Cynthia Giles NACAA Meeting May 5, 2014 1 Next Generation Compliance Partnership with States and Local Air Agencies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Advertisements

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT SOLID WASTE (SW) LANDFILLS QUIZ Ruxandra Floroiu, Environmental Engineer, ECSSD WB Safeguards Workshop Chisinau, Moldova October.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP CAA Title V Regulatory Requirements Malcolm C. Weiss, Esq. (310) Jeffer, Mangels, Butler.
CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT Modernization of Approvals Project Update July, 2010.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Air Resource Management Orange County Environmental Streamlining Task Force May 4, 2011 Air Resource Management,
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Philadelphia Diesel Difference June 18, 2007 Arleen Shulman Bureau of Air Quality, Pennsylvania.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting Philadelphia,
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Environmental Management Systems North Carolina’s Approach By Gary Hunt DPPEA.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
What is it and what can it do for me?
Webinar: EPA’s Environmental Enforcement Data August 10, 2011.
Gordon Pierce WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Denver, CO November 6, 2013.
SCAP April 29, 2014 Cleaning The Air That We Breathe… Update on 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP)
CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
Facility Lead Corrective Action Opportunities with Union Carbide RCRA National Meeting May, 2005 Bob Greaves EPA Region 3.
Environmental Management Systems in Massachusetts April, 2003.
Compliance Assistance Program at the US Environmental Protection Agency Michael M. Stahl Director, Office of Compliance U.S. EPA Presentation at The Regulatory.
NPDES Compliance Update NCMA Workshop April 1, 2015.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
Ensuring a desirable workplace which creates a diverse team of all kinds of people and professions. To be a progressive state transportation agency recognized.
1 Small Community Environmental Compliance Assistance Project May 8, 2007 Arizona’s.
BORDER ENVIRONMENT COOPERATION COMMISSION Mitigating Impacts on Water Resources: Environmental Infrastructure Investment.
Innovative Environmental Policy Air Permits David Neleigh Chief, Air Permits Section EPA Region 6 May 10, 2006.
Eaton Corporation Roxboro ISO Program Engine Air Management Operations Brian Phillips.
EPA Overreach WATERS OF THE U S METHANE REDUCTION PLAN LEGISLATIVE /REGULATORY FORUM SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
Notices to Comply (NTC) and Notices of Violation (NOV) March 22, 2006 Peter Moore Yorke Engineering, LLC x24
Flexible Air Permitting Innovation Done Right State-EPA Innovations Symposium Denver, CO January 24, 2006.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
ENCOURAGING BEYOND COMPLIANCE BEHAVIOUR Presentation to the Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Roundtable Daniel Cayen Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
IDEM Compliance/Enforcement Priorities Felicia Robinson Deputy Commissioner of Legal Affairs Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
The Use of Environmental Management Systems in Permitting Decisions National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 May 10, 2006 Christine Steagall SC Department.
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
Developing an In-House Air Quality Audit Program March 22, 2006 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
1 IDEM Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Changes at IDEM Since EQSC House Environmental Affairs Committee January 28, 2009 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
The Wisconsin Green Tier Program: Developing An Evaluation Tool Analysis by: Darryn Beckstrom, Jessalyn Frost, Erin Rushmer, and Melody Sakazaki.
March Why is MassDEP proposing new UST regulations? DFS’s regulation: standards for tanks construction, installation, O&M, decommissioning and.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Indiana Environmental Management Conference October 16, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management 1.
IDEM Update Indiana Industrial Operators Association April 9, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting May.
AFS Modernization NACAA Meeting – May 5, AFS Modernization Status  Long agreed upon need to modernize  Efficiencies and cost savings from modernization.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
1 Region 5 Enforcement Approach George Czerniak June 13, 2007 NACAA Enforcement and Compliance Workshop.
1 What Program Requirements Drive Data Needs James Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management Office of Water US EPA Expanded Steering Committee.
2013 Priorities January 25, Overview of 2013 Board Actions State implementation plans Climate change: plan update, regulatory actions, sustainable.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
1 Electronic DMRs: Key to Burden Reduction and Improved NPDES Program Management David Hindin, Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
1 Understanding the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement Betsy Smidinger, Deputy Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office of Compliance Office of.
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Photo image area measures.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Photo image area measures.
Indiana Chamber of Commerce Environmental Outlook September 5, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
Next Generation Emission Measurements for Fugitive, Area Source, and Fence Line Applications U.S. EPA Region 4 Air Monitoring Workshop -
Flexible Air Permitting
Using R to Analyze GeoSpatial Multi-Pollutant Data
E-Enterprise Advanced Monitoring: A Path Forward for EPA, States, and Tribes by Leslie Cronkhite for the National Environmental Monitoring Conference.
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Presentation transcript:

Cynthia Giles NACAA Meeting May 5, Next Generation Compliance Partnership with States and Local Air Agencies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Next Generation Compliance – What is it? (See Also Fall NACAA meeting web-site) More effective rules Design with implementation in mind Advanced monitoring technology Find out about pollution in real time Electronic reporting Reduce burden, increase efficiency, improve data quality and timeliness Increased transparency Public accountability to improve government and facility performance Innovative enforcement Use Next Gen in settlements, better targeting and analysis, innovative approaches that drive compliance U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GMAP (geospatial measure of air pollution) tool can be used to estimate amount and location of methane and VOC emissions. Includes IR camera, sampling ports, GPS, methane meter. 2

