Road and Bridge Contractor use of FieldManager in Michigan 2004 AASHTO TUG Mobile, Alabama Cliff Farr - Michigan DOT October 15, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Internet Contracting Estimating and Accounting System ICEAS Multi-Client Software Presented By: I C E A S.
Advertisements

FIELDMANAGER IOWA STYLE!!. IOWA D.O.T. RCE Office FieldManager Set-Up TS1 Line to Ames Communication Between RCE Office and Project Inspection Staff.
New Jersey Trnsport Cost Estimation System (CES) Implementation TUG 2006 John Lombardi Info Tech, Inc.
SITEMANAGER Frances J. Hood, P.E. Design/Materials/Construction Engineer Idaho Transportation Department.
FieldNet 2.0a Joe Bruewer Michigan Department of Transportation 2005 AASHTO TUG Field Management TAG Daytona Beach, Florida.
Weekly Risk Report & Performance Metrics
©Accenture 2010 All rights reserved. Deutsche Telekom Life insurance provider consolidates delivery model on journey to high performance Leading US Life.
AASHTO’s Cooperative Software Development Program Trnsport User Group Meeting October 22 – 26, 2006 Portland, Maine Trnsport User Group Trnsport Task Force.
AASHTOWare  - Transportation Software Solutions Contents Participants Follow-up Purpose Introduction Results Trnsport 2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey.
Forest Service Incident Business Solutions Team Incident Business Processes for 2006 and Beyond June 1, 2006.
Track, View, Manage and Report on all aspects of the Recruitment Process… with ease!
Making the Difference in Referral & Communication Systems September 2012 Emerald Health Exchange.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT DEFINITIONS AND CONCEPTS QUALITY MANAGEMENT TOOLS QA / QC PROCESS COMPUTERS AND PROJECT QUALITY.
System Implementations American corporations spend about $300 Billion a year on software implementation/upgrade projects.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
AASHTO’s Cooperative Software Development Program Trnsport User Group Meeting October 6 – 10, 2007 St. Louis, Missouri Trnsport User Group Trnsport Task.
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
Bridge Design-Rating 2014 Administrative Overview RADBUG Meeting Traverse City, MI Judy B. Skeen, P.E.
National Finance Center’s 2008 Customer Forum EmpowHR 9.0 Billy Dantagnan Teracore.
© 2007 IBM Corporation IBM Global Financing February 2007 An Introduction to IBM Global Financing for Software and Services.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) October 6, 2007.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) November 6, 2005.
Working with Info Tech, Inc. Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager November 6, 2005 A Primer for Trnsport Users.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Internet Bidding: Leveling the Playing Field TUG Conference St. Louis, MO October 8, 2007 Joe Phelan, Director, Info Tech, Inc.
Chief Operating Officer Greg Johnson. 7 Million Sheets of Paper.
INDOT’s Scheduling / Project Management System (SPMS) Vision & Objectives for Next Generation SPMS Mike Jenkins, Indiana DOT Teresa Franklin, Info Tech,
Status Update Chad Schafer / JoAnn Vanasco Info Tech, Inc.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable August 20, 2003 MyFloridaMarketPlace.
FDOT’s Path to e-Construction
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
FieldNet 2.0a Joe Bruewer Michigan Department of Transportation 2004 AASHTO TUG Mobile, Alabama.
Background on USPS mail forwarding operations Overview of PARS
Financials – Phase II Kick-Off Meeting September 11, 2008 Brenda Bolander, State Comptroller Michael Grisser, Project Manager.
Trns port What is Trnsport? Trnsport is a of suite software modules, developed by AASHTO, designed to support state construction programs.
AASHTO’s Cooperative Software Development Program AASHTOWare ® Transportation Software Solutions Trnsport User Group Meeting October 2004 Mobile, Alabama.
Utilities Planning Group CIP Tracking System Jim Broome, PE Chief Engineer.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction 2010 Annual Meeting Summary of C&T Section Work Plan Surveys August 16–20, 2010 Summary of C&T Section Work Plan Surveys.
1 I n t u i t C o n f i d e n t i a l QBES-Compatible Applications for Certified Payroll & AIA Billing Solutions Introduction Presentation Date: December.
Flash Docket is a program that takes PAIR XML data and automatically inserts actions and due dates in IP Master accordingly & sends PDF’s to the responsible.
WisDOT use of FieldManager ® Suite David Castleberg, PE Wisconsin Department of Transportation Bureau of Project Development Field Management TAG, October.
1 Billing, Metering CRM/CIS America 2004 Transition Strategy: Manual Field Data Collection to AMR Implementation Chuck Session Manager, Cinergy Meter Reading.
1 Amendment 10 People First Overview June 12, 2008.
FieldManager ® Contractor Read-Only David Castleberg, PE Wisconsin Department of Transportation Bureau of Project Development Contractor/Engineer Conf.,
 Coordinating construction related training  Following and gathering info for construction related performance measures  Follow Contract Modifications.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable January 21, :00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. MyFloridaMarketPlace.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): 2008 – 2011 Root Causes : BYE - 12% of total overpayments  Claimant Causes:  Unreported Earnings 68%,
Utility Procurement Utility Procurement 2004 Presenter: Albert A. Stephens, CPM Director of Supply Chain Management Los Angeles Department of Water.
Genesee County Road Commission Fred Peivandi, P.E. County Highway Engineer MTPA July 15, 2011 TIP Project Administration.
TUG Chair Report Report for the Fiscal Year of 1999.
HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DATABASE PROJECT.
11 Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Funding Guidelines for Agencies that Administer California Climate Investments September
C.A.L.M. SYSTEMS INC Shermer Road, Suite # 250, Northbrook, IL CALM(2256)
UNECE CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON TRADE FACILITATION IMPLEMENTATION: TOOLS, TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGIES 18 – 20 October 2004, Geneva Single Window Development.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
FieldNet 2.x Enhancement TUG – September 8, 2003 Andres Marin, Info Tech Inc.
December,  No official date for full switchover from RMS 2.38 to RMS 3.0  State of the RMS Support Contract  Expect regular updates once per.
Next Generation Trnsport Impact Assessment Sub-project Jim Johnson, Florida DOT and Pamela Barry, Info Tech, Inc.
Designing a Comprehensive Laserfiche System PP104 Steve Tivedt, The Insco Dico Group.
Public Purchasing in Florida MyFloridaMarketPlace Brief September 16, 2005.
THE LEADER IN MID-MARKET ENTERPRISE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS A Day in the Life of a Paperless Office Presented by: NAME Sales Director, ______ Region.
Standard Design Process Overview
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Quality Assurance System Field Service Automation
SiteManager/FieldManager Interface
Construction and Materials Management System
Quality Assurance System Field Service Automation
Regulation and Licensing Department RLD Permitting and Inspection Software Modernization Change (Planning) Request Agency CIO/IT Lead - Michelle Langehennig,
Closeout Certification Request May 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Road and Bridge Contractor use of FieldManager in Michigan 2004 AASHTO TUG Mobile, Alabama Cliff Farr - Michigan DOT October 15, 2004

