Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Advertisements

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
Reducing the Environmental Risks of Pest Management Joseph K. Bagdon Pest Management Specialist NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
Drainage Management to Improve Water Quality and Enhanced Agricultural Production Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL by.
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Phosphorus and Potassium. How is P managed? Key to managing soil and fertilizer P: Knowledge of whether or not the level of soil solution P is adequate.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
S TATE T ECHNICAL M EETING February 14, AGENDA Ag Water Quality Plans Nutrient Management Plans – Options for producers.
IPM in NRCS Programs Joe Bagdon USDA - NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
Modeling of Soil Nutrients – An Introduction to Logical Spreadsheeting Russell Yost Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawai`i.
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
Nutrient Management Planning Alan Sutton Department of Animal Sciences.
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
EUTROPHICATION (NUTRIENT POLLUTION) SOLUTIONS REVIEW BEST POLICIES & REAL FIXES.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
Conservation Planning: What’s New?. Topics for Today’s Webinar Revised NPPH Proposed NRCS Land Uses Resource Concerns Planning criteria.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
(commercial fertilizers)
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
Seasonal High Tunnel Systems for Crops Interim Standard 798 Technical and Program Guidance National bulletin: National Bulletin: Idaho.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Nutrient Budgets For CNMPs Nutrient Management Planners Training March 31, 2009 Bobby Smith County Extension Coordinator UGA Cooperative Extension Morgan.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
Our Mission Helping people help the land. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service Our Vision Productive Lands ---- Healthy Environment.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Sustainable Agriculture UNIT 1 – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Sections 2 and 3 Nutrient Management Regulations.
Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Water Quality Index for Runoff from Agricultural Fields (WQIag) By Harbans Lal, Environmental Engineer Shaun McKinney, Team Leader National Water Quality/Quantity.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
5. Terracing This practice is applied to reduce soil erosion and/or to retain run-off for moisture conservation, and consists of an earth embankment, or.
October 12, 2015 Iowa State University Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Water Quality.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Nutrient Management Planning CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Nutrient Management.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Manure Management and Water Quality By Jeff Lorimor, Iowa State University, Ames 32-1.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
NRCS Conservation Planning Slide 1 Astor BoozerWayne Honeycutt Regional ConservationistDeputy Chief for Science & Technology USDA NRCSUSDA-NRCSWashington,
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT POLICY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Chapter 15 Organic Amendments.
Sustainable Agriculture
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service

National Nutrient Management Guidance Better Nutrient Management Guidance 3 Important Documents  Nutrient Management Standard (CPS-590)  Nutrient Management Policy (GM )  Nutrient Management Policy Implementation (NI )

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard DEFINITION -Managing the amount (rate), source, placement (method of application), and timing of plant nutrients and soil amendments. 4 R’s of Nutrient Stewardship Right Rate Right Source Right Placement Right Time Minor Rewording

PURPOSE - To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for plant production. - To minimize agricultural nonpoint source pollution of surface and groundwater resources. - To properly utilize manure or organic by-products as a plant nutrient source. - To protect air quality by reducing odors, nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric particulates. - To maintain or improve the physical, chemical, and biological condition of soil. National Nutrient Management Practice Standard

CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES - This practice applies to all lands where plant nutrients and soil amendments are applied. This standard does not apply to one-time nutrient applications to establish perennial crops. National Nutrient Management Practice Standard Minor Rewording

CRITERIA - The NRCS-approved nutrient risk assessment for nitrogen must be completed on all sites unless the State NRCS, with the concurrence of State water quality control authorities, has determined specific conditions where nitrogen leaching is not a risk to water quality. National Nutrient Management Practice Standard Nitrogen Leaching Index

302.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT -B. Nitrogen Risk Assessment Criteria. Leaching Index.—The current NRCS-approved tool to assess the nitrogen leaching potential is the Leaching Index (LI). If N leaching is a concern, planners will use the N risk assessment and implement needed BMP (N application at planting, Split application …) National Instructions Part 302 –Nutrient Management Implementation Nitrogen Leaching Index

-Average Annual Percolation -Considers evapotranspiration of the crop -Inputs average monthly precipitation and the hydrologic soil group -Tables will be developed by county and soil group. Nitrogen Leaching Index RUSLE 2 Nitrogen Leaching Index

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA The NRCS-approved nutrient risk assessment for phosphorus must be completed when: -phosphorus application rate exceeds land-grant university fertility rate guidelines for the planned crop(s) - The planned area is within a phosphorus- impaired watershed -The NRCS and State water quality control authority have not determined specific conditions where the risk of phosphorus loss is low. Phosphorus Index

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA Nutrient planning must be based on current soil and manure testing -in accordance with land-grant university guidance or -industry practice, if recognized by the university Soil & Manure/Litter Testing

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA Manure analyses must include, at minimum, total nitrogen (N), ammonium N, total phosphorus (P) or P 2 O 5, total potassium (K) or K 2 O, and percent solids, or -follow land-grant university guidance regarding required analyses Manure/Litter Testing

Current AL Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA -Laboratory results will need to be adjusted for nitrogen application losses by using Tables 2 and 3. Manure/Litter Testing

