Appraisal for Teachers Phase Two: What is Evidence?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Appraisal: valuing difference, fostering self-responsibility Chris Thornley, New Zealand Teachers Council Kerry Mitchell, The Education Group.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Progression, Achievement and Pathways for Junior Social Studies
Bringing it all together!
So what constitutes evidence?
Appraisal for teachers: Support for professional leaders Webinar One: Strengthening understanding of appraisal.
Nau mai, haere mai Introductory Webinar Please dial into the audio conference a few minutes before the session is due to begin. On your phone dial: At.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Appraisal for teachers: Support for professional leaders Workshop Two Open to learning – evidence based discussions.
Registered Teacher Criteria Workshops 2010 E ngā mana, e ngā rau rangatira ma, Nau mai, haere mai. To the prestige and the leaders assembled here. Welcome.
Realities. Registration Provisional Registration (PRT) Valid for 5 years Subject to Confirmation (STC) Valid for 3 years Full Registration Valid for 5.
Consistency of Assessment
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Performance management guidance
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
Appraisal and performance management
Week 2 Standards and evidence Building your professional persona and portfolio.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Classroom Action Research Overview What is Action Research? What do Teacher Researchers Do? Guidelines and Ideas for Research.
Session Materials  Wiki
Appraisal for Teachers Phase Two What is Evidence? E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e rau rangatira mā, Nau mai, haere mai! A warm welcome to you all! Workshop One.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Seevic Performance Appraisal
Overall Teacher Judgements
Portfolio based assessment - options for the new CGEA.
1 Making sound teacher judgments and moderating them Moderation for Primary Teachers Owhata School Staff meeting 26 September 2011.
Aotearoa/New Zealand A Bi-cultural Classroom.. To gain full registration PRTs must participate in an Induction and Mentoring programme supervised by a.
Registered Teacher Criteria Workshops 2010 Supporting Implementation Resources Connections Reflections Appraisal Planning for action Questions Resource.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
A good place to start !. Our aim is to develop in students ; Interest in & enjoyment of historical study; Skills for life long learning; The capacity.
Appraisal for teachers: Support for professional leaders Workshop One: Strengthening understanding of appraisal.
Inquiry Focussed Professional Learning Nicki Dowling Shift Learning Facilitator.
PRT Mentor Workshop Irihapeti Mahuika PRT and Te Reo Maori Facilitator UCED Plus, University of Canterbury Te Tapuae o Rehua.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Teacher Refresher Course Professional Learning Program Program 1 Learning Leaders: Jill Flack Maureen O’Rourke.
What is a Health Promoting School? ‘Health Promoting Schools are schools which display, in everything they say and do, support and commitment to enhancing.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Driving Improvement.
Ko te reo te tuariki. Language is my identity. Ko te reo tōku ahurei. Language is my uniqueness. Ko te reo te ora. Language is my life.
Implementation Training
Appraisal It’s about learning It’s about growth It’s about accountability.
Secondary PRT/ OTT and Mentor teachers
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Appraisal of Principals and Tumuaki Workshop Two.
Good teaching for diverse learners
OUR PATH TO THE FUTURE STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 TO 2021.
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
Naumai Haere mai. Ko Kerry Mitchell ahau.
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Introduction and Overview
Introduction and Overview
Naumai Haere mai. Ko Kerry Mitchell ahau.
Appraisal of Principals and Tumuaki Webinar 2b - Inquiry Into Practice
Ni Hao.
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
The Framework for Teaching
Principal Appraisal - Special Character
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Kia ora koutou katoa Maori enjoying success as Maori
Appraisal Training Hyperlink.
Culturally Responsive and Relational Leadership
TE TIRITI O WAITANGI PARTNERSHIP He Kōrerorero
Presentation transcript:

Appraisal for Teachers Phase Two: What is Evidence? Workshop One

Welcome! E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e rau rangatira mā, Nau mai, haere mai! A warm welcome to you all!

He Karakia whakatuwhera 1 Tis the sneeze of life Ranginui above, Papatuanuku below The star Riegel has emerged A sign, a sign of this new year Of Matariki the sacred, the ancient Welcome the spirit , the life force, from the pantheon of gods / guardians to the realm of humanity. The first sneeze, let there be life. Tiheeii mauri ora Ko Ranginui ki runga, ko Papatuanuku ki raro Kua puta ake ko te whetu Puanga, he tohu, he tohu o te Tau hou nei, O Matariki te tipua, Matariki te tawhito Tau mai te wairua, Mai ngā ira atua, ki te ira tangata Tiiheeeii mauri ora (Opening karakia - For the time of Matariki – July)

Project aims By the end of the project you will: Have developed and strengthened your understanding about, and your use of evidence in your appraisal using the RTC with Tātaiako Have access to resources which support you in the use of the RTC with Tātaiako So that Appraisal in all settings continues to be effective beyond the life of this project.

