Summary of Supersites discussion at FRINGE 2011 meeting Frascati 21 Sept. 2011- splinter meeting Chair: Falk Amelung (GEO task leader) Craig Dobson, represented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 GEO/CEOS-SIT Call to Action Ken McDonald WGISS Vice-Chair.
Advertisements

1 Guy Duchossois, Work Plan Manager Report on 2006 Work Plan.
Remote Sensing at the service of Natural Disasters Warning: the Contribution of the Supersites Concept Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair GEO Institutions.
EGIDA Stakeholder Network and Advisory Board and Their Relevance for EGIDA and GEO Stefano Nativi 1 st Joint Workshop of the EGIDA Stakeholder Network.
Agencies’ response to DRM pilot EO data requirements Ivan Petiteville (ESA, Chair WGDisasters) Stéphane Chalifoux (CSA, Vice-Chair WGDisasters) Andrew.
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
25th CEOS Plenary | Lucca, Italy| 8-9 November 2011 Consideration of CEOS Response to the Arctic Ecosystems Initiative Agenda Item 14 Guy Séguin Canadian.
A Roadmap for the GHCP The GeoHazards Community of Practice (GHCP) Presentation developed during the First GHCP Workshop, Paris, January 18-21, 2010.
Geohazards Splinter Meeting at FRINGE 2011 | ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy | 21 September 2011 CEOS Task on Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
The GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Initiative Objective, Status, Value Chart 1> Geohazard Supersites > Jörn Hoffmann
WP5 Strategy Domenico Giardini SED ETHZ. WP5 Objectives Harmonize national implementation Integrate the European scientific community Establish Centres.
Stefano Salvi Chair of the Supersites Advisory Committee Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai, March 2015.
The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites Initiative The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites.
© GEO Secretariat GEO WP & 2013 GEO priorities for CEOS Support GEO Secretariat CEOS SIT-28 NASA - Langley March 2013.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
CEOS Response to the GEO Disasters Task Guy Seguin CSA CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA Date.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Klaus Schmidt, Dr. Jörn Hoffmann, DLR CEOS Support to the Geohazard Supersites The CEOS Supersite.
CEOS SIT-28 Introduction of the Agenda, Overall Objectives, and Essential Business Topics Hampton, Virginia, USA March 12-14, 2013.
IGOS Symposium Programme Committee Telecon
9th Dealing with Disasters International Conference (DwD 2015) Health Centered Disaster Risk Reduction: A New Agenda for a New Era Current Progress in.
Data Democracy Pakorn Apaphant May 11, 2009 WGISS 27 Toulouse, France.
Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Jörn Hoffmann, Klaus Schmidt German Aerospace Center (DLR) CEOS SIT-29 Meeting CNES, Toulouse, France 9 th.
CEOS Disaster Risk Management Implementation Phase Status Ivan Petiteville (ESA) on behalf of CEOS DRM Team CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA.
GEO Geohazard Supersites Current Status and key challenges EGU 2013 Vienna Supersites Splinter Meeting.
THE GEO GLOBAL CAPACITY BUILDING SYMPOSIUM Seville (Spain) September 10 & 11, 2007.
Geohazard Super Sites Concept & ESA Trial Geohazard objectives / requirements GEO Geohazard Members What is a Super Site? “Super Site” Concept ESA Virtual.
UNAVCO is a non-profit, membership-governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. Boulder, Colorado Main Offices.
REDUCING DISASTER RISK THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF EARTH OBSERVATIONS Helen M. Wood Chair, U.S. Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction August.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Slide 1 WGISS CEOS WGISS 21, Budapest 8-12 May 2006 WGISS Contribution to GEO WGISS Contribution to GEO Ivan Petiteville.
EUM/SIR/VWG/11/012 WP 2000: Climate SBA 9 October 2011 WP 2000: Climate Societal Benefit Area Robert Husband (EUMETSAT)
Capacity Building Committee Architecture and Data Committee Meeting Seattle – July 2006.