Value to States of Next Generation Compliance Increase program efficiency and effectiveness while driving compliance. Reduce burden; improve data quality through e-reporting. Provide needed information through advanced monitoring. More complete, shared information leads to greater accountability. Create opportunities to consider new measures related to compliance. Measure the effectiveness of new program implementation approaches. Experiment and test new ideas for solving tough environmental problems. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3

EPA’s Recent Use of Next Gen Tools in Enforcement  Advanced monitoring to prevent, detect and more quickly correct violations.  Electronic reporting of compliance data, including data on compliance with settlement obligations.  Transparency of compliance data through publicly available websites or other means.  Third-party certifications that settlement obligations have been met. 4

Major Flare Settlements Marathon (April 2012) Covered all of Marathon’s six U.S. refineries. Established parameters of flare related injunctive relief. First to accept volumetric cap on flaring. BP Whiting (May 2012) Refinery in Indiana. Includes specific flare gas recovery requirements. Shell Deer Park (July 2013) Refinery and Olefins Plant in Deer Park, TX. First facility to agree to flare gas recovery at an Olefins plant.

CAA settlement with BP Whiting (Indiana) 6 Next Gen tools included in settlement: Location of fence line monitors based on consultation with EPA and community Report fence line data weekly on public web site Report continuous emission monitoring data quarterly on public web site Review data with community at their request

CAA settlement with Shell Deer Park (Texas) 7 Next Gen tools included in settlement: ◦ Innovative technology to reduce pollution from flares ◦ Enhanced in-plant monitoring for benzene ◦ Regular tank inspections with infrared camera ◦ Fence line monitoring for benzene ◦ Report fence line data on public web site

Estimated Emissions – Underestimated air emissions from flares 8 Actual emissions (in red) at Marathon and BP were 25 times and 10 times greater, respectively, than best engineering estimates (in blue) Communities were exposed to greater amounts of pollutants than assumed, and companies paid a penalty which may have been avoidable

CWA settlement with Roquette America (Iowa) 9 Next Gen Tools included in settlement: EPA-approved contractor must complete annual 3 rd party audits for O&M plan, SWPPP, and NPDES permits Reports will identify non- compliance, steps to address, and schedule to correct Audit reports will be included in Annual Report

CWA Settlement with Metro. Sewer District (St. Louis, Mo.) Next Gen tools used in two settlements: For judicial settlement, CD submissions must be posted to District website for three years For Admin Compliance Orders (07 & 08), must post discharge locations to District website 10

11 PhotoionizationInfrared Detector Camera Examples of advanced monitoring tools used in EPA’s air program

Continuous/Fence-Line Monitoring in Region 5 Traditional metals sampling – 24-hour integrated PM sample (filter-based); weeks of waiting for results; 60 samples/yr on 1- in-6 day schedule Next Gen monitoring - semi-continuous monitor; 1-hour sample; near real-time data via built-in XRF lab instrument; over 700 measurements/mth (8,000/yr) 12

Off-site assessment with GMAP-REQ ( Geospatial Measurement of Air Pollution – Remote Emissions Quantification) driving path wind direction Spike in CH 4 indicates emission CH 4 Drive-by Mapping P osition vehicle in the plume Acquire CH 4 and wind data for 20 minutes Pull a 30 second canister sample for VOC information 13

Village Green Project, Durham, NC 14  Solar-Powered Park Bench  Air Sensors Monitor:  Air Quality (ozone, particulates, etc.)  Weather Information (wind speed, temperature, humidity)  Real Time Results  Uploaded to Website  Accessible to communities  Available on mobile app

Next Generation Compliance Strategic Plan Strategic Plan developed by an OECA/Regional work group Focus on OECA-lead work; coordinating with others AAships to implement Sets vision for how Next Gen will improve compliance and regulatory benefits through goals for each component for FY Future sharing with state and locals. 15

E-reporting/E-enterprise E-Reporting Policy Statement issued on September 30, 2013, setting E-reporting as default assumption for all new EPA rules. 16

Electronic Reporting has expanded into E-Enterprise for the Environment is a joint initiative of States and EPA to improve environmental outcomes and dramatically enhance service to the regulated community and the public by maximizing the use of advanced monitoring and information technologies, optimizing operations, and increasing transparency. 17

Next Generation Compliance E-Enterprise Advanced Monitoring E-Reporting Transparency Rule Permit Design Innovative Enforcement Business Process Modernization Shared IT Next Gen Compliance and E-Enterprise

Next Generation Compliance Partnership with States and Local Air Agencies: Status and Next Steps U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 19 EPA: Share Next Generation Compliance Strategic Plan with states and local agencies for review and comment. States and Local Agencies: Share examples of projects that include Next Generation components. States and Local Agencies: Ideas for new Next Generation Compliance projects to pilot. EPA: Incorporate state and local agency Next Generation examples into ongoing research and share periodically. Future Discussion: How our Next Generation Compliance partnership can assist in attaining our shared vision for a stronger air compliance program.

State and Local Perspective/Opportunities? More effective rules Permits? Advanced monitoring technology Partnerships with local universities and citizen monitoring groups? Electronic reporting State and local activities and c urrent EPA partnerships? Increased transparency State or local web-sites, permits, and enforcement agreements? Innovative enforcement State and local settlements, targeting, analysis, and innovative approaches? U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 20