The “solar flare” of 14th, July, 2000. Observation from the detector “L3+Cosmics” P. Ladron de Guevara on behalf of the L3+C collaboration. XXX REUNION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The MAGIC telescope and the GLAST satellite La Palma, Roque de los Muchacos (28.8° latitude ° longitude, 2225 m asl) INAUGURATION: 10/10/2003 LAT.
Advertisements

Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for.
OBSERVATIONS OF AGNs USING PACT (Pachmarhi Array of Cherenkov Telescopes) Debanjan Bose (On behalf of PACT collaboration) “The Multi-Messenger Approach.
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
Solar Energetic Particles -acceleration and observations- (Two approaches at the highest energy) Takashi SAKO Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
X.-X. Li, H.-H. He, F.-R. Zhu, S.-Z. Chen on behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Nanjing GRB Conference,Nanjing,
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Preliminary MC study on the GRAND prototype scintillator array Feng Zhaoyang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China GRAND Workshop, Paris, Feb. 015.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT.
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
High-Energy Ground Level Events Measured with Neutron Monitors and the Milagro Instrument James M. Ryan University of New Hampshire and the Milagro Collaboration.
Operation of the Space Environmental viewing and Analysis Network (Sevan) in 24-th Solar Activity Cycle A. Chilingarian A. Chilingarian Yerevan Physics.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
IceCube Galactic Halo Analysis Carsten Rott Jan-Patrick Huelss CCAPP Mini Workshop Columbus OH August 6, m 2450 m August 6, 20091CCAPP DM Miniworkshop.
Multi-TeV  -ray Astronomy with GRAPES-3 Pravata K Mohanty On behalf of the GRAPE-3 collaboration Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai Workshop.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector at the geographic South Pole. We give an overview of searches for time-variable neutrino.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Search for emission from Gamma Ray Bursts with the ARGO-YBJ detector Tristano Di Girolamo Universita` “Federico II” and INFN, Napoli, Italy ECRS, September.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Cosmic Ray Workshop May 15, Cosmic Ray Detector Kit.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
EAS Time Structures with ARGO-YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento and INFN Lecce, Italy A.K Calabrese Melcarne 1, G.Marsella.
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
Combining Gamma and Neutrino Observations Christian Spiering, DESY.
Cosmic ray physics in ALICE Katherin Shtejer Díaz For the ALICE Collaboration LatinoAmerican Workshop on High Energy Physics: Particles and Strings, Havana,
It is considered that until now in the 24th cycle of solar activity 2 ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays (GLEs) are registered: on May 17,
High-energy Electron Spectrum From PPB-BETS Experiment In Antarctica Kenji Yoshida 1, Shoji Torii 2 on behalf of the PPB-BETS collaboration 1 Shibaura.
The KASCADE-Grande Experiment: an Overview Andrea Chiavassa Universita’ di Torino for the KASCADE-Grande Collaboration.
Cosmic Rays from to eV. Open Problem and Experimental Results. (KASCADE-Grande view) Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe XLIV th Rencontres.
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
Ion Acceleration in Solar Flares Determined by Solar Neutron Observations 2013 AGU Meeting of the Cancun, Mexico 2013/05/15 Kyoko Watanabe ISAS/JAXA,
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.
Title Relativistic Solar Cosmic Ray Dynamics in Large Ground Level Events E.V. Vashenuyk, Yu.V. Balabin, B.B. Gvozdevsky Polar Geophysical Institute Apatity,
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
The Performance of the ALICE experiment for cosmic ray physics B. Alessandro, V. Canoa, A. Fernández, M. Rodríguez, M. Subieta for the ALICE Collaboration.
A New Solar Neutron Telescope working at the International Space Station K. Koga, T. Goka (PI), H. Matsumoto, T. Obara, O. Okudaira (JAXA) Y. Muraki (Nagoya)
Space-time structure of signals in scintillation detectors of EAS L.G. Dedenko, G.F. Fedorova, T.M. Roganova and D.A. Podgrudkov.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
32 nd ICRC –Beijing – August 11-18, 2011 Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Observation of MGRO J with.
XXX REUNION BIENAL DE LA RSEF
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
INTEGRAL Satellite on Oct 28th 2003
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
Alexei Struminsky1,2  1 Space Research Institute
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Detection of Solar Neutrons and Protons by the ground level detectors
Alexander Mishev & Ilya Usoskin
Application of neutron monitor data for space weather
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
Presentation transcript:

The “solar flare” of 14th, July, Observation from the detector “L3+Cosmics” P. Ladron de Guevara on behalf of the L3+C collaboration. XXX REUNION BIENAL DE LA RSEF Ourense, Septiembre, 2005

GROUND LEVEL ENHANCEMENTS (GLE s) Solar protons are accelerated in high energy solar process such as: * Solar flares (SF s) * Coronal mass ejections (CME s) * First GLE observed : 1946 From then… ~ 60 GLEs detected (Worldwide network of neutron monitors, NMs) - Solar protons with energies > 100 MeV produce secondaries that can be observed at ground level (Ground Level Enhancements, GLE s) More than 100 NMs distributed at different geomagnetic latitudes Geomagnetic spectrometer (started by Simpson,1950)