Registered Teacher Criteria and Tātaiako Project Stages Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Pre-reading Workshop One Webinar and PLG Workshop Two Webinar and PLG Formative Evaluation Registered Teacher Criteria and Tātaiako

Overview of the day Morning Session Project Overview What do you want out of the project? A Teacher’s Voice – your response Conceptual framework appraisal Unpacking the key ideas for each and across all of the RTC Morning Tea Building clarity about what constitutes evidence Examples of practice Afternoon Curating evidence Forming into PLGs Reflection on day and deciding on next steps

Where am I? 1 10 ‘I have read the RTC ‘I am very clear about But I don’t know where what evidence I need’ to start’ My big question is:

So, at the end of the project, what will you want to walk away with? By the end of the project … I am (have)…. (changed practice) So that … (desired outcome)

What might an effective organisation feel like? 12 elements of employee engagement What is your personal responsibility for enacting these elements? What influence can you have in creating these conditions in your workplace?

Appraisal Conceptual Framework He Kete Whakatipu Ngaio Tangata

Dual Purposes Of Appraisal Professional Growth Goal setting, inquiry into practice, career pathways) Accountability Renewal of Practising Certificate, attestation Underpinned by Self and joint responsibility and evaluative capability

Purpose and Audience for Evidence Me: my practice and its impact on my learners My professional leader: as part of my appraisal Teachers Council: renewal of Practising Certificate Valued and Respected Profession

Review the pre-reading of ‘A Teacher’s Voice’ What are the key messages in this paper? How do the writer's views match with my own experiences? Does the reading challenge my views? How does this reading contribute my understanding of appraisal?

Evaluative Capability: Appraisal Process Describe what ‘good’ looks like Work with colleagues to develop indicators, illustrations, rubrics, to shape a full understanding of ‘good’ Ask the evaluative question: How well does my practice enact each of the RTC and overall?

Use suitable processes to gather the evidence Determine the sources of evidence that can be used to answer this question Use suitable processes to gather the evidence Use the evidence to examine whether there is a significant gap between my practice and ‘good’ Answer the evaluative question by reaching a reasoned conclusion

Appraisal Components Performance Management Renewal of Practising Certificate ( every 3 years) Attestation (annual for pay progession) Appraisal (annual for growth and development) linked to learner outcomes Alignment to Tātaiako Process: Criteria established Goal setting Indicators of success identfied Timeframes and actions identified Support to be provided Evidence Collected (learning portfolio) Teaching as Inquiry Observations /feedback Evidence of learning(teacher/learner) Student voice Informal feedback Contribution to wider school - feedback from other staff Appraisal Discussions Interpreting evidence Affirmation Feedback Next steps Appraisal Report Overall evaluative judgements/statements Key strengths Next steps/concerns

Evaluative Capability: What does good look like using the RTC? What is the essence of each criterion? Highlight key words in each criterion: What’s the active language and what is the focus for each criterion? Identify any aspects you feel less familiar with

Evaluative Capability: What Does Good Look Like Using Tātaiako? Work with someone from your setting what does each competency look like? Manaakitanga Ako Whanaungatanga Wānanga Tangata whenuatanga

Morning tea: Karakia kai Nau mai i ngā hua O te ao, o te wai tai, o te wai māori Nā Rongo, Tāne, nā Maru Ko Ranginui e tū iho nei Ko Papatūānuku e takoto ake nei Whakamaua ki a tina Haumī e hui e tāiki e We acknowledge these fruits laid before us From the environment, from the sea, from the fresh waters Provided by Rongo, Tāne and Maru Ranginui guides above Papatūānuku supports us below Forever preserved and maintained Kai blessing is for the day

Evaluative Capability – What does ‘good look like for RTC 3, 6 and 11? Criteria Key Indicators Reflective Question Tātaiako What Would ‘Good’ Practice Look Like In Your Setting? What Would You Regard As Valid Evidence That You Could Use To Demonstrate ’Good’ Practice? demonstrate commitment to bicultural partnership in Aotearoa New Zealand demonstrate respect for the heritages, languages and cultures of both partners to the Treaty of Waitangi How do I reflect in my professional work respect for the cultural heritages of both Treaty partners in Aotearoa New Zealand? Tangata whenuatanga  

Using the Examples of Practice Erika (ECE) Bronwen (ECE) Andrea (ECE) Merianna (primary) Simon (primary) Alex (primary) Kelvin (secondary) Jane (secondary)

Examples of Practice Which RTC might this teacher be able to discuss with their professional leader? Which cultural competencies might the teacher discuss with their professional leader?

Selecting Examples of Practice How does this meet the RTC/Tātaiako? Reflection: What does this mean for next steps teaching and learning? Identification: What stands out? Where are the patterns? What does it mean for me, my group of ākonga and individual ākonga/priority learners? From everyday practice: What is available as evidence?

