Drought Monitoring in Colorado. Overview Background on climate monitoring. Description of Drought Indices Used for Colorado – Colorado Modified Palmer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Droughts in Canada: An Overview
Advertisements

Drought Monitoring and Precipitation Data A U.S. Perspective on Current Uses, Needs, and Opportunities Dr. Brian D. Wardlow Director and Associate Professor.
Andrew Benjamin University of Delaware.  Goals: ◦ To investigate Drought Monitoring plans of states along the coastal plain. ◦ Review literature and.
Drought Index Project Planning Workshop Boulder, August 18-19, 2009 Jim Verdin U.S. Geological Survey NIDIS Program Office NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
Drought workshop, Boulder, CO, August 2009 The Revised Surface Water Supply Index: Formulation and Issues David C. Garen, Ph.D. Hydrologist USDA Natural.
The Importance of Realistic Spatial Forcing in Understanding Hydroclimate Change-- Evaluation of Streamflow Changes in the Colorado River Basin Hydrology.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
Mel Kunkel & Jen Pierce Boise State University Climatic Indices: Predictors of Idaho's Precipitation and Streamflow.
Climate Services Provided by the Colorado Climate Center Mark Losleben and Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Atmospheric Science Department Colorado.
Mid-Range Streamflow Forecasts for River Management in the Puget Sound Region Richard Palmer Matthew Wiley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Hemlock Butte SNOTEL March 2008 Clearwater Basin 2008 Forecasts: Over, Under and Right On, and Amount of Snow Needed in 2009 for Adequate Surface Irrigation.
2003 Moisture Outlook Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss
Review of the 2009 Snowmelt and Rain Streamflow Forecasts & Snow Survey Advisory Team Ron Abramovich, Hydrologist Water Supply Specialist USDA Natural.
The Regional Climate Roger A. Pielke Sr. Professor & State Climatologist Colorado State University and Duke University CSU Speaker Series on Water in the.
Idaho's Climate and Water Resource Forecast for the 2008 Water Year Sponsored by: The Climatic Impacts Group at the University of Washington and the.
Colorado’s 2003 Moisture Outlook Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss
Understanding Drought
Standardized Precipitation Index for Croatia Krešo Pandžić, Tanja Likso Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Grič 3, Zagreb
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium Tempe, AZ September 28, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center : A Year of Extremes.
Long-term Precipitation Trends in Colorado Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Presented: Friday, December 12, 2008.
NIDIS Southeast Pilot Planning Meeting Chapel Hill, July 21-22, 2009 Lisa Darby NIDIS Program Office NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, Colorado.
Drought Monitor Primer Mark Svoboda, Climatologist Monitoring Program Area Leader, National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
Trends and spatial patterns of drought incidence in the Omo-Ghibe River Basin, Ethiopia Policy Brief Degefu MA. & Bewket W.
Economic Cooperation Organization Training Course on “Drought and Desertification” Alanya Facilities, Antalya, TURKEY presented by Ertan TURGU from Turkish.
The Colorado Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) Performance Since 1981 Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State.
UTILIZING COCORAHS RAINFALL DATA IN OPERATIONAL RIVER FORECAST OPERATIONS AT THE NERFC Ronald S. W. Horwood Meteorologist SR HAS Forecaster National Weather.
2010 Colorado Drought Mitigation and Response Plan NIDIS Update Meeting February 24, 2011 Boulder, CO.
Drought in the West: Short-Range Forecasts to Assist with Local and Regional Planning Douglas Le Comte NOAA/CPC Association of Bay Area Governments: Water/Land.
Dong-Yun Kim, Chao Han, and Evan Brooks Virginia Tech Department of Statistics.
Texas Drought Raymond Slade, Jr., Certified Professional Hydrologist.
Improving Collaborative Drought Monitoring and Early Warning Progress and Challenges from the NIDIS Upper Colorado River Basin Pilot Project Nolan Doesken,
Applying New Drought Decision Support Tools Mark Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center International Drought Information Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
H43H-1325 Kimberly A.T. Schreuders, David G. Tarboton, Jeffery S. Horsburgh, Avirup Sen Gupta, and Stephanie Reeder Utah State University CUAHSI HIS
Climate change impact on drought risk and uncertainty in the Willamette River basin Dept. of Geography, Portland State University, Portland, OR Il-Won.
Drought and Heat Wave of 2012 Midwest and Great Plains Worst drought since 1956 with ~60% of contiguous U.S. under drought, worst agricultural drought.
Drought Monitoring: Challenges in the Western United States
Hope Mizzell, Ph.D. SC State Climatologist South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Carolinas and Virginia Climate Conference Improving Drought Detection.
Overview of the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Lisa Holts.
Drought Response Plan Clarke County, Virginia Saving Water/Saving Money: Water Conservation in the Shenandoah Valley March 11, 2009 Alison Teetor Natural.
Drought in Travis County Chris Shaw CE394K.2 Spring 2007.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
July 31, 2012 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Tim Bardsley Western Water Assessment 1 Future Colorado Basin Observing System.
Drought Prediction (In progress) Besides real-time drought monitoring, it is essential to provide an utlook of what future might look like given the current.
Hydrologic Forecasting With Statistical Models Angus Goodbody David Garen USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service National Water and Climate Center.
NOAA North American Drought Monitor (NADM) Sharon LeDuc NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC NOAA - Environment Canada Bilateral Meeting November 6, 2008
The U.S. Drought Monitor and Beyond
P recipitation extremes during in the continental United States Kenneth E. Kunkel Illinois State Water Survey Collaborators: Dave Easterling,
Hydrologic Forecasting Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
Ahsha Tribble, Ph.D. Chief, Climate Services Division | NOAA National Weather Service May 20, 2009 Ahsha Tribble, Ph.D. Chief, Climate Services Division.
A Cyberinfrastructure for Drought Risk Assessment An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
Note: This presentation contains only preliminary research results. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Vano at Thanks.
Courtesy Dave Tzilkowski 4 miles s. Lamar, CO Courtesy Dave Tzilkowski 4 miles s. Lamar, CO.
Ag Talk 30 Jan What the Weather Will Bring or Agricultural Weather in Wisconsin Wisconsin Agri-Service Association 9 th Annual Trade Show 30 January.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Western States Water Council September 15, 2010 Washington, D.C. 1 Jim Verdin U.S. Geological Survey NIDIS Program Office NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory.
Mark Svoboda, Climatologist National Drought Mitigation Center School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln What is the Drought Monitor?
Overview of the NIDIS Weekly Climate, Water and Drought Assessment
Drought: Lab Exercise Deirdre Kann NWS Albuquerque.
s a Drought Indices for Zagreb-Grič Observatory
UW Civil and Environmental Engineering
Situation in March 2012 from the Monthly Hydrological Summary
NADSS Overview An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
DROUGHT MONITORING SYSTEM IN DHMZ
Hydrologic Forecasting
Refined NIDIS Application for the Upper Colorado River Basin
Drought in Upper Colorado Basin
Shraddhanand Shukla Andrew W. Wood
Drought in Oregon George H. Taylor October, 2007.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Presentation transcript:

Drought Monitoring in Colorado

Overview Background on climate monitoring. Description of Drought Indices Used for Colorado – Colorado Modified Palmer Drought Severity Index (CMPDSI) – Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) – Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) – U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) What resources are available for tracking drought?

Weather data are important for many and varied applications

From Kelly Redmond, WRCC NWS COOP stations are the backbone network for long- term climate monitoring

National Weather Service Cooperative Weather Stations Cooperative Weather Stations in Colorado Cooperative Weather Station

Holyoke NWS Cooperative Site

USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS Snotel Sites for Colorado Typical NRCS Snotel Site

NRCS Colorado Streamflow Forecast

Joe Wright Snotel WY2011

U.S. Geological Survey

Others CoCoRaHS High Density Precipitation Monitoring Reservoir Storage Monitoring CoAgMet Evapotranspiration Monitoring

Why Do We Like Indices? Combination of several data sources. Simplification of historical context. Allow decision makers to quickly assess the severity, duration and frequency of drought.

Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) Developed by Wayne Palmer in Simple water balance approach. Data requirements include temperature and precipitation. Climatically dependent coefficients must be determined that describe the normal conditions for that area. Index ranges from -6 to +6 Colorado modifications increased the number of regions the index is calculated for (originally only 5). PDSI has been criticized for spatial comparability. PDSI has a “memory” around 12 months. For more information, see Palmer, 1965.

National Palmer Drought Severity Index Very useful on the national scale Not so useful locally in Colorado Not enough spatial detail for our complex climate, so we refined it – CMPDSI (Colorado Modified Palmer Drought Severity Index)

CMPDSI What do the values mean?

Surface Water Supply Index Winter (Dec-May): Snowpack, Water Year Precipitation and Reservoir Storage Summer (Jun-Nov): Streamflow, Previous Month Precipitation, and Reservoir Storage. Value indicates the abundance of water supply of a particular basin. Each of the components is weighted by overall impact in the basin. – Weighting factors change with season and basin (winter versus summer -- snowpack or streamflow) – This leads to discontinuities as seasons change.

SWSI What do the values mean?

Revised SWSI Similar to “old” SWSI – Uses streamflow forecasts and reservoir storage instead of independent hydro-climatic factors (precipitation, streamflow, snowpack) with subjective weighting factors. – Based on finer spatial scale (8 digit HUC). – Performance of this revised index is on-going.

Colorado SWSI May 2011

Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) – Developed at CCC in 1993 to monitor drought on various time scales. – Can be compared across widely varied climates. – Precipitation time series of length (n) are generated. (n = 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 months) – Data is transformed to a normal distribution with mean = 0, variance = 1. – The SPI is essentially the number of standard deviations an event is above or below the mean value. – Index ranges from -3 to +3 – For more information see McKee, et al. 1993

SPI What do the values mean? – SPI values relate directly to percentile rankings. How does our current amount of precipitation rank against the past 30 years?

SPI What SPI time scale is the most important? – Depends on how you’re using it. Short term: Agriculture, rangeland, etc. Long term: Fisheries, hydrologists, reservoir operations, etc. Monitoring drought: look at all time scales, the differences will indicate long vs. short term drought.

Streamflow Conditions CDWR and USGS monitor stream gages across the state and provide real-time access to some gages.

U.S. Drought Monitor National depiction of drought which is revisited weekly. Integration of numerous drought monitoring products, drought impacts and local expertise. – Highlights Agricultural vs. Hydrologic Drought Used by Farm Service Agency to grant disaster assistance.

U.S. Drought Monitor What do the values mean?

Drought Monitoring Resources Colorado Climate Center: Weekly webinars (during peak SWE/runoff) to assess current conditions and make USDM changes. – WATF: Water Availability Task Force – CWCB run group that meets monthly to assess current drought conditions. – task-forces/Pages/main.aspx task-forces/Pages/main.aspx NIDIS Drought Portal – Access to various data types. – Portal: – Map and Data Viewer p_and_data_viewer p_and_data_viewer

NIDIS Drought Portal

How do we apply these indices?

Quick Example You are a local drought planner in the South Platte and it is July. Conditions have been dry for the past 3 months and you’re starting to worry. You need to figure out: – What stage of drought you are in – Decide if any action needs to take place

Here are your index levels: – SPI = -1.0 – CMPDI = -2.5 – SWSI = Remember, the South Platte has lots reservoir storage! – USDM has the region in D1 drought – Streamflow conditions: Vary between normal and below normal. – Impacts of wheat abandonment are being reported from dryland farmers.

????? SPI of -1.0 is “moderate drought” (11-20 th percentile) CMPDI of -2.5 is also “moderate drought” SWSI of +2.0 means you have adequate surface water supply in your region. USDM of D1 is “moderate drought” Wheat abandonment is a major impact!

What actions to take? You are in Phase 1 drought. The state would start involving the Agricultural task force since dryland ag is being impacted. – This ITF can gather more field information on how much and where dryland ag is being impacted. – The ITF can then report back with more concrete information for decision making. More frequent monitoring, you’re already in moderate drought and things can get worse very quickly.

Questions? McKee, T. B., N. J. Doesken, and J. Kleist, 1993: The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. Preprints, 8 th Conference on Applied Climatology, January, Anaheim, California, American Meteorological Society, McKee, Thomas B, Nolan J. Doesken, and John Kleist, 1999: Historical Dry and Wet Periods in Colorado, Climatology Report 99-1, Part A: Technical Report, Part B: Appendices, Dept. of Atmos. Sci., CSU, Fort Collins, CO, July, Palmer, W. C., 1965: Meteorological Drought. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Climatoology, U.S. Weather Bureau. Research Paper No. 45. Washington, D. C. February Shafer, B.A.; and L.E. Dezman Development of a Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) to assess the severity of drought conditions in snowpack runoff areas. In Proceedings of the Western Snow Conference, pp. 164–175. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.