H.N. Wang 1 , H. He 1, X. Huang 1, Z. L. Du 1 L. Y. Zhang 1 and Y. M. Cui 2 L. Y. Zhang 1 and Y. M. Cui 2 1 National Astronomical Observatories 2 National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolution of Magnetic Setting in Flare Productive Active Regions Yixuan Li Space Weather Research Lab New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Nonlinearity of the force-free parameter over active regions. M.Hagino and T.Sakurai National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Solar Observatory.
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Abstract Individual AR example: 8910 The only selection criterion imposed in this study is that the AR must be within 30 degrees of disk center to minimize.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Free Magnetic Energy and Flare Productivity of Active Regions Jing et al. ApJ, 2010, April 20 v713 issue, in press.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Improving the inverse of Carrington longitude to corresponding central meridian crossing time: A necessary step to estimate the effect of differential.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
1 A Statistical Study about Transequatorial loops Jie Chen National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Kinetic and Magnetic Helicities of Solar Active Regions Ram Ajor Maurya, Ashok Ambastha And Vema Reddy Udaipur Solar Observatory Physical Research Laboratory,
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Prediction on Time-Scales of Years to Decades Discussion Group A.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
Recent Progress of Research and Operational Activities of Solar Weather Forecasting at NAOC Han HE, Hua-Ning WANG Team Member: Zhan-Le DU, Li-Yun ZHANG,
Comparison on Calculated Helicity Parameters at Different Observing Sites Haiqing Xu (NAOC) Collaborators: Hongqi, Zhang, NAOC Kirill Kuzanyan, IZMIRAN,
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
The day after solar cycle 23 IHY 2009 September 23, 2009 Yu Yi 1 and Su Yeon Oh 2 1 Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science, Chungnam National University, Korea.
Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere Computer Systems Yu (Evans) Xiang Mentor: Dr. John Guillory, George Mason.
H.N. Wang Key Laboratory of Solar Activity National Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences SDO data for solar activity forecasts.
Mixture Models, Monte Carlo, Bayesian Updating and Dynamic Models Mike West Computing Science and Statistics, Vol. 24, pp , 1993.
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
Solar Soft X-Rays Data Periodic Analysis Pu Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University July 9, 2005
1 The Astrophysical Journal, 601:L195–L198, 2004 February RAPID PENUMBRAL DECAY FOLLOWING THREE X-CLASS SOLAR FLARES H. Wang, 1,2 C. Liu, 1 J.
Nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation scheme for solar active regions Han He, Huaning Wang, Yihua Yan National Astronomical Observatories,
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.
Forecasting the Solar Drivers of Severe Space Weather from Active-Region Magnetograms and Recent Flare Activity David A. Falconer (UAHuntsville/MSFC),
Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions Gao Yu Helicity Thinkshop Main Collaborators: Zhang, H.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Solar cycle variation of kinetic helicity Collaborators: Junwei Zhao (Stanford,
Graham Steward 1, Vasily Lobzin 1, Mike Terkildsen 1, Matt Francis 1, Iver Cairns 2 (1) Bureau of Meteorology, Space Weather Services, Sydney, Australia;
SPD 2004 Peter T Gallagher (NASA/GSFC) The Active Region Evolution and Activity of Halloween 2003 Peter T. Gallagher (L-3 Com GSI) and R. T. James McAteer.
Measurements of Vector Magnetic Fields
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.
Thomas Hackman: Stellar differential rotation1 Detecting stellar differential rotation NORDITA – Solar and stellar dynamo cycles Thomas Hackman,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Scientific Interests in OVSA Expanded Array Haimin Wang.
What the Long-Term Sunspot Record Tells Us About Space Climate David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, AL,
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
A Method for Solving 180 Degree Ambiguity in Observed Solar Transverse Magnetic Field Huaning Wang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy.
Solar Activity Level Estimation and Solar Activity Prediction Xin Huang Huaning Wang Liyun Zhang
Differential Rotation of coronal BP and Source Region of their Magnetic Fields H. Hara NAOJ 2011 Jun 29 Leverhulme – Probe the Sun 1 st Workshop at MSSL.
SOHO/ESA/NASA Solar cycle - modeling and predicting Petri Käpylä NORDITA AlbaNova University Center Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, 2nd Feb 2007 SST NASA.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Sunspot Group Evolution and Flare Forecasting
Mapping the Solar Magnetic Surface (a la Worden & Harvey)
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
How to forecast solar flares?
STOCHASTIC COUPLING OF SOLAR PHOTOSPHERE AND CORONA (Astrophysical J
Estimates of the forthcoming solar cycles 24 and 25
Carrington Rotation 2106 – Close-up of AR Mr 2106 Bt 2106
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
­Long-Term Variation of Latitudinal Distribution of Coronal Holes
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Measurements of lifetimes of high-l solar p-modes in sunspots
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Sushanta C. Tripathy National Solar Observatory
Presentation transcript:

H.N. Wang 1 , H. He 1, X. Huang 1, Z. L. Du 1 L. Y. Zhang 1 and Y. M. Cui 2 L. Y. Zhang 1 and Y. M. Cui 2 1 National Astronomical Observatories 2 National Space Science Center Chinese Academy of Sciences RWC--China Solar active longitude and active level estimation

