6.1 Multiple choice questions

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Reconstruction of Automobile destruction

Advertisements

Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.

Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.

PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.

BIG 12 - Powerpoint #1 Loftus & Palmer 1974; Bartlett 1932.

LOFTUS & PALMER (1974) Starter: Here is an introduction to Loftus & Palmer (1974)…what information is missing…  Loftus carried out an experiment where.

Episodic Memory (memory for episodes; also called autobiographical memory) Encoding Retrieval Encoding x Retrieval interactions Amnesia/Implicit memory.

Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.

Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.

Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction

Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.

By Dhina, Haneen, Viveka, and Natsuki Elizabeth Loftus.

Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.

Eye-witness testimony

Memory – Module 27 Forgetting and Memory Construction Memory – Module 27 Forgetting and Memory Construction General Psych 1 April 12, 2005 Class #21.

LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.

Nancy Jenkins Barbara Ostrowska Esha Patnaik IB Psychology, Pamoja TO WHAT EXTENT IS ONE COGNITIVE PROCESS RELIABLE?

Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.

Suggestibility Affecting Perception Carolina Fox Maggie Zager David Elkin Fran Gottenkieny.

Memory and the power of suggestion

Eyewitness Testimony Reconstructive memory Reconstructive memory Schema driven errors Schema driven errors Effect of leading questions Effect of leading.

Eye Witness Identification

Contents Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Cognitive Psychology - Loftus and Palmer.

Encoding Specificity Memory is improved when information available at encoding is also available at retrieval.

Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.

Memory Construction Period 3 #10

Reliability of one cognitive process

Special Topics in Memory Psychology, Unit 5 Today’s Objectives 1. Apply autobiographical memory to your life 2. Describe the explanations for childhood.

AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.

AREA OF STUDY 2 MEMORY UNIT 3 THE CONSCIOUS SELF.

Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.

Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.

Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.

Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.

Programming I Final Exam Review. Question..True or False (Please click on the answer...) Variables hold data that may change while the program.

Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?

Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.

MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.

Eyewitness Testimony Elizabeth Loftus.

Memory – Introduction and Application Three stages of processing an event Encoding Storage Retrieval Factors that can affect memory in these three stages.

AS Level Psychology The core studies

Memory Construction Chapter 8, Lecture 6 “Like scientists who infer a dinosaur’s appearance from its remains, we infer our past from stored information.

Penny Memory Test Retrieval test: what words and numbers, in which locations, are on the front of a U.S. one cent coin? Recognition test: choose the correct.

Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.

Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.

About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.

Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.

Loftus and Palmer (1974).  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory  Field of psychology:

Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.

Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.

Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.

MEMORY FALLIBLITY OF MEMORY.

Multiple choice questions

Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.

What is an article analysis and how do you perform one?

Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge

RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting.

Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.

Experimental Design.

Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer

PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory

Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction

what have we learned from past two lessons?

Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction

Article Analysis Practical

Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction

Sour Nice Candy Honey Pie Toffee Taste Cake Tooth Tart Sugar Pop

The cognitive area.

Reconstructing Memory

The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony

Presentation transcript:

6.1 Multiple choice questions Loftus and Palmer

Q1 Which method was used by Loftus and Palmer? field experiment natural experiment quasi experiment laboratory experiment

Q2 What was the design used by Loftus and Palmer? independent measures design matched pairs design repeated measures design single-subject design

Q3 Who were the participants in Experiment 1? students drivers accident witnesses accident victims

Q4 Which verb was not used in Experiment 1? hit smashed struck contacted

number of accidents recalled broken glass seen estimate of speed Q5 What was the dependent variable in Experiment 1? number of accidents recalled broken glass seen estimate of speed written account of accident

Q6 What was shown to participants in Experiment 1? videos of accidents film clips of accidents photographs of accidents CCTV of accidents

Q7 Which of the following was a dependent variable in Experiment 2? estimate of size of car whether broken glass seen participants written account of accident whether participant passed driving test

Q8 Which verb gave the highest speed estimate in Experiment 1? bumped hit collided smashed

Q9 How many participants were there in Experiment 2? 45 15 150 50

Q10 Which of these was not a group of participants in Experiment 2? control ‘hit' ‘contacted' ‘smashed'

Q11 How long was left between showing the films and asking about the broken glass? 24 hours 1 hour 1 week 1 month

Q12 Which group(s) 'saw' most broken glass? ‘smashed' and ‘hit' ‘smashed' control control and ‘hit'

Q13 What did Loftus and Palmer conclude about leading questions? They can influence memory. They have no effect on memory. They only effect students. They only work with car accidents.

Q14 What two types of information affect our memory? before and after an event before and during an event during and after an event immediately after and a long time after

Q15 What is a leading question? A question that leads a person to give a certain answer. A question that leads a person to give a wrong answer. A question that leads a person to give a right answer. A question that leads a person to lie.