IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
 Goals: 1. To help faculty respond critically to student generated course evaluation; 2. To help faculty improve student learning.  Outcomes: Faculty.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Using Student Ratings to Improve Program Quality and Student Learning Dr. Randi Hagen, Flagler College Dr. Sarah Logan, Angelo State University Dr. William.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: A Diagnostic Guide for Improvement Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Understanding and Using Your IDEA Evaluation Results Nina Campanicki & Ernie Linsay Faculty Development Day March 20, 2010.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: Adjunct Workshop Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott Fall 2009 Semester.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Update Carrie Ahern and Lynette Molstad Selected slides reproduced with permission of Dr. Amy Gross from The IDEA Center.
Using IDEA Reports To improve your teaching. Using IDEA Reports 0 What’s the goal of this session?
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Insight Improvement Impact ® Loyola University of Chicago April 10-11, 2013 Steve Benton, PhD Senior Research Officer.
TTU Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Teaching Effectiveness Past, Present, Future. Ken Keefner, R.Ph., PhD Associate Professor Vice Chair Department of Pharmacy Sciences School of Pharmacy.
The importance of course quality monitoring the example of course evaluations at WISP dr Wouter de Raad Director of the Warsaw International Studies in.
Refining Your Research Question. In this session, we will… Discuss guidelines for creating a ‘good’ research question Provide time to revisit and revise.
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form
IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,
Action Research: For Both Teacher and Student
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and SACS University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
Authentic Assessment Principles & Methods
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Data-Guided Faculty Development Planning University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Data-Informed Faculty Development Planning Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
IDEA Student Ratings System Loyola University September 9 & 10, 2015 Jake Glover, PhD Senior Education Officer.
 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Texas A & M University February 2013.
1 SUPPORTING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN NMR SCHOOLS PROJECT Briefing of NMR secondary schools 11 February, 2010 Jean Russell, Graeme Jane, Graham Marshall.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Faculty Information Form Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Using IDEA for Assessment Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
DEVELOPED BY MARY BETH FURST ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BUCO DIVISION AMY CHASE MARTIN DIRECTOR OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA UNDERSTANDING.
USING STUDENT EVALUATIONS AT STOCKTON Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Writing January 2012.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant

Individual Development Educational Assessment Teaching Improvement Faculty Evaluation Curriculum Review Program Assessment Accreditation

What is teaching effectiveness? Being Organized Being Prompt Being Clear Relating course material to real life situations Requiring critical thinking Forming learning teams Introducing stimulating ideas Inspiring students to set and achieve goals

Most Surveys How well do the instructor’s methods resemble those of a “model” teacher? How well do students rate their progress on the types of learning the instructor targeted? Teaching Effectiveness

What is teaching effectiveness? Philosophy of IDEA Primary indicant of Teaching Effectiveness = Facilitating Learning

Conditions for Good Use The instrument Targets learning Provides suggested action steps for teaching improvement Has evidence for validity

Conditions for Good Use The Faculty Trust the process Value student feedback Are motivated to make improvements

Conditions for Good Use Campus Culture Teaching excellence - high priority Resources to improve - provided Student ratings - appropriate weight

Conditions for Good Use The Evaluation Process 30-50% of evaluation of teaching 6-8 classes, more if small (<10) Not over-interpreted (3-5 performance categories)

Reflective Practice using Individual Reports Collect Feedback Interpret Results Read & Learn Reflect & Discuss Improve IDEA resources that are keyed to reports Talk with colleagues Try new ideas Online, Paper What the reports say and what they mean

Underlying Philosophy of IDEA Teaching effectiveness is determined primarily by students’ progress on the types of learning the instructor targets.

Faculty Information Form

Student Learning Model Specific teaching behaviors are associated with certain types of student progress under certain circumstances. Student Learning Teaching Behaviors Circumstances

Student Learning Model: Diagnostic Form Student Learning Items Teaching Behaviors Items 1-20 Circumstances Students: Items 36-39, 43 Course: Items Summary Items: Research Items: Up to 20 extra items

Student Learning Model: Short Form Summary Measures: Items Experimental Questions: Items Additional Questions Student Learning Items 1-12 Teaching Behaviors Circumstances Students: Items 13-15

FIF: Selecting Objectives 3-5 as “Essential” or “Important” Is it a significant part of the course? Do you do something specific to help students accomplish the objective? Does the student’s progress on the objective influence his or her grade? Be true to your course.

Faculty Information Form

Common Misconception #1 Students are expected to make significant progress on all 12 learning objectives in a given course.

Common Misconception #2 Effective instructors need to successfully employ all 20 teaching methods in a given course.

Relationship of Learning Objectives to Teaching Methods

Common Misconception #3 The 20 teaching methods items should be used to make an overall judgment about teaching effectiveness. Faculty Evaluation

Faculty Information Form: Discipline Codes

Faculty Information Form: Local Code

Course Description Items (FIF) Used for research Best answered toward end of term Do NOT influence your results Bottom of Page 1 Top of page 2

IDEA Online

FIF Online Delivery Reminders are delivered by Start/end dates are determined by Institution Access is unlimited while available Questions can be added Objectives can be copied

Copying Objectives

Student Survey Online Delivery Link is on Howdy Reminders are sent by Start/end dates determined by Institution Submission is confidential and restricted to one

Online Response Rates – Best Practices Create value for feedback Prepare Students Monitor and Communicate

Example: Course Syllabus Objective 3: Learning to apply course material (to improve thinking, problem solving, and decisions) Students will be able to apply the methods, processes, and principles of earth science to understanding natural phenomena Students will think more critically about the earth and environment Objective 8: Developing skill in expressing myself orally or in writing Students will be able to present scientific results in written and oral forms IDEA Center Learning Objective Course Learning Outcomes

Diagnostic Report Overview 1.How did students rate their learning experience? 2.What contextual factors impacted those ratings? 3.How do my scores compare to: IDEA, discipline, and institution? 4.What might I do to facilitate better learning for my students next time?

Your Average (5-point Scale) RawAdj. A.Progress on Relevant Objectives 1 Four objectives were selected as relevant (Important or Essential—see page 2) If you are comparing Progress on Relevant Objectives from one instructor to another, use the converted average. 1. How did Students Rate their Learning?

Progress On Relevant Objectives

Summary Evaluation: Five-Point Scale Report Page 1 Your Average Score (5-point scale) RawAdj. A.Progress on Relevant Objectives Four objectives were selected as relevant (Important or Essential—see page 2) Overall Ratings B. Excellent Teacher C. Excellent Course D. Average of B & C Summary Evaluation (Average of A & D) % 25%

2. What contextual factors impacted those scores?

3. How do my scores compare to: IDEA, Discipline, Institution?

Comparisons (Norms): Converted Averages

4. What might I do to facilitate better learning next time?

Page 2: What did students learn?

Page 3: Suggested Action Steps #16 #18 #19

POD-IDEA Notes on IDEA Website

POD-IDEA Notes Background Helpful Hints Application for online learning Assessment Issues References and Resources

IDEA Papers Resources for Faculty Evaluation Faculty Development

IDEA Terminology Student Ratings of Instruction = student survey FIF = Faculty Information Form OCC = On Campus Coordinator Sub-OCC = Person who works with the OCC on campus GSR = Group Summary Report Aggregate Data File = Excel spreadsheets of all data Benchmarking Report Discipline Code = modified CIP codes Local Code = code for creating groups Converted Averages = T Scores Adjusted Scores = Scores that take into consideration variables outside the control of the instructor

IDEA Website and Who’s Who

Questions ? Visit our IDEA Help Community!IDEA Help