Sponsored by the Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation, and Research Committee (CMER) of the Timber, Fish, and Wildlife (TFW) Agreement Forested Wetlands.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT) Formed in 1983 to provide a common voice for our region through the collaborative efforts of the Upper Columbia.

Advertisements

The Clean Estuary Partnership and the RMP Comparing two stakeholder programs producing science in support of policy James M. Kelly, Chair Bay Area Clean.

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.

Southeast Climate Consortium Extension Program C. W. Fraisse, J. Bellow, N. Breuer, V. Cabrera, J. W. Jones, K. Ingram, and G. Hoogenboom.

Planning for Our Future:

Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.

AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL. Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office (208)

The Fellowships aim to: Educate scientists and engineers on the intricacies of federal policymaking Provide scientific and technical knowledge to support.

Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.

National Standard 2 Guidelines on scientific information.

Collaborative Management and Multi Party Stakeholder Negotiation Rosemary O’Leary, Distinguished Professor The Maxwell School of Syracuse University April.

Sierra Water Work Group Summit June Upper Mokelumne River Watershed Authority.

Sponsored by the Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation, and Research Committee (CMER) of the Timber, Fish, and Wildlife (TFW) Agreement Forested Wetlands.

1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.

Session 301 Factors in Assessing Risk Mitigation Actions Impact reducing the identified risks and vulnerabilities in the community Probability that each.

Cumulative Impact Estimation For Landscape Scale Forest Planning Finn Krogstad & Peter Schiess Forest Engineering, U. Washington.

Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.

PPA 502 – Program Evaluation

ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.

Applying First Nations Traditional Knowledge to Reclamation in the Oil and Gas Industry West Moberly First Nations Traditional Knowledge Project Oil and.

A DAPTIVE MANAGEMENT: S TRATEGIES FOR COPING WITH CHANGE AND UNCERTAINTY J. BRIAN NYBERG FRST 532 COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEM, GLOBAL CHANGE SCIENCE AND ECOLOGICAL.

Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.

CMI Workshop: Resource roads in BC: Environmental challenges at the site level November 8, 2012 Ian Miller, RPF.

Central management of training Program development Local implementation of programs Government orientations, policies and structures Components of the.

Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.

First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.

ATO/ITTO PCI for the sustainable management of African natural forests.

Millennium Assessment (MA) 2003 Typology of Ecosystem Goods and Services Regulating Benefits obtained from regulation of ecosystem processes climate regulation.

In-Delta Storage Process OverviewProcess Overview Program BenefitsProgram Benefits Project CostsProject Costs IssuesIssues Proposed Work Plan for FY 2003Proposed.

CMER Research Update George McFadden CMER Study Implementation Coordinator.

US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.

Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.

National Forest Projects West Virginia GIS Conference June 7 – 10, 2010 Huntington, WV Marshall University West Virginia GIS Conference June 7 – 10, 2010.

Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.

United for the benefit of all Regional Coordination.

Land Use Planning in the Deh Cho territory. Overview Who are the Land Use Planning Committee? What is Land Use Planning? How does this relate to the Deh.

ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Public Meetings December 2, 4, Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch--CDR Associates.

1 Monitor and Evaluate Planning Step 9. 2 Social Science Activities in Land Use Planning Planning StepsSocial Science Activities Steps 1 & 2: Identify.

Ash Roorbach CMER Riparian Ecologist CMER Monthly Meeting, July 27, 2010.

1 Chair’s Report on the 2011 Annual Plan Priorities Dan Tonsmeire May 18, 2011.

1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.

Evidence-based Education and the Culture of Special Education Chair: Jack States, Wing Institute Discussant: Teri Palmer, University of Oregon.

Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.

1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.

North Slope Science Initiative Dr. John F. Payne, Executive Director Dr. Denny Lassuy, Acting Deputy Director North Slope Science Initiative

Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.

An Expanded Model of Evidence-based Practice in Special Education Randy Keyworth Jack States Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.

DEEPWATER HORIZON $1B EARLY RESTORATION AGREEMENT Governor’s Advisory Commission May 11, 2010.

Potential of regulatory and voluntary carbon markets to support carbon credits for blue carbon restoration and conservation projects Steve Emmett-Mattox,

Office of Science Statement on Digital Data Management Laura Biven, PhD Senior Science and Technology Advisor Office of the Deputy Director for Science.

Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: The Prairie Adaptation Research Cooperative Mark Johnston Forest Ecosystems Branch, Environment and Resource Management.

Steve Todd WetSAG co-chair Suquamish Tribe Ash Roorbach CMER Riparian Ecologist August 5, 2010.

Towards a responsible biofuels* development process * And eventually agriculture?

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and DWR’s Role in Sustainable Groundwater Management California Irrigation Institute 2016 Conference January.

Millennium Assessment (MA) 2003 Typology of Ecosystem Goods and Services Regulating Benefits obtained from regulation of ecosystem processes climate regulation.

Science and Technology TAC Review of Action Items and TAC Priorities for the June 21, 2002 Clean Water Summit.

Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.

Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.

Using GAO’s Fraud Risk Management Framework

MTEF ALLOCATIONS 2016/17 – 2017/18 – 2018/19 Nosipho Ngcaba Director-General Portfolio Committee Briefing March

Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)

Pennsylvania Climate Change Act

Todd Petty, Mike Strager, and Michael Hasenmyer

The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process

Information Sharing and

Land Based Investment Program

Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology

University of Nizwa.

History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.

Presentation transcript:

Sponsored by the Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation, and Research Committee (CMER) of the Timber, Fish, and Wildlife (TFW) Agreement Forested Wetlands and Silvicultural Practices November 1, 2002 Lacey, Washington

History of Washington State Forest Practices Rules 1946: Reforestation required, Forest Practices Board formed 1976: Broad package of Forest Practice Rules WAC : TFW rule package and formation of CMER 1992: Wetland rules included 2001: Rule revision under Forests & Fish report

Washington State Forest Practices Rules under the 1987 Timber Fish & Wildlife Agreement TFW stakeholder commitment to reach consensus on:  protecting wildlife and fish  water quality and quantity  archeological and cultural resources  economic viability of timber industry

SciencePolicy Forest Practices Board Committee for Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation & Research Timber Fish & Wildlife/ Forests and Fish Policy Adaptive Management Program Administrator Summary of the Timber Fish & Wildlife /Forests & Fish Adaptive Management Program Public Comment Scientific Advisory Groups Wetland, Bull Trout,. Riparian,Monitoring, Landscape/Wildlife, Upslope processes.

CMER “Challenges” Currie, J An analysis of program integration and development for the TFW report, TFW Report 1 Support field implementation Validate assumptions behind agreement Develop and test alternative rules Assess cumulative effects

TFW Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation, and Research accomplishments CMER Funding Approx. $600,000/yr form 1987–2000 (~total $7.8 million) Future Funding under Forests & Fish $2 - 3 million/yr from ??

TFW CMER publications by subject for Admin.WildlifeFishPhysical Literature Field

CMER’s Wetland Scientific Advisory Group (WETSAG) Guidance to WETSAG from CMER via the Forest and Fish Report (Appendix F) “…..assessment of the functions served by forested wetlands and the potential impacts of harvest activities in forested wetlands.” Guidance to WETSAG from CMER via the Forest and Fish Report (Appendix F) “…..assessment of the functions served by forested wetlands and the potential impacts of harvest activities in forested wetlands.”

Wetland Scientific Advisory Group WETSAG Research Priorities from CMER What are the functions of forested wetlands? How can wetland classifications better reflect functions? Are current WMZ’s working to protect all forested wetland functions? What is the relationships between WMZ shading and water temperature? What wetland size and functions should trigger mitigation?

Adaptive management challenges of forested wetlands and silvicultural practices “Go where the truth leads us”. (Stu Bledsoe, cofounder of TFW, 1987) Share common understanding (TFW ideal). Do good science (important, efficient, credible).