Multi-Payer Reimbursement Pilot Overview of Risk/Benefit to Practices L Gordon Moore MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Payment Reforms Work for Patients and Families Lee Partridge Senior Health Policy Advisor National Partnership for Women and Families January 28,
Advertisements

The Advanced Medical Home ACP Attributes of Advanced Medical Home Evidence-based care/clinical decision support Chronic care model approach for all patients.
Collaboration for Referral to Mayo Clinic Health System COMPASS Medical Home Inpatient/ ED Transitions RN January 2014.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Pilgrimage Healthcare Patients Deserve More Options…
The Rhode Island Chronic Care Sustainability Initiative: Building a Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot in Rhode Island.
Value - Based Purchasing Presented by Kyle Bain For Kemal Erkan HCM-401 Course.
Department of Vermont Health Access Vermont Blueprint for Health: Using APCD to Evaluate Health Care Reform Pat Jones, MS Blueprint Assistant Director.
September 2010 Lisa M. Letourneau MD, MPH Quality Counts.
Aetna and PCMH Improving Employee Health through Patient- Centered Medical Homes Morristown, New Jersey October 12, 2010 Aetna’s experience with Patient-Centered.
Will Groneman Executive Vice President System Development TriHealth
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
Pioneer ACO Overview to NYSDOH ACO Workgroup March 6, 2014.
Patient Centered Medical Home Program. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana PCMH Overview Began as a pilot PCMH program in late 2009 to correct gaps in care.
John W. Robinson, MD, SM VP Medical Affairs & Chief Medical Officer Molina Healthcare of Washington, Inc. Reducing Preventable ER Visits April 19, 2011.
HFMA December Attacking Rising Costs 23% of the Medicare population has a chronic condition with 5 or more co-morbid conditions that compel them.
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation: Providing Health Care Quality and Value for New York City Residents Anne-Marie J. Audet, MD, MSc, FACP.
The Evolution of the Physician Compensation Plan: Volume to Value
Renaissance Medical Management Company Overview A Pioneer Accountable Care Organization.
A Report from the Alliance Clinical Practice Improvement Network January 30, 2013.
Missouri’s Primary Care and CMHC Health Home Initiative
FINANCING MEDICAL HOME SERVICES KENNETH W. FAISTL, MD Family Practice of Central Jersey July 2010.
Primary Care & New Jersey James E. Barr, MD Medical/Executive Director, Central Jersey Physician Network IPA Horizon BCBS of NJ HMO Board Member Member,
Value-Based Purchasing in NY Medicaid Deborah Bachrach, Esq. Medicaid Director Deputy Commissioner Office of Health Insurance Programs New York State Department.
{ Louisiana Medicaid Baseline Quality Data Dr. Sandra Blake Eddy Myers University of Louisiana at Monroe College of Pharmacy Office of Outcomes Research.
Access to Care Where Are We All Going to Get Care? Bruce A. Bishop Senior Counsel/Director of Compliance Northwest Permanente, P.C., Physicians and Surgeons.
NASHP Learning the ABCs of APCs and Medical Homes October 5, 2010 Foster Gesten, MD New York State Department of Health 1.
1 CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. ® Registered trademark of the Blue Cross and.
Accountable Care Organizations at UCSF Adrienne Green, MD Associate Chief Medical Officer, UCSF Medical Center.
© 2011 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The Role of Payment Reform in the Transformation of the HealthCare System Jim Eppel.
Next Steps in Oncology Payment Reform for Established Provider & Payer Teams Presented By: Robert Baird CEO, Dayton Physicians Network Community Oncology.
NASHP - October 5, 2010 Lisa M. Letourneau MD, MPH Quality Counts Learning the ABCs of APCs and Medical Homes.
Practice Transformation: Using Technology to Improve Models of Care and Transitions in Care Mat Kendall, EVP Aledade DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions.
California Pay for Performance: Reporting First Year Results and The Business Case for IT Investment Lance Lang, MD Health Net, California November 18,
New York State Department of Health Hospital-Medical Home Demonstration Reflections, Celebrations and Transformations.
Health Care Financing the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Making the Investment in Primary Care Sandeep Wadhwa, MD, MBA Medicaid Director and Chief Medical.
EmblemHealth Medical Home High Value Network Project William Rollow, MD MPH PCPCC Presentation December 2, 2008.
1 Show Me the Money: Aligning Patient- Centered Medical Home Reimbursement to Achieve Value in Health Care Delivery The National Medical Home Summit March.
Population Health and the NCM Care Transformation Collaborative of R.I. NANCY MAMO, MANAGING DIRECTOR, POPULATION HEALTH ANALYTICS, BCBSRI MAY 5, 2015.
A Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Presentation Office of Policy and Representation Changing Payment Incentives: 'Crucial Step' In Healthcare Reform.
New Jersey Academy of Family Physicians and Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey Pilot Project July 28, 2010 © NJAFP Cari Miller, Director,
Department of Vermont Health Access The Vermont Approach to Building an Integrated Health System Creating “Accountable Care Partners” Based on Shared Interests.
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
Population Health Janet Appel, RN, MSN Director of Informatics and Population Health.
Jim Jenkins, MD President, Fairfax Family Practice Centers.
Case Studies – Medical Home A 360 Degree View of the Medical Home in Action.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
MiPCT Evaluation Update 1 Clare Tanner March 14, 2014.
Terry McInnis, MD MPH President- Blue Thorn, Inc - Mobile Co-Chair- Center for.
Update on Medicaid Integration in SW Washington January 7, 2016 Erin Hafer, MPH Director, New Programs Integration & Network Development.
PATIENT CARE NETWORK OF OKLAHOMA (PCNOK) Oklahoma Healthcare Authority ABD Care Coordination RFI Response August 17, 2015.
Care Management: The Transition to Meeting NCQA Standards for PCMH Clyde H. Satterly, MD, MBA SUNY Upstate Medical University, Dept of Family Medicine.
Managed Care Nursing Facility Quality Initiatives February 2, 2015.
Janet Hurley MD Operational Chief of Primary Care, CHRISTUS® Trinity Mother Frances Health System.
The Payer Perspective Richard Snyder, M.D.. Agenda The National Landscape Profiles of Single and Multi-Stakeholder Pilots –North Dakota –New Jersey –Pennsylvania.
1 Swedish Community Health A Medical Home Pilot With an Innovative Payment Model Carol Cordy, MD, Clinical Site Director Mark Johnson, MD, Residency Site.
What Will it Take for DM to Demonstrate an ROI? Ariel Linden, DrPH, MS President, Linden Consulting Group
Innovations in Primary Care: Implementing Clinical Care Management in Primary Care Practices Judith Steinberg, MD, MPH Deputy Chief Medical Officer Jeanne.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a nonprofit corporation and independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. 1.
The heart and science of medicine. UVMHealth.org/MedCenter Vermont Blueprint for Health John G. King, MD, MPH December 6, 2014.
ALAMO FAMILY HEALTH TEAM 1.
Charlotte Crist, BS, RN-BC, CCM, CPHQ
Fundamental Payment Reform for Chronic Care
IBH, Cost (Risk Adjusted)
Paying for Serious Illness Care Under a Global Budget: Opportunities and Challenges Anna Gosline, Senior Director of Health Policy and Strategic Initiatives,
Highmark QualityBLUE Pay for Performance Program
PRACTICE MANAGER MEETING Thursday June 15th 2017 Noon – 1:00PM
Integration of Health Care and Value-Based Reimbursement in New Jersey
Intro to Risk Based Contracts/Value Based Agreements
Cost and Performance Management Under Alternative Payment Models
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Payer Reimbursement Pilot Overview of Risk/Benefit to Practices L Gordon Moore MD

