IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July 3-4 2012 Aerosol Profiling during CINDI Udo Frieß Henk Klein Baltink Katrijn Clémer Udo Frieß Hitoshi Irie Tim.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Papers DSCD intercomparison: Journal: ATM based on 1996 template Core team: HKR, MVR, FW, MK Figures: MVR Tables: FW Deadline: May 2010 Campaign overview:
Advertisements

Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
Analysis of SPUV aerosol data for the May 2003 BBC2 campaign Piet Stammes Wouter Knap KNMI.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
JERAL ESTUPINAN National Weather Service, Miami, Florida DAN GREGORIA National Weather Service, Miami, Florida ROBERTO ARIAS University of Puerto Rico.
Hester Volten, Ellen Brinksma, Stijn Berkhout, Daan Swart, René van der Hoff, Hans Bergwerff, Pieternel Levelt, Gaia Pinardi, Michel Van Roozendael NO.
Comparison of the aerosol extinction coefficient retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements to in-situ measurements P. Zieger 1, K. Clemer 2, S. Yilmaz 3, R.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Status S5p TROPOMI Pepijn Veefkind.
Irie et al., Multi-component retrievals for MAX-DOAS, 2 nd CINDI workshop, Brussels, March 10-11, 2010 Multi-component vertical profile retrievals for.
1. The MPI MAX-DOAS inversion scheme 2. Cloud classification 3. Results: Aerosol OD: Correlation with AERONET Surface extinction: Correlation with Nephelometer.
MAXDOAS formaldehyde slant column measurements during CINDI: intercomparison and analysis improvement G. Pinardi, M. Van Roozendael, N. Abuhassan, C. Adams,
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
1 MAX-DOAS IO and BrO measurements in the western pacific boundary layer Enno Peters 1, Katja Grossmann 2, Folkard Wittrock 1, Udo Frieß 2, Anja Schönhardt.
Lidar Intercomparion Study with Airborne Aerosol Optical Measurements near Tokyo on April 23, 2001 Toshiyuki Murayama Tokyo University of Mercantile Marine,
M. Van Roozendael, AMFIC Final Meeting, 23 Oct 2009, Beijing, China1 MAXDOAS measurements in Beijing M. Van Roozendael 1, K. Clémer 1, C. Fayt 1, C. Hermans.
Cloud screening and aerosol retrievals from MAX-DOAS measurements at Ukkel Clio Gielen Michel Van Roozendael, Francois Hendrick, Caroline Fayt, Christian.
Mainly sampled Asian outflow in the Alaska phase local forest fire smoke in the Canada phase We expect these phases to represent the two extremes among.
Summer Institute in Earth Sciences 2009 Comparison of GEOS-5 Model to MPLNET Aerosol Data Bryon J. Baumstarck Departments of Physics, Computer Science,
A comparison of air quality simulated by LOTO-EUROS driven by Harmonie and ECMWF using observations from Cabauw Jieying Ding, Ujjwal Kumar, Henk Eskes,
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research - CESAR - Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section.
SCIAMACHY satellite validation during the field campaigns CINDI and TRANSBROM Enno Peters, Folkard Wittrock, Andreas Richter, Mark Weber and John P. Burrows.
BIRA-IASB station report
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Figure 1. (left) Direct comparison of CCN concentration adjusted to 0.4% supersaturation and 499 nm AOD, both observed from ≤1 km altitudes during ARCTAS.
CINDI – Profiling by Tim Hay. Read DSCD or SCD file Write SZAs, SAzs, elevations, & viewing Azs to geometry file for RT Read prescribed profiles and settings:
Retrieval of Ozone Profiles from GOME (and SCIAMACHY, and OMI, and GOME2 ) Roeland van Oss Ronald van der A and Johan de Haan, Robert Voors, Robert Spurr.
Satellite group MPI Mainz Investigating Global Long-term Data Sets of the Atmospheric H 2 O VCD and of Cloud Properties.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
AEROSOL CLASSIFICATION RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS FOR EARTHCARE/ATLID, CALIPSO/CALIOP, AND GROUND-BASED LIDARS Sugimoto, N., T. Nishizawa, I. Matsui, National.
HONO retrievals in Beijing and Xianghe F. Hendrick 1, K. Clémer 1,*, C. Fayt 1, C. Hermans 1, Y. Huan 1,2, T. Vlemmix 1, P. Wang 2, and M. Van Roozendael.
Air Pollution/Environmental Technology laboratory Initial results on OMI NO 2 Validation during CINDI A contribution to the BIRA Cindi Workshop Yipin Zhou,
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
Plans to study horizontal NO 2 distribution Ankie Piters, Tim Vlemmix, KNMI data from: INTA, IUPB, JAMSTEC, KNMI, Leicester, NASA Objectives: –Satellite.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
CLOUD PHYSICS LIDAR for GOES-R Matthew McGill / Goddard Space Flight Center April 8, 2015.
 4-azimuth MAX-DOAS measurements in Mainz  Characterisation of the information content using 3D RTM MAXDOAS horizontal (averaging) effects MPI for Chemistry.
AGACC II: WP3: Aerosol properties and radiative forcing at Uccle Veerle De Bock Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Rob Albee, Jim Wendell, Stan Unander, NOAA Climate Forcing program, DOE ARM program, NASA, Met. Service Canada, Chinese Met. Agency,
A new method for first-principles calibration
3km 1.7 km 60 o 30 o With 1dg FOV, 3km from the cloud, the foot print perpendicular to the cloud will be about 50m. Cloud-Aerosol Scanner: Possible measurements.
 Methodology  Comparison with others instruments  Impact of daily AMF  Conclusions Tropospheric NO 2 from SAOZ F. Goutail, A. Pazmino, A. Griesfeller,
II GALION workshop - Geneva, Switzerland – September 21-23, 2010 EARLINET contribution to SDS-WAS Europe – North Africa regional node Lucia Mona Istituto.
MAXDOAS observations in Beijing G. Pinardi, K. Clémer, C. Hermans, C. Fayt, M. Van Roozendael BIRA-IASB Pucai Wang & Jianhui Bai IAP/CAS 24 June 2009,
Review of PM2.5/AOD Relationships
EOS-AURA Science Team Meeting September 2009, Leiden Comparison of NO 2 profiles derived from MAX-DOAS measurements and model simulations.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
First results of the aerosol profiling group IUP Heidelberg BIRA-IASB MPIC Mainz IUP Bremen JAMSTEC WSU KNMI NIWA Univ. Leicester PSI TNO RIVM KNMI.
ACCENT Symposium Sept ,Urbino (Italy) CEILOMETER FOR THE AEROSOL PROFILING: OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITS Fabio Madonna, Ioannis Binietoglou, D’Amico.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2004 Aircraft observations of Biomass burning aerosol Ben Johnson, Simon Osborne & Jim Haywood AMMA SOP0 Meeting, Exeter, 15 th.
Horizontal variability of aerosol optical properties observed during the ARCTAS airborne experiment Yohei Shinozuka 1*, Jens Redemann 1, Phil Russell 2,
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Page 1 OMI ST Meeting #11, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands, June 2006 Validation of OMI trace gas products Main contributors (this work): Michel Van.
Braak et al., OMI Science Team Meeting 6 June 2007 OMI Multiwavelength Aerosol Product Validation Status Remco Braak, Ben Veihelmann, Pepijn Veefkind.
MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric aerosols and formaldehyde above China Tim Vlemmix Francois Hendrick Michel Van Roozendael Isabelle De Smedt Katrijn.
Aerosol extinction coefficient (Raman method)
in-situ measurements in the framework of the ACTRIS-2 campaigns in:
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Julia Remmers1, Thomas Wagner1
Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY NO2, the Chimère air-quality model and
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
Emma Hopkin University of Reading
Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY NO2, the Chimère air-quality model and
PHY Lecture 16 Lidar remote sensing.
M. De Graaf1,2, K. Sarna2, J. Brown3, E. Tenner2, M. Schenkels4, and D
Presentation transcript:

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July Aerosol Profiling during CINDI Udo Frieß Henk Klein Baltink Katrijn Clémer Udo Frieß Hitoshi Irie Tim Vlemmix Thomas Wagner Folkard Wittrock Selami Yilmaz Paul Zieger

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July Institute of Environmental Physics The Aerosol Retrieval Group Institute Quantities retrieved Input data Vertical gridding Status BIRAExtinction profile O 4 single wavelength 200 m Data for most of the period Bremen AOT+ Layer height O 4 single wavelength n/aNo data yet Heidelberg Extinction profile and optical properties O 4 dSCDs (optionally: relative several wavelengths) 200 m Data for selected days KNMIAOT Relative single wavelength n/a Data for selected days MPI AOT+ Layer height O 4 single wavelength n/a Data for most of the period JAMSTECExtinction profile O 4 single wavelength 1 km Data for most of the period

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July Institute of Environmental Physics Aerosol Instrumentation during CINDI InstituteInstrumentQuantities RIVMBackscatter LidarBackscatter profiles KNMI Vaisala CT75 Ceilometer Backscatter profiles RIVM CAELI Raman Lidar Backscatter and extinction profiles PSI Humidity controlled Nephelometer Surface extinction coefficient TNO Multi Angle Absorption Photometer Black carbon TNO CIMEL Sun Photometer AOT

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July Treatment of Backscatter Profiles Full vertical resolution (~7.5 m) 20 min average Institute of Environmental Physics 200 m average Artificial degradation to MAX-DOAS vertical resolution by applying Averaging Kernel (IUPHD)

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July Data Intercomparison All data converted to 477 nm using Ångstrom exponent from Sun photometer (except Ceilometer, 905 nm)  Disadvantage for MPI (360 nm), but no Sun Photometer data available below 440 nm Comparison restricted to Golden Days: – 23., 24., 25., 30. June & 1., 2., 3., 4. July Institute of Environmental Physics

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July

: : : :00

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July

CINDI Campaign Comparison with Nephelometer and Sun Photometer

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July CINDI Campaign Comparison with Nephelometer and Sun Photometer Data excluded from intercomparison

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July AOT – Correlation with Sun Photometer - All data converted to 477 nm using Ångström Exponent from Sun Photometer - Institute of Environmental Physics Participant Regression coefficient SlopeIntercept BIRA IUPHD JAMSTEC KNMI MPI > 477 nm 427 -> 477 nm

IUP Heidelberg – NDACC/NORS Meeting – July Institute of Environmental Physics Summary Vertical structure of boundary layer as retrieved from MAX-DOAS is in very good agreement with backscatter profiles from Ceilometer, especially for BIRA and IUPHD AOD in good agreement with Sun Photometer for most groups Comparison of data at 477 nm with measurements at other wavelengths (MPI, 360 nm) problematic; no Sun Photometer data below 440 nm Systematically higher surface extinction than WetNeph in the afternoon remains unresolved, huge discrepancies Each of the algorithms and different approaches has its individual advantages/shortcomings (vert. resolution, robustness, …) Write-up of paper is in progress….