Outline Outline Solar Active LongitudesSolar Active Longitudes  Where solar activity often occurs  Where solar activity often occurs Solar Activity Level EstimationSolar Activity Level Estimation  How to estimate activity level of active regions  How to estimate activity level of active regions SummySummy

1. Solar Active Longitudes (1) Two persistent active longitudes of sunspots (Usoskin, et al., 2005, A&A, 441, 347 (1) Two persistent active longitudes of sunspots (Usoskin, et al., 2005, A&A, 441, 347 ) The distribution of sunspots is non- axisymmetric implies that the existence of two persistent (on century scale) active longitudes separated by 180 deg. These longitudes migrate with differential rotation and periodically alternate their activity levels showing a flip-flop cycle. The distribution of sunspots is non- axisymmetric implies that the existence of two persistent (on century scale) active longitudes separated by 180 deg. These longitudes migrate with differential rotation and periodically alternate their activity levels showing a flip-flop cycle.

The longitudinal distribution of the sunspot area (Usoskin, et al., 2005, A&A, 441, 347 during cycle No. 19. (Usoskin, et al., 2005, A&A, 441, 347 ) The expected migration path of the two active longitudes according to differential rotation law

The corrected longitudinal distribution of the sunspot area (Usoskin, et al., 2005, A&A, 441, 347 during cycle No. 19. (Usoskin, et al., 2005, A&A, 441, 347 ) The longitudinal distribution of the sunspot area is corrected with a dynamic reference frame based on differential rotation law

a) Actual sunspots (area weighted) in the Carrington frame. The distribution is nearly isotropic. b) The same as panel a) but in the dynamic reference frame. c) Only the position of one dominant spot for each Carrington rotation is considered. d) The same as in panel c) but for 6-months averages. (Usoskin, et al, 2005, A&A, 441, 347) Longitudinal distributions of sunspot occurrence in the Northern hemisphere for the period

(2) Two persistent active longitudes of solar X-ray flares (Zhang, et al 2007, A&A, 471, 711 (Zhang, et al 2007, A&A, 471, 711 ) When the Usoskins’s method was employed for observational solar flare data, the same phenomenon was found in the longitudinal distribution of powerful X-ray flares. When the Usoskins’s method was employed for observational solar flare data, the same phenomenon was found in the longitudinal distribution of powerful X-ray flares.

a) Data Optical flares associated with all the solar X-ray flares ≥ C class observed by GOES during the period of 1975 to 2005; Sunspots collected at the Royal Greenwich Observatory, the US Air Force, and NOAA for the same period as X-ray flares. b) Analysis Method The longitudinal distribution of the solar flares is corrected with a dynamic reference frame based on differential rotation law.

c) Result c) Result The observed longitude distribution of X-Class flares in the Carrington frame for the period of 1975–2005 The revised longitude distribution of X-class flares by differential rotation law

Non-axisymmetry comparison between flare and sunspot number This fact means that active longitudes related to X-ray flare location are more outstanding than those related to sunspot location.

(3) Application: X-ray flares in 23rd solar cycle N f the number of flares occurred in longitudes with  h width N t the total number of all flares

2. Solar Activity Level Estimation (1) Solar flare productivity Solar active strength Solar active strength GOES X-ray flux is employed as a quantitative parameter for describing solar active strength GOES X-ray flux is employed as a quantitative parameter for describing solar active strength Active sample Active sample A sample with GOES X-ray flux is larger than a threshold is called active sample A sample with GOES X-ray flux is larger than a threshold is called active sample

Forecasting time window A forward looking period when a parameter is measured at a moment. A forward looking period when a parameter is measured at a moment. Flare productivity P( x ) = Sa( x )/St( x ), P( x ) = Sa( x )/St( x ), where X is a random value of measures describing magnetic properties, Sa(X) and St(X) are the number of the active samples and that of the total when values of these parameters are in the range [X,∞], respectively.

(2) Statistical analyses Data ( ) MDI/SOHO manetograms : related active regions : 839 HSOS vector magnetograms: 1353 related active regions : 554 near the central of solar disk(E30 o -W30 o ). Threshold for total soft X-ray flux: to be equivalent to a M1 flare

Selected parameters Maximum of horizontal gradient in longitudinal field |  h B z | m length of neutral line with high horizontal gradient L number of singular points in transverse field 

Singular points in transverse field

Solar flare productivity and magnetic measures ( Cui, Y. M. et al, 2006, 2007; Wang, H. N. et al, 2009;Yu D. R. et al, 2010 )

A1A1 A2A2 X0X0 W ∣▽ h B z ∣ m L η A 1 and A 2 are two asymptotic values W is approximate width between these two asymptotic values X 0 is the center of W Dimensionless parameter

(3) Modeling and validation 1-Nearest Neighbor Model

Validation Hit rate not considering active longitudes ~0.7 correct rejection rate not considering active longitudes ~ 0.7 Hit rate not considering active longitudes ~0.75 correct rejection rate not considering active longitudes ~ 0.75

(Zhang, et al 2007, )Active longitude can be predicted by considering the solar surface differential rotation (Zhang, et al 2007, 2011) Activity level of active regions can be estimated by the dimensionless method (Wang, et al 2009) Combination between active longitudes and active level estimation will be beneficial to modeling for solar activity forecasting. Summary

Thanks !

For all of these measures, we have sigmoid function fittings : were Y is the flare productivity, and X is the value of measures.