Payer Participants Aetna CIGNA Community Health Plan of Washington Group Health Cooperative Molina Premera Blue Cross Regence Blue Shield United Healthcare

Goal Primary Goal – to partially shift payment from the current fee-for-service model towards payment for improved outcomes. “Improved Outcomes” defined as: Reduced preventable emergency room visits and hospitalizations

Definitions Reduce preventable ED = Calculated using NYU ED Use Profiling Algorithm for patients attributed to the practice. Reduce preventable hospitalizations – calculated using AHRQ PQI methodology for patients attributed to practice.

Pilot Objectives Reduce preventable ER visits by 30% Reduce preventable inpatient admissions by 10% Pilot objectives are achievable as indicated by results from other pilots nationwide. New York City, 1998: 82% ER visits preventable New Jersey, 2004: 47% ER Visits preventable Tennessee, 2004: 51% ER visits preventable Massachusetts, FY 2006: 47% ER visits preventable

Practice Targets Reduce preventable ER visits and inpatient admissions,combined, by enough to cover the cost of investment in the pilot.

Participation Criteria At baseline, have some level of skill and facility in coordinating care – you have to get out of the gate fast or risk penalty (payback). Helpful attributes: Current participant in WA PCMH collaborative Prior WA DOH collaborative experience NCQA “Level 1” PPC-PCMH recognition A solid plan of action linked to outcomes

Helpful Core Capabilities Ability to: Offer extended hours of access (evenings/weekends) Offer care beyond “office visits” (i.e., phone, online) Demonstrate tools and processes in place for chronic care management (registry, outreach function & staff, etc.) Follow-up ED/hospital discharge with a proactive and coordinated team approach to care coordination Demonstrate timely and actionable communication to your main ED/hospital

How Much $? Two payment plans: Plan 1 Plan 2

Plan 1 Start of payment pilot: get case management bump: Year 1: additional $2.50 PMPM Years 2 & 3: PMPM drops to $2 Shared savings based on difference of periods 1, 2 & 3 from baseline (2 years prior to start) - Savings = going beyond the target set for your practice

Potential Shared Savings Any savings above PMPM earned in a year are shared 50/50 between payers and practice by adjusted PMPM in the following year. Shared savings for reductions in ER visits and hospital admissions beyond break-even levels will be distributed to participating practice groups only if they have met agreed upon quality performance measures.

