NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. CONNECTING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
A Guide to Implementation
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Student Learning Targets in the CCSS Classroom: Mathematics.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Foundations for Differentiation Part 2
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Building Assessment Literacy in Michigan through Quality Common Assessment Development.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Assessing Scientific Inquiry  Presented by:. Goals for Scoring Sessions  Learn to reliably score student work using the Scoring Guide.  Understand.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Debunking the SLO Myth: What It Is, What It Isn’t, and How the Process Can Be Used to Support Challenging Instruction for All Learners 2015 PAGE Annual.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Last Revised: 10/01/15. Senate Bill 290 has specific goal-setting requirements for all licensed and administrative staff in the State of Oregon. In ,
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Literacy Strategies for AIG Readers March 6, 2015 Dana Gillis Mount Mourne IB School, Iredell-Statesville Schools A Race to the Top Initiative NC Department.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. FOUNDATIONS OF STUDENT GROWTH GOAL SETTING: DETERMINING STUDENT NEEDS SETTING A BASELINE What do my students.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
WELCOME! DATA TEAM COACH TRAINING  Review the PLC Process, Roles and Expectations  Provide an opportunity for questions and possible responses.
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
 Develop SMART Goal aligned to your building’s School Improvement Plan.  Goals should be single year goals with benchmarks throughout the.
Problem Solving Response-to-Intervention Bringing Theory to Practice
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
An Introduction to Evaluating Federal Title Funding
Presentation transcript:

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. CONNECTING SMART GOALS TO STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Direct Access to Achievement (DATA) Project Breakout Session

HELLO FRIEND Pairs—someone you do not know Shake Hands – Exchange names Describe where you went to college and what you do. Read the essential question and the learning target to each other. Thank your partner and return to your seat.

 What is an Student Learning Goal (SLG) Essential Questions

 How might I support a PLC to understand and improve SLG goals? Essential Questions

Today’s Learning targets I can use my background about antecedents and the data team process to review key concepts.

Today’s Learning targets I can develop a deeper understanding of Student Learning Goals, and learn how it aligns with the BEST PRACTICES of the ODP data team process.

 Review of Antecedents  Review data team process  Student Learning Goals Jigsaw  Be Sure To...  Good /Better/ Best:  Setting SLGs  Final Reflections Agenda

Let’s Review Antecedents Data Teams

Let’s Review Antecedents, Differentiated Causes Teacher Behaviors and routines that effect student achievement and lend themselves to replication. Instructional Strategies Teacher-student practices that engage students in thinking; require training, practice, and ongoing professional development; and lend themselves to replication. Antecedents Administrative structures and learning conditions that precede, anticipate, or predict excellence in performance, and lend themselves to replication.

Antecedent—Describe and Explain Sample Providing students with a clear and understandable vision of the learning target is a perfect example of an antecedent. This is a teacher behavior and instructional strategy that increases student achievement, predicts excellence in performance, and lends itself to replication. This is an antecedent of excellence because it is foundational for students to understand what they are learning and not just what they are doing; this is a pivotal step to develop the students’ capacities as self-reliant learners.

Antecedent—Describe and Explain ____________________________ is a perfect example of an antecedent because it is a teacher behavior and instructional strategy that increases student achievement, predicts excellence in performance, and lends itself to replication. This is an antecedent of excellence because it is a teacher behavior and instructional strategy that ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________

Thinking about the Data Team Process AS A TRIAD SORT THE STEPS IN THE DATA TEAM PROCESS IN ORDER.

Let’s Compare Steps for setting SLG 1. Collect and chart baseline data to determine needs 2. Create specific learning goals based on pre- assessments 3. Create and implement teaching and learning strategies 4. Monitor student progress through ongoing formative assessment 5. Determine whether students achieved the goal

A CLOSE READING GUIDANCE FOR SETTING STUDENT LEARNING GOALS

A Close Reading Protocol -- CODING + for items that are key details, ? for ideas that leave you with questions, ! For aspects you totally love!

Be Sure To.... At the end of the section you are assigned, summarize one key point with a be sure to. When you ________, be sure to ___________. When you determine a content standard, be sure to select a standard that is relevant (a standard that is ongoing throughout the year).

A LIVING LIKERT: What percentage gain can you expect from students who set challenging goals? 0% to 300%

What are Student Learning and Growth Goals?

Types of Measures Category One Standardized Tests OAKS/SBAC/ELPA Category Two District Common Assessments, ACT, AP, IB, DIBELS, etc. Category Three Classroom or school Analyze Collected Data Create SMART Goal Which category are you required to use?

A goal without a measure... or an action plan... is simply hope.

Good, Better, Best What about this goal is good? For the school year, 100% of my students will make measurable progress as assessed on the Oregon Analytical Scoring Guide for Scientific Inquiry. Each student will improve by one level in all dimensions. How would you guide someone to make it better?Best?

Three Good Examples For the school year, 100% of my students will make measurable progress as assessed on the Oregon Analytical Scoring Guide for Scientific Inquiry. Each student will improve by one level in all dimensions. By June 2013: -29/34 of students will show at least a year’s worth of growth and 2/4 of students who are over two years behind will show 2- year’s growth as measured by the DRA -Based on my DRA data, I believe that 24/33 of my 3 rd grade students will meet benchmark (211) +/-3 RIT scores as measured by their OAKS-Reading 3 rd Grade assessments. Student Growth Goal Statement: For the 2012 – 13 school year students will make measurable progress in writing- 80% of the students will score a “3” or better in overall.

Possible Questions to ask a team when discussing their SLG Goals. How will we leverage __________________________for student achievement? How will we ensure that____________________________ will promote proficiency? What effect can we expect in classrooms that adopt _________________________? What instructional strategies have been most effective with ___________________? What professional development requirements are needed to ensure staff proficiency with __________? What measures have been developed for implementation quality? Describe how adoption of _______________________ will engage student thinking? Does __ lend itself to systematic introduction through administrative structures and conditions for learning? If so, what structures would you recommend and why?

Why Use Student Learning and Growth Goals?  Two minute Quick Write

Questions? Thoughts? Argumentative Rebecca Eastland or.us Program Assistant: Testing & Evaluation Salem-Keizer School District Missi Thurman 12.or.us PLC Instructional Coach Office: Cell: