC Tom Hamill (ESRL) Yuejian Zhu (EMC) Tom Workoff (WPC) Kathryn Gilbert (MDL) Mike Charles (CPC) Hank Herr (OHD) Trevor.
Demonstration Testbed for the Evaluation of Experimental Models for Tropical Cyclone Forecasting in Support of the NOAA Hurricane Forecast Improvement.
Targeted observations and Observing System simulation Experiments Within THORPEX Yucheng Song IMSG/EMC/NCEP/NOAA Camp Springs, MD THORPEX Review, Feb 25.
A comparison of hybrid ensemble transform Kalman filter(ETKF)-3DVAR and ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) analysis schemes Xuguang Wang NOAA/ESRL/PSD,
UMAC data callpage 1 of 16Global Ensemble Forecast System - GEFS Global Ensemble Forecast System Yuejian Zhu Ensemble Team Leader, Environmental Modeling.
Targeting strategies to improve hurricane track forecasts (JHT 03-05) PIs: Dr Sharanya J. Majumdar (University of Miami) Dr Sim D. Aberson (NOAA/AOML/HRD)
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 WE-01 Jim Caughey THORPEX IPO.
Evaluation of Potential Impacts of Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements on High-impact Weather Forecasting: A Regional OSSE Study Zhaoxia Pu and Lei Zhang University.
Observing Strategy and Observation Targeting for Tropical Cyclones Using Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation Chen, Deng-Shun 3 Dec,
NSF Hurricane Research National Science Foundation Pamela Stephens Geosciences Directorate.
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Inter-comparison and Validation Task Team Breakout discussion.
Data assimilation and observing systems strategies Pierre Gauthier Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Division Meteorological Service of Canada.
Page 1 Pacific THORPEX Predictability, 6-7 June 2005© Crown copyright 2005 The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble David Richardson Met Office, Exeter.
1 Precipitation verification Precipitation verification is still in a testing stage due to the lack of station observation data in some regions
Perspectives on Targeting Sharanya J. Majumdar (RSMAS/U. Miami) Session 3.1, THORPEX/DAOS WG Fourth Meeting June 2011.
Hybrid Variational/Ensemble Data Assimilation
Celeste Saulo and Juan Ruiz CIMA (CONICET/UBA) – DCAO (FCEN –UBA)
1 GSI/ETKF Regional Hybrid Data Assimilation with MMM Hybrid Testbed Arthur P. Mizzi NCAR/MMM 2011 GSI Workshop June 29 – July 1, 2011.
1 Rolf Langland Naval Research Laboratory – Monterey, CA Uncertainty in Operational Atmospheric Analyses.
1 Next Generation of NR Michiko Masutani January 2009.
1 An overview of the use of reforecasts for improving probabilistic weather forecasts Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Div.
WWRP OUTCOME OF CASXV (November 2009) David Burridge and Gilbert Brunet WWRP & THORPEX IPO CASXV report – ftp://ftp.wmo.int/Documents/PublicWeb/mainweb/meetings/
WWRP Implementation Plan for the WWRP Polar Prediction Project Thomas Jung, Steering Group Chair Neil Gordon, WMO Consultant November
Ligia Bernardet, S. Bao, C. Harrop, D. Stark, T. Brown, and L. Carson Technology Transfer in Tropical Cyclone Numerical Modeling – The Role of the DTC.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2008 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2007 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP): Where do we stand after 3 years? Bob Gall – HFIP Development Manager Fred Toepfer—HFIP Project manager Frank.
Lennart Bengtsson ESSC, Uni. Reading THORPEX Conference December 2004 Predictability and predictive skill of weather systems and atmospheric flow patterns.
GIFS-FDP Introduction to Framework Plan and links with SWFDP Richard Swinbank & Zoltan Toth.
Assess Observation Impacts in the Hybrid GSI-EnKF Data Assimilation Systems for NCEP Global Forecast System Model Through OSE and Ensemble Based Observation.
NOAA G-IV AIRCRAFT TRACK AROUND HURRICANE IVAN. ETKF PLANNED FLIGHT ACTUAL G-IV FLIGHT.
Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned Technology: NOAA's multi-year plan to deploy the NASA Global Hawk aircraft for high impact weather Michael L.
CHPR An integrated hurricane prediction and response system that allows: Strategic planning (weeks): energy, transportation, supply chains, financial,
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Guidance for Targeted Observations during N-AMMA and data impact results: 3 studies 1. Sharanya Majumdar (RSMAS/U.Miami) 2. Jason Dunion & Sim Aberson.
Potential Use of the NOAA G-IV for East Pacific Atmospheric Rivers Marty Ralph Dave Reynolds, Chris Fairall, Allen White, Mike Dettinger, Ryan Spackman.
Proposed THORPEX/HEPEX Hydrologic Ensemble Project (THEPS) Presentation for 3 rd THORPEX Science Symposium September 14-18, 2009 Prepared by John Schaake,
A Random Subgrouping Scheme for Ensemble Kalman Filters Yun Liu Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland Atmospheric and oceanic.
Adaptive Observations at NWS Lacey Holland, SAIC at EMC/NCEP/NWS Zoltan Toth, EMC/NCEP/NWS Acknowledgements:
Ensemble prediction review for WGNE, 2010 Tom Hamill 1 and Pedro de Silva-Dias 2 1 NOAA/ESRL 2 Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica
THORPEX THORPEX (THeObserving system Research and Predictability Experiment) was established in 2003 by the Fourteenth World Meteorological Congress. THORPEX.
© Crown copyright Met Office Predictability and systematic error growth in Met Office MJO predictions Ann Shelly, Nick Savage & Sean Milton, UK Met Office.
1 National Centers for Environmental Prediction: Where America’s Climate and Weather Services Begin Louis W. Uccellini Director, NCEP January 28, 2004.
1 Next Generation of NR Michiko Masutani November 20, 2008.
Tom Hamill, Jeff Whitaker, Brian Etherton, and Zoltan Toth with contributions from Phil Pegion, Gary Bates, Don Murray, others 1 Ensemble-based data assimilation.
2. WRF model configuration and initial conditions  Three sets of initial and lateral boundary conditions for Katrina are used, including the output from.
Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory
WRN Workshop NWS Funding Opportunities
THORPEX report to the CAS Management Group Alan Dickinson ICSC Chair
Exploring Application of Radio Occultation Data in Improving Analyses of T and Q in Radiosonde Sparse Regions Using WRF Ensemble Data Assimilation System.
GIFS-TIGGE project Richard Swinbank, and Young-Youn Park,
Science Objectives contained in three categories
La Plata Basin Originated from sub-seasonal workshop focussing on link seamless prediction climate to weather.
2. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
Recent Forecast Impact Results from WSR and ATREC
(NRL Base-funded project)
Presentation transcript:

