Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Continuing Accreditation 2005 Self-Study and Site Visit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
Institutional Accreditation: An Overview HLC Accreditation Kick-Off March 24, 2006.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES The Higher Learning Commission.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
HLC and Me What does HLC stand for? Hydrocarbolyte Liquid Crystal Holy Living in Communion Her Left Cheek Hysterical Laughing Clown Whatever it is I don’t.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Incorporating Student Engagement into the Accreditation Process April 11, 2010.
Criteria for Accreditation Making a Difference in Higher Learning.
University-wide Accreditation Academic Leadership Program February 18, 2010.
STRATEGIC PLANNING JANUARY 29, 2010 AGENDA 9:00 Welcome David Danahar 9:05Introduction Beth Weatherby 9:20 Focus on Accreditation Mary Hickerson 10:00Break.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
HLC Re-accreditation Update GENERAL FACULTY MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
UT Self Study All Criterion Teams Meeting Friday, November 13, :00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. SU 2582.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
HLC/Strategic Planning Update Professional Development and Assessment Day August 15, 2017.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010
University Community Briefing
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Task Force Orientation
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Continuing Accreditation 2005 Self-Study and Site Visit

Accreditation at SMSU  Lists 58 programs accredited by various accrediting organizations

Accreditation at SMSU Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools accredits the institution not individual programs

Higher Learning Commission (HLC) A voluntary, non-governmental, regional accrediting organization with over 1,000 member institutions in 19 states NCA was founded in 1895 SMSU - by various names - has been continuously accredited by the NCA/HLC since 1915

North Central Association prior to January 1, 2001 Covers 19 States... 1, and 4-year, public and private Higher Learning Commission

Focus of Accreditation by HLC To assess the quality of an institution and its effectiveness To assist the institution in making improvements in its operations and effectiveness To provide mission-driven accreditation

HLC Mission Statement “Serving the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learning”

Self-Study and Site Visit Five Criteria Twenty-one Core Components  Examples of Evidence Four Categories of Operational Indicators These must be addressed in our self- study

Five Criteria Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Teaching Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge Engagement and Service

1. Mission and Integrity The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students. Five Criteria

2. Preparing for the Future The organization’s allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.

3. Student Learning and Effective Teaching The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission. Five Criteria

4. Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission.

Five Criteria 5. Engagement and Service As called for by its mission, the organization identifies its constituencies and serves them in ways both value.

Cross-Cutting Themes The Future-Oriented Organization The Learning-Focused Organization The Connected Organization The Distinctive Organization not a another set of criteria nor required... but seem to fit SMSU

Categories of Operational Indicators Demographics Educational Programs Financial Strength Scope of Activities Updated annually and addressed in self-study

HLC “Position Statements” How SMSU addresses HLC position statements will be part of the 2005 Self-Study Commission Statement on Assessment of Student Learning Commission Statement on General Education Commission Statement on Diversity

Basic Understandings What you have collectively defined Publicly committed to And intended for them to Learn, do, and become Have learned Are able to do And are becoming STUDENTS… INSTITUTION… General Education/Assessment

Evidence of Assessment of Student Learning Assumption: SMSU is assessing student learning (course, program, general education) and using results of assessments to improve student learning

Assuring and Advancing… Five Criteria and Cross-Cutting Themes Preparing for the future Student learning & effective teaching Acquisition, discovery, & application of knowledge Engagement & service Mission & integrity Future-oriented Connected Distinctive Learning-focused

Fundamental Shifts In Evaluation Process SMSU will be among the first institutions to be evaluated using recently revised and adopted criteria Experience from 1995 self-study and site visit will help but will not be duplicated

From inputs and resources to results From teaching to teaching & learning From a look backwards to a future focus From autonomy to connection & collaboration From uniformity/stratification to distinctiveness, flexibility, & differentiation Fundamental Shifts

Previous self-studies were snapshots of the past 10 years 2005 self-study will show how SMSU is poised for the future Fundamental Shifts

Creating the Self-Study “…the overriding goal of the self- study is to show that SMSU is mission focused and guided by a long-range vision.”

How...? How do we create a self-evaluation process that is meaningful, useful, and will make a significant difference for SMSU? What forums do we use for raising the most important questions and holding the meaningful conversations that make this significant difference possible? How do we connect the self-evaluation to the criteria and the self-study process?

How do we write a self-study that assures peer institutions of our distinctive quality and advances the work and purposes of SMSU? “Serving the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learning.” HLC mission statement How...?

Use existing university committees to the fullest extent possible Handbook pdf How...?

Minimize duplication in 2005 self-study and next long-range plan Both will be 18-month process beginning January 2004 How...?

Long-Range Plan will be submitted as Part 1 of the Self-Study Summary evaluation of the processes will be Part 2 How...?

HLC Steering Committee Dr. Jim Baker Assistant to the President Dr. Sue George Teacher Education Dr. Barbara Bushman Graduate College Dr. John Catau University College Dr. Tom Dicke History Dr. Frank Einhellig* Graduate College Mr. Don Simpson Enrollment Services Dr. Tammy Jahnke* Chemistry Dr. Martha Kirker* Assessment Dr. Etta Madden English Dr. Pete Richardson Management Dr. Roger Sell Academic Development Dr. Lois Shufeldt* Marketing Dr. Bill Cheek* Natural and Applied Sciences HLC Review Committee (1997-present) and Executive Committee Jim Baker, Frank Einhellig, Martha Kirker, Lois Shufeldt, Bill Cheek-Chair Also serving on UPAC Jim Baker, Roger Sell, Lois Shufeldt, Bill Cheek

NCA/HLC Review Committee has been working since HLC Steering Committee has been working since 2002  Now meeting twice monthly HLC Steering Committee

Self-Study Goal and Objectives While affirming that Southwest Missouri State University (SMSU) fulfills all criteria for continuing accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission, the overriding goal of the self-study is to show that SMSU is mission focused and guided by a long-range vision. Southwest Missouri State University is a multi-campus metropolitan university system* with a statewide mission in public affairs whose purpose is to develop educated persons while focusing on five themes: professional education, health, business and economic development, creative arts, and science and the environment. To what extent do these foci influence the Institution’s many functions?  * SMSU-West Plains is an open enrollment, two-year institution separately accredited by the Higher Learning Commission and is not included in this self-study.

Self-Study Goal and Objectives Objective 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of the University’s continuous planning processes, performance measures, student learning outcomes measures, and the integration of those processes in support of the mission of the Institution. Objective 2. To identify strengths, issues of concern, and opportunities for improvement. Objective 3. To involve the University’s many constituencies in the evaluation of institutional structures, processes, and programs, relative to the criteria for accreditation. Objective 4. To establish and implement a plan for systematic collection and evaluation of information that will facilitate future: (1) accreditation activities for the Higher Learning Commission and programmatic accreditations and (2) continual improvement of university functions.  Approved 11/14/03 by HLC Steering Committee

Preparation for 2005 HLC Self-Study and Long-Range Vision and Five-Year Plan

Questions to Consider... Add two or three questions appropriate for the group