Vulnerable Populations Subpart B Requirement for IRB to make Protocol Specific Determinations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

ETHICS OF CONSENTING IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS THERAPEUTICS Col Xolani Currie, Nat Dipl Rad, BA, HED, MPH Regulatory Oversight Manager Project Phidisa.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Informed consent requirements
VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Informed Consent, Parental Permission & Assent Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Conducting Human Research with Vulnerable Populations Michelle Brignac, CIP Human Research Protection Program Manager.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Vicki Hammen, Vice Chair, IRB IRB Brown Bag February 9, 2009.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Human Subject Research Ethics
IRB Member Refresher Course 2010 Melissa Epstein, PhD Senior Education Specialist 1.
IRB Discussion Consent and Assent Issues in Vulnerable Populations December
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
HRPP Training – Session Two Human Research Protection Program Manager
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
Sara Brand Associate Director Research Compliance Administration.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Required Findings & Determinations Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
CHILD ASSENT IRB Member Continuing Education. AAHRRP Element 1I.4. B. The IRB or EC has and follows written policies and procedures requiring appropriate.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
PwC Carleton College October 10, 2002 Tom Puglisi, PhD Protecting Human Subjects -- Advanced Topics.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Planned Parenthood of Southern PA v. Casey Roe v. Wade Revisited.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
HIPAA and Human Subjects Research IRB Member CE May 2014 Slideshow by Sean Horkheimer.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Flagging of VHA Health Record. IRB Determination for VA Studies The IRB may determine that the patient health record must be flagged to protect the subject’s.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Children in Research: They’re Not Just Small Adults
Carleton College October 10, 2002 Tom Puglisi, PhD
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Anna C. Mastroianni, JD, MPH
Changes to Exempt Categories
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research
Informed Consent Allison Blodgett, PhD, CIP Director of IRB Operations
Presentation transcript:

Vulnerable Populations Subpart B Requirement for IRB to make Protocol Specific Determinations

AAHRRP Element II.4.A The IRB has and follows written policies and procedures for determining the risks to prospective participants who are vulnerable to coercion or undue influence and ensuring that additional protections are provided as required by applicable laws, regulations, codes, and guidance.

HRPP 8.4 Research Involving Pregnant Women, Fetuses, and Neonates Pregnant women or fetuses may be involved in research if all of the following conditions are met: a) Where scientifically appropriate, preclinical studies, including studies on pregnant animals, and clinical studies, including studies on nonpregnant women, have been conducted and provide data for assessing potential risks to pregnant women and fetuses; a) Where scientifically appropriate, preclinical studies, including studies on pregnant animals, and clinical studies, including studies on nonpregnant women, have been conducted and provide data for assessing potential risks to pregnant women and fetuses; (b) The risk to the fetus is caused solely by interventions or procedures that hold out the prospect of direct benefit for the woman or the fetus; or, if there is no such prospect of benefit, the risk to the fetus is not greater than minimal and the purpose of the research is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by any other means;

HRPP 8.4 Research Involving Pregnant Women, Fetuses, and Neonates (cont.) (c) Any risk is the least possible for achieving the objectives of the research; (d) If the research holds out the prospect of direct benefit to the pregnant woman, the prospect of a direct benefit both to the pregnant woman and the fetus, or no prospect of benefit for the woman nor the fetus when risk to the fetus is not greater than minimal and the purpose of the research is the development of important biomedical knowledge that cannot be obtained by any other means, her consent is obtained in accord with the informed consent provisions of subpart A;

HRPP 8.4 Research Involving Pregnant Women, Fetuses, and Neonates (e) If the research holds out the prospect of direct benefit solely to the fetus then the consent of the pregnant woman and the father is obtained in accord with the informed consent provisions of subpart A, except that the father's consent need not be obtained if he is unable to consent because of unavailability, incompetence, or temporary incapacity or the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest; subpart Asubpart A (f) Each individual providing consent under paragraph (d) or (e) of this section is fully informed regarding the reasonably foreseeable impact of the research on the fetus or neonate; (d)(e)(d)(e)

HRPP 8.4 Research Involving Pregnant Women, Fetuses, and Neonates (Cont.) (g) For children who are pregnant, assent and permission are obtained in accord with the provisions of subpart D; subpart Dsubpart D (h) No inducements, monetary or otherwise, will be offered to terminate a pregnancy; (i) Individuals engaged in the research will have no part in any decisions as to the timing, method, or procedures used to terminate a pregnancy; and (j) Individuals engaged in the research will have no part in determining the viability of a neonate.

Neonates (a) Neonates of uncertain viability and nonviable neonates may be involved in research if all of the following conditions are met: (1) Where scientifically appropriate, preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted and provide data for assessing potential risks to neonates. (2) Each individual providing consent under paragraph (b)(2) or (c)(5) of this section is fully informed regarding the reasonably foreseeable impact of the research on the neonate (b)(2)(c)(5)(b)(2)(c)(5)

Neonates (Cont.) (3) Individuals engaged in the research will have no part in determining the viability of a neonate. (4) The requirements of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section have been met as applicable. (b)(c)(b)(c) (b) Neonates of uncertain viability. Until it has been ascertained whether or not a neonate is viable, a neonate may not be involved in research covered by this subpart unless the following additional conditions have been met: ascertained whether or not a neonate is viable, a neonate may not be involved in research covered by this subpart unless the following additional conditions have been met:

Neonates (Cont.) (1) The IRB determines that: (i) The research holds out the prospect of enhancing the probability of survival of the neonate to the point of viability, and any risk is the least possible for achieving that objective, or (ii) The purpose of the research is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means and there will be no added risk to the neonate resulting from the research; and (ii) The purpose of the research is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means and there will be no added risk to the neonate resulting from the research; and

Neonates (Cont.) (2) The legally effective informed consent of either parent of the neonate or, if neither parent is able to consent because of unavailability, incompetence, or temporary incapacity, the legally effective informed consent of either parent's legally authorized representative is obtained in accord with subpart A of this part, except that the consent of the father or his legally authorized representative need not be obtained if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. subpart Athis partsubpart Athis part

Neonates (Cont.) (c) Nonviable neonates. After delivery nonviable neonate may not be involved in research covered by this subpart unless all of the following additional conditions are met: neonate may not be involved in research covered by this subpart unless all of the following additional conditions are met: ( 1) Vital functions of the neonate will not be artificially maintained; (2) The research will not terminate the heartbeat or respiration of the neonate; (3) There will be no added risk to the neonate resulting from the research;

Neonates (Cont.) 4) The purpose of the research is the development of important biomedical knowledge that cannot be obtained by other means; and (5) The legally effective informed consent of both parents of the neonate is obtained in accord with subpart A, except that the waiver and alteration provisions do not apply. However, if either parent is unable to consent because of unavailability, incompetence, or temporary incapacity, the informed consent of one parent of a nonviable neonate will suffice to meet the requirements of this paragraph (c)(5), except that the consent of the father need not be obtained if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The consent of a legally authorized representative of either or both of the parents of a nonviable neonate will not suffice to meet the requirements of this paragraph (c)(5). subpart Asubpart A

IRB Determinations and Documentation Determine that all requirements of Subpart B are met and document determination in the IRB minutes. This includes the determination regarding the requirements surrounding informed consent of the both the mother and father. Determine that all requirements of Subpart B are met and document determination in the IRB minutes. This includes the determination regarding the requirements surrounding informed consent of the both the mother and father.

Questions? Stacey Goretzka IRB Program Manager