University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 1: Getting ready.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation: What is it?
Advertisements

Quality Management Measures of Organizational Success Chapter 9
National Public Health Performance Standards Program Orientation to the Essential Public Health Services.
Capacity Building.
Pursuing Effective Governance in Canada’s National Sport Community June 2011.
Reclaiming Futures as part of the OJJDP required Three-Year State Plan A Presentation to State SAGs Tom Begich.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Abt Associates Inc. In collaboration with: I Aga Khan Foundation I BearingPoint I Bitrán y Asociados I BRAC University I Broad Branch Associates I Forum.
Mark Weist, Ph.D. University of South Carolina Carolina Network for School Mental Health Myrtle Beach, January 9, 2014.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Collaboration as a Powerful Tool for Change: Balancing Risk, Commitment, & Resources Terms and Definitions from Arthur T Himmelman (2004). “COLLABORATION.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 3: Engaging stakeholders.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Getting started with evaluation.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
A Framework For School Counseling Programs
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Building a Strong Foundation Through and Effective Board and Sound Practices.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Multidisplinary Approach.. What are your expectations Write on board.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Evaluation Basics Processes of Evaluation The process of evaluating “So what?” (outcomes) and “how was that?” (processes) can serve many purposes for leaders,
Reflect and Revise: Evaluative Thinking for Program Success Tom DeCaigny and Leah Goldstein Moses.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Cathy Burack and Alan Melchior The Center for Youth and Communities The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University Your Program.
Culture, Practice, and Leadership: Where Do I Stand? Tiffany Young, M. Ed. Equity & Diversity Coordinator Josh Deason, M.A. Equity & Diversity Specialist.
Logical Logic Models Youth Emphasis Wisline Web October 3, :00 am Rene Mehlberg and Ellen Taylor-Powell.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training Community Planning Training 1-2.
1 © 2010 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 11 Logic Models A ROADMAP TO SUCCESS.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
General Capacity Building Components for Non Profit and Faith Based Agencies Lakewood Resource and Referral Center nd Street, suite 204 Lakewood,
Genesee County Arts & Cultural Groups/Organizations Presented by Jennifer Acree - BEST Project, Flint, Michigan A presentation for.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Strategic Framework C-1. Strategic Plan Our Mission: “Improving the health of our community in all we do.” C-2 Our Core Values: The organization’s core.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Promoting a Culture of Evidence Through Program Evaluation Patti Bourexis, Ph.D. Principal Researcher The Study Group Inc. OSEP Project Directors’ Conference.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Evaluating for Impact Washington State’s Perspective: Our Blueprint.
How to write… Effective Safety Plans (c) Geigle Communications, LLC - Developing Effective Written Safety Plans This material is for training use.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Non-profit Governance Models/Board Types
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Governance for a Board Monday March 14, Agenda  Introductions  Benefits and challenges of regional cooperation  What is governance  Governance.
Business Leadership Network: Program Evaluation in Public Health March 28, 2016.
Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
UNITY and the RoadMap for urban youth violence prevention American Public Health Association Annual Meeting 2007 Session.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Building Organizational Capacity to Create Community Change
Blue Hills Community Health Alliance (CHNA 20)
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Presentation transcript:

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 1: Getting ready

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation What comes to mind when you hear the word evaluation?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation What does evaluation mean to you? On a piece of paper, write down your definition of evaluation.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Definition of evaluation Definitions of evaluation may vary by approach and field of practice. We use: Program evaluation is… “the systematic collection of information about the activities, characteristics, and results of programs to make judgments about the program, improve or further develop program effectiveness, inform decisions about future program development, and/or increase understanding.” – Patton, 2008 Source: Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation In simplest terms, evaluation answers 3 questions: What? So what? Now what?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation An outcome is… the change that occurs as a result of our activities and investments.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation A new way of thinking… FROM: What are you doing? What activities do you deliver? Who participates? How many? ACTIVITIES TO: So what? What difference are you making? What results were achieved? Who benefited? How? OUTCOMES

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation A metaphor for outcomes: Not how many worms the bird feeds its young, but how well the fledgling flies –United Way, 1999 Source: United Way of America. (n.d.). Outcome measurement: What and Why?: An overview. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Create your own “outcome metaphor” Create your own metaphor or drawing that will help you remember the meaning of outcome. Metaphor: a word or phrase denoting one kind of object or idea in place of another

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation What does the term program mean? Program refers to the object of evaluation: direct service interventions, community mobilization efforts, research initiatives, surveillance systems, policy development activities, outbreak investigations, laboratory diagnostics, communication campaigns, infrastructure-building projects, training and educational services, administrative systems. –CDC, 1999 Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health [Electronic version]. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 48, No. RR-11, (September 17). Retrieved July 31, 2008, from

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Why am I evaluating outcomes? “Don’t accept your dog’s admiration as conclusive proof that you are wonderful.” –Ann Landers

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation What’s in this for you? Benefits of evaluating outcomes: Program/organizational improvement Improved accountability Better ability to describe what a program does – program description for stakeholders Data for fund raising Data for public relations Input for policy decision making Better planning Satisfaction in knowing how you are doing

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing organizational readiness for evaluating outcomes Does your organization have a clearly defined and commonly understood/supported Mission – what your organization does Vision – what your organization should look like in the future Values/beliefs/principles – what you value/ believe – manifested in how you behave

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing organizational readiness for evaluating outcomes Are your identified priorities reflected in your goals? Are the leaders committed to evaluation? Is there a general commitment to evaluation throughout the organization?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing your organization’s readiness… Does your organization have the resources needed to do outcome evaluation? Human −Leadership – committed and involved −Board and staff – understand the purpose −Time – of leadership, staff, and participants Fiscal −Often entails some financial commitment

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing your organization’s readiness… Is there a plan and a timeline? Is there a common framework/language for evaluation? Do funders/stakeholders expect reporting of outcomes?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing your organization’s readiness… Is your organization going to be reporting to a funder? If so, the funder may have a specific format or expectation for reporting outcomes. Design outcome evaluations to meet the format or expectation. Remember, mission/vision/values are core to what you do – don’t compromise by “chasing” dollars that don’t “fit” your organization.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing your organization’s readiness… Are staff members interested in outcome evaluation? Do they have skills to engage in outcome evaluation? Does the organization support professional development for staff?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing your organization’s readiness… Is evaluation rewarded in your organization? Are evaluation processes, data, and findings valued? Are evaluation data and findings used? Do staff know/see how their evaluations are used?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assessing your organization’s readiness… Is evaluation data used by the organization to improve programs, guide resource allocations, and support planning? Is evaluation data used outside the organization to enhance its image, increase funding, and share promising practices?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Barriers to evaluating outcomes Lack of leadership commitment Limited time and resources, including computer technologies Limited knowledge and skills in evaluation Attitude that programs cannot be measured Fear that evaluation data will hurt programs Lack of use or misuse of evaluation data

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Assets in evaluating outcomes Committed leadership Resources allocated for outcome measurement Evaluation expertise exists or can be secured Evaluations are used Incentives exist for doing quality evaluation