Phase II Total Fatigue Life (Crack Initiation + Crack Propagation) SAE FD&E Current Effort 30 October 2012 at Peoria, IL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Advertisements

1 Analysis of Test Results 2 What we’ll have to do: Load-Deflection curve. Load Vs Strain curve for steel and concrete Find yield load (  s = 0.002)
ME 240: Introduction to Engineering Materials Chapter 8. Failure 8.1 CHAPTER 8.
Fracture Mechanics Overview & Basics
Fracture Specimen To Visualize whether a crack of given length in a material of known fracture toughness is dangerous, because it will propagate to given.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Chapter 3 Mechanical Properties of Materials
Design of Machine Elements
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
4 Pure Bending.
CTU in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering DAF Page 1 Concentration factors Shape Factor or Stress Concentration Factor of an Elastic Stress Relative.
NOTCH EFFECTS INTRODUCTION OF A NOTCH AFFECTS THE FRACTURE PROCESS Eg: INCREASES THE DUCTILE-BRITTLE TRANSITION TEMPERATURE OF STEEL NOTCH CREATES A LOCAL.
Engineering materials lecture #14
Over the Next Several Days
Ken Youssefi Mechanical & Aerospace Engr., SJSU Discontinuity in Cross Section Stepped shafts Discontinuity.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
1 CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 10: Strength of Materials Strains Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO Reference: Statics and Strength of Materials, 2.
4 Pure Bending.
Mechanics of Materials II
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
ENGR 225 Section
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Mechanics of Elastic Materials
MSE 527 Lab Mechanical Behavior of Materials Fall 2011.
Elastic Stress-Strain Relationships
Design Agains Fatigue - part Fatigue Endurance Prediction Design Agains Fatigue - part Fatigue Endurance Prediction Milan Růžička
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Accuracy of Fully Elastic vs. Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis Masters of Engineering Rensselear Polytechnic Institute By Nicholas Szwaja May 17,
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Fourth Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. John T. DeWolf Lecture Notes: J. Walt Oler Texas Tech University CHAPTER.
FRACTURE MECHANICS AND FATIGUE DESIGN HANS MF PANJAITAN Marinteknisk Senter Otto Nielsens Veg Trondheim Norway Mobile:
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Welding Design 1998/MJ1/MatJoin2/1 Design. Lesson Objectives When you finish this lesson you will understand: Mechanical and Physical Properties (structure.
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Mechanical Behavior, Testing and Manufacturing Properties of Materials
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Fatigue Failure Due to Variable Loading
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
ME 612 Metal Forming and Theory of Plasticity
Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila Lecture No. (4&5)
Jiangyu Li, University of Washington Yielding and Failure Criteria Plasticity Fracture Fatigue Jiangyu Li University of Washington Mechanics of Materials.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering West Virginia University Statistics of Brittle Fracture.
Exam 2 Grade Distribution. Stress-strain behavior (Room T): Ideal vs Real Materials TS
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
STRUCTURES Young’s Modulus. Tests There are 4 tests that you can do to a material There are 4 tests that you can do to a material 1 tensile This is where.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy SNS mercury target fatigue life prediction with Fe-Safe/Verity High Power Targetry Workshop.
Engg College Tuwa Mechanics of Solids.( ) Presented by: PARMAR CHETANKUMAR VIKRAMSINH PARMAR NILESHKUMAR NATVARLAL PARMAR.
Hasmukh Goswami College Of Engineering
Suction Roll Material Comparison
IS:800 Section 13 FATIGUE. Introduction Mechanism of Fatigue Fracture Factors Affecting Fatigue Strength Design Strength & Cumulative Fatigue Damage IS:800.
ATMIYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE MECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Pure Bending.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Methods to Maximize Design Life
Mechanical Properties of Metals
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Determination of Fracture Toughness
4.7 STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
Mechanical Properties of Metals
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
FATIGUE FATIGUE Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq
Lab8: Fatigue Testing Machine
Lab8: Fatigue Testing Machine
Tutorial.
Presentation transcript:

Phase II Total Fatigue Life (Crack Initiation + Crack Propagation) SAE FD&E Current Effort 30 October 2012 at Peoria, IL

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

Load Carrying Weld Specimen Configuration and Test Fixture/FEM Boundary Conditions See Next Slide

Specimen in Test Rig See Next Slide

Specimen Crack After Inability To Carry Load In Test Rig See Next Slide

Specimen Crack Fracture Surface Total Prototype Test Fatigue Life (Crack Initiation + Crack Propagation) = 36,895 Cycles

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

Exact – Same Steel Pedigree (Material Characterization) Definition/Documentation Microstructure, Chemistry & Hardness Sample Purchased “Enough” 4 A36 20ft HR bars

Steel Microstructure, Hardness, Grain Size and Chemistry

Steel Local Strain Low Cycle Crack Initiation Material Characterization

Assumes the welding residual tension stress is equal to the steel’s proportional limit (for Ni analysis only): 1200ue

