E VALUATION P ROJECT S PUTUM C ULTURE C ONVERSION I LLINOIS 2010-2014 Carrie Storrs RN, MPH, CPH Illinois Department of Public Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOTS/ DOTS PLUS IMPLEMENTATION AND INTEGRATION Vaira Leimane State Centre of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases of Latvia Paris, October, 28.
Advertisements

What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Evaluation of Sputum Culture Conversion
TM PEN: CDC Guidance for Developing Plans and Reports 2011 TB ETN/PEN Conference Awal Khan, PhD Lead, Program Evaluation Team Field Services and Evaluation.
Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Compendium of Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating National Tuberculosis Programs.
Engagement strategies for Montoring & Evaluation Charlotte Colvin MEASURE Regional NTP Workshop New Delhi, India 2 February 2006 MEASURE Evaluation.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Culture Conversion and Self- Administered Therapy in Privately Managed Tuberculosis Patients Melissa Ehman MPH, Jennifer Flood MD MPH, Pennan Barry MD.
Evaluation Methods.
CONTACT INVESTIGATION EVALUATING NTIP OBJECTIVES: A CHICAGO EXAMPLE Margarita Reina, MPH Chicago Department of Public Health December 7, 2011.
GSU-NACDD-CDC Chronic Disease and Public Health Workforce Training Training Needs Survey and Public Health Certificate in Chronic Disease Training for.
Assessment of Program Evaluation Activities in Tuberculosis Control Programs — United States, 2009–2010 Silvia M. Trigoso, MPH Fellow, Public Health Prevention.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
Meredith Carr, JD J. Stan Lehman, MPH David W. Purcell, JD, PhD Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention July 25, 2012.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Maria Jessing, Clinical Improvement Manager SESLHD Trish Wills, Southern Sector Manger Clinical Practice Improvement Unit Sandra Grove A/Clinical Quality.
Operational Research in the 21 st Century. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) World’s oldest humanitarian organization.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission Performance Improvement: Getting Started in Your ASC Dana Dunn RN, MBA, CNOR, CASC Certified Yellow Belt Field Representative,
Tuberculosis Indicators Project (TIP) Overview Tuberculosis Control Branch (TBCB ) Division of Communicable Disease Control Center for Infectious Diseases.
Skunk Works Evaluation Tools: How do we know if we are having an impact?
Monitoring and Evaluation Module 12 – March 2010.
The Cohort Review Process The Cohort Review Process Kim Field RN, MSN WA State DOH Tuberculosis Program.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Data Coaching Getting to the human side of data. Session Goals  Identify the purpose of using data in an educational setting.  Describe ways to connect.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
V IRGINIA C OHORT D ATA – 5 YEAR TRENDS AFTER 4 YEARS OF LOCAL COHORT REVIEW Virginia achievement on National TB Indicators for the past 5 years – where.
Experience in Other Provinces: Nova Scotia Stroke System Neala Gill, RN, BN, MA Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia Quebec Summit on Stroke October 7, 2008.
Public Health Advocacy in Low Income Settings: Views and Experiences on Effective Strategies and Evaluation of Health Advocates in Malawi IFGH Conference:
Surveillance Data in Action: Tuberculosis Indicators Melissa Ehman, MPH Tuberculosis Control Branch (TBCB) Division of Communicable Disease Control Center.
Update of the Global Plan to Stop TB TB/HIV Working Group Meeting Geneva, November 2009 Christian Lienhardt.
Stakeholder Analysis. What is stakeholder analysis?  Stakeholder analysis is a process of systematically gathering and analyzing qualitative information.
COMMUNITY INDICATORS CONSORTIUM Integrating Community Indicators And Performance Measures 1 Children’s Services Council of Broward County: A Real Story.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Outcomes, Outputs & Context Tammy Horne, Ph.D. WellQuest Consulting Ltd. (780)
MAFF Workshop on INTERNATIONAL BEST Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) PRACTICES 24 August 2010.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
GALVESTON COUNTY TB PROGRAM  SYED HAIDRY TB PROGRAM MANAGER  Dr. MARK GUIDRY CEO, HEALTH AUTHORITY & TB CLINICIAN.
Dr Ral Antic Chair Scientific Committee IUATLD-APR Australia Pre-Conference Workshop 1 National TB Control Program Summary & Remarks.
September 19,  “Cohort review is a systematic review of the management of patients with TB disease and their contacts.”—Understanding the Cohort.
Capacity Building For Program Evaluation In A Local Tobacco Control Program Eileen Eisen-Cohen, Maricopa County Tobacco Use Prevention Program Tips for.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Cindy Tumbarello, RN, MSN, DHA September 22, 2011.
DATA TEAM SIX STEP PROCESS. GOAL: IMPROVED TEACHING AND STUDENT LEARNING Analyze student performance in context with school, district and state performance.
Compendium of Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating National Tuberculosis Programs.
The Illinois Clostridium difficile Prevention Collaborative.
Presentation on Strategic Plan for Monitoring and Evaluation 1386 – 1390.
Hepatitis C Virus Program in Chicago
Evaluation of Programs
Problem Solving Process.
World Tuberculosis Day 2013
This is an archived document.
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Chicago Department of Public Health
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Concepts of Nursing NUR 212
TB epidemiological situation in Kyrgyzstan
Evaluation of Programs
monitoring & evaluation THD Unit, Stop TB department WHO Geneva
Using Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis in California
Surveillance, Monitoring and Evaluation Working Group
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Presentation transcript:

E VALUATION P ROJECT S PUTUM C ULTURE C ONVERSION I LLINOIS Carrie Storrs RN, MPH, CPH Illinois Department of Public Health

I LLINOIS TB P ROGRAM Illinois excluding Chicago 102 counties with local health departments and/or local TB boards Locally funded; funding and services vary widely Resources for sputum induction in only a few areas Cases treated by PMDs in many areas IDPH: surveillance, oversight & consultation No regulatory authority over local programs Testing by IDPH lab at no cost to programs or providers DOT grants to six highest incidence areas

E VALUATION F OCUS S ELECTION Review of program performance on NTIP and other indicators Prioritize problem areas Performance areas lacking national targets State and local resources Anecdotal information related to problem areas Feasibility of demonstrating improvement

B ACKGROUND National target: 61.5% of sputum culture positive cases will have documentation of sputum culture conversion within 60 days by 2015 Performance had decreased steadily 57.1% in % in 2008 New web-based TB reporting system implemented in 2008 TB control in Illinois’ largest local jurisdiction moved from a specially (and well) funded TB San District to the county health department in 2007

P URPOSE OF E VALUATION Improve patient outcome (response to treatment), as indicated by an increase in the percentage of sputum culture positive cases with documentation of sputum culture conversion within 60 days Analyze data to determine scope and nature of problem Explore strategies to improve program performance

O BJECTIVES By 12/31/2009 data will be collected, and by 5/31/10 data will be analyzed to identify the nature and scope of the problem and identify contributing factors and barriers. By August 30, 2010 an evaluation team meeting will be held to review the data analysis and to identify and develop strategies to increase documentation of sputum culture conversion within 60 days of treatment initiation. Increase the percentage of sputum culture positive cases with documentation of sputum culture conversion within 60 days to 50% by % by % by % by % by % by 2014.

A CTIVITIES 2008 data for comparison Review quantitative & qualitative data Team meetings to develop strategies Revise case & cohort review tools and emphasize sputum culture conversion in reviews Provide education at regional meetings, workshops, during case consults, etc. Evaluation focus and rationale Strategies and barriers Ongoing monitoring of surveillance data for completeness Develop reports in web based reporting system

T OOLS

T OOLS – C ASE /C OHORT R EVIEW F ORM

R ESULTS Nature of problem Completeness of documentation Accuracy of documentation Some lack of sputum collection, usually due to patient unable to produce Patients with extensive disease 2008 conversion increased from 37.1% to 50.2% Cases lacking documentation decreased from 34.7% to 6.4% 2009 conversion 61.3% Exceeded 5 year program target in first year Near National 2015 target of 61.5%

R ESULTS – 2009 CASES County# Cases# Sputum + # Convert  60%Convert  Other combined Total

R ESULTS County# Cases# Sputum + # Convert  60% Convert  Other combined Total

C ONCLUSION With improved accuracy & completeness of documentation, objectives were exceeded Remaining barriers likely to remain unresolved Priority shifted to other performance targets Decision to change evaluation focus