Trees for the Future Presentation to FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Elspeth Macdonald Barry Gardiner, Shaun Mochan, John Fonweban and John Moore* Timber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conifer Plantations Module #7 Restoring Your Plantation 7-1.
Advertisements

Uneven-aged beech stand, Germany. Uneven-aged mixed-hardwood stand, Michigan.
An Envirothon Primer Glenn “Dode” Gladders
Timber Management Elements of Forestry Kenneth Williams
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
FORESTS – IMPORTANT ENERGY SOURCE. Forests in the EU Apart from their importance for ecology and environment conservation forests are one of the Europe's.
Biomass and the Natural Heritage SNH Sharing Good Practice Event 2nd November 2006, Battleby Fiona McPhie Northern WoodHeat Project Manager Highland Birchwoods.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
BOGFOR RESEARCH PROGRAMME Florence Renou, Project Manager and E.P. Farrell, Project Leader Forest Ecosystem Research Group, University College Dublin CUTAWAY.
Investing in Forest Fertilization: tools, measures, analyses By Ralph Winter Forest Practices Branch July 25, 2005.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
VARIABLE RETENTION HARVESTING ON POTLATCH FORESTS.
Establishing Timber as a preferred material for construction IUFRO All Division 5 Meeting 2007 Investigating the effect of tree breeding on the timber.
Intro to the Forester’s Craft or How is Scientific Forestry different than just cutting down trees? and getting towards What is the “forestry” in community-
Juvenile Wood in Pines. Overview Basics Of Wood Production What Is Juvenile Wood Characteristics What influences Juvenile Wood What Are The Problems With.
I N T E G R A T E D S I N K E N H A N C E M E N T A S S E S S M E N T INSEA PARTNERS Forest production and carbon storage -potentials of European forestry.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Western Hardwood Association Symposium III October 7, 2003 The Future of Hardwood Tree Farming.
Commercial Management Options for Hybrid Poplar Buffers Carolyn J. Henri, Ph.D. Jon Johnson, Ph.D. James P. Dobrowolski, Ph.D.
Overview of Financial Analysis
FEG Autumn Symposium David Read UK Forests and Mitigation of Climate Change.
The potential for hardwood business in the South Baltic Region Edgar Kastenholz European Network of Forest Entrepreneurs (ENFE)
Hardwood Management in the Coast Region Implementation: A guide to where, when and how. Prepared by the Coast Region FRPA Implementation Team (CRIT) Silviculture.
Allocation Effects on Sustainability within a Solid Wood Chain A Case Study in South Scotland Stefania Pizzirani and Barry Gardiner, John Fonweban and.
Young-Stand Management Options and their Implications for Wood Quality and Other Values by Jamie Barbour, PNW Research Station; Richard Zaborske, USFS.
Tended intimate mixtures (tending stands or individual spruce) Advantages –Nursing effects are evenly distributed (better protection from radiation frost.
A Decision Support Demonstrator for Abiotic Damage to Trees, using a WWW Interface Ari Talkkari Roger Dunham.
Progressing Radiata pine breeding in Australia. M.B. Powell, T.A. McRae, D.J. Pilbeam and H.X. Wu.
Hardwood Management in the Coast Region Implementation: A guide to where, when and how. Neil Hughes RPF Spring 2012.