From the Neutron Monitors (NMs) observations: (primaries energy threshold set by rigidity of the site) * The Sun can accelerate protons at least up to GeV energies * Huancayo NM (Peru) : solar protons > 13 GeV (29/Sept/1989) Modelling on data: (Ref. [1-3]) Description of the proton beam approaching the Earth : * Steep spectrum ( index ~ -6) * Anisotropic beams * Delayed components Muon telescopes (directional) (Ref [5-8]) Embudo => solar protons from GeV (1989) (35 mwe,New Mexico) * Baksan => solar protons > 500 GeV (?) (1989) (signal delayed 2 hrs after the impulsive flare phase ) - Isolated NMs are not sensitive in detecting a directionally narrow beam, or excesses for E>5 GeV (statistics !!) - Add EAS arrays (E > 5 GeV) - Add underground muon telescopes if proton momentum high enough (??) - particle trajectory tracing. - model of magnetospheric magnetic field - data from several NMs for the same GLE L3+C is a muon telescope Problems (Ref 4)

Of interest : -the limit in primary energy -the (an)isotropy of the proton beams -the spectral index -the existence of delayed components One GLE happened during L3+C operation, the 14th July, 2000 (“Bastille Day” event) named as SF ( Ref [9-11] )

* Solar flare and CME associated. * X5.7/3B from 9077 sunspot region (X class SF, x-ray wavelenght 5.7 Amstrongs) * 10:24 UT X-ray flare peak * 10:30 UT proton flux rapidly increased up to E> 100 MeV, observed by satellite GOES-8 * During this period a full halo, earth directed CME was developped and observed by SOHO/LASCO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle Spectrometric Coronograph ) A GLE event produced. The earliest increase occurred at 10:30 UT. > 20 NMs observed flux increases in the range of 2 % => 60 % * Reconstructed from ~20 NMs data, the solar protons have anisotropic incident direction, energy threshold up to 6.7 GeV, soft spectrum with a power law index of –6 during the rising phase, -7 at 11 h, -8 at 12 h. * Particle arrival was anisotropic and changed with time. 10:00 13:206:4016:40 UT (hrs)

Analysis of data from L3+C during 14th/July/2000

L3+C schematic setup and momentum measurement. Mean energy loss : (molasse + magnet) 15 GeV

L3+C ( Ref [12] ) angular resolution ~ momentum resolution ~ 5 % (from 15 GeV-25 GeV) momentum threshold ~ 15 GeV/c sensitive volume 1000 m 3 magnetic field 0.5 T Coordinates : E, N, 450 m. asl 30 m. underground Magnetic rigidity cutoff ~ 5 GV Event selection : - Only a single muon track is present in the muon chamber. - Track composed of at least 3 segments of hits in P-chambers (wires parallel to magnetic field) and 2 segments of hits in Z-chambers (wires perpendicular to magnetic field) - Back-tracking from muon chambers to the surface succesful, to ensure a good pointing. - Only muons with surface energies from 15 GeV to 25 GeV were consider at first step. Live-time binning: * 83.9 s (~1.4 min) live-time bin as the basic time unit in searching for possible signals. * The different time windows used in the search are multiples of the above.

The goal is the detection of an excess in flux in any direction. We divide the space according to the direction cosines: l= sin  cos   : zenith,  : azimuth of the muon at surface. m= sin . sin  The squared area of l and m was divided in a 10 x 10 grid. Ignoring the cells with poor acceptance, 41 sky cells remain for investigation.

t o : flare time Square: Cell with coordinates: < Zenith< <Azim.< ( cell 57 ) Contour lines: Equal acceptance Star marks: Sun direction every hour 57

Two kinds of methods used : 1)“Free” search. (“running means” method). * Fix parameter : time start of the search ( 22:00 UT in 13th July) * Free parameter: time window, tw (related to the unknown duration of the excess) * Two alternative background determinations: a) Computed from 12 h. before the S-F start time. (fixed background) from 13/July 22:00 UT to 14/July 10:00 UT) b) Computed as the mean of two backgrounds, 3h. of livetime before and after the region of the “signal” * Notice: In a) the background is unique and assumed to be extrapolable to the S-F region. In b) the background changes with the position and size of the time window and - has the trend to dilute the “excess” if the time window is larger than the “signal” - the statistical error is greater than for a) (by sqrt(2) )...but reduces the influence of the local fluctuations. The search of flux excess

The running means principle, method 1.b, variable background.

