Foreshock studies by MEX and VEX FAB: field-aligned beam FAB + FS: foreshock M. Yamauchi et al.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Advertisements

AS 4002 Star Formation & Plasma Astrophysics BACKGROUND: Maxwell’s Equations (mks) H (the magnetic field) and D (the electric displacement) to eliminate.
PRECIPITATION OF HIGH-ENERGY PROTONS AND HYDROGEN ATOMS INTO THE UPPER ATMOSPHERES OF MARS AND VENUS Valery I. Shematovich Institute of Astronomy, Russian.
Single particle motion and trapped particles
Plasma layers in the terrestrial, martian and venusian ionospheres: Their origins and physical characteristics Martin Patzold (University of Cologne) and.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Martian Pick-up Ions (and foreshock): Solar-Cycle and Seasonal Variation M. Yamauchi(1); T. Hara(2); R. Lundin(3); E. Dubinin(4); A. Fedorov(5); R.A. Frahm(6);
Near-Earth Magnetotail Reconnection and Plasmoid Formation in Connection With a Substorm Onset on 27 August 2001 S. Eriksson 1, M. Oieroset 2, D. N. Baker.
Lunar Results Hybrid code. Initial condition Amplitude of dipole for the moon= 0 Lunar Radius=16.9 (unit of length) Maximum time = 200(inverse of gyro.
Budget and Roles of Heavy Ions in the Solar System M. Yamauchi, I. Sandahl, H. Nilsson, R. Lundin, and L. Eliasson Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF)
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
Solar Flare Particle Heating via low-beta Reconnection Dietmar Krauss-Varban & Brian T. Welsch Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley Reconnection Workshop.
Reinisch_ Solar Terrestrial Relations (Cravens, Physics of Solar Systems Plasmas, Cambridge U.P.) Lecture 1- Space Environment –Matter in.
Expected Influence of Crustal Magnetic Fields on ASPERA-3 ELS Observations: Insight from MGS D.A. Brain, J.G. Luhmann, D.L. Mitchell, R.P. Lin UC Berkeley.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Shock Wave Related Plasma Processes
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Plasma in the Heliosheath John Richardson M.I.T. Collaborators: J. Belcher, J. Kasper, E. Stone, C. Wang.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
The EUV impact on ionosphere: J.-E. Wahlund and M. Yamauchi Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) ON3 Response of atmospheres and magnetospheres of.
IMF direction derived from cycloid-like ion distributions observed by Mars Express M. Yamauchi, Y. Futaana, R. Lundin, S. Barabash, M. Holmström (IRF-Kiruna,
Finite Gyroradius Effect in Space and Laboratory 1. Radiation belt (Ring current) 2. Auroral phenomena (Substorm current) 3. Shock acceleration and upstream.
1 Origin of Ion Cyclotron Waves in the Polar Cusp: Insights from Comparative Planetology Discovery by OGO-5 Ion cyclotron waves in other planetary magnetospheres.
Perpendicular Flow Separation in a Magnetized Counterstreaming Plasma: Application to the Dust Plume of Enceladus Y.-D. Jia, Y. J. Ma, C.T. Russell, G.
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL MONITORING OF THE INTERMITTENT DYNAMICS IN THE TERRESTRIAL FORESHOCK Péter Kovács, Gergely Vadász, András Koppán 1.Geological and.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Radiation Belts1 The Radiation Belts A radiation belt is a population of energetic particles stably-trapped by the.
14 May JIM M. RAINES University of Michigan DANIEL J. GERSHMAN, THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN, JAMES A. SLAVIN, HAJE KORTH, and BRIAN J. ANDERSON Magnetospheric.
Foreshock studies by MEX and VEX FAB: field-aligned beam FAB + FS: foreshock M. Yamauchi et al.
9 May MESSENGER First Flyby Magnetospheric Results J. A. Slavin and the MESSENGER Team BepiColombo SERENA Team Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico 11 May.
Bone Trajectories and Model Simulations Kathleen Mandt, Ray Goldstein, Christoph Koenders May 29, 2013 IES Team Meeting – San Antonio.
Gravitational Field Historical facts Geocentric Theory Heliocentric Theory – Nicholas Copernicus (1473 – 1543) Nicholas Copernicus – All planets, including.
Cold plasma: a previously hidden solar system particle population Mats André and Chris Cully Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
Escaping ions over polar cap. Inner magnetosphere, Bow shock/Foreshock, and Ancient magnetosphere.
Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F.
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Group A: S. Bale(Tutor), B. Engavale, W.L. Shi, W.L. Teh, L. Xie, L. Yang, and X.G. Zhang 13,May rd COSPAR Capacity Building Workshop3 rd COSPAR.
IMF derivation from Pickup Ions observed by ASPERA UT UT UT M. Yamauchi B ion ion motion in.
Analysis of Suprathermal Events Observed by STEREO/PLASTIC with a Focus on Upstream Events STEREO SWG - 20 Meredith, NH October 27-29, 2009 Josh Barry,
Solar Wind Induced Escape on Mars and Venus. Mutual Lessons from Different Space Missions E. Dubinin Max-Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Katlenburg-Lindau,
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2007 PHYS , Fall 2007 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1443 – Section 002 Lecture #11 Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2007 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Free Fall.
M. Yamauchi 1, H. Lammer 2, J.-E. Wahlund 3 1. Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden 2. Space Research Institute (IWF), Graz, Austria.
Measurements of 3D Structure in Solar Wind Langmuir Waves
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group Tracking solar wind structures from the Sun through to the orbit of Mars A.O. Williams 1, N.J.T. Edberg 1,2, S.E.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
Multiple Ion Acceleration at Martian Bow Shock M. Yamauchi 1, Y. Futaana 1, A. Fedorov 2, R.A. Frahm 3, E. Dubinin 4, R. Lundin 1, J.-A. Sauvaud 2, J.D.
SEPT/STEREO Observations of Upstream Particle Events: Almost Monoenergetic Ion Beams A. Klassen, R. Gomez-Herrero, R. Mueller-Mellin and SEPT Team, G.
24 January, 20011st NOZOMI_MEX Science Workshop, Jan, 2001 R. Lundin, M. Yamauchi, and H. Borg, Swedish Institute of Space Physics H. Hayakawa, M.
Foreshock and planetary size: A Venus-Mars comparison M. Yamauchi, Y. Futaana, R. Lundin, S. Barabash, M. Holmstrom (IRF, Kiruna, Sweden) A. Fedorov, J.-A.
Introduction to Plasma Physics and Plasma-based Acceleration
R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, D. Fontaine 3, A. Teste 4, C. Jacquey 5 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA); 2 Institute.
Observations of reflected ions downstream of shocks in the heliosphere John Richardson M.I.T. (Voyager plasma experiment) 10 – 5950 eV/q.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Evolution of the poloidal Alfven waves in 3D dipole geometry Jiwon Choi and Dong-Hun Lee School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University 5 th East-Asia.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
Plasma Wave Excitation Regions in the Earth’s Global Magnetosphere
Mass-loading effect in the exterior cusp and plasma mantle
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Ion Pickup Phenomenon upstream of Mars observed by ASPERA 3
Mars, Venus, The Moon, and Jovian/Saturnian satellites
M. Yamauchi1, Y. Futaana1, R. Lundin1, S. Barabash1, M. Wieser1, A
ESS 154/200C Lecture 19 Waves in Plasmas 2
Multiple Ion Acceleration at Martian Bow Shock
Multiple Ion Acceleration at Martian Bow Shock
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
solar wind – bow shock - magnetosheath
Mars, Venus, The Moon, and Jovian/Saturnian satellites
Periodic Acceleration of Electrons in Solar Flares
Presentation transcript:

Foreshock studies by MEX and VEX FAB: field-aligned beam FAB + FS: foreshock M. Yamauchi et al.

Shock = Fluid nature Foreshock = Particle nature

(1) Alfvén Mach number (M A ) x  (2) Gyroradius (r g ) / Bow-shock radius (R S ) (3) Inertia length (c/  pi ) / Bow-shock size (R S ) SW parameter R S (BS radius) M A (  n 1/2 V/B) c/  pi (  n -1/2 ) & c/  pi R S r g (  V/B) & r g /R S Venus & 1 Earth~ 5~ 1.2~ 1.7 & ~ 0.3~ 2 & ~ 0.4 Mars~ 0.5~ 1.4~ 3 & ~ 5~ 4 & ~ 8 For Mars: R S ~ 5000 km for Martian Subsolar 2 keV H + under 6 nT  r g = 1000 km 5/cm 3 H +  c/  pi = 100 km Important parameters

Venus-Mars difference: (2) cold H+ (1) Gravity: Venus > Mars  (2) Exosphere: Venus < Mars  (3) newly born H+: Venus << Mars (This is clear from the difference in “ring distribution”)  (4) cold H+ at Bow shock: Venus << Mars (High density cold H+ is observed only for Mars)

(1) Alfvén Mach number (M A ) (2) Gyroradius (r g ) / Bow-shock radius (R S ) (3) Inertia length (c/  pi ) / Bow-shock size (R S ) (4) Cold ion inside Bow-shock parameterRSRS MAMA c/  pi R S r g /R S cold H+ at BS Venus very little Mars~ 0.5~ 1.4~ 5~ 8a lot Venus - Mars difference (summary) ?? ??

(1) Alfvén Mach number (M A ) (2) Gyroradius (r g ) / Bow-shock radius (R S ) (3) Inertia length (c/  pi ) / Bow-shock size (R S ) (4) Cold ion inside Bow-shock parameterRSRS MAMA c/  pi R S r g /R S cold H+ at BS Earth 5~ 1.2~ 0.3~ 0.4no Venus very little Mars~ 0.5~ 1.4~ 5~ 8a lot Ending (add Earth) ?? ??

1. Introduction: ion motion 2. Introduction: Earth's knowledge 3. Venus (similar to Earth) 4. Mars (Different from Venus/Earth) Outline

B Earth’s case = since 1970’s

* Upstream region * Large V // (& sunward) * Energized (> E sw )

(Cao et al., 2008) V // VV VV cluster-3cluster-1 SW FAB * Localized (< few 100km)

Ion motion in B (and E) Lorenz transform B' = B E' = E + V x B Lorenz force on ion F = q(E' + qv x B') where V: velocity of frame v: velocity of ion q: charge of ion and R G = mv  /qB RGRG

1. solar wind, 2. newly born ion, 3. bow-shock cold ion

SW BS ∑ 3-min scan e- (top) & H+ (rest) at different angle SW BS ∑ 3-min scan we show this Venus (Venus Express)

Venus (VEX) connected to BS

Venus ≈ Earth FS Scanning over -45°~+45° SW (  =1) B connected to BS = FS B

gyrotropic IMA Instrument

IMA looking direction VEX

SW

Two populations (same as Earth) 1. Field-aligned H Gyrating H + with large V //. Both types are ∆V // << V //,

1. solar wind, 2&3. bow-shock cold ion, 4. sneak out ∆V // << V // (yes), ∆V // << V // (yes), ∆V // ~ V // (no),

He++ and H+ show different behavior (future work)

Venus ≈ Earth No internal magnetic field. Planet is the same size as the Earth  Smaller bow shock size than the Earth, yet MHD regime. Effect of cod ions in the bow shock can be ignored. No internal magnetic field. Planet is smaller than the Earth.  The bow shock size is too small to treat with MHD. Effect of cod ions in the bow shock cannot be ignored. Mars  Earth

(1) only "ring" distribution (2) no "foreshock" signature (examined ~ 500 traversals) BS Quite different from Venus:

Examine close to the Bow Shock MEX We sometimes observed “multiple-ring” structure. c/  pi rgrg

beyond c/  pi within r g = reflected ions Three types of accelerated ions within c/  pi = foot ions beyond r g = pickup ions  obtain B direction

3rd // acc 2nd // acc main // acc pre-acc heating

green: foot blue: primary ring red: 1st branch purple: 2nd branch brown: 3rd branch Multiple acceleration Gyro-phase bunching red: half gyro purple: one third gyro

Multiple-Reflection n (-0.5, -0.7, -0.5)_LMN ±(0.05, 0.05, 0.05) V SW /V SW (0.0, 1.0, 0.2)_LMN V R /V SW (-0.6, 0.1, -0.8)_LMN ±(0, 0.2, 0) V HT /V SW (0., 1.0, -1.4)_LMN ±(0, 0, 0.3) n: shock normal V R : specularly reflected SW x V HT : de Hoffman Teller (V’ SW // B) L ~ (0, 0.6, -0.8)_XYZ M (-1.0, 0.2, 0.1)_XYZ N=-B/B (0.2, 0.8, 0.6)_XYZ e.g., 11:40 UT x x

Multiple-Reflection S E S: toward BS from left S&E: toward BS from left S ~ V HT = along BS E: along BS S: along BS E: toward BS E: toward BS from right x x (0.6, -0.8, 0) XYZ

SW Reflection  convert V  to V // in SW frame ∆∆ The observed multiple ring structure is well explained by multiple specular reflection. But, why is it observed outside the foot region?  no : Finite bow shock size compared to r g. yes: Cold ion in the bow shock  This may explain “non-specular reflection” at subsolar.

V // -V X V SW reflection gyration

3rd // acc 2nd // acc main // acc pre-acc heating Time = Spatial variation

B (N-direction) is estimated from minimum variance method applied to the ring distribution Classifying counts in // and  directions Time = Spatial variation

Three configurations (on-going work) Done

Special features for Mars Energy is stepping (due to reflection?) Gyro-bunching effect (due to short distance?) with gradual  acceleration (why?) Two different scale length No specular reflection near the bow shock (need to confirm)

Summary Venus Express / ASPERA-4 often observes back- streaming H + in the foreshock region of Venus, in a similar ways as the Terrestrial foreshock, i.e., field- aligned component, and intermediate (gyrating) component Mars Express / ASPERA-3 (same instrumentation as VEX) did not observe similar ions in the Martian foreshock region beyond the foot region. Instead, it shows different type of acceleration in the foot region, indicating the ion trajectory (history) during its gyromotion. The finite gyroradius effect makes Mars a perfect laboratory to study acceleration processes.

End

Detail of spectrogram (E=1~15 keV)  =4  =3  =2  =1   =all Mixture of accelerated ion (H+) components ring H+

Quasi-  shock (case 1)

Quasi-  and // (case 1+3)

Quasi-// (case 3)

case 3a

case 3b

Quasi-  (case 1+3)

B connected to BS BBB Beam = foreshock connected to BS Sometimes no beam in foreshock Venus ≈ Earth

Scan=-45°~45° SW BS, ∑ 3-min scan e- (top) & H+ (rest) at different angle Venus

5th Alfvén Conference 4-8 October, 2010 Sapporo, Japan on “Plasma Interaction with Non- magnetized Planets/Moons and its Influence on Planetary Evolution” Mars, Venus, The Moon, and Jovian/Saturnian satellites