Does N limit C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems? If so, how? Yiqi Luo Department of Botany and Microbiology University of Oklahoma USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Advertisements

Parameter identifiability, constraints, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models Dr. Yiqi Luo Botany and microbiology department University.
Effects of Forest Thinning on CO 2 Efflux Peter Erb, Trisha Thoms, Jamie Shinn Biogeochemistry 2003: Block 1.
Some slides on warming, precipitation, and biomass harvesting experiments in Oklahoma Yiqi Luo Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology University.
BIOL 4120: Principles of Ecology Lecture 20: Ecosystem Ecology Dafeng Hui Room: Harned Hall 320 Phone:
Peter S. Curtis Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Managing Great Lakes Forests for Climate Change Mitigation.
Land Carbon Sink and Nitrogen Regulation under Elevated CO 2 : Central Tendency Yiqi Luo University of Oklahoma NCEAS Working group: William Currie, Jeffrey.
 Critical assumptions to test include: Is leaf litter chemistry affected by elevated [CO 2 ]? Does a change in litter chemistry in elevated [CO 2 ] alter.
CENTURY ECOSYSTEM MODEL Introduction to CENTURY. WHY CENTURY Evaluate Effects of Environmental Change Evaluate Changes in Management.
Data-model assimilation for manipulative experiments Dr. Yiqi Luo Botany and microbiology department University of Oklahoma, USA.
Diagnostic canopy Prognostic canopy. Offline results: Combined influence of sun/shade and prognostic canopy scheme, compared to CLM3.0. CLM3-CN running.
Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions in the LM3 Land Model Stefan Gerber Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Princeton University
Predictability of the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Yiqi Luo University of Oklahoma, USA Tsinghua University, China Trevor Keenan Harvard University, USA Matthew.
Introduction to the science of agricultural emissions and sinks This presentation provides participants with a basic understanding of the soil, plant and.
Persistence of nitrogen limitation over terrestrial carbon uptake Galina Churkina, Mona Vetter and Kristina Trusilova Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry.
Critical needs for new understanding of nutrient dynamics in Earth System Models Peter Thornton Oak Ridge National Laboratory Collaborators: Gautam Bisht,
Carbon – Nitrogen – Climate Coupling Peter Thornton NCAR, CGD/TSS June 2006.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Vegetation turnover and nitrogen feedback drive carbon sequestration in response to elevated.
Interactions Between Increasing CO 2 and Temperature in Terrestrial Ecosystems Lake Tahoe, California April 27-30, 2003.
The Carbon Cycle I.Introduction: Changes to Global C Cycle (Ch. 15) II.C-cycle overview: pools & fluxes (Ch. 6) III. Controls on GPP (Ch. 5) IV.Controls.
The Carbon Cycle 3 I.Introduction: Changes to Global C Cycle (Ch. 15) II.C-cycle overview: pools & fluxes (Ch. 6) III. Controls on GPP (Ch. 5) IV.Controls.
Effects of silvicultural practices on forest soil metabolism Claire Phillips FS 533 Winter 2007.
The benefits and the environmental costs of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen 刘玲莉 中国科学院植物研究所 植被与环境变化国家重点实验室 The 7 th ISOME & the 4 th IYEF, GuangZhou, 06/12/2013.
Forest Sensitivity to Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 and its Relevance to Carbon Management Richard J. Norby Oak Ridge National Laboratory Aspen Global Change.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Effects of Forest Management on Carbon Flux and Storage Jiquan Chen, Randy Jensen, Qinglin Li, Rachel Henderson & Jianye Xu University of Toledo & Missouri.
Soil biological indicators: Organic Farming Systems Dr. Rachel Creamer, Prof. Bryan Griffiths Johnstown Castle Environment Research Centre Acknowledgements:
Box 1 CO 2 mitigation potential of managed grassland: An example Franzluebbers et al. (2000; Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: ) quantified C sequestration.
Modelling C and N dynamics with MAGIC model from annual to seasonal/monthly time step Filip Oulehle, Jack Cosby, Chris Evans, Jakub Hruška, Jiří Kopáček,
Chapter 5 The Biosphere: The Carbon Cycle of Terrestrial Ecosystems
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
1 Nutrient Cycling and Retention Chapter 19 nitro/biggraph.asp.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
1. Ecological legacies are: Anything handed down from a pre-disturbance ecosystem (Perry 1994). The carry-over or memory of the system with regard to.
Climate change and the carbon cycle David Schimel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado.
Long-term Climate Change Mitigation Potential with Organic Matter Management on Grasslands Presentation By Taylor Smith Authored By Rebecca Ryals, Melannie.
Ecosystem ecology studies the flow of energy and materials through organisms and the physical environment as an integrated system. a population reproduction.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 15: Biosphere and Nutrients Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Kathryn Berger UNH Department of Natural Resources
Methods Model. The TECOS model is used as forward model to simulate carbon transfer among the carbon pools (Fig.1). In the model, ecosystem is simplified.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
Forest response to elevated [CO 2 ] depends on the potential for an ecosystem to meet productivity and carbon storage demands. If soil N is limiting, PNL.
Model Intercomparisons and Validation: Terrestrial Carbon, an Arctic Emphasis Andrew Slater.
Effects of Rising Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Carbon Sequestration and N losses in the Delaware River Basin Yude Pan, John Hom, Richard Birdsey, Kevin.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Background The extent to which terrestrial ecosystems are able to store excess carbon is debated in literature. Soils accumulate two thirds of all carbon.
Effects of Climate Change on Tundra Ecosystems Greg Henry, University of British Columbia Philip Wookey, University of Uppsala.
Welcome Grant from National Science Foundation: Fire, Atmospheric pCO 2, and Climate as Alternative Primary Controls of C 4 -Grass Abundance: The Late-Quaternary.
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER: Can the LTER network be leveraged to inform science and policy?
Nutrient Cycling and Retention
Estimates of Carbon Transfer coefficients Using Probabilistic Inversion for Three Forest Ecosystems in East China Li Zhang 1, Yiqi Luo 2, Guirui Yu 1,
Flux Measurements and Systematic Terrestrial Measurements 1.discuss gaps and opportunities What are gaps? 2. brainstorm ideas about collaborative projects.
CLM-CN update: Sensitivity to CO 2, temperature, and precipitation in C-only vs. C-N mode Peter Thornton, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mariana Vertenstein,
Peter Thornton NCAR, CGD/TSS Collaborators:
Mixed Oak Ecosystem: Field and Lab Data Integration Deborah Hudleston Catherine Resler Mary Walton Chris Weber.
1390 ±190 GTC 4000 GTC VEGETATION SOIL & DETRITUS FOSSIL FUEL OCEAN SURFACE 960± 60 GTC INTERMEDIATE & DEEP OCEAN ± 2000 GTC SEDIMENT 150 GTC ATMOSPHERE.
Parameter estimation of forest carbon dynamics using Kalman Filter methods –Preliminary results Chao Gao, 1 Han Wang, 2 S Lakshmivarahan, 3 Ensheng Weng,
Nitrogen Limitation and Terrestrial C Storage Adrien C. Finzi Boston University Christine L. Goodale Cornell University
Uncertainty analysis of carbon turnover time and sequestration potential in terrestrial ecosystems of the Conterminous USA Xuhui Zhou 1, Tao Zhou 1, Yiqi.
Inorganic Nutrient Research- Bonanza Creek LTER BNZ LTER Global permafrost soil organic C pool: 1,500 Pg 0-3 m depth Warming = 15% loss of pool by 2100.
Greater root carbon storage compared to shoot carbon storage in soil Fig 1 We labeled cereal rye cover crop with 13 CO 2 (left) aboveground biomass was.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Matter cycles within ecosystems energy flows unidirectionally through ecosystems matter cycles at local and global scales movement of elements among various.
ECOLOGICAL CYCLES: CARBON, PHOTOSYNTHESIS, & RESPIRATION How are my farming practices affecting the environment & long term stability?
CLM-CN update: Sensitivity to CO2, temperature, and precipitation in C-only vs. C-N mode Peter Thornton, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mariana Vertenstein, Nan.
Results and discussion
CLM-CN update: Sensitivity to CO2, temperature, and precipitation in C-only vs. C-N mode Peter Thornton, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mariana Vertenstein, Nan.
OUTLINE Why deal with decomposition Controls on decomposition
Presentation transcript:

Does N limit C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems? If so, how? Yiqi Luo Department of Botany and Microbiology University of Oklahoma USA

Key points 1. 1.Mineral N regulates plant growth and its responses to global change 2. 2.N capital in organic form determines long-term carbon sequestration

Working hypotheses 1.CO 2 stimulation of carbon sequestration will be down-regulated by limited N supply over time. 2.Climate warming stimulates N mineralization and increases N availability, which will enhance C sequestration 3.N deposition increases mineral N availability, stimulate plant growth, and thus will enhance C sequestration

Carbon cycle Soil Mineral N Nitrogen cycle Plant assimilation Warming N deposition Elevated CO 2

Effects of nitrogen on plant growth, overall and grouped by biome LeBauer and Treseder 2008

Plant Carbon cycle Soil Mineral N Nitrogen cycle assimilation Atm CO 2 Litter / CWD Soil Organic Matter N deposition N fixation denitrification N leaching respiration Internal fast External slow mineralization photosynthesis litterfall & mortality decomposition (i) Thornton et al. 2009

Effects of N addition on C and N cycles Meta-analysis of data from 206 papers Lu et al New Phytologist (N cycle) Lu et al Agricultural Ecosystems & Environment (C cycle)

Leaching 461% N 2 O 134%Den 84% N addition NH % N uptake NO % Aboveground plant N 44% Belowground plant N 53% N-Min 25% Litter/OH decomposition Litter N 24% Organic Horizon N 6.1% Soil N pool 6.2% Microbial biomass N 5.8% DON 21% Nit. 154% Extremely leaking system Lu et al. 2011a

O’Sullivan et al GCB Once N fertilization stops, mineral N gradually reset to the control level

N additions Aboveground plant C 35.7% Ps Belowground plant C 23% Litter/OH decomposition Litter C 20.9% Organic Horizon C 1.8% Deep layer SOM DOC 11% R:S 14.5 Rs 4.3% Soil organic C 2.2% Microbe C 6.4% 1.Reduce C input into soil systems 2.Little contributions of aboveground biomass and litter production to soil C 3.Increased C loss via decomposition and respiration 4.Increased C loss via DOC Lu et al. 2011b

Mack et al Nature

Mineral N does not set the level of soil N capital over time

“dummy” heater Infrared heater clip unclip clip Long-term (12 years) warming and clipping

C and N interactions under experimental warming Plant community C 4 /C 3 species Leaf Ps Phenology Growing season Plant growth Microbial community Fungi/bacteria Plant N uptake Plant & soil C Available N Quality of bulk litter Respiration NUE Litter Decomposition Luo, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System

Plant community C 4 /C 3 species Leaf Ps Phenology Growing season Plant growth Microbial community Fungi/bacteria Plant N uptake Plant & soil C Available N Quality of bulk litter Respiration NUE Litter Decomposition Sherry et al. 2007, PNAS Zhou et al. 2007a, JIPB Zhou et al. 2006, GBC; 2007b, GCB Luo et al. 2001, Nature Zhang et al GCB Zhou et al. In review An et al. 2005, GCB Cheng et al Agric Ecosystems Wan et al. 2005, GBC Luo et al. 2009, GCB-E Sherry et al. 2008, GCB Niu et al. 2010, Ecology

Niu et al Ecology NUE is the main mechanism underlying warming- induced increases in plant C storage

Lu et al. In preparation

Warming effects on carbon processes Lu et al. In preparation

NPP N sequestered in biomass & litter C input to soil N sequestered in SOM labile soil N N uptake N availability C:N CO 2 P rogressive N itrogen L imitation Luo et al BioScineces

NPP N sequestered in biomass & litter C input to soil N sequestered in SOM labile soil N N uptake N availability C:N CO 2 Luo et al BioScineces PNL may not occur if N fixation N loss

Luo et al Ecology 21% increase in litter C 25% increase in litter N 5.6% increase in soil C 11.2% increase in soil N Ecosystem C increases by ~100 g m -2 yr -1 Ecosystem N increases by ~1 g m -2 yr -1 No complete down-regulation

Working hypotheses N capital increased by ~1 g N m -1 yr -1 to alleviate N limitation Increased N mineralization enhances biomass growth but not soil C sequestration. Yes for plant pools, not for soil pools CO 2 stimulation of carbon sequestration will be down- regulated by limited N supply over time. Climate warming stimulates N mineralization and increases N availability, which will enhance C sequestration N deposition increases mineral N availability, stimulate plant growth, and thus will enhance C sequestration

Soil mineral N availability regulates plant growth but does not determine long-term C sequestration Which N processes determine long- term C sequestration?

Rastteter et al. 1997

N capital in organic form  Long-term C sequestration Redistribution of N among pools  intermediate C sequestration Adjustment in C/N ratio  short- term C sequestration Rastteter et al. 1997

Binkley et al Ecosystems N capital

Adding inorganic N Lu et al. 2011, New Phytologist Fire Wan et al. 2001, Ecological Appl Plant invasionLiao et al. 2008, New Phytologist Forest successionYang et al. 2011, New Phytologist Forest plantationLiao et al. 2010, PloS One Elevated CO 2 Luo et al. 2006, Ecology Experimental warmingLu et al. In preparation Net change in organic N capital (the key variable to determine long-term C sequestration)

A database of 124 published papers from the literature Carbon and nitrogen coupling during forest succession Yang et al New Phytologists

The rates of C pool changes declined with forest age and approached an equilibrium state

Yang et al New Phytologists The rate of relative N change was positively associated with the rate of relative C change with different slopes among various ecosystem components

Yang et al New Phytologists The rate of absolute N change increased linearly with that of C pool change

Yang et al. Unpublished

Yang et al New Phytologists The relative change in C: N ratio was larger than 1.0 in both aboveground plant and woody tissues, but close to 1.0 in other ecosystem components

Conclusions 1. 1.Mineral N limits plant growth but does not regulate long-term carbon sequestration 2. 2.Organic N capital determines long-term carbon sequestration

Acknowledgement Financial support: U.S. National Science Foundation US Department of Energy NCEAS Working group: William Currie, Jeffrey Dukes, Christopher Field,,Adrien Finzi, Ueli Hartwig, Bruce Hungate, Yiqi Luo, Ross McMurtrie, Ram Oren, William Parton, Diane Pataki, Rebecca Shaw, Bo Su, Donald Zak Meta analysis collaborators: Dafeng Hui, Chengzhang Liao, Meng Lu, Shuli Niu, Shiqiang Wan, Yuanhe Yang, Deqiang Zhang, Xuhui Zhou