“Running means” principle: ( in a given directional cell ) ** pick a time window tw centered on the time t and compute : nsd = ( S(t,tw) – B(t,tw) ) /  ( B(t,tw) ) S(t,tw) is the number of entries in the interval with length tw and center at t. B(t,tw) is the background and  ( B(t,tw) )  stands for its mean standard deviation. ** run over tw (from m. to m.) and over t (the full day) to get nsd and find the absolute maximum of nsd and its corresponding t, tw ( 3 values per directional cell )

Results: Only two cells (CR arrival directions) have been found with coincident t, tw from methods a) and b) in the interval from 10:00 to 11:00 Method 1a (fixed background) Method 1b) (variable background) Cell bakground excess max  time-window time (UT) background excess max  min 10: min 10:

Cell 57

Cell 59

2) “Guided” search. This search uses our knowledge of the 14th July 2000 GLE event. We search for protons with higher energies than established until now The analysis of NMs data ( Ref [5] ) shows a soft solar proton spectrum (g= - 6) and became softer with time => the higher the solar proton energy, the shorter the signal duration time  We search for short signals.  We concentrate on a short period starting from 10:20 UT (the onset time of the type II radio burst) and around the peak time of the increase seen by the NMs. (~ 10:UT=> ~12:00 UT) Background: From GOES-8 (Ref [9]) => Event rate of protons with energies > 100 MeV stable during the 12 hours before 10:00. The background is extracted from this range, the same as for method 3a) above. Search of excess : 1- Check of possible excesses during the peak time of NMs only. 2- Search for an excess using a bin (tw) unit (83.9 s live-time) starting from 10:20 UT 3- When found, (at 10:24 UT in cell 57 only), add the next bins up to the point that the excess start to decrease live-time units were so gathered amounting to a tw = min. 5- The fit of the background with the min bin compared to the the excess allowed to measure a 4.2  effect 6- It was also checked whether there were other possible excesses appearing at delayed times min. live-time bins were examined from 9:52 UT to 11:51 UT over the 41 cells and no other excess than the one reported was found.

Cell 57 Bkg=235 Excess=65  =4.2 tw=16.7min. time=10:33 UT

Resumee The “free” and “guided” searches are coincident in finding an excess at very close time and time-window in cell 57, with directions: < Zenith< <Azim.< Free search : time: 10:34 UT with time-window = min (3.74  ) Guided search : time: 10:33 UT with time-window = min (4.22  ) From Monte-Carlo simulation, the probability for the excess of 4.2  in one of the 41 sky cells being due to a background fluctuation is ~ 1 % (small significance !!) No excess was found for muons at > 25 GeV in the cell 57.

Assuming the muon excess being produced by protons associated to the GLE: What is the primary energy of such protons ? MC simulation (Air simulation code CORSIKA) *Primary proton spectrum with exponent of –6 above 20 GeV *Primary protons assumed to be incident along the directions that make the produced muons to appear in cell 57. (85 % of the produced muons come from the region GeV with most probable energy of 70 GeV)

*The MC produced muons on the surface are recorded *Large enough area centered around the  chambers was set to ensure less of 1 % loss of muons. *Muons were traced through the molasse and  -chambers and its tracks reconstructed. Background: Same procedure as for the “signal”, but using the primary ray spectrum power law index –2.7 Comparison between observed data and simulated data gives un upper limit of the flux: Upper limit of the solar flare induced proton flux I(Ep > 40 GeV ) < 2.8 x 10 –3 cm –2 sec –1 sr –1 (90% c. l.)

Comparison with other measurements and theoretical upper limits

Conclusions * In the GLE event of the 14th July 2000 a 4.2  excess of muons with E  = GeV in a particular sky region was observed which lasted from 10:24 UT to 10:42 UT. The probability of finding such an excess in this search as a fluctuation of the background is ~ 1% It was time-coincident with the peak increase observed by 20 different NMs during the impulsive phase of the solar flare, at 10:30 UT * If the excess was really induced by solar protons the observation might indicate that solar protons with energies higher than 40 GeV were generated in this event. The upper limit of a solar proton beam entering the upper atmosphere around the space direction < Zenith< <Azim.< and corresponding to the excess was determined to be : I(Ep > 40 GeV ) < 2.8 x 10 –3 cm –2 sec –1 sr –1 (90% c. l.)

References 1- M.L. Duldig, Proceedings of 27th ICRC, 3363 (2001) 2- V.V. Pchelkin et al., Proceedings of the 27th ICRC,3379, ( 2001 ). 3- E.V. Vashenyuk et al., Proceedings of 27 th ICRC, 3383, ( 2001 ). 4- N.A. Tsyganenko, Planet Space Sci. 37,5, ( 1989 ). 5- A.T. Filippov et al., 22nd ICRC, Dublin,3,113,( 1991 ). 6- E.N. Alexeyev et al., Geomagn. Aeron.,32,192, ( 1992 ). 7- E.N. Alexeyev et al., Geomagn. Aeron.,34,143, ( 1994 ). 8- S.N. Karpov et al., Nuo. Cim.,21C,551, ( 1998 ) dimages/gpa1day/proton/ gifhttp://crlhir.crl.go.jp/dimages/gpa1day/proton/ gif A.V. Belov et al.,Proceedings of 27th ICRC, 3446,( 2001 ). 12- O. Adriani et al., Nucl. Instr. And Methods in Physics Research, A488,209,(2002).

End of talk. Thank you !!