QUESTIONS Has licensing generated sponsored research? How has it affected knowledge sharing & use of research? Has faculty research been diverted in response.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

COMMERCIALIZATION AS A TENURE CRITERION: A POWERFUL INCENTIVE FOR FACULTY INVENTORS Stephen W.S. McKeever Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer.

Advertisements

FRAMING THE BAYH-DOLE DEBATE: MAJOR POLICY ISSUES AAAS Science & Technology Colloquium April 11, 2003 Marie Thursby DuPree College of Mgmt, Georgia Tech.

Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron.

1 WIPO/INV/BEI/02/3.a The Role of Universities in the Innovation Cycle Document prepared by Ms. Kirsten Leute, Licensing Associate Office of Technology.

University IPRs and Knowledge Transfer. Is the IPR ownership model more efficient? Gustavo Crespi (SPRU) Aldo Geuna (SPRU & ICER) Bart Verspagen (ECIS)

Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development

The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980: Policy Model for Other Industrial Economies? David C. Mowery Haas School of Business U.C. Berkeley & NBER Bhaven N. Sampat University.

CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.

Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006.

IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.

Industry – University Transactions: Rights to Future Intellectual Property Varda N. Main Director, Technology Licensing Rochester Institute of Technology.

LOWER SHORE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM Bringing the Benefits of Discovery to the World MAY 23, 2012 Wesley D. Blakeslee Executive Director Johns Hopkins.

University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.

© Goddard & Isabelle Groupe de Travail JERIP 03 mars 2006 John Gabriel GODDARD IMRI (Université Paris-Dauphine) Marc ISABELLE IMRI (Université Paris-Dauphine)

University Patenting Aldo Geuna SPRU-University of Sussex PECS – July 2007.

Science, Innovations and Institutions: Comments Paula Stephan, Georgia State University June 2005.

Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.

Research Development Fellows Program May 10, 2010 David Conrad We are NUtech Ventures.

In or Out? Faculty Research and Consulting Richard Jensen University of Notre Dame Jerry Thursby Emory University Marie Thursby Georgia Tech & NBER Supported.

TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership

1 In Search of Performance Effects of (in)direct Industry Science Links Bruno Cassiman IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra Reinhilde Veugelers.

Scholarship and Inventive Activity in the University: Complements or Substitutes? Brent Goldfarb University of Maryland Gerald Marschke University at Albany,

Academic patenting in Japan -Some policy issues- Isamu Yamauchi Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) 1 APE-INV 3-4 September 2013.

OTM INTRODUCTION AND IP PRIMER Patrick E. Reed, Director, Office of Technology Management.

OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION Title of Invention Invention Disclosure Form Date Name Department School CONFIDENTIAL.

Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer Bringing the benefits of discovery to the World. Wesley D. Blakeslee, B.S., J.D. Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer Medical.

1 25 Nov 20032nd EPIP Conference - Maastricht1 Academic Patenting in OECD Countries Mario Cervantes, OECD.

Technology Transfer at Rice

WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.

University Intellectual Property Transfer Mechanisms: Adaptation and Learning Maryann P. Feldman Johns Hopkins University.

Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.

Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing Katharine Ku October 1, 2012.

+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.

What should you know about Intellectual Property? Katharine Ku Office of Technology Licensing.

Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.

03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.

1 Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Commercialization in Academe: Lessons from the Life.

University Technology Transfer and Commercialisation of Research: Some Evidence from International Best Practice Brian Harney CISC Seminar Programme.

Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.

“IP Universities” Istanbul, April 14 to 15, 2011 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY The U.S. Bayh- Dole Act Av. Uğur Aktekin The U.S. Bayh-

POLICY INCENTIVES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PEREZ W.J ODERO LEGAL CONSULTANT 5 TH JUNE 2005.

Technology Licensing at Stanford University

Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.

Paola Giuri, Federico Munari – FinKT Project What determines University Patent Commercialization? Empirical Evidence on the role of University IPR Ownership.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

IP and Technology Transfer from the Academic Perspective Robert L. Barchi, M.D., Ph.D. Provost University of Pennsylvania 122 College Hall Philadelphia,

Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.

US University Patenting and Licensing: Historical Evolution and Recent Trends David C. Mowery Haas School of Business U.C. Berkeley.

Working with UR Ventures David Williams Dean for Research in Arts, Sciences, & Engineering.

Session II: Effects of University Patenting and Licensing on Commercialization Lessons Learned From Recent Quantitative and Qualitative Research on the.

Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.

University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.

IP, Invention Disclosures and Commercialization

Intellectual Property 101

Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D

The Academic/Industrial

Universities and the Commercial World

Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process

Commercialization of University Intellectual Property & Biotechnology

Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind

Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)

Technology Commercialization Office

Taking Discoveries from Lab to Marketplace

Intellectual Property 101

Partnering with Business and Industry

University of Iowa Research Foundation

University patenting and possible measures to increase patenting

Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development

Effects of Patenting and Technology Transfer on Commercialization

Presentation transcript:

QUESTIONS Has licensing generated sponsored research? How has it affected knowledge sharing & use of research? Has faculty research been diverted in response to financial incentives associated with Bayh Dole? Little known Some known Very little known

How Are License Funds Spent? 41% of royalty income to administration or inventor department ( Thursby, Jensen, & Thursby 2001 JTT) Sponsored research associated with licenses as % of license funds ( AUTM Surveys )

INDUSTRY SPONSORED RESEARCH Benefits Complementary to basic research agenda Mansfield 1995 ReStat Zucker et al. 1994, 1998 Access to equipment & data Morgan, Strickland, & Kannankutty surveys (NSF) What are the costs?

Restrictions From IP Issues Publication restrictions Blumenthal 1997 JAMA Cohen, Florida, and Randazzese 1997 Thursby and Thursby 2000 Publication delay related to patent/commercialization Reluctance to share research related to scientific priority Sharing of materials and research Blumenthal 1997

Faculty Effort Important for commercial development of many university inventions Jensen & Thursby AER 2001 Agarwal 2000 Inventions in early stages of development Most are proof of concept or lab scale prototype

FACULTY INVOLVEMENT Thursby and Thursby 2000 Business Survey

Focus of Faculty Research Tradition of applied research before Bayh-Dole Mowery, Nelson, Sampat, & Ziedonis 1999 Research Policy New willingness of faculty to disclose inventions? Thursby & Thursby 2001 Management Science Evidence of changes in academic research Cohen, Florida, Randezzese, & Walsh 1997 Morgan, Kannankutty, & Strickland (NSF )

Need Data on Individual Faculty to Examine Have research agendas changed? If so, Is it faculty with a comparative advantage in basic or applied research? Why the change? Is it individual or policy effects? –Age distribution of faculty –Funding availability –University policies Thursby & Thursby—panel database of research and disclosure activity of 7000 faculty from 11 universities for (NSF)