Sources And Perspectives Curation of evidence of practice over time Learner outcomes, RTC and Tātaiako Perspectives

Revisiting Evidence Of Quality Practice Task: Return to the Knowing and working with the RTC template Consider what the evidence of quality practice looks like Complete the final column for 3, 6 and 11

Professional Learning Group Purpose: Participants interact with colleagues in similar settings about issues and challenges they face in strengthening their understanding about what constitutes evidence. Participants process new learning with others between each of the workshops. By the end of today Selected who you would like to meet with (3 -4 others) Appoint a coordinator Set a date and venue to meet Have a brief about the purpose of your first PLG  

Lunch time

Types Of Evidence (Necessary And Sufficient) My Evidence Shows Focus Sources Of Evidence Outcomes Impact on child/student learning Assessment information Teacher voice Child/student Voice Parent/whānau voice Teaching Actual Teaching Practice Teaching/Lesson observation Child/student voice Planning Teacher conception – espoused theory of teaching Resources Centre/classroom environment

What might I do with my evidence? I need to: Know where the evidence can be found (planning, assessment information…) Compile some of it in some way to show my practice overtime and its impact on learners I can: Map it to the RTC/Tātaiako/ school indicators of effective practice Bring the evidence I have to an appraisal meeting Talk about my practice and its effect on my learners Affirm what is going well and identify my learning needs

Evaluating my own current practice against ‘good’ What evidence do I currently use? (Page 14 Resource book) What other evidence would I need to use in order to evaluate my own current practice against ‘good’? (Page 15)

Curating evidence Options for gathering, analysing and organising evidence over time : Collected under each RTC and referenced to Tātaiako Under examples of practice; backmapped to the RTC and referenced to Tātaiako According to my goals and my setting’s goals and backmapped to the RTC and referenced to Tātaiako According to my inquiry backmapped to the RTC and referenced to Tātaiako

Using backward mapping If you have decided to organise your evidence in a holistic manner under examples, goals or inquiry it is necessary to map back onto the RTC and Tātaiako to see what you have quality evidence for and which RTC you meet. Then look to see where your gaps may be or where you need to focus more closely on your practice –this will help you identify your goals.

Portfolios Of Evidence With Reference To RTC Primary teacher example Secondary example ECE example

Option 1: Evidence analysis-backward mapping Goals:   Evidence for Registered Teacher Criteria and Tātaiako RTC and Tātaiako Comments and dates 1 Establish and maintain effective professional relationships focussed on the learning and well-being of all ākonga 2 Demonstrate commitment to promoting the well-being of all ākonga 3 Demonstrate commitment to bicultural partnership in Aotearoa New Zealand 4 Demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional learning and development of personal professional practice

Option 2: Evidence analysis-backward mapping Cultural competency Tātaiako   Whanaungatanga Manaakitanga Tangata whenuatanga Ako Wānanga RTC 1 relationships 2 well being 3 Treaty 4 ongoing PD 5 leadership 6 learning plans 7 engagement 8 learning 9 diversity 10 bicultural 11 Assess ment 12 inquiry Example/s of practice My goals/setting goals My inquiry .

Go back to your goal Is this still your goal? Would you like to change it in anyway or is it still a priority for you?

Working in a PLG

Appraisal Components Performance Management Renewal of Practising Certificate ( every 3 years) Attestation (annual for pay progession) Appraisal (annual for growth and development) linked to learner outcomes Alignment to Tātaiako Process: Criteria established Goal setting Indicators of success identfied Timeframes and actions identified Support to be provided Evidence Collected (learning portfolio) Teaching as Inquiry Observations /feedback Evidence of learning(teacher/learner) Student voice Informal feedback Contribution to wider school - feedback from other staff Appraisal Discussions Interpreting evidence Affirmation Feedback Next steps Appraisal Report Overall evaluative judgements/statements Key strengths Next steps/concerns

Building a Portfolio of Evidence Work in your PLGs If you have brought along examples of evidence how does what you have align with what you now know about evidence? What examples of practice could you select and what RTC would they demonstrate?

Professional Learning Groups (PLG) Purpose: To provide collegial support for improving your understanding of what constitutes evidence Select 4 to 5 colleagues to form a PLG Select a coordinator Agree a date for your first meeting (face to face or group Skype) Record your group name, meeting date and group leader The meeting(s) needs to be held before our next workshop

Problem solve together PLG Task Bring along at least one example of practice referenced to the RTC and Tātaiako. Each participant will share their evidence and the group will ask questions about what the evidence shows (think about impact evidence). What are the gaps in the evidence and what might each of you do to address any gaps in evidence? What would necessary and sufficient evidence look like? Problem solve together

Workshop Two Inquiry and self-review as a means to evidence the RTC Evidence and its relationship between practice and learning for students and teachers Evidence-based conversations that will/could occur with teachers as part of their appraisal Identifying goals and next steps Your significant role in the appraisal process and in the preparation for appraisal meetings Appraisal reporting - the final report

Preparation For Workshop Two Collect your sources of evidence and bring them to workshop two. Write up your learning and reflection from the PLG Be prepared to share your thinking about what you consider to be necessary and sufficient evidence