CEO Team SEO SIT Technical Workshop 25 – Agenda #16 EUMETSAT 17 th to 18 th September 2015 Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEOS in the future.
Co-Chair Comments – Session 2 Gary Foley, Rick Lawford With inputs from Presenters and Douglas Cripe GEO Work Planning Session Geneva April 28-30, 2014.
WGISS Technology Subgroup Report WGISS-29 Bonn, 2010 Nataliia Kussul WGISS.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Ake Rosenqvist, Nobuyoshi Fujimoto/ JAXA SDCG-8 Session #1, Agenda Item #7 SDCG Element 3: Satellite Data Support to GFOI R&D Activities SDCG-8 DLR, Bonn,
Forest Carbon Tracking A New GEO Task in WP Per Erik Skr ø vseth Norwegian Space Centre.
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-4 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
JCOMM Services Program Area Working together beyond GODAE for Operational Oceanography Dr. Craig Donlon JCOMM Service Programme Area Coordinator The Met.
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
The ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, in continuity with the preceding ERA-NET TRANSCAN, aims at linking translational cancer research funding programmes in 15 Member.
EPOS where we are, where we go ! Massimo Cocco INGV Rome September EPOS Meeting.
Towards an European Network of Earth Observation Networks (ENEON): Addressing Challenges and Facilitating Collaboration for non-space based Earth Observations.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team Plenary Agenda Item #14b 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6.
Why are we here? projectsnational coordinationWorking groupsTCS.
GEO Coordination Items S. Briggs, B. Smith, E. Volden Agenda Item 5 CEOS SIT-29 Meeting CNES, Toulouse, France 9 th -10 th April 2014.
Slide: 1 37 th WGISS meeting|Cocoa beach | 14 april 2014 Richard Moreno WGISS chair report.
GEO’s Need for Non-space Based Observations and the GEO Vision for GD6 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat November 10 Mexico City.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites ESA F. Sarti Day 1 – point 7 CEOS WGCapD-5 CEOS Systems Engineering Office (SEO), Hampton, VA, USA March 30th.
GEO 2016 Work Programme Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Report from GEO Post-2015 WG and GEO Ministerial WG D. Brent Smith, NOAA CEOS Representative CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
A. Rosenqvist, S. Yabe-Ogawa SDCG-10 Session #4 Element 3 Space Data Support to GFOI R&D.
CEOS Response to GEOSS Water Strategy
The Geohazard Supersites initiative improving DRR through better science Stefano Salvi Chair of the GSNL Scientific Advisory Committee.
CEOS Response to the Sendai Framework
Review of Candidate GEO Initiative “Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories 2.0” Prepared by: Review Team Lead: Jonathon Ross – CEOS Delegation (Alternate)
WInSAR Operations Update
GFOI Status & Issues CEOS Lead & SDCG EXEC SIT-31 Agenda Item 5
International Financing Institutions (IFI) Engagement
Proposed 2019 CEOS chair initiative
Access to COSMO-SkyMed data for science
Prepared at the Joint Meeting For SDCG for GFOI / GEOGLAM / LSI-VC
WG Disasters Report 2018 SIT TW Simona Zoffoli & WG Disasters Members
EuroGEOSS initiative CEOS WGISS-46 meeting Anica Huck October 24, 2018
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
WG Disasters Observation for Disasters
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Supersites discussion at FRINGE 2011 meeting Frascati 21 Sept splinter meeting Chair: Falk Amelung (GEO task leader) Craig Dobson, represented by Jeanne Sauber (NASA - CEOS task leader) Massimo Cocco (INGV - EPOS leader)

Objective of the Splinter meeting: general information on progress on action of previous splinter meeting information on Space / In-situ collaboration Endorsement of White Paper (Bylaws, consortium structure, governance structure, every contributor own data policy, time delay for volcanoes) Input for Strategic Plan ( ). Focus: Natural laboratories (presented to GEO plenary Nov 16), Focus sites for Space within European Natural Laboratory Next steps / milestones / demonstrators (GEO Plenary, GEOSS of Americas, UNAVCO Science meeting,??)