NOAA THORPEX Highlights John Cortinas Tom Hamill NOAA/OAR 1

Implementation of EnKF concepts into operations NOAA/THORPEX, in its early years, provided seed money to many organizations (e.g., ESRL/PSD, U. Maryland, and NRL) for the development and inter-comparison of ensemble-based data assimilation methods. In the second round of funding (after a budget cut), ESRL/PSD received funding for more concerted development. This funding was supplemented with PSD base funds and HIWPP funds. ESRL/PSD demonstrated significant improvements, for example in hurricane track forecasts (see next page) In timeframe, ESRL/PSD worked closely with EMC (supported by OST funds) to develop and implement a hybrid ensemble Kalman filter/3D-Var global data assimilation system. This system was implemented in May 2012, resulting in a significant jump in the performance of NCEP’s global models. 2

NOAA Support ~$1.3M annually for research and international program office support – $588,000 to international program office from (sole supporter from US agencies) – NOAA budget discontinued funding in 2012 Research funding supported numerous projects that involved NOAA investigators working with cooperative institute partners 3

Some articles on EnKF supported by NOAA THORPEX research Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2012: Evaluating methods to account for system errors in ensemble data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, D. T. Kleist, M. Fiorino, and S. J. Benjamin, 2011: Predictions of 2010's tropical cyclones using the GFS and ensemble- based data assimilation methods. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, Hamill, T. M., and J. S. Whitaker, 2011: What Constrains Spread Growth in Forecasts Initialized from Ensemble Kalman Filters? Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, (50) Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, M. Fiorino, and S. J. Benjamin, 2011: Global ensemble predictions of 2009's tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, J. L. Anderson, and C. Snyder, 2009: Comment on "Sigma-point Kalman filter data assimilation methods for strongly nonlinear systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, Bougeault, P., Z. Toth, many others, T. M. Hamill, and many others, 2009: The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE). Bull Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, Wang, X., T. M. Hamill, J. S. Whitaker, C. H. Bishop, 2009: A comparison of the hybrid and EnSRF analysis schemes in the presence of model error due to unresolved scales. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, Whitaker, J. S., T. M. Hamill, X. Wei, Y. Song, and Z. Toth, 2008: Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP Global Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, Wang, X., D. M. Barker, C. Snyder, and T. M. Hamill, 2008: A hybrid ETKF-3DVAR data assimilation scheme for the WRF model. Part II: real observation experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, Wang, X., D. M. Barker, C. Snyder, and T. M. Hamill, 2008: A hybrid ETKF-3DVAR data assimilation scheme for the WRF model. Part I: observing system simulation experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, Wang, X., T. M. Hamill, and C. Snyder, 2007: On the theoretical equivalence of differently proposed ensemble/3D-Var hybrid analysis schemes Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, Wang, X., T. M. Hamill, C. Snyder, and C. H. Bishop, 2006: A Comparison of Hybrid Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter-OI and Ensemble Square-Root filter Analysis Schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, Hamill, T. M., 2006: Ensemble-based atmospheric data assimilation Chapter 6 of Predictability of Weather and Climate, Cambridge Press, Hamill, T. M., and J. S. Whitaker, Accounting for the error due to unresolved scales in ensemble data assimilation: a comparison of different approaches. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, Evaluating methods to account for system errors in ensemble data assimilation. Predictions of 2010's tropical cyclones using the GFS and ensemble- based data assimilation methods.What Constrains Spread Growth in Forecasts Initialized from Ensemble Kalman Filters?Global ensemble predictions of 2009's tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Comment on "Sigma-point Kalman filter data assimilation methods for strongly nonlinear systems. The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE).A comparison of the hybrid and EnSRF analysis schemes in the presence of model error due to unresolved scales.Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP Global Forecast System.A hybrid ETKF-3DVAR data assimilation scheme for the WRF model. Part II: real observation experiments. A hybrid ETKF-3DVAR data assimilation scheme for the WRF model. Part I: observing system simulation experiments.On the theoretical equivalence of differently proposed ensemble/3D-Var hybrid analysis schemes A Comparison of Hybrid Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter-OI and Ensemble Square-Root filter Analysis SchemesEnsemble-based atmospheric data assimilation Tippett, M., J. L. Anderson, C. H. Bishop, T. M. Hamill, and J. S. Whitaker, 2003: Ensemble square-root filters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, Ensemble square-root filters. 4

Skill of tropical cyclone track forecasts from EnKF compared to then-operational NCEP GEFS ensemble (2009) Mean error and spread of 2009 Northern Hemisphere track forecasts initialized from EnKF vs. other operational and experimental (FIM) forecast systems. from Hamill et al., 2011 MWRHamill et al., 2011 MWR 5

Targeted observation research Winter Storms Reconnaissance (WSR) ~ was supported by NOAA THORPEX funds. Dropsonde data from reconnaissance aircraft was dropped into areas deemed important, largely in the Pacific basin, aiming for reducing forecast error for significant land-falling storms that had potential for rapid error growth. WMO/DAOS recommended a careful evaluation of the impact of WSR data with a modern data assimilation system. A NOAA-THORPEX funded study observing system experiment was conducted using 2011 WSR data, examining skill of forecasts with and without the extra data. Result: no significant impact (too few observations). Consequence: WSR was cancelled for 2014 winter storms season. Recommendation to concentrate targeting concepts on other ideas, such as targeted assimilation of denser cloud-drift wind data. 6

Comparison of forecasts with and without assimilation of WSR data From Hamill et al., 2013 MWR ( Error of forecasts with assimilation of dropsonde data (CONTROL) vs. without (NODROP) measured in pre-computed downstream verification region. 7

TIGGE (THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble) NOAA THORPEX contributed to the establishment of multi-model ensemble archives that could be used for a variety of forecast purposes, including studies of the effect of multi-model ensembles. See Bougeault et al. overview article in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Aug 2010.overview article 8

Example of TIGGE-facilitated research: multi-model vs. reforecast-calibrated Here, a comparison of multi-model ensemble skill of 2-meter temperature forecasts vs. the various individual systems. Also plotted is the skill of ECMWF’s forecasts, post-processed using their internal reforecast database. from Hagedorn et al Hagedorn et al. 9

Forecastability of atmospheric rivers Gary Wick (ESRL/PSD) received funds for studying how well atmospheric rivers were forecast in various global models. Study published in WAF Dec 2013.WAF Dec

Issues NOAA THORPEX funding was eliminated in – Several of the research projects were cancelled, and/or had to find funding from other sources. – Support of WMO’s International Program Office for THORPEX was terminated earlier than originally planned. Hindered ability of NOAA to leverage other international THORPEX research. Many activities such as planned workshops had to be cancelled due to lack of funding. No shared contribution to international program office by US agencies, only NOAA. US agencies lacked a strong coordinated effort to collaborate and communicate results. No overall performance metrics to evaluate progress toward goals. 11