Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M-25 over Harbor Beach Creek
Advertisements

Local Agency Bridge (LABP) Program Overview Informational Presentation – January 7, 2011 Carol Olsen, ODOT LGS Bridge Program Manager Local.
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
LOAD RATING TRAINING Hand Calculations Tim Keller, PE Amjad Waheed, PE
ODOT Structure Project Manager Training
MDOT Load Rating Local Agency Workshop Training Bradley M. Wagner, PE Load Rating Program Manager.
Idaho Load Rating Program
Brenden K. Schaefer, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation 2011 Virtis / Opis User Group Meeting August 2, 2011 Helena, MT.
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
Micheal J. Watters, P.E. Principal Bridge Engineer Wyoming Department of Transportation Virtis / Opis Users Group Meeting August 3, 2010.
Chapter 34 Bridge Construction.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAL DESIGN SECTION REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. B-0427 ON DAIRY ROAD OVER OWL BRANCH.
TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER NDE Research Ongoing Projects and Response Based Load Rating The Office of Research, Development, and Technology.
FHWA Update for the Virtis Opis User Group Meeting Thomas Saad, P. E. FHWA Resource Center Phone:
National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS)
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
INDOT Challenge: How to Maintain Our Highway Infrastructure Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck
Thomas Saad, P.E. Senior Structural Engineer Federal Highway Administration Phone: (708)
2015 Winter School Structures Heidi A. Mertz, P.E. District 8-0 Structure Control Engineer.
Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis Bridgeware User Group 2011 Conference Helena, Montana 1.
Virtis-Opis Update Virtis-Opis User Group Training Meeting Helena – August 2011.
PGSuper2AASHTOWare Bridge Data Translator
Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Girder at Simple Support Virtis/Opis User Group Conference Nashville, TN, August 3-4, 2010 George Huang, PhD, PE California.
Crane Bridge Design STJ Engineering Matt Albert AJ Chandler Noah Fehrenbacher Jake Gennicks Jake Wilhoit Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation RADBUG - August 2014 Water Management and Structures.
FHWA Update 2011 VOBug Meeting Helena, MT Thomas Saad, P. E. FHWA Resource Center Phone:
LS Engineering Associates Corporation LS Engineering Associates Corporation CORPORATE PORFILE Engineering Services ■ Bridge Inspection ■ Bridge Design.
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Load Rating Dan Walsh.
Snapshot of Member States’ Feedback after the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse - Summary of Information Collected via Recent Surveys Malcolm Kerley, Chair –
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Inspections Dan Walsh.
Design Standards For Local Agency Bridges Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference May, 2006 Design Standards For Local Agency Bridges Statewide.
Fatigue in Concrete Structures Raquib Ahsan, Ph.D. Professor Department of Civil Engineering BUET.
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Alternatives Presentation.
CODES, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
NCHRP VOBUG Nashville– 2010 NCHRP Evaluation of Load Rating by LRFR Mark Mlynarski, P.E. – Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Wagdy Wassef, Ph.D. P.E.-
LRFR vs. LFR Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 2, 2011
St Johnsbury BF 7000(20) Bridge 6 on VT Route 2B over the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail Presenter: John Byatt, PE Consultant Project Manager.
Monitoring a Prestressed Concrete Box-Beam Bridge for Superloads Osman Hag-Elsafi Jonathan Kunin Structures Research Transportation Research and Development.
NBIS – National Bridge Inspection Standards National standards for the proper safety inspection and evaluation of all hwy bridges NBI – National Bridge.
New York State Department of Transportation Accelerated Bridge Program Phase 1B Design-Build Projects Request for Proposals Informational Meeting April.
Bridge Safety Initiative: Slab Bridge Load Rating using AASHTO Methodology and Finite Element Analysis AASHTO RAC/TRB 2011 Summer Meeting Prepared by Dale.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Forms Completion Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge.
Bridge Design Implementation Jeff Olsen, PE – MT DOT AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force
C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Public Information Meeting.
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
National Bridge Inventory Coding Guide Update Pontis Users’ Group Meeting September 5-6, 2007 Portland, Maine.
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.
RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGESAND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BYTRUCKS RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGES AND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BY TRUCKS Terry Swygert South.
Danbro Selected Data For Maps Prioritizing / Ranking Arne Henriksen NVF Annual Bridge Conference 2015.
LOADS 1.
PORT OF TACOMA. Contract Increase & Award Pier 7 Structural Repairs Request authorization to expand the scope of existing A/E Contract No and.
Load carrying capacity based on load testing Joan R. Casas Technical University of Catalunya (UPC) Barcelona, Spain.
A Paper from the Transportation Research Record
Inspection Form Types Each form has a unique
Posting Bridges for Specialized Single-Unit Trucks
High Bridge Re-Deck Project
Understanding the 2017 ODOT Bridge Inspection Reports
P.L Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING
SDDOT –Load Rating & Permitting
Blatnik Bridge Management Study
Bridge Load Rating.
Load Posting For Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHVs)
Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013
What’s new in Bridges ABCD March 2019
Historical Life Cycle Costs of Steel & Concrete Girder Bridges
BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING
Presentation transcript:

Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Presentation Overview  Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHVs)  Bridge Rating for SHVs  Rating Contract  Rating Analysis  Challenges  Future Project

Specialized Hauling Vehicles  What is a SHV? Single unit (SU) trucks with closely-spaced multiple axles Maximum load of up to nearly 80,000 lbs Must meet the Federal Bridge Formula B Considered legal and typically allowed unrestricted operation Examples: Gravel Trucks, Redi Mix Trucks, Milk Trucks

Specialized Hauling Vehicles SU4 18’ 54 kips 62 kips SU5 22’ 69.5 kips SU6 26’ 77.5 kips SU7 30’

Bridge Rating for SHVs  Why is bridge rating important? SHVs are increasingly common on our roadways Effects on short span bridges Fulfill National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) requirements Update local bridge rating database

Bridge Rating for SHVs  Why is bridge rating important? (cont.) Create a consistent summary of load carrying capacities of all state bridges Used for bridge posting and for issuing overweight permits Monitor safety of bridges over time Determine when rehabilitation or replacement is needed

Bridge Rating for SHVs Type M3 Type M3S ’ 80 kips Type M3S3 16’ 48 kips  Minnesota legal trucks used to determine load posting 47’ 80 kips

Rating Contract  Funding - $800,000 from FHWA and State Aid  14,786 bridges in the local system  Bridge selection process Operating Rating < HS 27 Rating date, 30+ years old Rating Method Bridge type Local agencies input - 2 year replacement 581 bridges selected for rating

Rating Contract

 $1400 ± /bridge Data gathering, field investigation, inspections, rating analysis  4 bridge rating contracts $200,000/contract – Bonestroo – national firm – HDR – national firm – LHB – local firm – WSN – local firm

Rating Contract  Phase I May 2010 – May 2011  Impact of the project is statewide  Heaviest concentration of work located in southern Minnesota

Rating Contract  Scope of work Information and Data Gathering – Examine current inventory rating sheets and inspection reports – Examine bridge files and records Field Investigations – Bridge inspections – Field measurements

Rating Analysis  Virtis 6.1 Bridge will be rated in Virtis – Provides consistency in rating Bridges not compatible with Virtis will be rated by hand or other design approved software such as MDX Rating analysis based on AASHTO Design Trucks, MnDOT Legal (posting) Vehicles, and SHV’s Ratings must meet AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation, MnDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual requirements Perform a complete QC of each rating

Rating Analysis  Virtis 6.1 (cont.) Rating method – Reinforced and prestressed concrete bridges will be rated for both LFR and LRFR methods – Steel bridges - LFR method – Timber bridges - ASR method

Rating Analysis  Virtis 6.1 (cont.) Why use Virtis for local bridges? – Consistent with TH system – Ease of permitting with local bridges – Ease of re-rating bridges when a change in rating codes, bridges condition or truck configuration occurs

Challenges  No plans available Timber and steel bridges Prestress concrete bridges – Physical Inspection Rating (PIR)  No Access Bridge No Built in 1950 Concrete Slab Span – 12ft in length Operating Rating = HS18, Date: 1973

Br. No

Challenges  Deteriorated Substructures Bridge No. L3612 Built in 1958 Timber Slab Span – 26ft in length Operating Rating = HS26, Date: 1974

Br. No. L3612  Abutment pile failure from earth pressure

Br. No. L3612  Deteriorated abutment pile

Challenges  Unique Design Bridge No Built in 1958 Steel Beam Span – 16ft in length Operating Rating = HS20, Date: 1973

Br. No

Br. No  Concrete slab span  20ft long  Built in 1923  Operating rating = HS19  Rating Date: 1973  No plans available

Br. No

Br. No  Steel beam span  17ft long  Built in 1941  Operating rating = HS20  Rating Date: 1973

Br. No

Future Project  Phase II $500,000 budget, contract FHWA audit of load ratings and postings – Emphasis on load rating updates Help locals with permitting by giving them procedures and guidelines Accommodate changing truck weights

Questions?