Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reconstruction of Automobile destruction
Advertisements

Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.
PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
BIG 12 - Powerpoint #1 Loftus & Palmer 1974; Bartlett 1932.
Write them down Did you note down ‘sweet’ and ‘angry’?
Evaluating Loftus (1979) ‘The weapon effect’
LOFTUS & PALMER (1974) Starter: Here is an introduction to Loftus & Palmer (1974)…what information is missing…  Loftus carried out an experiment where.
Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.
By Dhina, Haneen, Viveka, and Natsuki Elizabeth Loftus.
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
6.1 Multiple choice questions
Eye-witness testimony
Memory – Module 27 Forgetting and Memory Construction Memory – Module 27 Forgetting and Memory Construction General Psych 1 April 12, 2005 Class #21.
LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.
Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.
EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY. WHAT IS EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY? Question – write your answer on your mini-whiteboards – What is an Eyewitness Testimony? AQA Definition:
Memory and the power of suggestion
Eye Witness Identification
Contents Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Cognitive Psychology - Loftus and Palmer.
Encoding Specificity Memory is improved when information available at encoding is also available at retrieval.
Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.
Reliability of one cognitive process
Special Topics in Memory Psychology, Unit 5 Today’s Objectives 1. Apply autobiographical memory to your life 2. Describe the explanations for childhood.
AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.
AREA OF STUDY 2 MEMORY UNIT 3 THE CONSCIOUS SELF.
Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.
Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.
Eyewitness Testimony Elizabeth Loftus.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
Loftus and Pickrell 1995 The Formation of False Memories (Lost in the Mall) Video 1 “This presentation contains copyrighted material under the educational.
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.
Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.
Loftus and Palmer (1974).  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory  Field of psychology:
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
Loftus and Palmer Study one Study two Aim Reconstructive memory is….
MEMORY FALLIBLITY OF MEMORY.
Multiple choice questions
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
Lesson objectives Starter: Identifing different types of validity
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge
RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting.
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
Starter: how good is your memory?
Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
Cognitive Level of Analysis
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Memory – Introduction and Application
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
what have we learned from past two lessons?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Article Analysis Practical
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.
The cognitive area.
Reconstructing Memory
The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony
Presentation transcript:

Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the key study

Think about this What is your earliest memory? What do you remember How old were you? Do you really remember it or only think you do from your parents stories?

Eye Witness Testimony An exercise in remembering –Listen to this story –Without looking draw both sides of a fifty pence piece –Learn the list of words I am going to read out now –Watch this clipWatch this clip –Write down all the words you can remember –Answer the questions about the film –Write down the story

Why is this area important? Devlin Committee (1976) –Those prosecuted after being picked in ID parade 82% convicted –Out of 374 cases where eyewitness only evidence 74% conviction

Why is this area important? Loftus 1974 –Asked students to judge guilt or innocence of a man Man had robbed a grocery store Murdered the shop keepers daughter –9 out of 50 judged him guilty on the evidence alone –36 out of 50 judged him guilty with an eyewitness –What do you think happened when told the eyewitness was not wearing his glasses and therefore could not see? 34 out of 50 still find him guilty

EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY? Loftus & Palmer –Loftus is a WOMAN (Elizabeth) TESTED –The validity of eye witness testimony –The effect of leading questions

LOFTUS & PALMER What is a leading question ? Have you seen the book? (leading Q) Have you seen a book?(not leading Q) Memory is NOT like a camera - we always reconstruct our memories

LOFTUS & PALMER The title of their paper was: The reconstruction of an automobile destruction Their research involved TWO experiments

LOFTUS & PALMER Experiment 1 The participants - 45 students The procedure - Students watched film clips of car accidents –there were 7 film clips –each student saw 4 clips –Evergreen safety council or Seattle Safety Department (standardised) After watching each film students did TWO things

LOFTUS & PALMER Experiment 1 1Write an account of what they had seen 2Answer questions about what they had seen One question was the CRITICAL QUESTION

LOFTUS & PALMER Experiment 1 THE CRITICAL QUESTION About how fast were the cars going when they (*******) each other There were five conditions (verbs) in the experiment (Five groups of students)

LOFTUS & PALMER Experiment 1 The five conditions (verbs) were CONTACTED HIT BUMPED COLLIDED SMASHED

LOFTUS & PALMER Experiment 1 Results –Contacted 31.8 –Hit 34.0 –Bumped38.1 –Collided39.3 –Smashed40.8

LOFTUS & PALMER Experiment 1 What conclusion can you draw from the results? What was the IV? What was the DV?

EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY A second experiment is needed as Two explanations for results in first study –Memory has been changed –Word acts as a cue to the speed that is expected (Demand Characteristic) So set up second study to find out

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 The participants students The procedure - Students watched a one minute film which showed a 4 second multiple car accident

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 After the film The participants were divided into THREE EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 GROUP 1 was asked How fast were the cars going when they HIT each other?

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 GROUP 2 was asked How fast were the cars going when they SMASHED INTO each other?

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 GROUP 3 was asked NO QUESTION about the speed of the cars

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 ONE WEEK LATER The participants returned and were asked more questions Including a critical question

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 THE CRITICAL QUESTION Did you see any broken glass? This question is not related to the speed directly

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 Which group saw more broken glass? –Smashed YES16NO34 –HitYES7NO43 –ControlYES6NO44

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 Probability of seeing broken glass based on estimate of speed Speed Smashed Hit

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 What was the DV in the second experiment?

LOFTUS & PALMER - Experiment 2 What conclusion can you draw from the results?

EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY In this second study Memory has been altered As all participants asked the glass question Two types of info go into memory –Your perception –Information you get after the event

EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY List all the differences between study 1 and study 2

Q1 Which method was used by Loftus and Palmer? A.field experiment B.natural experiment C.quasi experiment D.laboratory experiment

Q2 Who were the participants in Experiment 1? A.students B.drivers C.accident witnesses D.accident victims

Q3 Which verb was not used in Experiment 1? A.hit B.smashed C.struck D.contacted

Q4 What was the dependent variable in Experiment 1? A.number of accidents recalled B.broken glass seen C.estimate of speed D.written account of accident

Q5 What was shown to participants in Experiment 1? A.videos of accidents B.film clips of accidents C.photographs of accidents D.CCTV of accidents

Q6 Which of the following was a dependent variable in Experiment 2? A.estimate of size of car B.whether broken glass seen C.participants written account of accident D.whether participant passed driving test

Q7 Which verb gave the highest speed estimate in Experiment 1? A.bumped B.hit C.collided D.smashed

Q8 How many participants were there in Experiment 2? A.45 B.15 C.150 D.50

Q9 Which of these was not a group of participants in Experiment 2? A.control B.‘hit' C.‘contacted' D.‘smashed'

Q10 How long was left between showing the films and asking about the broken glass? A.24 hours B.1 hour C.1 week D.1 month

Q11 Which group(s) 'saw' most broken glass? A.‘smashed' and ‘hit' B.‘smashed' C.control D.control and ‘hit'

Q12 What did Loftus and Palmer conclude about leading questions? A.They can influence memory. B.They have no effect on memory. C.They only effect students. D.They only work with car accidents.

Q13 What two types of information affect our memory? A.before and after an event B.before and during an event C.during and after an event D.immediately after and a long time after

Q14 What is a leading question? A.A question that leads a person to give a certain answer. B.A question that leads a person to give a wrong answer. C.A question that leads a person to give a right answer. D.A question that leads a person to lie.

LOFTUS & PALMER – A02 Is this study reliable? Is this study valid –Internal Is this study Ecologically Valid? Is this study ethical? Is the sample representative?

LOFTUS & PALMER – A02 How would you change the sample? –Effect on results –Effect on validity or reliability How would you change the procedure? –Effect on results –Effect on validity or reliability How would you change the method? –Effect on results –Effect on validity or reliability

Eye Witness testimony Do you think that UNSUPPORTED EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY should be sufficient evidence upon which to convict someone ?

Exam questions In the study by Loftus & Palmer, the subjects were shown film clips of car accidents. Identity two differences between witnessing these film clips and witnessing a real accident and, for each difference say how this might affect the results of the study. (4 marks)

Exam questions In the study by Loftus and Palmer on eyewitness testimony, the subjects gave different estimates of the speed of the cars depending on how the question was asked. Give two explanations for this. (4 marks)

Exam questions In the study by Loftus and Palmer (eyewitness testimony), the participants were shown film clips of car accidents. Suggest two ways in which the ecological validity of this study could be improved. (4 marks)

Exam questions a.In their study on eyewitness testimony, Loftus and Palmer suggest two kinds of information go into a person’s memory for a complex event. Identify one of these two kinds of information (2 marks) b. What does the existence of these two kinds of information tell us about memory? (2 marks)

Exam questions a.Identify the independent variable in the first experiment conducted by Loftus and Palmer on eyewitness testimony(2 marks) b. Outline how the independent variable was manipulated in the experiment(2 marks)