Learning, Leading, and Teaching in the Digital Age Self- Motivating Self- Monitoring Self- Modifying 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth and
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What it means for New Teachers
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Professional Growth and
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Appraisal and performance management
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Understanding the Process T EACHER L EARNING P ORTFOLIO.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
What it means for New Teachers
Avon Grove School District October 2009
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Professional Growth Plans
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Learning, Leading, and Teaching in the Digital Age Self- Motivating Self- Monitoring Self- Modifying 2

 Teachers/principals’ professional growth and performance should have a positive impact on student learning and achievement.  The process should define clear, consistent expectations for all teachers/principals and should support continuous learning.  The process should foster collaboration among the teacher/principal, evaluator, and peers.  The process should be a professional growth experience based on trust and mutual respect. 3

 The process should provide multiple ways of developing and documenting skills and knowledge.  The process should provide for differentiation based on teacher support needs and experience.  The process should engage teachers in reflective practice and active involvement in their own professional growth. 4

“Problem of Practice” Problem based on data Success indicated from data Hypothesis for resolving the gap 5

 What type of data is relevant foryour position? 6

 Observation Data  Data from Observations/ Evaluations  Self-Assessment Data  Student Achievement Data  National or State Assessment Data (Aggregate and Individual)  District Assessments  Classroom Data (Assessment and Performance)  Anecdotal Data  Records, Logs,  Perceptual Data  Surveys, Responses  Demographic Data  Attendance or Discipline Data  ETC… 7

 The roles of educators is varied in school districts  The data that is used to identify a school, grade level, or individual “problem of practice” is as diverse as the varied roles within the school  While a common “problem of practice” may be identified for a school or a group of educators, the goal(s) to improve professional practice and the strategies to achieve the goal will vary depending on an individual educator’s role within the school  Individual educators are encouraged to identify the problem of practice based on data relevant to their respective roles. 8

“Problem of Practice” Problem based on data Success indicated from data Hypothesis for resolving the gap Choose a goal or action from building ACSIP 9

 As the Problem of Practice is identified, educators should consider how the problem of practice connects to a goal or action identified in the school’s improvement plan.  The inclusion of a related ACSIP goal will help the educator to create a PGP goal that will in some way tie in to goals identified in ACSIP and focus on ways to improve educator practice that will ultimately lead to improvement in student achievement.  The manner in which an educator improves professional practice will vary depending on the educator’s experience and needs identified in the PGP and observation ratings. 10

“The Vision” Personal Professional Goal(s)—What will I achieve to ensure student growth? “Problem of Practice” Problem based on data Success indicated from data Hypothesis for resolving the gap Choose a goal or action from building ACSIP 11

 Do these goals reflect my own professional learning needs?  After assessing my own professional learning needs, what areas have I chosen to focus on for this school year?  Do these goals reflect the Standards (CCSS or ACF, ISSLC) and take into consideration my school/system plans?  Are these goals based on student achievement data, discipline data, CWT data, etc.?  Are these goals realistic? 12

Growth is a result of working toward goals. Specific goals help direct professional development activities and changes in practice. A goal may be to “learn about cooperative learning”. A more specific goal would be “to utilize cooperative learning as a teaching and learning approach which impacts achievement”. 13

Meaningful goals:  have substance and meaning for the teacher/principal.  are tied to effect size.  stretch current thinking and practice.  can be achieved and don’t lead to frustration.  have deadlines that help to ensure that the goal is attained.  lead to improved student performance. 14

“The Vision” Personal Professional Goal(s)—What will I achieve to ensure student growth? “Problem of Practice” Problem based on data Success indicated from data Hypothesis for resolving the gap Choose a goal or action from building ACSIP 15 Related Framework Components that ALIGN with the GOAL. How do my goals align with my evaluation? What does proficient or distinguished performance look like as related to my goal?

The Barometer An effect size [ES] of 0.4 is one year’s growth for one year’s time. An ES of 1.0 is equivalent to two to three years of growth in one year’s time. 16

S specific and contextual M meaningful measures A achievable within resources R realistic T time targeted 17

 Apply  Implement  Investigate  Maintain  Organize  Pilot  Attend  Conduct  Join  Participate  Publish  Read  Share Contribute Discuss Enroll Integrate Mentor Serve 18

 State the Action you will take  Describe an Area of Focus for the Learning  Include the Rationale  Add the Activities (optional) I will investigate intervention strategies to incorporate Response to Intervention (RTI) processes into my classroom to better differentiate student instruction due to delayed learning by students performing below grade level. 19

 State the Action you will take  Describe an Area of Focus for the Learning  Include the Rationale  Add the Activities (optional) Because the number of teacher and student absences has increased by 10% during the last 3 years, I will seek strategies to reduce the rate of absences school-wide. In collaboration with a variety of stakeholders, I will seek to find the causes for the increased absenteeism and utilize research to find ways to decrease the number of days of missed instruction. 20

