2014 Sentencing Guidelines Update G. Alan DuBois First Assistant Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of N.C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Tennessee Legislation Sexual Offenses, Offender Registration, And Other Concerns August 2007.
Advertisements

 LDR assess a UET penalty on individual income for underpayment of individual income tax.  The penalty may be imposed if the taxpayer did not pay enough.
SUPREME COURT UPDATE G. Alan DuBois Patrick L. Bryant.
JUVENILE RECORDS AND JUVENILE EXPUNGEMENT IN ILLINOIS Camille Taylor, LAF (Legal Assistance Foundation) October 8, 2014.
Demystifying the B.O.P. Time Computations, Designation, Programs, and Advocacy Robert M. Jensen Assistant Regional Counsel Bureau of Prisons – Northeast.
RETROACTIVITY OF THE FSA CRACK GUIDELINE AMENDMENT Laura S. Wasco Research & Writing Attorney.
IFCD 2014 JESSIE A. COOK TERRE HAUTE, IN. MINIMIZING THE FEDERAL SENTENCE FOR CLIENTS PROSECUTED IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURT.
924(c) Convictions and Career Offender Sentencing Keith A. Williams.
Vocabulary Indictment- Determines if there is enough evidence for a defendant to go to trial Arraignment- Defendant is officially informed of charges and.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Governor’s Commission on Volunteerism & Community Service volunteerflorida.org AmeriCorps Background Check101  NATIONAL SERVICE CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK.
Dealing with Disparity in Federal Court Civil Rights and Sentencing 2009 JRCLS Conference Harvard Law School Benji McMurray Supreme Court Fellow February.
1 606 CMR 14.00: Criminal Offender and Other Background Record Checks - Emergency Regulations EEC Board Meeting December 10, 2013.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Sentencing Guidelines
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
WISP Assessing Implementation and Early Outcomes Seattle City Council Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD December 12, 2011.
Phone: Disclaimer: The tips in this presentation are general in nature. Please use.
Punishment & Sentencing Chapter 10 in Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
Statutory and Policy Limits 18 U.S.C. § 3582(b) – Effect of Finality of Judgment Notwithstanding the fact that a sentence to imprisonment can subsequently.
Aim: What are the guidelines for imposing sentences upon a convicted person?
1 Sentencing Decisions Chapter Sixteen. 2 Lady Justice Right hand: scales of justice symbolizing fairness in the administration of justice. Eyes: blindfold,
Understanding How Prison Sentences Work
People of the Court Lawyers and Judges Prosecutor Federal State Local.
Precincts, Districts and Annexation Let’s Start with Definitions Precincts: Areas established for election purposes Election Districts: Areas used to determine.
Criminal Restitution in Federal Criminal Cases: Research Findings 2014 © The Human Trafficking Pro Bono Legal Center 2014.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Unemployment in Germany In the year 2011 By Sophia Gammerler Quarter 4.
 ANZELA 2015 Presented by Chris Morey.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
CJA Training September 2009  Not a citizen or national of the United States  Lawfully deported  Re-entered  No official permission to return.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Update Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission November 7, 2012.
By: Jon Taroy. Backgrounds Of my Career choices Probation OfficerBailiff  1. An official usually attached to a juvenile court and charged with the care.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
What’s New 2011 Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines.
What’s New 2012 Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines.
Criminal Procedure Chapter 16.2 Review. What is a crime? An action that breaks the law Felonies are serious crimes Misdemeanors are less serious crimes.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
judge decides on a punishment.
Petitions & Candidate Filing General Rules & Guidelines.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE BRIEFING: IMPACT OF THE 2012 SPECIAL REMISSION OF SENTENCE Date: 08 August 2012 Received on: 6 Aug 2012.
Task Force on Public Safety Oregon Criminal Justice Commission November 22, 2013.
THIS IS With Host... Your Key Terms Executive Branch Judicial Branch Legislative Branch Bill of Rights Citizenship
ORGANIZATIONAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES THE HONORABLE RUBEN J. CASTILLO VICE-CHAIR, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION.
 Inform students of the most recent changes to educational benefits  Inform students of new procedures concerning Shelton State Community College  Inform.
1 Relevant Conduct & Felon-in-Possession Districts of Kansas & Western Missouri Guideline Training Seminar Kansas City, MO Thursday, February 25, 2016.
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN THE LAW Created by: Cathi, Nicole, Eunice and Jeanell.
Civil and Criminal Law Chapter 16 (Part 2). Criminal Cases O Criminal Cases are when the state or federal government charges someone with a crime O The.
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
1 Introductory & Advanced Guideline Training Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse Kansas City, MO February 24-25, 2016.
GETTING STARTED: Notices of appeal & the initial appellate documents.
What State Court Practitioners Need to Know About Federal Civil Procedures.
Federal Prosecutor’s Perspective
Texas Legislature.
sealing of adult convictions
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
Civics Corner Part 06.
7-4 Drug Law.
FIRST STEP ACT ONE STEP AT A TIME.
San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Region Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) Meeting SLO City/County Library Community.
HNA Lesson 26 Aim: What are the guidelines for imposing sentences upon a convicted person?
Sentencing Guidelines/Mandatory Minimums and Charging
A brief overview of the Act’s impact on federal criminal defendants.
Presentation transcript:

