Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Evaluation Plan for Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System Prepared for the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction By: ●Josef Dvorak ●Daniel Marlin.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Oklahoma State Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Title II, Part B Competitive Grant Program No Child Left.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Sustainable Building Oregon Team Oregon Department of Education, June 2010.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
UIC Early Reading First Building the Foundations for Early Literacy Excellence Alicia J Wyche Summer Internship 2009.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
Mathematics Center for Educator Development Charles A. Dana Center, UT Austin Mathematics and Science statewide professional development–TEXTEAMS Instructional.
School year end report  Devoted time to reviewing data  Require research based strategies  Began imbedding Common Core into lesson plans  Observed.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
1 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Scope of FY08 Evaluation Activities December 11, 2007.
Arkansas Capacity Building Science Partnership Grant: Beyond Traditional Professional Development Models 2008 Math Science Partnership Regional Conference.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND STUDENT LEARNING OF MATHEMATICS Karina K. R. Hensberry, Ph.D. USFSP – St. Petersburg, FL Faculty.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Ready schools... Ready schools... Ready Children... Ready Families... Ready Schools... Ready Communities Ready Schools Virginia’s Definition of School.
November 2002 Evaluating Community-Based Tobacco Prevention Programs Minnesota’s Experience Amy J. Ellestad, MPH Laura Hutton, MA Minnesota Department.
ACSS Adapting Curriculum for Student Success. GOALS To improve the quality of higher education for students with disabilities To improve the quality of.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
MSP Regional Meeting February 13-15, 2008 Calli Holaway-Johnson, Ph.D. Charles Stegman, Ph.D. National Office for Research on Measurement and Evaluation.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Spring 2013 OMSP Request For Proposal. The purpose of this PowerPoint is to highlight critical components of the Request for Proposals that have historically.
Ohio’s Mathematics Science Partnership All New OMSP Programs must use the Survey of Enacted Curriculum.
Creating Alternative Pathways for Students to Achieve Academic Credit in School The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
IT Scholar goal for the year: Grant funding
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas National Office for Research on Measurement and Evaluation Systems (NORMES) Laura Kent University of Arkansas Department of Curriculum & Instruction

Statewide Evaluation Team  Charles Stegman, Ph.D.  Professor of educational statistics and research design  Laura Kent, Ph.D.  Associate professor of mathematics education  Calli Holaway-Johnson, Ph.D.  Research assistant with background in math education

NORMES  Housed at the University of Arkansas within the College of Education and Health Professions  Staff  University of Arkansas Educational Statistics faculty  Education and technology professionals  Graduate students from education, policy, statistics, and computer engineering  Funded through federal grants, state contracts, and foundations

Evaluation Plan  Goal of evaluation is to aggregate results across all MSP grants in the state  Use qualitative and quantitative techniques to determine:  quality of grant implementation  enactment of professional development in the classroom  impact of content-based training on teacher content knowledge  Examine state assessment data to determine impact on student achievement

Evaluation Plan, Current Grants  Arkansas currently has 22 MSP grants  Impact of current MSP grants will be evaluated on:  alignment of professional development with stated program goals  results of program assessments or surveys  quality of implementation as described in yearly reports

Evaluation Plan, Future Grants  8 MSP grants to begin Summer 2007  Impact of future MSP grants will be evaluated using:  teacher-level data of all participants  student-level data for all participating teachers  program assessment data or survey results  direct observation studies

Role of NORMES  Developed standardized evaluation component for RFP (January 2007)  Conduct focus meetings with project directors and evaluators  Develop standardized evaluator and program director questionnaire  Analyze program data to determine the overall effectiveness of programs

Role of NORMES  Assist new grantees and their evaluators in developing appropriate evaluation techniques specific to their program  Assist new grantees and their evaluators in developing or identifying a measure of teacher content knowledge  Disseminate results of evaluation  Focus meetings with project directors  NORMES website using GIS technology

Contact Information Judy Trowell Charles Stegman Laura Kent Calli Holaway-Johnson