Presentation Overview The Need for Information The Need for Information Pilot Project Pilot Project Pilot Project Results Pilot Project Results Policy Implementation Policy Implementation Contractor Read-Only in Michigan Today Contractor Read-Only in Michigan Today Wrap-up Wrap-up

The Need for Information Contractor associations Contractor associations Better construction communication neededBetter construction communication needed FieldManager potential FieldManager potential Distribution capabilityDistribution capability Stability, ease of use, accuracy of dataStability, ease of use, accuracy of data Quick training and implementationQuick training and implementation Contractors could take advantage of many of the same documented benefitsContractors could take advantage of many of the same documented benefits

FieldManager Provides Report access Report access IDR (DWR)IDR (DWR) Pay EstimatePay Estimate Contract Modification (Change Order)Contract Modification (Change Order) Lists Lists IDR, Pay Estimate, Contract Modification, item, material, contractor, etc.IDR, Pay Estimate, Contract Modification, item, material, contractor, etc. Dozens of contract and project level, work item and test material reports and inquiries Dozens of contract and project level, work item and test material reports and inquiries Various levels of payment informationVarious levels of payment information Insufficient materials at the contract and/or Estimate level.Insufficient materials at the contract and/or Estimate level.

Optimistic Future AASHTOWare products AASHTOWare products New releases annually New releases annually Commitment to continuous software improvements and enhancements Commitment to continuous software improvements and enhancements Software performance is solid Software performance is solid Future of products are solid Future of products are solid Excellent user acceptance Excellent user acceptance

Scope $1.5 billion annual construction program $1.5 billion annual construction program An estimated 160 active road/bridge construction contractors in Michigan An estimated 160 active road/bridge construction contractors in Michigan Potential impact on out-of-state FieldManager DOTs and agencies Potential impact on out-of-state FieldManager DOTs and agencies

The Pilot Project

Potential Benefits Reduction in: Reduction in: Telephone callsTelephone calls MailingsMailings FaxesFaxes Item/material status discussionsItem/material status discussions More efficient and accurate: More efficient and accurate: Estimate processingEstimate processing Contract Modification processingContract Modification processing Contract finalizationContract finalization MeetingsMeetings

MDOT Apprehensions Inspector Daily Report comments Inspector Daily Report comments Inspectors will shy away from making comments?Inspectors will shy away from making comments? Inspector comments cause misunderstandings?Inspector comments cause misunderstandings? Claims flare-up? Claims flare-up? What if the number of telephone calls actually increase instead of decrease? What if the number of telephone calls actually increase instead of decrease?