Conifer Plantation Management Caring for Your Land Series of Workshops Conifer Plantations Module #4 Timber Sales and Marketing 4-1.
Developing the Scots Pine Resource. The Partnership Three year Northern Periphery Project involving partner s from Scotland, Finland, Norway and Sweden.
timber in environmentally sustainable development Timber Specification Guide Timber Specification Guidelines 0.0 title.
Forestry. What do we use forests for? An Older View of Canadian Forestry
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Thinning as a tool of close to nature forestry Igor Štefančík Forest Research Institute, Zvolen Slovakia.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2007 BALTIC BIOMASS NETWORK SECTION “BIOENERGY IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION: ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY,
Alder Supply + Red Alder Plantation Growth and Yield RAP ORGANON Glenn Ahrens Oregon State University Extension Forester.
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Then… ….and Now. 2 Old growth Second growth Stand age vs. percent of juvenile wood When trees grow rapidly so that they are of harvestable size when.
Silvicultural considerations in established alder stands Jeff DeBell Washington DNR June 10, 2009.
Programmes for breeding of hybrid larch in Germany Volker Schneck Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry.
Education and Research Committee Report Washington Hardwoods Commission Annual Meeting – 2008.
Non-Destructive Wood Quality Estimation From Standing Tree In Relation To End Product Characteristics Of Fast Growth Plantation Eucalypts In Uruguay (Eucalyptus.
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
SILVICULTURAL PRACTICES. SILVICULTURE The application of various treatments such as; tree planting, pruning, intermediate cuttings and harvest cuts.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
Class “A” western larch seed and interim seed deployment zones Barry Jaquish and Susan Zedel Tree Improvement Branch October 3,
 The removal of a proportion of the trees in a stand …………..  …for silvicultural or economic reasons.
Silvicultural Systems for Mixedwood Management Phil Comeau Dept. of Renewable Resources University of Alberta.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
What gains can we expect from Genetics?
FOR 350 Silviculture. What is silviculture? The art and science of controlling the establishment, composition, structure, and growth of a forest stand.
FORESTRY LAND USE Overview and Update Buckingham County Land Use Work Session September 18, 2017 Dean Cumbia Forest Resource Management Branch.
SILVICULTURAL PRACTICES
PRESENTATION SLIDES Measurements taken from pine and eucalyptus plantation demonstration sites in the Southern Highlands, Tanzania All material is open.
Forest Growing and Processing in Otago - Southland
Update on delivering “Roots for Future Growth”. Autumn 2016.
UK Sawmill View September 2017.
FOR 350 Silviculture.
Diversifying your business with woodland creation
Will present results from a combination of market related studies, trials and demonstration sites, grower adoption surveys Example of tea! EXPERIENCES.
FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Then… ….and Now.
Wood Quality - Definitions
Wood Quality - Definitions
Harvesting Early Good or Bad?
Kirk Hanson (360)
Presentation transcript:

Trees for the Future Presentation to FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Elspeth Macdonald Barry Gardiner, Shaun Mochan, John Fonweban and John Moore* Timber Properties Research Programme * Napier University CTE

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Outline 1.Objectives of timber properties research programme and collaboration 2.Trees for the future – timescales 3.The next 10 years – assessment and sorting 4.10 – 40 years – silviculture to improve quality 5.40 years plus – establishing forests to maximise quality 6.Conclusions Trees for the Future

FEG Symposium 31 st October Investigating and modelling the effects of silvicultural practice and site factors upon conifer timber quality 2.Developing methods of defining, assessing and forecasting timber quality to provide improved information about future timber supplies to forest managers and wood using industries Timber properties research - objectives Trees for the Future

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Work reported includes projects undertaken by Forest Research and Napier University Centre for Timber Engineering (Napier CTE) We collaborate widely:  Building Research Establishment  Universities in the UK  Industry –sawmilling and forest management companies  European partners – universities and research organisations Funding:  Forestry Commission  Scottish Funding Council  Scottish Forestry Trust  Scottish Enterprise  Highlands and Islands Enterprise  European Union Collaboration and acknowledgements Trees for the Future

FEG Symposium 31 st October The next 10 years: Silvicultural input to improve timber quality is minimal Focus on assessing timber quality & allocating material to the most appropriate end use to maximise value in the woodchain 2.10 – 40 years: Majority of timber production in this period will be from forests already established Main intervention will be thinning & choice of rotation length Possibility of pruning 3.40 years plus: Majority of timber production from stands still to be established Greatest scope for silvicultural intervention – least certainty about market demands Trees for the future - timescales Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 A number of ongoing projects relate to assessment of timber quality and informing allocation of material to different end uses: Stem form – straightness and branching Acoustic measurement – standing trees and logs Airborne laser scanning (LIDAR) Terrestrial laser scanning The next 10 years – assessment and sorting Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 System developed for use in Sitka spruce Can be used to predict out-turn of “green” logs Stem straightness scoring Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Branching indices Height of lowest dead branch commonly used as branching index in Scandinavia Has been tested for use with Scots pine – improved predictions of log grade out-turn Lowest dead branch Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Acoustic tools Provide information about mechanical properties from trees and logs Aim to assess quality early in the wood chain Sawmill Road sideStand Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Project ongoing to integrate quality assessment with standard harvesting operations Trial in several FC Scotland forest districts Stem straightness assessed before felling Acoustic measurements on roadside logs GIS mapping of results Comparison of products actually cut with timber quality data collected Data will be used to validate models developed to predict timber quality Using these methods in practice Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Lidar technology can be used to estimate stand and tree parameters (tree heights, crown width, stocking density, stem diameter) Airborne Laser Scanning (LIDAR) These data can then be used as inputs to timber quality models → predictions of log grade and timber properties Work ongoing to evaluate the potential for timber quality assessment at this scale Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Terrestrial Laser Scanning provides detailed stem profile data Stem quality assessment (using straightness scoring) can be derived Terrestrial Laser Scanning Forest Research working with Treemetrics to improve stem profile assessment above the range of the laser (taper functions) Potential for improved pre-harvest assessment of quantity AND quality Trees for the Future: the next 10 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Interventions that will influence the quality of timber from forests already established:  Thinning  Choice of rotation length  Pruning Forest Research is working with Napier University and the Building Research Establishment to integrate growth, timber quality and timber performance models Such models allow the impact of different management alternatives on timber produced to be evaluated 10 – 40 years: silviculture for improved timber quality Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

Thinning Thinning is a key silvicultural tool used to:  improve stand by: removing poor stems of poor form concentrating increment on superior trees  provide an early economic return (?)  manipulate stocking density and stand structure canopies of seed bearing trees light environment for regenerating crop Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

General effects of thinning Compared to no-thin regimes, thinning will result in:  improvement in stem form and branching through selection  lower proportion of juvenile wood  more uniform growth Timing is key: early thinning or respacing prior to canopy closure can result in:  retention of deep living crown → large knots in logs  increased taper  possible reduction in stem straightness Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

Juvenile wood area – modelling the effects of thinning Juvenile wood area (15 growth rings) Nominal sawn timber section No thin Intermediate thin 31% juvenile wood 21% juvenile wood Cross-section at 4.8m Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

Current average rotation length for conifers: 40 – 50 years Transformation to CCF, retain trees for:  seed source  shelter for regenerating crop  landscape  biodiversity Longer rotations Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

Consequences of longer rotations Lower proportion of juvenile wood Potential for significant amount of knot free timber Napier CTE evaluated timber properties of 83 year old Sitka spruce from Birkley Wood Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Birkley Wood - Grade Distribution within a Log Pos1Pos2Pos3Pos4 Strength (N/mm 2 ) Density (kg/m 3 ) MOE (kN/mm 2 ) Strength class C16C20 C24 Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Birkley Wood: Distortion – Spring and Twist Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

Pruning Pruning will always benefit timber quality if performed well  reduce knot area and produce clear timber  reduce the juvenile core  reduce taper Economic return from pruning hard to predict Evidence of pruning essential Grants for pruning available under SRDP Trees for the Future: 10 – 40 years