Plan 1 investment If savings exceed the initial investment then they are shared between practices and plans 50/50 Savings from preventable ED and hospital visits Shared savings

Quality Performance Measures Staying healthy (HEDIS) Screening for Breast Cancer (women, age 52-69) Screening for Cervical Cancer (women, age 21-64) Screening for Colon Cancer (men/women, age 50+) Managing chronic conditions (chart review? registry?) Diabetes (HbA1c testing, cholesterol testing, nephropathy screening) Heart Disease (cholesterol testing, cholesterol lowering medication) Depression (medication adherence at 12 wks. and 6 mo.) Experience measures (surveys by practice? health plan?) Patient/Family experience measures Provider and staff experience measures

Plan 1 Performance Scenarios Assumption for Plan 1 Performance Scenarios: Attributed patients = 1000 Year 1 PMPM payments = 1000 Pts x $2.50 PMPM x 12 months = $30,000 Scenario A: No Improvement Year 1 performance = 100 ED visits Year 1 savings = 0 prevented visits x $1,500/visit = $0 Year 2 adjustment = $30,000 year 1 PMPM x.50 = $15,000 Year 2 PMPM rate = $2.00 PMPM base rate x 12 months = $24,000 - $15,000 adjustment = $9,000/12 months = $750/1000 pts = $0.75

Plan 1 Performance Scenarios Scenario B: Improvement < 50% PMPM Year 1 performance = 97 preventable ED visits Year 1 savings = 3 prevented ED visits x $1,500/visit = $4,500 Year 2 adjustment = $30,000 year 1 PMPM - $4,500 savings = -$25,500 (Stop 0.50 PMPM = $15,000) Year 2 PMPM rate = $2 PMPM base x 12 months = $24,000 -$15,000 adjustment = $9,000/12 months = $750/1000 pts = $0.75

Plan 1 Performance Scenarios Scenario C: Improvement >100% PMPM Year 1 performance = 70 preventable ED visits Year 1 savings = 30 preventable visits x $1,500/visit = $45,000 Year 2 adjustment = ($30,000 PMPM - $45,000) savings = $15,000 Year 2 PMPM rate = $2 base rate x 12 months = $24,000 +($15,00 x.50 = $7,500) = $31,500/12 months =$2625 $/month/1000 pts = $2.63

>50% of PMPM saved Plan 1 PMPM investment Savings from preventable ED and hospital visits No shared savings 50% of PMPM exceeded by savings Next year’s PMPM investment Change in PMPM Same goal for savings If total savings do not exceed the initial investment there are no “shared savings” between practices and plans If savings exceed 50% of PMPM but still fall short of break even, the practice faces a reduction in PMPM investment the next year For years 2 and 3 shared savings occur once savings exceed $2.00 PMPM investment Break even

< 50% of PMPM saved Plan 1 PMPM investment Savings from preventable ED and hospital visits No shared savings < 50% of PMPM saved Next year’s PMPM investment Reduction in PMPM – 50% of previous PMPM Same goal for savings If savings do not exceed the initial investment then there are no shared savings between practices and plans Both practices and plans are limited in their losses to 50% of PMPM For practices, the PMPM is reduced by 50% in the next year Shared savings occur when the savings for the next year exceed $2.00 PMPM for years 2 and 3

PMPM investmentSavings from preventable ED and hospital visits No shared savings 50% of PMPM exceeded by savings Next year’s PMPM investment Change in PMPM Same goal for savings PMPM investmentSavings from preventable ED and hospital visits No shared savings < 50% of PMPM saved Next year’s PMPM investment Same goal for savings Practice 1 Practice 2 Change in PMPM

Potential Downside/Risk If savings are less than PMPM in a year, payment is reduced by the amount of the shortfall up to ½ PMPM, by downward adjustment of following year’s PMPM

Plan 2 The “No Up-Front $” Plan Premise: shift FFS $ to a PMPM so the practice can choose to work as it sees fit Virtual visits instead of office visits Case management and outreach Shared savings just like Plan 1 (with one twist to help the practice) The first $2.50 PMPM (yr 1) of savings goes 100% to practice ($2 PMPM yrs 2 & 3) Beyond that: 50% share (like Plan 1)

Savings Both plans and practices have limits on losses to 50% of the PMPM invested that year Plan 1 – plans receive savings first Plan 2 – practices receive shared savings first Both practices and plans split shared savings once break even point exceeded Yearly PMPM investment Savings from preventable ED and hospital visits Break even Plan paid first Shared savings Yearly PMPM investment Savings from preventable ED and hospital visits Break even Shared savings Practice paid first Plan 1Plan 2

Which Plan is Right for You? For more information, see the advisory letter in your application packet.