Contractor Apprehensions What if the investment doesn’t pay off? What if the investment doesn’t pay off? Learning curve Learning curve Installation issues?Installation issues? Ease of use / logical work flowsEase of use / logical work flows Stability and integrity of the software Stability and integrity of the software Interest of the field offices to provide files Interest of the field offices to provide files Future of the product Future of the product

Pilot Project Logistics Voluntary participation – both sides Voluntary participation – both sides Contractors must license FieldManager Contractors must license FieldManager License includes support from Info TechLicense includes support from Info Tech Contractors on board Contractors on board December, 2001December, 2001 June, 2002June, 2002 Read-only copies distributed after Estimate generation Read-only copies distributed after Estimate generation

Pilot Participants 12 Contractors 11 DOT offices 1 local agency 8 consultants

Pilot Project Contract Statistics Total number of contracts = 25 MDOT contracts = 14 Consultant contracts = 8 Local government contract = 1 Local government contracts managed by consultant = 2 Number of dollars under construction for the pilot was $587 million

Pilot Project Results

Business Summary By the fall of 2002, pilot participants had gained significant experience with the Contractor Read-Only distribution process By the fall of 2002, pilot participants had gained significant experience with the Contractor Read-Only distribution process Questionnaires distributed, completed and summarized Questionnaires distributed, completed and summarized

Pilot Project Findings Participants (contractor and field office) responded unanimously to make this a permanent business practice Participants (contractor and field office) responded unanimously to make this a permanent business practice User acceptance excellent for both contractor and field offices: User acceptance excellent for both contractor and field offices: Improved communications:Improved communications: Contract/Project/Item/Material statuses Contract/Project/Item/Material statuses Bi-weekly meetings Bi-weekly meetings Contract finalization Contract finalization

Pilot Project Findings (cont.) Reduced volume of phone calls, mailings and faxes Reduced volume of phone calls, mailings and faxes Reduced contractor time required to gather information Reduced contractor time required to gather information Creates an environment of more timely and accurate information Creates an environment of more timely and accurate information Earlier identification of errors and concerns Earlier identification of errors and concerns More current material tracking More current material tracking

Pilot Project Findings (cont.) Eliminated some contractor spread-sheets or hand generated data Eliminated some contractor spread-sheets or hand generated data Some offices reported improved field office / contractor relationships Some offices reported improved field office / contractor relationships Concerns Concerns CostCost Time to import the electronic fileTime to import the electronic file Recommendation formulated Recommendation formulated To implement as permanent policyTo implement as permanent policy

Pilot Project Findings (cont.) Information to be removed from Contractor Read-Only electronic files: Information to be removed from Contractor Read-Only electronic files: File size issue:File size issue: IDR attachments IDR attachments General information:General information: Item Documentation Notes Item Documentation Notes Miscellaneous Reports Miscellaneous Reports

Policy Implementation

Recommendation approved by executive management Recommendation approved by executive management Met with industry Met with industry Cost (FieldManager Read-Only annual license fee is $850)Cost (FieldManager Read-Only annual license fee is $850) Time to import contracts was drastically reduced in FieldManager release 3.3.Time to import contracts was drastically reduced in FieldManager release 3.3. Policy was implemented to include all contracts let by MDOT after September, 2003 (MDOT and local agency) Policy was implemented to include all contracts let by MDOT after September, 2003 (MDOT and local agency)

Contractor Read-Only in Michigan Today

All MDOT field offices, local agencies, and consultants are participating All MDOT field offices, local agencies, and consultants are participating 51 contractors participating 51 contractors participating 48 Read-Only licenses48 Read-Only licenses 3 Full licenses 3 Full licenses Over 1660 Read-Only files distributed by MDOT this construction season Over 1660 Read-Only files distributed by MDOT this construction season

MDOT Involvement Contractors and consultants license FieldManager directly from Info Tech Contractors and consultants license FieldManager directly from Info Tech Training available through Info Tech and ACEC of Michigan Training available through Info Tech and ACEC of Michigan Field offices distribute the Contractor Read-Only files Field offices distribute the Contractor Read-Only files CurrentlyCurrently FieldNet 2.0 beginning in 2005FieldNet 2.0 beginning in 2005

Wrap-up Contractor Read-Only is off to an excellent start in Michigan Contractor Read-Only is off to an excellent start in Michigan FieldManager Read-Only data distribution is easily filtered FieldManager Read-Only data distribution is easily filtered Good communication is key Good communication is key Potential solution for states and local agencies Potential solution for states and local agencies

Questions? Cliff Farr FieldManager Business Engineer