Current AL Nutrient Management Practice Standard Table 2

Current AL Nutrient Management Practice Standard Table 3

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA The following nutrient use efficiency strategies or technologies must be considered: slow and controlled release fertilizers nitrification and urease inhibitors enhanced efficiency fertilizers incorporation or injection timing and number of applications soil nitrate and organic N testing Additional Criteria to Minimize Nonpoint Pollution

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA The following nutrient use efficiency strategies or technologies must be considered: Coordinate nutrient applications with optimum crop nutrient uptake Corn Stalk Nitrate Test (CSNT), Pre-Sidedress Nitrate Test (PSNT), and Pre-Plant Soil Nitrate Test (PPSN) Tissue testing, chlorophyll meters, and spectral analysis technologies Other land-grant university recommended technologies that improve nutrient use efficiency and minimize surface or groundwater resource concerns. Additional Criteria to Minimize Nonpoint Pollution

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard CRITERIA Nitrogen and phosphorus application rates must be planned based on risk assessment results as determined by NRCS-approved nitrogen and phosphorus risk assessment tools. Additional Criteria to Properly Utilize Manure

302.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT D. Minimum Criteria for State P-Index Tools. - Consider nutrient losses caused by water and wind erosion using current NRCS water and wind erosion prediction technology (RUSLE 2). - At a minimum, consider STP; time, rate, and method of P application; erosion; runoff; and leaching (when leaching is applicable) factors in the assessment of P- loss risk from fields. - Demonstrate that risk increases with increasing runoff, erosion, STP, application rate, and also depends on method of application. National Instructions Part 302 –Nutrient Management Implementation P-Index

302.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT D. Minimum Criteria for State P-Index Tools. Include the following risk categories: Low risk—phosphorus can be applied at rates greater than crop requirement not to exceed the nitrogen requirement for the succeeding crop Moderate risk—phosphorus can be applied not to exceed the crop requirement rate or crop removal rate High risk— phosphorus can be applied not to exceed the crop removal rate if the following requirements are met: -- A soil phosphorus drawdown strategy has been implemented -- A site assessment for nutrients and soil loss has been conducted to determine if mitigation practices are required to protect water quality. National Instructions Part 302 –Nutrient Management Implementation P-Index

302.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR RISK ASSESSMENT F. Phosphorus Application. If increases in soil phosphorus levels are expected (i.e., when N- based application rates are used), the nutrient management plan shall document: (i) The soil P levels at which it is desirable to convert to P-based planning (ii) The proposed plan for STP drawdown from the production and harvesting of crops (iii) Management activities or techniques used to reduce the potential for P transport and loss National Instructions Part 302 –Nutrient Management Implementation P-Index

Alabama P-Index STP Rate Method Erosion Runoff

Alabama P-Index Low Risk Moderate Risk High Risk New vs Old 3 Risk Categories vs 4 Field Vulnerability

Alabama P-Index Other Practices that May Reduce Risk Reduced tillage systems and cover crops to reduced runoff Implementation of intensive grazing systems to reduced runoff Use of precision application equipment to increase the accuracy of applications Application of other products with the litter that may reduced P loss risk

Reduced Tillage Systems to Reduced Runoff Soils Infiltration (in/hr) Sulivan et al 2007

National Nutrient Management Practice Standard Use no-till/strip till, cover crops and crop rotation Use variable-rate application based on crop yield, site- specific variability, soil characteristics, soil test and other factors Soil test should not be older than 1 year Use soil test, plant tissue analyses and field observations to check for secondary plant nutrient deficiencies or toxicity Use adaptive nutrient management learning process to improve nutrient use efficiency Considerations

302.2 ADAPTIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT A process used to plan, implement, evaluate, and adjust nutrient application strategies over time (multiple seasons). The process is intended to allow for continued adjustment of the CPS Code 590 4Rs plan to achieve better nutrient-use efficiency. General Manual Part 402 –Nutrient Management

302.2 ADAPTIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT The process is to be carried out by producers themselves, in cooperation with the land-grant university, or with other agencies and industry partners following prescribed protocols developed by the State NRCS, land-grant university, or other appropriate technical agencies and industry. The results of adaptive nutrient management testing that meet the established protocols and are concurred with by NRCS and the land-grant university may be used in nutrient planning where appropriate. General Manual Part 402 –Nutrient Management

Current AL Nutrient Management Practice Standard Other needed information Averaged Nutrient Value of Manure/Litter (Table 1) Available N Provided by Cover Crop (Table 4) Recommended Application Distance for Manure/Litter (Table 9) Filter Strips Riparian Forest Buffer Field Boarders

Needed Feedback - N Leaching Index

Needed Feedback - N Leaching Index - P Index

Needed Feedback - N Leaching Index - P Index - Soil and Manure/Litter Testing

Needed Feedback - N Leaching Index - P Index - Soil and Manure/Litter Testing - Nutrient Efficiency Strategies

Needed Feedback - N Leaching Index - P Index - Soil and Manure/Litter Testing - Nutrient Efficiency Strategies -Considerations Reduced Tillage and Cover Crops Adaptive Nutrient Management

Needed Feedback - N Leaching Index - P Index - Soil and Manure/Litter Testing - Nutrient Efficiency Strategies - Considerations - Other Information Averaged Nutrient Values N Provided by Cover Crops Filter Strips

QUESTIONS?