General information on progress on action of previous splinter meeting Previously identified actions  closed (White Paper, Bylaws, Partnership instead of Consortium) Enlargement of on-line data repository  done. In particular good progress has been made for the event Supersites Haiti and Japan with data from Envisat, TS-X, ALOS, Radarsat, UAV SAR DLR gave a presentation about procedures for accessing TS-X data to the Supersite initiative ESA makes very good progress in populating natural laboratories

Space & in-situ are joining forces – Impressive presentation about in-situ assets: EPOS: the “European Plate Observatory System” infrastructure project. Data assets from 18 countries are being contributed Unavco (Earthscope, CocoNet) Japan; – US- European coordination of in-situ assets under way – The European Commission has opened a call for several Supersites in Europe with a funding of 6M€ each. – Monitoring agencies are getting integrated into the Supersite structure – New results have been presented exploitation of synergy of multiple data sources across discipline

Endorsement of White Paper governance: representative for in-situ data provider needed as co-Chair Results of CEOS survey on the Supersites: – The White Paper looks fine – Supersite PI should submit proposal with specific data needs to CEOS PoC, showing expected results and synergy utilizing the specific strengths of satellites and in-situ data (value of the combination should be clear) – Reporting from the science community to the data providers is essential. The benefit for both, data provider and scientists, of openly available access needs to be shown. – Individual data policies need to be respected International coordination of in-situ data provider is a big challenge. In many countries the in-situ responsibility is not clear (except: EPOS for Europe, USGS and Earthscope for USA)

Input for Strategic Plan ( ). In the Splinter meeting it became clear that before expanding the number of Supersites and Natural Laboratories, success and usefulness needs to be demonstrated However the Natural Laboratories could /should be used as a mechanism for data providers to attract innovative science, leading to new applications and services. The Strategic Plan is close to be finalized An updated strategic plan will be posted on Supersites website together with a questionaire on potential Supersites/Natural Laboratories and in-situ data provider, and the input form the community will be solicited. Willing in-situ data provider (who contribute data) should be rewarded by establishment of additional Supersites.

Unresolved issues Reporting: the usefulness of the SSNL data provision for the CEOS is not obvious, even though results exist. Expectation from some CEOS Agencies are not obvious to fulfill (e.g. how data are used by decision makers and cabinet office) Differences in expectations from Space Agency’s: NASA: vulnerability, DLR: vulnerability is a business case. Science is priority without interfering with business opportunities. Different understanding of business opportunities between Space Agencies: DLR, ASI?: services (data processing and interpretation). Japan (selling of data). ESA: (1) Science; (2) innovation engine for EO (from R&D to operations, services). No in-situ data provider as PoC has been identified in Japan  Opportunities for CEOS data exists, but has not been exploited (e.g. no TerraSAR-X acquisitions)

Actions for GEO task lead Changes to White Paper (approval by CEOS requested) 1.“Consortium” will be changed to “partnership” (remains consortium among data users (universities)) 2.Clarify difference between geologic hazards and geologic risks (see next slide; triggered by JAXA survey comments) SSNL focus is on geological hazards. The development of another GEO structure with focus on geological risks is encouraged. Develop comprehensive strategic plan about a global network of Natural Laboratories and Supersites (requested in GEO workplan)

Geological hazard versus geological risk Areas of high hazard can be of low risk if nobody lives there (e.g. Tibet). Risks can be reduced but not hazards. SSNL concerned with geological hazards (fundamental research). A different GEO structure could focus on risks, building on SSNL. Space agencies can encourage risk reduction by data provision for selected areas (e.g. ESA providing data for Europe)

The Challenge: SSNL concept requires critical thinking.