2014 Sentencing Guidelines Update G. Alan DuBois First Assistant Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of N.C.

Where Do We Stand?

What is the “Minus 2”? Sentencing Commission dropped the Drug Guidelines by two levels for all drugs. Not just crack. Doesn’t affect very top or bottom of table. BOL range floors no longer pegged to mandatory minimums. So, ranges after acceptance may be lower than mandatory minimum.

How Does it Affect Defendants Who Haven’t Been Sentenced Yet? Will apply to all Defendants sentenced after November 1, What about Defendants who are scheduled to be sentenced between now and November 1? DOJ says Gov’t will not oppose a two-level reduction in certain cases sentenced before November 1, 2014.

What About Defendants Who’ve Already Been Sentenced? Last Friday, the Sentence Commission voted to make the “minus 2” amendment retroactive. Applies to all eligible Defendants. Rejected DOJ proposals to limit relief to Defendants in Criminal History Categories I and II. Courts can start processing and ordering retroactive sentence reductions on November 1, But……

Delayed Release in Retroactive Cases No immediate release in retroactive cases. While courts can start entering orders on November 1, 2014, no order retroactively reducing a defendant’s sentence can take effect before November 1, Effectively, there is a one year delay before anyone can be released. Any defendant with a release date before November 1, 2015 gets no relief.

Retroactive Cases: How Many Are Eligible? Nationwide : 51,141* Eastern NC:1178 (10 th in U.S.) Middle NC:456 (36 th in U.S.) Western NC:699 (20 th in U.S.) * All numbers from the Sentencing Commission, May 2014.

Who is Eligible?

What Kind of Drugs?

How Big a Cut?

What is the Average Cut? Average Reduction: 18.4% 35% of Defendants will receive cut of one year of less. 4.9% of Defendants will receive cut of more than 60 months.

What is the Effect of the Delay? Basically some Defendants get hosed.

OK, Who Gets Hosed in My District? EDNC : o Immediate Release: 7.4% of those eligible for relief (86 Defs) o Release within one year: 9.1% (106 Defs) MDNC : o Immediate Release: 10.6% of those eligible for relief (48 Defs) o Release within one year: 14% (63 Defs) WDNC : o Immediate Release: 13.2% of those eligible for relief (90 Defs) o Release within one year: 13.6% (93 Defs) Bottom line : the closer you are to release, the more likely you are to get screwed.

How About Some Examples? Defendant Joe Blow: o Files motion on November 1, o Due for release August 15, o Eligible for 12-month cut under new guidelines. o No Relief! Joe will be out be for any order cutting his sentence can take effect. Defendant Jon Snow: o Files motion on November 1, o Due for release December 25, 2016 o Eligible for 24-month cut under new guidelines o Partial Relief! Reduction would call for out date in December 2014 but order can not take effect until November 1, 2015 so Jon could be released that day but no sooner.

What Do I Need to Do? This is just like the Crack Amendment and FSA retroactive reductions. Nothing in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) has changed. Nothing in U.S.S.G. §1B1.10 has changed except the one year delay. Same eligibility requirements, same limitations on relief. Each district will develop its own procedures.

So, What Else Is New? Amendments to the Felon-in-Possession cross- reference: Limited to guns listed in indictment. Failure to register as sex offender is not a sex offense. Courts can run sentences concurrent to related state sentences that have not yet been imposed.

What’s Next? Nothing huge on the horizon. May take a look at mitigating role. Continue various studies. Some promising legislation but not much happening.