Why Did the Number of New Patent Cases Stop Rising? By Greg Upchurch LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School Adjunct Professor-Washington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-Answer Motions. 12(b)(1) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Should have been in state rather than federal court 12(b)(2) Personal Jurisdiction This court.
Advertisements

Summary of what Jim Slater said: Small companies[
Describing Trends in Graphs
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation & Procedure Introduction To Litigation Litigation & Procedure Introduction.
Environment Lisa. Purpose Learn how to describe a line graph and show the changes over time. This unit you will also learn how to write a paragraph where.
Describing trends and graphs
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Removal Problems. Car wreck in Jackson Co, MO. -- $500K Case filed in Circuit Court of Jackson Co Can Defendants remove? Why or why not? If they could.
Professor Victor D. Quintanilla Indiana University, Maurer School of Law May 23, 2013 Law & Social Psychology.
(A Very Brief) Introduction to Civil Procedure Professor Pauline Kim August 23, 2012.
Jeopardy Facts 1IssuesReasoning Educators Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy Facts 2.
© 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Offense as Defense in U.S. Patent Litigation Anthony L. Press Maximizing IP Seminar October 31, 2005.
Mayview Regional Service Area Community Inpatient Utilization July 2006 – January
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.
 Any defendant who fails to timely file a response to a Complaint is considered to be a “Defendant in Default”  Defendant in Default can still file a.
Stephen J. Ware Professor of Law University of Kansas.
Software Patents for Higher Education ICPL August 12, 2008.
Meyerlustenberger Rechtsanwälte − Attorneys at Lawwww.meyerlustenberger.ch European Patent Law and Litigation Guest Lecture, Health and Intellectual Property.
Rolling Ball. To Start Off Materials Needed: Incline plane (binder), Tennis ball, Baseball, solid object.
Is the Patent Pilot Program Doomed to Fail? By Greg Upchurch LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School Adjunct Professor-Washington University.
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports in Maryland: Money Follows the Person Metrics October 4, 2015 Presented to the Maryland Department of Health and.
1 Natural Gas Productive Capacity for the Lower-48 States May 2001 Information about this presentation may be obtained from John Wood
Number and Win Rates on Trademark Preliminary Injunctions: By Greg Upchurch LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School First in Litigation.
1 Agenda for 24th Class Name plates out Fee Shifting Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction to Erie.
CLEAN POWER PLAN. OVERVIEW The final rule released in August 2015: Sets first-ever limits on carbon pollution from power plants Sets achievable standards.
Copyright Litigation in the Seventh Circuit: Pilot Study Report and Consultation Wednesday December 5 th :30 pm © Matthew Sag 2012 All Rights Reserved.
Mayview Regional Service Area Community Inpatient Utilization July 2006 – September
Presentable Market Data. Understanding three views of the current market allows Buyers to maximize their ability to evaluate properties, receiving the.
Orange County, Florida and Martha O. Haynie, Orange County Comptroller, vs. Expedia, Inc., Orbitz, LLC and Orbitz, Inc. (“Dot.Com Case”) Presentation to.
Nationwide Patent Litigation Statistics By Greg Upchurch, Esq. LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School 1975 Adjunct Professor-Washington.
My Ceding Company's Data is Not Credible, So NOW What Do I Do? Directors and Officers Liability Linda Bjork, FCAS, MAAA American Re-Insurance Company.
Warm-Up1/12/15  What is kinetic energy?  How do we calculate the amount of force something has?
Background and Summary ©Copyright, 2007, LegalMetric, LLC, All Rights Reserved The Supreme Court KSR decision was issued on April 30, Since the decision,
Nationwide Trademark Litigation Statistics By Greg Upchurch, Esq. LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School 1975 Adjunct Professor-Washington.
Patent Reexamination: Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Reexamination and Litigation.
U.S. District Court District of Minnesota Immigration Litigation in Federal Court January 30, 2015 Procedural Requirements in U.S. District Court.
Find phrases from the text which mean: went up and down frequently: did not change: went up a little: went up very quickly: arrived at its highest point:
United States v. Miami University (Ohio) EDL: 276 Applications of School Law, Mandates and Policies.
3:00. 2:59 2:58 2:57 2:56 2:55 2:54 2:53 2:52.
Chief Judge Intellectual Property High Court Ryuichi Shitara.
Newton’s First Law Notes TEKS 8.6C Investigate an describe applications of Newton’s law of inertia.
Motion Graphs (p in notebook). Interpret The Graph Below: (As time increases, ….)
Trending Down: Contested Judgment Win Rates in Patent Cases By Greg Upchurch LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School.
Business Law with UCC Applications,13e
Bankruptcy Dr. Jean Lown.
U-Visa Delay Litigation
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION
Nationwide Patent Litigation Statistics
State Court System: Structure & Overview
CBM/PGR Differences Differences in time periods of availability, parties who have standing, grounds of challenge available, standards of review, and.
Top Fire Protection Services Ottawa available on Dubinskyconstruction
CIVIL PROCEDURE ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #4 MODEL ANSWER
Timed Writing 1 Exam Today, we continue preparing for Task 1:
Motion to Transfer Success Rates Before and After TC Heartland
Federal Circuit Rulings by Issue
Changing Win Rates in Patent Litigation
Level 3 Writing Bar Charts / Line Graphs Part 3 Information Transfer 1 Preparation Your class test for Information Transfer 1 is in Week 2. Get ready!
Property Tax Millage Rates (52.72 voted/29.9 collected)
Motion Success After Alice (E.D. Tex.)
Motion Graphs Time – Distance Graphs.
Motion Graphs Time – Distance Graphs.
Motion Graphs Time – Distance Graphs.
Multiple Defendants in Patent Cases
Timed Writing 1 Exam Today, we continue preparing for Task 1:
Effect of KSR on Summary Judgment Decisions on Obviousness
Royal University of Law and Economic
Pacific Legal Foundation
Presentation transcript:

Why Did the Number of New Patent Cases Stop Rising? By Greg Upchurch LegalMetric Director of Research J.D.-Yale Law School Adjunct Professor-Washington University School of Law

Number of Cases Filed, by Year

From 1995 through 2004, the number of patent cases filed in the district courts nationwide increased steadily Since 2004, the number of new cases has been basically flat Note: if the numbers had continued to increase at the pre-2005 rate, there would have been roughly 900 additional patent cases filed in 2009.

Reduction in Litigation Activity

The same trend is found in the number of summary judgment motions filed The peak, however, is in 2005 rather than 2004

Motions to Dismiss

Motions to dismiss followed the same trend through 2005, but in 2006 began a sharp upward trend Twombly (2007) and Iqbal (2009) may have contributed to the trend, but why did it start in 2006?

Possible Explanation of Falloff

Possible Explanation Number of patent cases filed and number of patents issued track closely, with approximately a month lag Number of patents issued peaked in 2004 (a peak which was approached in 2007) The amount of patent litigation is likely to stay relatively flat until the yearly number of patents being issued increases

Source Data Extracted from LegalMetric District Reports