Steel Crack Propagation Material Characterization

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

Accurate Loading Definition 24 KN to 2.4 KN R=0.1

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

Component Stress/Strain Distribution Path Across Critical Section

Component Stress/Strain Distribution Path At Weld Toe Critical Section FEM Stress FEM Strain

Component BS 5400 or BS7608 Stress Analysis (by an expert with decades of experience) and N = 15,500 cycles. Analysis is simple with BS 5400 or BS7608 methods. Input is simply nominal stress range and weld class with a modifier for plate thickness. This is a fillet weld with the stress perpendicular to the toe so I would call it class F. Equation for class F is S=11995(N)^(-0.333) Stress range is = delta m*C/I =.9*24000*225*12.7/(101.6*25.4^3/12)=445 MPa. (This is a bit higher than the 400 I get by extrapolating the linear section of Eric’s plot from FEA.) Since the plate is 1 inch and curves are based on 0.5 strength is modified by (0.5/1)^.25 = 0.84 (This was also proposed by Fred Lawrence.) The intercept of the SN curve would be 11995*0.84 = Since this is a design curve, I would increase strength by about 10% for this lab test. So 10086*1.1= and N = 15,500 cycles. Use some judgment in applying this number. Since the R ratio is high, life might be expected to be a bit less but since the calculated elastic stress is above the material strength, there will be yielding so that the actual stress range will likely not be as high as predicted. Also, curves were developed with axial specimens tested to failure and this is bending this piece should last a bit longer. I would expect life to be between 15,000 and 60,000 cycles to get to the point where it will not carry the load.

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

GeometryLoadingMat’l. Prop. Stress/Strain Analysis Crack Initiation Analysis Program Crack Initiation Life 13,070Cycles Local Strain Low Cycle Crack Initiation Fatigue Analysis Appropriately Meshed Mesh of CAD Geometry 24 KN to 2.4 KN R=0.1 Crack Initiation Material Characterization

GeometryLoadingMat’l. Prop. Stress Distribution Crack Propagation Analysis Program Crack Propagation Life 45,190 Cycles Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics Crack Propagation Fatigue Analysis Appropriately Meshed CAD Geometry 24 KN to 2.4 KN R=0.1 Crack Propagation Material Characterization

GeometryLoadingMat’l. Prop. Stress/Strain Analysis Damage Analysis Total Life Total Life = Crack Initiation + Crack Propagation = 13,070 Cycles (CI) + 45,190 Cycles (CP-SE) + 0 Cycles (CP-EC) = 58,260 Cycles Predicted life/Test Life (of 1 Hand Welded Prototype Sample) =58,260 Cycles/36,895 Cycles = 1.6 Total Life

Predict the Upper and Lower Total Fatigue Life Bounds (Using “Principal” ue for CI) Loading Direction CI CPCP Free Surface

Component BS 5400 or BS7608 Stress Analysis (by an expert with decades of experience) Analysis is simple with BS 5400 or BS7608 methods. Input is simply nominal stress range and weld class with a modifier for plate thickness. This is a fillet weld with the stress perpendicular to the toe so I would call it class F. Equation for class F is S=11995(N)^(-0.333) Stress range is = delta m*C/I =.9*24000*225*12.7/(101.6*25.4^3/12)=445 MPa. (This is a bit higher than the 400 I get by extrapolating the linear section of Eric’s plot from FEA.) Since the plate is 1 inch and curves are based on 0.5 strength is modified by (0.5/1)^.25 = 0.84 (This was also proposed by Fred Lawrence.) The intercept of the SN curve would be 11995*0.84 = Since this is a design curve, I would increase strength by about 10% for this lab test. So 10086*1.1= and N = 15,500 cycles. Use some judgment in applying this number. Since the R ratio is high, life might be expected to be a bit less but since the calculated elastic stress is above the material strength, there will be yielding so that the actual stress range will likely not be as high as predicted. Also, curves were developed with axial specimens tested to failure and this is bending this piece should last a bit longer. I would expect life to be between 15,000 and 60,000 cycles to get to the point where it will not carry the load.

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

0.200 in in in holes Accurate Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Crack Growth Measurements a a To be evaluated by a second robotic welded prototype test R = 0.5

Effort Definition 1)Steel procurement, prototype test specimen design/fabrication, prototype test and prototype test result. 2)Steel pedigree (material characterization) definition/documentation. 3)Accurate loading definition 4)Test component geometry for stress/strain (FEM and other) analysis. 5)Total fatigue life predictions (crack initiation + crack propagation and other). 6)The next (crucial) step for discerning the transition from crack initiation to crack propagation. 7)Test Matrix and Future Work (committed to and not committed to).

Test Matrix and Future Work : Read marker band “striation patterns

Machined Specimen Configuration and Test Fixture/FEM Boundary Conditions Eliminate the weld entirely – machine the entire specimen from the mm x mm bar. Duplicate, by machining, the weld profile and weld toe radius as closely as possible so the sample is consistently made from the same material. Comparing the test results from these samples relative to the test results from the previously welded samples. This will confirm (or not) how sound an assumption it is to use the base material properties when analyzing welded structures.