Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

 Logos/logic is situated (bound/defined by a cultural space).  In Philosophy, there are “traditions” of logic, and a study of various forms of logic.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
Fallacies Learning Targets: I can identify logical fallacies when they are committed. I can recognize why reasoning is fallacious. I can avoid logical.
Logical Fallacies Persuasion Pitfalls. Logical Fallacies What is a logical fallacy? A mistake in reasoning that seriously affects the ability to argue.
4 Thinking Critically. 2 2 Learning Outcomes The student will learn techniques for: Interpreting written texts. Participating in class discussions about.
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Chapter 6 Lecture Notes Working on Relevance. Chapter 6 Understanding Relevance: The second condition for cogency for an argument is the (R) condition.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
When Claims Go Wrong Recognizing & Avoiding Logical Fallacies Kim Miller Davis.
Speaking Persuasively. AV Aids & Props Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Evidence.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Fallacies Information taken from Purdue OWL, Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument and Annette Rottenberg’s Elements of Argument.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
Logical Fallacies.
AP English Language and Composition
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Logical Fallacies Protect yourself!. A “Fallacy” is an error in reasoning. Sometimes it’s an honest mistake, but sometimes people use fallacies to try.
FALLACIES COMMON AND RECURRENT ERRORS IN REASONING
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
ARGUMENTS. WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? An argument consist of two or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that supports the conclusion.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Logical Fallacies.
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
Argumentation.
C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES English O VERGENERALIZATION : Statements that are so general that they oversimplify reality.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Definition Review Diversion and Distortion Tactics
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Rhetorical Proofs and Fallacies Week 10 – Wednesday, October 28.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Fallacies are errors in argument and they fall into two groups: 1.Evasions 2.Oversimplifications Source: The Little Brown Handbook, 11th ed.
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Persuasive Speech Unit Logical Fallacies Fallacy: A mistake in an argument that automatically invalidates it.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
Argumentative Terms Quiz “Jeopardy Style”. Single Sided Arguments.
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter 10 notes Logic and Reasoning.
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Logical Fallacies List
Fallacies A Brief Guide.
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
More on Argument.
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
(upload to dropbox in Blackboard)
Fallacies of Reasoning
Fallacies.
Fallacies A Brief Guide.
Logical Fallacies English III.
Presentation transcript:

Fallacies What are they?

Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/ or not intended) They’re generally hurtful and distract from the argument Be careful because the fallacy is sometimes very subtle

Fallacies QA Hasty Generalization: drawing a conclusion from insufficient evidence Either/Or: creates the false dilemma (binary) by limiting the choice to 2 alternatives when there are more options False Authority (Appeal to an Expert): citing irrelevant information of an expert who isn’t an expert on the issue/subject

Fallacies contd. False Analogy: comparing two disparate things when the comparison is invalid. False Cause: claims that one event leads to another (but the events are unrelated) Slipper Slope: arguments that suggest an event will precipitate the domino effect- ending in inevitable disaster.

Fallacies contd. Ad Hominem: attacking your opponent- their appearance, personal habits or character instead of dealing with the validity of the argument Red Herring: fallacy of distraction which brings up unrelated/irrelevant issues to distract people from the truth.

Fallacies contd. Bandwagon (Appeal to Popularity): basing an argument on a popular belief and using this as proof that it’s valid. Non Sequitur (Irrelevant argument): means “it does not follow”. The conclusion doesn’t follow the premise.

Fallacies contd. Begging the Question or (Circular Reasoning): the supporting reasons restate the claim. The argument paraphrases the same idea w/out evidence.

Fallacies contd. Death by a 1000 Qualifications: making a statement that might be true but using so many qualifiers that it becomes insignificant. Many Questions: asking questions that subtly attacks opponent

Fallacies contd. Oversimplification: using absolute statements that might not be relevant-or presenting overly simplistic explanations when the issues is infinitely complex

Fallacies contd. Appeal to Ignorance: basing an argument on the lack of evidence. Have to present negative evidence to ‘prove’ something. Appeal to Tradition: basing an argument on tradition

Fallacies contd. Protecting the Hypothesis: manipulating/mischaracterizing data to prove a point Fallacy of Omission: conveniently leaving out relevant information that would weaken argument

Fallacies contd. Emotional Appeals: inciting fear, tradition, or pity to manipulate audience’s emotions rather than their reasoning Equivocation/Slanted Language: biasing the reader by using word choices that have multiple connotations to manipulate your point.

Fallacies contd. Straw Man: using the ‘weakest’ points of opponents argument to mischaracterize their position