 State the Action you will take  Describe an Area of Focus for the Learning  Include the Rationale  Add the Activities (optional) Because I am a science teacher and need new approaches to helping my non-readers, I will learn about research-based strategies to improve student learning in reading comprehension. I will incorporate new strategies into my daily instructional practices. Student achievement will increase in reading comprehension as a result of focused instruction. 21

 State the Action you will take  Describe an Area of Focus for the Learning  Include the Rationale  Add the Activities (optional) The goal of this plan is to eliminate the need for college remediation by consistently evaluating student progress on college-entrance exams in collaboration with students, parents, and community stakeholders. The goal will be to improve our school’s ACT averages, reduce remediation rates and improve rates of post-secondary institution enrollment. Through a partnership between the high school and local 2-year college, students will be provided with opportunities for ACT preparation through throughout the year designed to increase overall scores and target areas of high remediation rates and also to provide early access to non-credit bearing college-courses for students who require them. 22

Individually Guided  Personal study  Web-based learning  Anecdotal records  Reflective journals  Individual action research  Log entries Cooperatively Guided  Project-based  School visits  Assessment instruments (surveys, questionnaires)  Authentic teacher made materials (designing quality work for students) 23

Instruction/Workshops  Technology skill training  Workshops  Conference Observation/Assessment  Peer coaching (peer-to- peer)  Cognitive coaching (peer-admin)  Videotaped lessons  Team teaching Inquiry  Group action research  Data collection and analysis  Study group 24

 What activities will I use to reach my goal?  How will I achieve my desired outcomes? 25

“The Plan” Strategies—How will I achieve my goal(s)? “The Proof Indicators” How will I know I have achieved my goal(s)? “The Proof Indicators” How will I know I have achieved my goal(s)? “The Proof Evidence” What data or information will help me to reflect on the achievement of my goal? “The Proof Evidence” What data or information will help me to reflect on the achievement of my goal? 26

 What will success look like when I reach my goal?  What do I want to achieve as a result of this goal and what difference will it make in student learning and achievement results?  How will I collect evidence of my professional growth? 27

“The Support Resources” What do I have and what do I need to achieve my goal(s)? “The Support Timeline” What are my activities and when will they occur as I achieve my goal(s)? 28

What assistance and supports are available to me? What expertise is available from my colleagues? What co-op, district, or other resources are available (specialist, teachers’ conferences, website and professional library)? What resources will help me work toward my goals? How might I access assistance from district resources, the co-op, universities and/ or community? 29

What are my time targets and how do they fit the cycle of the school year? Are they scheduled on my school calendar? How will I work toward completing this goal? Is this timeline appropriate for the goal? 30

1. Select one goal that you will focus on within your Community of Learners Team. 2. The reason that I chose this goal is that it (state as many as apply):  Represents new challenges and learning.  Is based on research and has a high effect size.  Inspires me to reflect on the teaching and learning process.  Is doable and useful.  Aligns with a standard in CCSS or AR Frameworks or ISLLC. 3. Describe the outcome(s) you expect to achieve this year. 4. If the goal relates to action research, state the essential question to be answered. 5. Explain how accomplishing this goal positively affects students. 31

1. Identify three to five colleagues who share your goal(s). 2. These colleagues will become part of your Community of Learners focus group (PLC/Data Teams). 3. Meet with your group to explain your goal(s) and how you plan to accomplish it (them). 4. Brainstorm additional ways of accomplishing your goal(s). 5. Your group may also help you refine your goal(s). 32

33

TRUST BenevolenceHonestyOpennessReliabilityCompetency Remember these facets of trust are integral to an effective evaluation system. 34

“The Review” Evaluation—How am I doing? What have I learned? What revisions and adjustments do I need to make? 35

 Identify documentation that is used to demonstrate professional growth.  Develop reflections that give evidence.  Self-assess to provide insight into professional growth.  Record sharing with colleagues.  Compile artifacts reflecting progress.  Other evidence collaboratively identified. 36

 Empower educators in the review process.  Encourage professional reflection and collegial dialogue.  Link professional development to improved practice.  Encourage data reflection.  Discuss the support required to facilitate future professional growth.  Discuss the educator's role in achieving school and district goals.  Promote a collegial model for professional growth (data teams/ departmental/PLCs). 37

 Be prepared for the review.  Lead the discussion (after all, the teacher/principal owns the growth plan).  Provide a rationale for the goals and strategies identified in the plan.  Lead the evaluator through the critical parts of the growth plan.  Identify resources that may help support the growth plan. ( these expectations to teachers/principals) 38

 Link information gained through supervision into the reflective questions asked of the teacher/principal (for example, “We discussed the work you were doing with assessment for learning during our last conversation. How is that coming along and could you see it becoming something that you would include?”). Coaching  Tie conversation to observation data and student performance changes.  Ask reflective rather than evaluative questions.  Ask questions of clarification.  Help to identify the resources needed to complete the growth plan.  Act as a “reflective colleague”. 39

“The absence of administrator prescription will allow moments of discovery, enthusiasm, dedication, sharing of successes, and relentless persistence despite extraordinary challenges. The flip side of the prescription paradox is that with less prescription, there is genuine accountability. There is accountability for learning.” Doug Reeves, Accountability for Learning 40