Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Issues for Council Discussion April 24, Critical Habitat Changes made to Chapter II, IV and V in response to comments received, and experience gained.
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Resource Advisory Councils (RACs) Bureau of Land Management.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Meeting the Letter and Spirit of the Law: Legal Components of Comprehensive Plans.
Land into Federal Trust For Alaska Tribes Tribal Transportation Conference September 2014 Prepared by Lisa Jaeger Tribal Government Specialist Tanana Chiefs.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
HAWAIIAN HOMES COMMISSION ACT What Have We Forgotten ?
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
Act 381 Amendments John V. Byl and Richard A. Barr February 5 and 6, 2008.
Randolph Community Forest Partnerships. R C F & Randolph Valley.
ANWR. Conflict ANWR likely has one of the largest untapped oil deposits left in the United States. ANWR is one of the last true ``wilderness’’ areas.
Local and Tribal Intergovernmental Consultation Senate Bill 18: Law, Definitions, Process Protection of Traditional Tribal Cultural Places.
Land Resources and Conservation How Do We Use Our Public Lands?
Local Planning Process The General Plan SB 18 Training Program.
Snapper Grouper Amendment 35 (Removal of Species & Golden Tilefish Endorsements) Prepared by Myra Brouwer January 2015.
Language Legislation in the U.S.A. The “English as Official Language” Debate.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Public Information Meeting Tools for Intensification within the Yonge/Davis Urban Centres Marion Plaunt MES, MCIP, RPP Planning and Building Services August.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Agricultural Preserves Program Uniform Rules Update Office of Long Range Planning Board of Supervisors Hearing September 25, 2007.
Working with Tribal Governments Cooperative Conservation Partnership Leadership Training Conference November 28-30, 2006 Nashville TN.
Atlin/Taku Land Use Planning Forestry Chapter Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #4 June 19, 2009.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDER ABORIGINAL LAND CLAIM AGREEMENTS FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Title US Department of the Interior Indian Affairs 2016 Indian Affairs House/Senate Mark Presentation to Tribal/Interior Budget Council August 6, 2015.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved Slides developed by Les Wiletzky PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
The Community Preservation Act in Harwich – July 28, 2004.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
The Community Preservation Act Hadley – April 14, 2004 The Community Preservation Coalition What is the CPA and how does it work? What does the CPA mean.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
1 Discussion: Resource Management in the Context of Alaska Native Village Corporations EE Discussion Group June 4, 2003.
Alaska National Interest Lands Act of 1980 Rachel Lustbader Maria Espinoza.
Stanton Energy Center Solar Facility Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners February 22,
Environmental Assessment Act – Overview Environmental Media Group.
The House and Senate Committees of Congress By Christian, Jason,Jeff, AND Tevon 6 th Period.
What is a congressional hearing
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Unit 2– Treaties, Rights, and Resource Interests on National Forest System Lands Unit 2 Objectives – unit objectivesIntroduction – unit rationale and relevance.
1 Satellite Export Control Policy: Current Status and Prospects for Reform Patricia Cooper President, Satellite Industry Association.
USFWS Alaska Native Relations Policy Drafting a new policy – 2016 Crystal Leonetti, USFWS Alaska Native Affairs Specialist Patty Schwalenburg, Chugach.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Pending FAA Reauthorization Impact on Foreign Repair Stations Maintenance Information Session 2008.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
Worldviews Perspective on historic treaties Treaties to the Europeans were originally land use agreements which were used to keep the peace and gain.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
Mead Treadwell Lieutenant Governor Public Hearing on Ballot Measure 4: An Act Providing for Protection of Bristol Bay Wild Salmon and Waters.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Environmental Quality Board
The Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement Act
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Overview of 2019 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
The READI for Disasters Act
American Indian Rights and Claims Course Sequence Flowchart
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
Introduction – unit rationale and relevance
FIRE PROGRAM ALASKA.
Sandra Moller, Director
Overview of 2020 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
Planning Advisory Committee Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal Areas Fairbanks, Alaska June 7 – 8, 2013

Introduction  Sealaska made a presentation to the Commission during the February 2013 meeting in Juneau.  There have been many issues raised by the Commission or the Public that have been addressed in current versions of the legislation. Concerns have included: Public Access; 17(b) and reservation of easements; impacts on commercial guides; recreational use and access; timber harvest and the environment  This presentation will attempt to highlight some of those changes that address Commission concerns. 2

Current Status  S. 340 Hearing Held April 25, 2013 – Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources’ Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests and Mining. - Administration favorable, but seeking CMAI Language – to adjust Cumulative Mean Annual Increment so 2 nd growth could be harvested sooner. - CMAI is not a Sealaska Issue – requested by the Forest Service Committee Mark-Up potentially by the end of June Mark-up will add CMAI language After Committee Approval, likely inclusion in a package with several Senate Public Land Bills to be developed by Senate Leadership. 3

Current Status (continued)  H.R. 740 Hearing Held on May 16, 2013 – Before the House Committee on Natural Resources’ Subcommittee on Indian and Alaska Native Affairs - Testimony by Sealaska and Jimmie Rosenbruch (Bear Guide) - Testimony by Administration – favorable to goal of bill; prefer Senate version and would like to see inclusion of CMAI language No projected date for House Committee mark-up. 4

Summary of Current Senate Bill  Completes conveyance of final 70,075 acres  Three categories of lands: Large Economic Development Parcels (Timber Lands) – 68,581 acres; 9 sites - Not a pool; all lands specifically identified Small Economic Development Sites – 1,004 acres; 9 sites - Significantly decreased as a result of public input; 2 energy sites Cemetery and Historic Sites – 490 acres; 76 sites - No sites within Conservation System Units - Must apply for sites within 2 years of enactment - Must use the ANCSA 14(h)(1) application and approval process  Quick Conveyance; but current amendments allow time to ensure conveyance documents can be amended to recognize all easements and preexisting uses (per 17(b) process). 17(b) window remains open until 17(b) process completed by the BLM 5

Summary of Current Senate Bill (continued)  Public Access Permitted for subsistence use and non commercial recreational uses Subject to “reasonable restrictions” (public safety; minimize conflict; protect cultural resources; scientific research; environmental protection) Also permitted across Cultural Sites where there is no reasonable alternative access available Public Access along salmon streams for subsistence, sport and recreational fishing along salmon streams within cultural site boundaries  Permit Holders – Recognized and Renewed Permit continues through remainder of term; plus one 10-year renewal  Conservation Lands – 150,000 acres of new LUD II areas  Reference to ANILCA Sec. 803 will eliminated 6

Summary of House Bill  House Bill Very Similar to Senate Bill in this Congress – Some Distinctions Addressed Below  Timber Lands reduced by roughly 1,000 acres to accommodate additional small economic parcels and cultural sites.  Small Economic Development Parcels An Additional Seven (7) Sites are included in the House Bill; all energy sites  Cemetery & Historic Sites An Additional Fifty-One (51) Sites are included in the House Bill (because no CSU limitation for location of historic sites) Public Easements for salmon streams not required for cultural sites  No Conservation Lands 7

Summary of House Bill (continued)  Technical Amendment to the National Historic Preservation Act Provides that ANCSA Corporations shall be eligible to participate in all programs administered under this Act for the benefit of Indian Tribes, including securing grants and other support to manage their historic sites and preservation programs.  Technical Amendment to the Tribal Forest Protection Act Provides that forest land owned by ANCSA Corporations shall be eligible for agreements and contracts authorized under the TFPA.  Both Amendments Clarify: Does not validate, invalidate, or otherwise affect any claim regarding the existence of “Indian Country” in Alaska 8

Questions? We are available to answer questions now and will be on the phone line during the Land Bill discussion tomorrow (June 8). 9