40 years plus: establishing forests to maximise quality (or revenue?) In this timescale, opportunity to influence timber quality is greatest:  Species choice  Planting stock – provenance, improved progeny  Planting or natural regeneration  Spacing Markets in 40 years time uncertain  Should we always grow for best possible quality?  Should we grow to meet the needs of the renewable energy market? Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Choice of species If species is not well suited to site:  patchy establishment  poor growth  possible stem form problems Also need to consider  pests & diseases  climate change impact  potential future markets Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Choice of provenance Differences in growth and timber properties between provenances E.g. lodgepole pine  problem with brittle failure in service (posts, pallets)  South Coastal LP more compression wood lower impact strength an increase in brash fracture compared to Alaskan and inland provenances Fibrous fracture Brash fracture Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Choice of progeny Selective tree breeding can deliver improvements in:  growth rate  stem straightness  branching  wood density  fibre properties Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Conifer breeding in Britain Sitka spruce – main focus of breeding programme  significant gains made in growth rate and quality Scots pine  seed orchard material: increased growth rate (8 – 12%) and improved stem straightness (0 – 3%) Douglas fir  UK selected seed stands  French/USA seed from breeding programmes Hybrid larch  Small gains from untested seed orchards  Prospects for vegetative propagation of superior families, to give gains of 15–20% for diameter and 20– 25% for stem straightness Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Recent results: study of improved Sitka Spruce Progeny trial at Kershope in N. England, planted 1968 – half sib Unimproved QCI and 3 improved families:  Family 2: The straightest treatment.  Family 3: The most vigorous treatment.  Family 4: The treatment with the highest wood density. 36 trees from each family felled for testing Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Batten Stiffness (MOE) Highest density Most vigorous Straightest Unimproved QCI Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Summary of Results from Kershope Trees selected for improved straightness and vigour yielded a greater volume of green logs Wood mechanical properties of progeny of selected progeny did not differ from those of QCI trees Major sources of variation in mechanical properties were between battens within a log and between trees within progeny – gains could be made by assessment and sorting… Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Planting or natural regeneration? Planting - advantages  Opportunity to select species  Volume and quality gains from improved progeny  Control over stocking  Minimal variation in age class structure Planting - disadvantages  Possible stem form problems associated with nursery practice and early instability (toppling)  High establishment costs  Possible patchy stocking – future timber quality problems Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Planting or natural regeneration? Natural regeneration - advantages  Improved stability – possibly better stem form  Potentially high stocking and large number of trees for selection in thinning  Potentially low cost  Fits well with Continuous Cover Forestry Natural regeneration - disadvantages  No opportunity for improvement in growth or TQ through use of selected provenance/progeny  Difficult to control species mix – may have a lot of low value species (e.g. hemlock, grand fir)  Costs of respacing/pre-commercial thinning Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Spacing – a recent concern? Michie (1926) advocated a maximum spacing of 7’ (~2.1m) as adequately close to prevent the formation of “very large knots” Brazier (1993) “it is recommended that 2m is the maximum planting spacing used for spruce if commercially acceptable yields of timber grading to SC3 (C16) are to be obtained” Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Wider spacing Larger, longer lived branches Larger juvenile core Reduction in straightness Higher grain angle Higher taper Fewer trees for selection amongst when thinning May not fully utilise biological capacity of site BUT lower establishment costs, improved stability and trees achieve merchantable volume earlier Poorer mechanical properties and dimensional stability Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

Quantifying impact of spacing - Baronscourt study 12’ x 12’ (3.05m x 3.05m) 12’ x 18’ (3.05m x 5.5m)18’ x 18’ (5.5m x5.5m) 6’ x 6’ (1.8m x 1.8m) Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 Baronscourt - summary of properties PropertySpacing (feet) 18x1818x1212x1212x66x6 MOR (N/mm²) MOE (kN/mm²) Density (kg/m³) Grade--C14C16 Trees for the Future: 40 years plus

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 A range of technological advances allow timber quality assessments to be made in the forest:  Strategic level – regional forecasts in conjunction with inventory, to inform processing investments  Forest level as part of pre-harvest assessment – allocation of timber to different end uses At an individual stand level, a key priority is to maximise use of information gathered :  Harvester data relating to logs cut  Sorting in the forest according to quality classes  Potential for log tracking At each stage the cost of gathering data must be weighed against the increase in value recovery achieved:  Forest Research working with European partners to develop a standardised method of valuing timber supply chains: Trees for the Future – Conclusions (1)

Silvicultural intervention can play a key role in determining the quality of timber produced from conifer forests in the future The outcome will not depend on any one action – impacts on timber quality depend on every aspect of management A key priority must be commitment to the production of quality timber at each stage: “from plant to plank”! Trees for the Future – Conclusions (2)

FEG Symposium 31 st October 2008 More information: