Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Mike Israni & John Gale Aug 5, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The State of Natural Gas Pipelines in Fort Worth.
Advertisements

QUALITY MANAGEMENT AGA – BEST PRACTICE ROUNDTABLE Sara Peralta, Director – Quality & Improvement Philadelphia February, 2013.
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
2010 PODS User Conference Houston, Texas October 28, 2010 PHMSA Update John A. Jacobi, P.E. CATS Manager, SW Region.
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Spill Control Association of America 2014 Annual Meeting and Conference March 20, 2014.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Gathering Update Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
GulfSafe Notification System GULF
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NW Area Committee Meeting Focus on Pipelines PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS.
GCREAG Regulatory Update January, 2014 Lincoln Stroh J. Connor Consulting, Inc.
Ohio’s One-Stop Utility Resource Gas Pipeline Safety Pipelines - State and Local Issues Pete Chace GPS Program Manager (614)
AGA Perspectives on Current Pipeline Safety Regulations August 2014.
Gas Transmission Pipelines
Congressional Reauthorization and PHMSA Rulemakings – Enough to avoid future tragedies? Carl Weimer, Executive Director Pipeline Safety Trust.
Railroad Commission of Texas Pipeline Safety Division.
Overview of Key Rule Features
Gas Processors Association GPA Incident Survey For Onshore Gas Gathering Lines Five Year History For Additional Information Contact: Johnny Dreyer GPA.
1 Resources for Integrity Management Marty Matheson, American Petroleum Institute OPS Public Meeting August 8, 2001 Houston, TX.
Pipeline Safety Program Regulatory (DOT) Pipeline Risk Management Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 16, 2007 John A. Jacobi, P.E. PHMSA.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Cover Over Buried Pipelines Section 28 of the Pipeline Safety,
Transportation Strategy SCMN 4780 Modal Analysis: Pipeline.
Gathering Lines- Definitions, Background, and Proposed Rule Makings * 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Meeting – New Orleans Randy Knepper NAPSR Vice.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous.
Gathering Definition – Proposed Rulemaking Rocky Mountain EHS Peer Group Meeting January 19, 2006 Jeannette Jones Director- Pipeline Integrity Duke Energy.
Storm Water Discharges from Oil and Gas Related Construction Activities EPA Public Meeting Dallas, Texas May 10, 2005.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Regulation of Pipelines
Should Natural Gas Pipelines be Built in Northeastern PA? By: Ethan, Tanner, Rebecca, Tara.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 25, 2009 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) & SHRIMP.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Gathering Definition Rocky Mountain EHS Peer Group Meeting July 25, 2006 Jeannette Jones Director- Pipeline Integrity Duke Energy Field Services.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Distribution Integrity Management – What To Expect John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association Western Regional Gas Conference.
Aging Infrastructure Management and Challenges Sue Fleck Vice President Pipeline Safety Trust “Getting to Zero’ Conference 2011.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
OPS Workshop August 8, 2001 Equilon Pipeline Company, LLC. Equilon Pipeline’s Risk Management Program.
HCAs & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Is There a Need for Change? Richard B. Kuprewicz President, Accufacts Inc. For Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans Conference.
PIPELINE SPECIFICATIONS
Consequence Analysis: A More Comprehensive Proposed Regulatory Approach Western Regional Gas Conference Tempe, Arizona Daron Moore August 19, 2014.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Chairman David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick Commissioner Ryan Sitton September 15-17, 2015.
Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002.
A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program. 2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts.
Office of Pipeline Safety Impacts of Integrity Management James K. O’Steen Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety July 23, 2002.
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Incentives for Regulation SARA GOSMAN, UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS SCHOOL OF LAW PIPELINE SAFETY TRUST ANNUAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Transmission 2012 Annual Reports Joint Advisory Committees.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: Standards & Committees.
How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Rulemaking Process and Cost Benefit Analysis
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Public Awareness Programs for Pipeline Operators WESTERN REGIONAL GAS CONFERENCE August 21, 2007 Presented by: Ross Reineke.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Regulatory Initiatives.
Distribution Integrity Management Program
86 th Annual Operations Conference Ames, IA August 5, 2009.
Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Regulations Update
Federal Regulatory Update
Crane, Conveyor, and Rigging Part I - Crane OSHE 112, Spring 2016
Melissa Holbrook Cell:
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
PIPELINE SPECIFICATIONS
Cities and PIPA Why Should We Participate? What Do We Need?
GulfSafe Notification System
Presented to the Project Certification Committee on November 16, 2011.
AGA Positions on Current PHMSA Rulemakings
PIPELINE SPECIFICATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Mike Israni & John Gale Aug 5, 2009

Regulatory Requirements for Low- Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Section 4 of the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006 (PIPES Act) requires the Secretary to issue regulations subjecting low-stress hazardous liquid pipelines to the same standards and regulations as other hazardous liquid pipelines.

Regulatory Requirements for Low- Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines (continued) Exceptions to the PIPES Act requirements are: (1) low-stress pipelines regulated by the US Coast Guard; (2) A pipeline that serves refining, manufacturing, or truck, rail or vessel terminal facilities if the pipeline is less than one mile long (measured outside the facility grounds) and does not cross an offshore area or a waterway currently used for commercial navigation.

The June 3, 2008, Low-Stress Pipelines Final Rule- (Phase one) Covered Rural low-stress pipelines with a nominal diameter greater than 8⅝ inches and within ½ mile of unusually sensitive areas (USAs) Applies full set of regulations to these pipelines Adds annual, safety-related condition, and accident reporting for ALL rural low stress pipelines

Low-Stress Pipelines Upstream from Refining Storage Production 8⅝” coming from production – Gathering line 10” and Operating less than 20% SMYS USA Navigable Waterway Non-Rural Area Trucked In Oil Tankage Storage 6” and Operating less than 20% SMYS Subject to Part 195 Requirements Refining

Low-Stress Pipelines Upstream from Refining Storage Production 8⅝” coming from production – Gathering line 10” and Operating less than 20% SMYS USA Navigable Waterway Non-Rural Area Trunked In Oil Tankage Storage 6” and Operating less than 20% SMYS Subject to Part 195 Requirements After Phase 2 Refining

Airport Breakout Tankage Breakout Tankage 8 ⅝ ” operating at less than 20% USA 6”operating at less than 20% SMYS Refining Navigable Waterway Non-Rural Area Low-Stress Pipelines Downstream from Refining Subject to Part 195 Requirements Refining Less than 1 mile

Airport Breakout Tankage Breakout Tankage 8 ⅝ ” operating at less than 20% USA 6”operating at less than 20% SMYS Refining Navigable Waterway Non-Rural Area Low-Stress Pipelines Downstream from Refining Refining Less than 1 mile Subject to Part 195 Requirements After Phase 2

Cost-Benefit of Implementing Regulation for Unregulated Low-Stress Haz Liq. Pipelines Risk = Probability x Consequence (Unknown- No data on unregulated LS) Infrastructure size Total LS Miles = LS (pop+navig) + LS usa + LS rural Reasonable cost for this Infrastructure

Estimated Benefit for Low-Stress Pipelines Currently no incident data to review March 2009 we surveyed nine States to ascertain if they had incident data Currently evaluating the benefits associated with Low Stress II rulemaking

Supporting Data for Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Rural Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Survey – October 2008 Low-Stress Pipeline Survey – Company Follow- up – March 30, 2009 Regulatory Evaluation for Low Stress I Final Rule- June 3, 2008

Supporting Data for Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines (continued) Total estimated Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines = 1575 miles Phase I picked up = 312 miles Phase II will pick = 1263 miles Of the total 1263 miles, 161 miles are estimated to be within USAs and with nominal diameter less than 8⅝ inches

Estimated Costs for Low-Stress Pipelines Cost Component Unit Cost per Mile Additional Costs (In thousands of dollars) Initial costs Recurring Costs Year 1 Years 2 through 5 Years 6 and on Part 195, Subpart A General $0 Part 195, Subpart B – Annual, Accident, and Safety-Related Condition Reporting Nominal $0 Part 195, Subpart C – Design Requirements, Subpart D – Construction, and Subpart E – Pressure Testing $0 Part 195, Subpart F – Operation and Maintenance Various*Various??? Part 195, Subpart G – Qualification of Pipeline Personnel Nominal $0 Part 195, Subpart H – Corrosion Control $15,022*???? Part 199 – Drug and Alcohol Testing $0Negligible$0 TOTAL

Estimated Costs for Low-Stress Pipelines Subpart F – Operation and Maintenance Maps and Records – nominal cost increase Damage Prevention Programs Costs under development, based on State mandated One call systems Line markers – Initial cost: $514 per mile Recurring cost: $134 per mile 90% of these lines are already marked

Estimated Costs for Low-Stress Pipelines Integrity Management Programs Impacts only those lines that are in a HCA 161 miles of small diameter pipe within a 1/2 mile of a USA Cost per mile is under development Subpart H Corrosion Control Initial cost: $15,022 per mile Recurring cost: $400 per mile 90% of the lines already comply with Subpart H.

Low-Stress Pipelines- (Phase Two) Will Cover Depending on supporting data either one, some, all, or none of the following will be regulated: All Part 195 to all low-stress pipelines not currently regulated All Part 195 to all low-stress pipelines less than 8⅝ inches diameter inside ½ mile of USAs All Part 195 to all low-stress pipelines 8⅝ inches diameter or more outside ½ mile of USAs All Part 195 to all low-stress pipelines less than 8⅝ inches diameter outside ½ mile of USAs Other option